Max Hetrick wrote:
I wanted to ask before I created the main category Diskless Clients
under the How To page. Any objections to that there? Or suggest a better
title?
Not really, go ahead (IMHO).
Cheers,
Ralph
pgpTS9VjXWDv2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 19:28 -0400, Max Hetrick wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Not really, go ahead (IMHO).
Done.
May I see it please.
Regards,
Max
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John wrote:
Do you have a workaround for it. IE:Manually? system config netboot is not
included in CentOS 5. There is a Bugzila report on
redhat that I was pointed to that said it maybe released in another version
of RHEL v5. I on the
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0214
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0214.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/squid-2.5.STABLE3-9.3E.ia64.rpm
--
Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0214
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0214.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/squid-2.5.STABLE14-1.4E.c4.2.ia64.rpm
--
Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0209
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0209.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/thunderbird-1.5.0.12-10.el4.centos.ia64.rpm
--
Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
On 4/10/08, Steve Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim,
I tried the new config file - the downloaded one - and it still gives me the
errors. I then went through and removed the xattr options on all of them
with no luck still. I have not ran the --check yet.
OK, so what if I enable
how to deny changes to proxy setting in Mozilla firefox . Please help me out.
Regards,
Gopinath M
Signal Networks Pvt. Ltd.
Smile... it increases your face value!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
I have an Overland tape library connected, via SCSI card, to an
out-of-box, full install of C5 install on an old PC.
I have a script that uses tar to archive data to tape and mtx to change
tapes. What I don't know, if possible, is to obtain the status of how
much tape is left in the drive.
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can
Thanks all for the assistance. I'm going to put the machine into full
production today (a necessity). I'll reconfigure the system and hope for
the best. As it is now, AIDE is working fine.
steve
Michael Simpson wrote:
On 4/10/08, Steve Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim,
I tried the
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Steve Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks all for the assistance. I'm going to put the machine into full
production today (a necessity). I'll reconfigure the system and hope for the
best. As it is now, AIDE is working fine.
Hey, gave me a chance to learn a
Dear all,
will there be a fastrack channel for C5?
What are the problems inventing one?
Thx
Rainer
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Rainer Traut wrote:
Dear all,
will there be a fastrack channel for C5?
What are the problems inventing one?
Thx
Rainer
There is a centos 5 fast track channel now, however populating it is the
problem.
We are currently working to get yum-security, RHWAS for c5, openjdk,
CentOS Directory
while it takes a minimum of 6 disks, we've had great luck with RAID 50.
Two separate RAID 5 arrays (fast read, moderate writes) that are then
placed into a RAID 0 (fast read, fast write). you lose 2 drives worth of
space, but lord it's fast and the data is mirrored. Not sure if you can
do the
Hi,
I'm running CentOS 4 with most of the latest updates, but am having trouble
with iptables and the CONNMARK target. Is it available in the CentOS 4
kernel?
Running on i386:
kernel: 2.6.9-67.0.4.ELsmp
iptables: v1.2.11
# iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j CONNMARK --set-mark 1
iptables:
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 10:49 -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I want to build the 64bit version of Xen 3.2, they only show one srpm
available. I assume if its compiled on a x86_64 version of CentOS 5.1
it will be a 64bit rpm when its done?
Yes.
I am aware its not
Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linux wrote on Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:06:40 +0300:
Every 59 minutes (maybe every hour) it reboots without any logs,
without any traces and unfortunately with breaking software raid.
After reboot dmesg does not have any strange entries.
I
Is there a way to get mail from a MS Exchange server that is addressed
as [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than the [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that users on
host.domain.com can read their mail on that host (CentOS). (I'm
assuming that Exchange needs to know about host.domain.com, somehow.)
Frank M. Ramaekers
On Apr 11, 2008, at 9:40 AM, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:
Is there a way to get mail from a MS Exchange server that is addressed
as [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than the [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that
users on
host.domain.com can read their mail on that host (CentOS). (I'm
assuming that Exchange needs
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 10:26 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
It would be nice to have yum install the build requirements. Has
anybody developed a plugin to allow yum to install SRPMs and
optionally install the requirements as part of this?
You mean like yum-builddep in yum-utils?
--
Ignacio
On Apr 10, 2008, at 6:08 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Scott Silva wrote on Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:28:42 -0700:
I think you can download the intermediate certs from their webpage.
I had a look at their KB website yesterday and exactly the page that
explains how to get and install the intermediates
Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:
Is there a way to get mail from a MS Exchange server that is addressed
as [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than the [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that users on
host.domain.com can read their mail on that host (CentOS). (I'm
assuming that Exchange needs to know about host.domain.com,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every 59 minutes (maybe every hour) it reboots without any logs,
without any traces and unfortunately with breaking software raid.
After reboot dmesg does not have any strange entries.
I have^Whad exactly the same problem with
Take a look at
http://www.verisign.com/support/advisories/page_040611.html
You can download the intermediate cert and install it in
your file system and point to it with SSLCertificateChainFile
in your Apache's SSL configuration as Ross Cavanagh pointed
out.
I've been bit by this one
on 4-11-2008 6:20 AM Johnny Hughes spake the following:
Rainer Traut wrote:
Dear all,
will there be a fastrack channel for C5?
What are the problems inventing one?
Thx
Rainer
There is a centos 5 fast track channel now, however populating it is the
problem.
We are currently working to get
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 11:24 +0100, Michael Simpson wrote:
Certainly the 2900 will support 802.3ad or LACP natively.
i found this which may be of use
http://wiki.oracle.com/page/Cisco+Systems+IOS-based+switches-+interface+bonding+and+trunking?t=anon
So, as it turns out, it's a 2900XL, which
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You left out sleep, occasional meals, a day job, and at least some
interaction with family/friends! ;-P
Sleep is overrated
Sleep is for the weak
Sleep is for the wimp
(All quoted from the hughesjr's book)
Akemi
Hello All,
I can't get this one figured out. The few search hits I get on it
suggest it is mail-related, but I don't even know how that was determined.
Apr 11 12:18:17 mxt root: Process did not exit cleanly, returned 255
with signal 0
I get one of these per minute. I can't seem to tweak
On Apr 11, 2008, at 1:10 PM, Curtis H. Wilbar Jr. wrote:
Take a look at
http://www.verisign.com/support/advisories/page_040611.html
You can download the intermediate cert and install it in
your file system and point to it with SSLCertificateChainFile
in your Apache's SSL configuration as
has anyone seen any sort of tutorial pertaining to centos 5? I have
found some old ones on redhat 9, but was looking for something a
little more modern.
dnk
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi all,
I am trying to install the packages of Qt/Trolltech by yum, but the
Qt comes without the support of exceptions,
it possible enable that?
I do not want to compile the Qt manually!
Best regards, edm.
--
Ederson de Moura
Your mind is like a parachute: it works better when open.
Is there an easy way to specify the proper device location for
the kickstart configuration file if it is on a USB flash or USB
floppy drive? Depending on the hard disk configuration they
might by /dev/sda, /dev/sdb, etc.
On SuSE'autoyast instalattions, the system searches all available
devices
findfs comes to mind.
other than that...
fdisk -l | grep
Bill Campbell wrote:
Is there an easy way to specify the proper device location for
the kickstart configuration file if it is on a USB flash or USB
floppy drive? Depending on the hard disk configuration they
might by /dev/sda,
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 13:43 -0400, Guy Boisvert wrote:
Timothy Selivanow wrote:
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 11:24 +0100, Michael Simpson wrote:
Certainly the 2900 will support 802.3ad or LACP natively.
i found this which may be of use
Any ideas if this can run centos with out a special modifications?
Elite C7VCM Mini-ITX Motherboard with VIA C7 1.5GHz Processor
http://resources.mini-box.com/online/MBD-E-C7VCM/MBD-E-C7VCM-manual.pdf
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-
--- Glenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
I can't get this one figured out. The few search hits I get on it
suggest it is mail-related, but I don't even know how that was determined.
Apr 11 12:18:17 mxt root: Process did not exit cleanly, returned 255
with signal 0
I get one of
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 12:18 -0600, Milton Calnek wrote:
findfs comes to mind.
other than that...
fdisk -l | grep
Bill Campbell wrote:
Is there an easy way to specify the proper device location for
the kickstart configuration file if it is on a USB flash or USB
floppy drive?
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 13:43 -0400, Guy Boisvert wrote:
You may have a look at:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/140.pdf
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps607/products_configuration_example09186a0080094789.shtml
I've looked at both of these documents already. In the
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote:
If I paid a couple grand for a core switch i'd be calling Cisco!
They're not core switches, they're just the catalyst 2900XL which is a
small 24 port switch. We've got stacks of these sitting unused, so I
doubt they're too expensive/valuable.
Keith Christian wrote:
--- Glenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
I can't get this one figured out. The few search hits I get on it
suggest it is mail-related, but I don't even know how that was determined.
Apr 11 12:18:17 mxt root: Process did not exit cleanly, returned 255
with
Timothy Selivanow wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote:
If I paid a couple grand for a core switch i'd be calling Cisco!
They're not core switches, they're just the catalyst 2900XL which is a
small 24 port switch. We've got stacks of these sitting unused, so I
doubt they're
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 11:49 -0700, Timothy Selivanow wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote:
If I paid a couple grand for a core switch i'd be calling Cisco!
They're not core switches, they're just the catalyst 2900XL which is a
small 24 port switch. We've got stacks of
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Timothy Selivanow wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote:
If I paid a couple grand for a core switch i'd be calling Cisco!
They're not core switches, they're just the catalyst 2900XL which is a
small 24 port switch.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008, Milton Calnek wrote:
findfs comes to mind.
other than that...
fdisk -l | grep
That's fine -- once the system has been installed, but I'm
looking for a general way when attempting kickstart installs
on new hardware that may find devices in different places.
Bill Campbell
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008, John wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 12:18 -0600, Milton Calnek wrote:
findfs comes to mind.
other than that...
fdisk -l | grep
Bill Campbell wrote:
Is there an easy way to specify the proper device location for
the kickstart configuration file if it is on a USB
Timothy Selivanow wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote:
If I paid a couple grand for a core switch i'd be calling Cisco!
They're not core switches, they're just the catalyst 2900XL which is a
small 24 port switch. We've got stacks of these sitting unused, so I
doubt
John wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Timothy Selivanow wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote:
If I paid a couple grand for a core switch i'd be calling Cisco!
They're not core switches, they're just the catalyst 2900XL which is a
small 24 port
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 15:14 -0400, John wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Timothy Selivanow wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote:
If I paid a couple grand for a core switch i'd be calling Cisco!
They're not core switches, they're just
Les Mikesell wrote:
John wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Timothy Selivanow wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote:
If I paid a couple grand for a core switch i'd be calling Cisco!
They're not core switches, they're just the catalyst 2900XL
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 12:24 -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008, John wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 12:18 -0600, Milton Calnek wrote:
findfs comes to mind.
other than that...
fdisk -l | grep
Bill Campbell wrote:
Is there an easy way to specify the proper device
Timothy Selivanow wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 15:14 -0400, John wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Timothy Selivanow wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote:
If I paid a couple grand for a core switch i'd be calling Cisco!
They're
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 12:33 -0700, Timothy Selivanow wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 15:14 -0400, John wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Timothy Selivanow wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote:
If I paid a couple grand for a core switch i'd be
Jason,
I don't see why the 32 bit version of centos would not run on that
hardware. Despite the fancy processor name, it still has to work
with the i586 command set (at the worst).
There's no such thing as a 12 volt computer... unless you're looking
at some sort of weird industrial setup.
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 15:46 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Timothy Selivanow wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 15:14 -0400, John wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Timothy Selivanow wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote:
If I paid a couple
On Wednesday, April 02, 2008 8:13 AM -0400 Drew Weaver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And by insecure, I of course refer to the recent rash of bugs which have
been found.
Can you give Red Hat bugzilla numbers for these? If none exist, they should
be entered in the system.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gordon McLellan
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 4:10 PM
...
There's no such thing as a 12 volt computer... unless you're looking
at some sort of weird industrial setup.
Yes. We are trying to
John wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 15:46 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Timothy Selivanow wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 15:14 -0400, John wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Timothy Selivanow wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
I don't think you need to do all that:
Check out:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst2900xl_3500xl/release12.0_5_wc3/swg/Swgports.html
I've run 2900xl's connected to each other though 2 ports each configured
with:
port group 1
Les Mikesell wrote:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
I don't think you need to do all that:
Check out:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst2900xl_3500xl/release12.0_5_wc3/swg/Swgports.html
I've run 2900xl's connected to each other though 2 ports each
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 16:59 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
John wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 15:46 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Timothy Selivanow wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 15:14 -0400, John wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Timothy Selivanow
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 17:23 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
I don't think you need to do all that:
Check out:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst2900xl_3500xl/release12.0_5_wc3/swg/Swgports.html
I have run CentOS 4.5 on this platform without problems.
I wouldn't expect any issues with CentOS 5+.
-Ben
Jason Pyeron wrote:
Any ideas if this can run centos with out a special modifications?
Elite C7VCM Mini-ITX Motherboard with VIA C7 1.5GHz Processor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John R Pierce
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 4:55 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] 12V computing?
Jason Pyeron wrote:
Yes. We are trying to minimize costs ( certification of
John wrote:
Now for what version of the 2900 you have I do not know. But it seems
the info on Ciscos site is kind of misleading in places. There is some
documentation that says it works and some say you have to have the add
on modules.
Your best bet if your not comfortable with the IOS
If you want to minimize power costs, look to higher voltage, not
lower. Run your computers off 208-240 volts instead of 100-120. If
your supply is not auto ranging, make sure it's set to the high / 230
setting.
Having a massive 12v power supply to run several computers isn't going
to save any
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 18:05 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
John wrote:
Now for what version of the 2900 you have I do not know. But it seems
the info on Ciscos site is kind of misleading in places. There is some
documentation that says it works and some say you have to have the add
on
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 17:23 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
This should give you what you need when doing 802.3ad LAGs:
interface FastEthernet0/21
port group 1
spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/22
port group 1
spanning-tree portfast
!
Using this on the switch and
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 17:13 -0700, Timothy Selivanow wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 17:23 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
This should give you what you need when doing 802.3ad LAGs:
interface FastEthernet0/21
port group 1
spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/22
Timothy Selivanow wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 17:23 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
This should give you what you need when doing 802.3ad LAGs:
interface FastEthernet0/21
port group 1
spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/22
port group 1
spanning-tree portfast
!
Using this
John wrote:
Now for what version of the 2900 you have I do not know. But it seems
the info on Ciscos site is kind of misleading in places. There is some
documentation that says it works and some say you have to have the add
on modules.
Your best bet if your not comfortable with the IOS
there are computer systems that take 12VDC
(for example the PC-104 type and others). such
a computer system is a box that has a connection
for 12VDC. inside the box is a power supply that
takes the 12VDC and presents the +12VDC, -12VCD,
5VDC, and -5VDC that's needed by the various
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 19:51 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
John wrote:
Now for what version of the 2900 you have I do not know. But it seems
the info on Ciscos site is kind of misleading in places. There is some
documentation that says it works and some say you have to have the add
on
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 19:45 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Timothy Selivanow wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 17:23 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
This should give you what you need when doing 802.3ad LAGs:
interface FastEthernet0/21
port group 1
spanning-tree portfast
!
interface
Is there a CentOS RPM for gallery2?
I'm thinking of installing gallery2 through the preinstaller
if I can't find an RPM.
Is this the best way to go?
Is anyone happily running gallery2 under CentOS?
Any advice or suggestions gratefully received.
___
12VDC is appropriate for places that don't have
other electrical supplies. these places include
automobiles and boats as well as remote regions
that use windmills, creekmills, solar panels,
car batteries, and deep discharge gel batteries,
possibly in a mix. typically there's noise and
jim wrote:
12VDC is appropriate for places that don't have
other electrical supplies. these places include
automobiles and boats as well as remote regions
that use windmills, creekmills, solar panels,
car batteries, and deep discharge gel batteries,
possibly in a mix. typically there's noise
a 100 Watt system draws a little less than 1 Amp
at 120 VAC and about 8 Amps at 12VDC. there's about
10 times power loss per foot of conductor and per
connection (estimate 1/2 Ohm per connection). Yes,
heavier guage wire is required for a lower voltage
supplying the same power.
for
78 matches
Mail list logo
