Re: [CentOS-docs] modern-CentOS-1.10

2008-05-22 Thread Alain Reguera Delgado
On 5/21/08, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: Ralph could we modify the table that is in RecentChanges page top, adding it the messages classes (blue if possible) ? to see how it looks. Hmmm. I have to find out where that one gets generated. Let me look.

Re: [CentOS-docs] modern-CentOS-1.10

2008-05-22 Thread Alain Reguera Delgado
On 5/21/08, Alain Reguera Delgado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/21/08, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Does the rest look okay? Logo dimentions looks a bit different here compared to the previous one ... maybe that's what Karan noted ... I'll check that tonight. Well that seems

[CentOS-docs] Some ideas about FrontPage reorganization

2008-05-22 Thread Alain Reguera Delgado
Hi, Take a look at: http://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/WikiDesign/FrontPageStructure We have put there some ideas about FrontPage reorganization ... What do you think ? Cheers, al. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org

Re: [CentOS-docs] Some ideas about FrontPage reorganization

2008-05-22 Thread Niels de Vos
Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: Take a look at: http://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/WikiDesign/FrontPageStructure We have put there some ideas about FrontPage reorganization ... What do you think ? I like it better than the current one. However I don't know if it's cool on small displays.

Re: [CentOS-docs] Some ideas about FrontPage reorganization

2008-05-22 Thread Alain Reguera Delgado
On 5/22/08, Niels de Vos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: Take a look at: http://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/WikiDesign/FrontPageStructure We have put there some ideas about FrontPage reorganization ... What do you think ? I like it better than the current one. However I

Re: [CentOS-docs] Some ideas about FrontPage reorganization

2008-05-22 Thread Niels de Vos
Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: On 5/22/08, Niels de Vos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: Take a look at: http://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/WikiDesign/FrontPageStructure We have put there some ideas about FrontPage reorganization ... What do you think ? I like it better

Re: [CentOS-docs] Some ideas about FrontPage reorganization

2008-05-22 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Ralph Angenendt wrote: Niels de Vos wrote: I'll try to do this tonight. Don't have my EeePC 7 here atm. Okay, I could try it on my phone, but ... Works better than the one on wiki.centos.org, as the right and left content areas are thinner than the ones on the wiki. Cheers, Ralph

Re: [CentOS-docs] Some ideas about FrontPage reorganization

2008-05-22 Thread Niels de Vos
Ralph Angenendt wrote: Niels de Vos wrote: I'll try to do this tonight. Don't have my EeePC 7 here atm. Okay, I could try it on my phone, but ... On my BlackBerry 8100 it looks fine. Missing some color, but that's normal behavior for my phone ;) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: [CentOS-docs] Some ideas about FrontPage reorganization

2008-05-22 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Niels de Vos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ralph Angenendt wrote: Niels de Vos wrote: I'll try to do this tonight. Don't have my EeePC 7 here atm. Okay, I could try it on my phone, but ... On my BlackBerry 8100 it looks fine. Missing some color, but that's

Re: [CentOS-docs] modern-CentOS-1.10

2008-05-22 Thread Alain Reguera Delgado
On 5/22/08, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: On 5/21/08, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm. I have to find out where that one gets generated. Let me look. Ralph if you have write access in RecentChanges page, you should see the edit link

[CentOS-docs] Some ideas about FrontPage reorganization

2008-05-22 Thread R P Herrold
On Thu, 22 May 2008, Niels de Vos wrote: Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: Take a look at: http://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/WikiDesign/FrontPageStructure I see a boring balanced two equal column block design; from a matter of page layout, the old inverted L has disappeared from the net (think

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0287-01: Important CentOS 2 i386 libxslt security update

2008-05-22 Thread John Newbigin
The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded to the centos mirror: RHSA-2008:0287-01 Important: libxslt security update Files available: libxslt-1.0.15-3.i386.rpm libxslt-devel-1.0.15-3.i386.rpm libxslt-python-1.0.15-3.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0492 Important CentOS 4 i386 gnutls Update

2008-05-22 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0492 Imporant Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0492.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: gnutls-1.0.20-4.el4_6.i386.rpm gnutls-devel-1.0.20-4.el4_6.i386.rpm

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0492 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 gnutls Update

2008-05-22 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0492 Imporant Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0492.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: gnutls-1.0.20-4.el4_6.i386.rpm gnutls-1.0.20-4.el4_6.x86_64.rpm

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0287 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 libxslt Update

2008-05-22 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0287 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0287.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: libxslt-1.1.11-1.el4_6.1.i386.rpm libxslt-1.1.11-1.el4_6.1.x86_64.rpm

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0287 Important CentOS 4 i386 libxslt Update

2008-05-22 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0287 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0287.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: libxslt-1.1.11-1.el4_6.1.i386.rpm

[CentOS-virt] my domU from jailtime.org using latests xen kernel freezees

2008-05-22 Thread David Hláčik
Hello, i will describe my approach 1) I have downloaded Centos5-64bit xen image from jailtime.org 2) I have created own swap image with 512MB file size 3) I have used same as dom0 kernel 2.6.18-53.1.19.el5xen 4) I have mounted my image file and copied /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.19.el5xen 5) I have

Re: {Phishing} {Disarmed} [CentOS-virt] my domU from jailtime.org using latests xen kernel freezees

2008-05-22 Thread Kai Schaetzl
David Hláèik wrote on Thu, 22 May 2008 13:34:17 +0200: disk = [ 'tap:aio:/home/xen/webdev/webdev_root.img,sda1,w', 'tap:aio:/home/xen/webdev/webdev_swap.img,sda2,w' ] I suggest using file: instead of tap:aio (I haven't tested this, but it's been said here or elsewhere several times that it is

Re: [CentOS-virt] my domU from jailtime.org using latests xen kernel freezees

2008-05-22 Thread Luke S Crawford
Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: David Hláèik wrote on Thu, 22 May 2008 13:34:17 +0200: disk = [ 'tap:aio:/home/xen/webdev/webdev_root.img,sda1,w', 'tap:aio:/home/xen/webdev/webdev_swap.img,sda2,w' ] I suggest using file: instead of tap:aio (I haven't tested this, but it's been

Re: [CentOS-es] Arquitectura de un Nodo

2008-05-22 Thread O. T. Suarez
hola: 2008/5/22 Ms.C. Jesús Graverán Mesa [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Estimados colegas, alguien podría enviar a mi e-mail documentación de la arquitectura, tanto desde el punto de vista de hard, como de soft, de un nodo (Area de Servidores) para prestar servicios de todo tipo y realizar su control y

Re: [CentOS-es] Arquitectura de un Nodo

2008-05-22 Thread Oscar Osta Pueyo
O. T. Suarez escribió: hola: 2008/5/22 Ms.C. Jesús Graverán Mesa [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Estimados colegas, alguien podría enviar a mi e-mail documentación de la arquitectura, tanto desde el punto de vista de hard, como de soft, de un nodo (Area de Servidores) para prestar servicios de todo tipo

Re: [CentOS-es] Arquitectura de un Nodo

2008-05-22 Thread O. T. Suarez
Hola Jesús: 2008/5/22 Ms.C. Jesús Graverán Mesa [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Estimados colegas, alguien podría enviar a mi e-mail documentación de la arquitectura, tanto desde el punto de vista de hard, como de soft, de un nodo (Area de Servidores) para prestar servicios de todo tipo y realizar su

Re: [CentOS-es] Arquitectura de un Nodo

2008-05-22 Thread Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez
O. T. Suarez wrote: Hola Jesús: 2008/5/22 Ms.C. Jesús Graverán Mesa [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Estimados colegas, alguien podría enviar a mi e-mail documentación de la arquitectura, tanto desde el punto de vista de hard, como de soft, de un nodo (Area de Servidores) para prestar servicios de todo tipo

[CentOS-es] Ayuda!!! yum desinstala cosas que no quiero!!!

2008-05-22 Thread Alejandro
Hola amigos alguno de ustedes sabra porque cuando corro #yum -y remove (cualquier paquete), me desinstala cosas que no tienen nada que ver con el paquete en cuestion y me desconfigura el sistema operativo no booteando correctamente, que habria que hacer Saludos cordiales,

Re: [CentOS-es] Ayuda!!! yum desinstala cosas que no quiero!!!

2008-05-22 Thread Roger Peña
--- On Thu, 5/22/08, Alejandro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Alejandro [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CentOS-es] Ayuda!!! yum desinstala cosas que no quiero!!! Hola amigos alguno de ustedes sabra porque cuando corro #yum -y remove (cualquier paquete) cualquiera pensaria que __si__ quieres

Re: [CentOS-es] Ayuda!!! yum no instala nada!!!

2008-05-22 Thread Alberto Castillo
Efectivamente El administrador del proxy, sin querer dio de baja la extension 'rpm'. Les pido millon de disculpas por hacerles perder el tiempo con esta tonteria... Muchisimas gracias por la pronta respuesta! Les comento que estabamos usando fedora para las escuelas y ahora nos pasamos a

Re: [CentOS-es] Ayuda!!! yum desinstala cosas que no quiero!!!

2008-05-22 Thread Alberto Castillo
El día 22 de mayo de 2008 13:15, Oscar Osta Pueyo [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Alejandro escribió: Hola amigos alguno de ustedes sabra porque cuando corro #yum -y remove (cualquier paquete), me desinstala cosas que no tienen nada que ver con el paquete en cuestion y me desconfigura el sistema

RE: [CentOS-es] Ayuda!!! yum no instala nada!!!

2008-05-22 Thread Javier Aquino H.
Si quieres eliminar un solo paquete mejor usa: rpm –e nombre-del-paquete Saludos, Javier. De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Alberto Castillo Enviado el: Jueves, 22 de Mayo de 2008 11:25 a.m. Para: centos-es@centos.org Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] Ayuda!!! yum

Re: [CentOS-es] Arquitectura de un Nodo

2008-05-22 Thread Ms.C.
Si, es posible y comparto, y respeto, y todo lo que quieran agregar. ¿Pero no existe nadie en esta lista que haya escrito unas líneas describiendo una lógica de armar un punto tal vital para cualquier entidad?. Sé que la respuesta que me den puede decir que es así. Pero preguntar es de sabios; sin

Re: [CentOS] COBOL

2008-05-22 Thread Ian Blackwell
Michael wrote: Just curious, maybe some old timers could help me out. I am working with a company that is migrating 20 years of Mainframe Software Development to Unix, HPUX. How much harder would it be to go to Linux, Centos Linux? I think you would be better served looking for a flavour of

Re: [CentOS] Re: OT: Top Posting - PLEASE STOP THIS POINTLESS POST

2008-05-22 Thread Martyn Drake
With respect, there are such things as email filters. I encourage everybody to learn how to use their own particular MUA's filtering system. Secondly, posting a PLEASE STOP THIS POINTLESS POST message is futile in the extreme. If something is bothering you to the extent that the moderators need

[CentOS] samba question

2008-05-22 Thread david chong
Hi, I am running Centos5.1, trying to configure samba now. I am quite new in this area and hope help from the list. I could not connect to it from a windows xp pc From the console, I log in and do a smbclient -L localhost -U% Domain=[MYGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.25b-0.el5.4]

Re: [CentOS] 1333/8GB Intel motherboard for C5.1

2008-05-22 Thread Karanbir Singh
Shawn wrote: Realtek drivers can be found in the CentOS wiki: http://wiki.centos.org/HardwareList#head-851e245f4f537add3de9c3c6a6d686771fb01bfa Sweet thanks. Now I know about dkms-enabled driver package which rebuilds the driver automatically for each kernel upgrade! ofcouse, you dont

Re: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

2008-05-22 Thread Michael Simpson
On 5/22/08, Mag Gam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just out of curiosity. If you wanted to bond do you have to ask your network admin to configure a special switch setting for MAC addresses? depends on the mode of bonding http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/Net:Bonding

Re: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

2008-05-22 Thread James Pearson
Mag Gam wrote: Just out of curiosity. If you wanted to bond do you have to ask your network admin to configure a special switch setting for MAC addresses? AFAIK, only with 802.3ad The other Linux bonding modes don't require any switch settings James Pearson

Re: [CentOS] 1333/8GB Intel motherboard for C5.1

2008-05-22 Thread Farkas Levente
Karanbir Singh wrote: Shawn wrote: Realtek drivers can be found in the CentOS wiki: http://wiki.centos.org/HardwareList#head-851e245f4f537add3de9c3c6a6d686771fb01bfa Sweet thanks. Now I know about dkms-enabled driver package which rebuilds the driver automatically for each kernel

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 39, Issue 10

2008-05-22 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can

Re: [CentOS] 1333/8GB Intel motherboard for C5.1

2008-05-22 Thread Karanbir Singh
Farkas Levente wrote: Sweet thanks. Now I know about dkms-enabled driver package which rebuilds the driver automatically for each kernel upgrade! ofcouse, you dont need that on CentOS :D rhel 5.2 contains updated drivers. so as centos 5.2 will be release these problems will vanish. Perhaps

Re: [CentOS] Interface bonding?

2008-05-22 Thread Mag Gam
Thanks Jim. Since, 802.3ad requires switch settings does it perform better than other modes? Does anyone have any benchmarks? TIA On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 7:19 AM, James Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mag Gam wrote: Just out of curiosity. If you wanted to bond do you have to ask your

RE: [CentOS] samba question

2008-05-22 Thread John
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of david chong Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 6:21 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] samba question Hi, I am running Centos5.1, trying to configure samba now. I am quite new in this area and hope

[CentOS] question on minimal install using CF as /dev/sda

2008-05-22 Thread Ray Leventhal
Hi all, We're attempting to use CentOS 5.1 on a test platform which uses a CF card as it's primary storage. (MB: ETX-LX) The BIOS supports booting from CD and/or the CF. Issues we've run into are: During installation of CentOS 5.1, it appears all goes well through partitioning, package

[CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?

2008-05-22 Thread mcclnx mcc
we have DELL 6800 server with 12 internal disks in it. O.S. is CENTOS 4.6 and SCSI control card is PERC 4e/di. We plan to configure 4 disks (5,8,9,10) as RAID5 or RAID50. This logical volume will be use as file systems and store database backup files. Can anyone tell me which one is better

Re: [CentOS] Failed boot drive

2008-05-22 Thread Hakan Koseoglu
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Dean Maluski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unclear on how to recover from failed boot drive? SDA has failed but I'm still able to boot. I need to replace primary boot drive. Upon initial build I created a RAID 1 mirror of /boot dir/partition. How do I get system to

Re: [CentOS] samba question

2008-05-22 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 22 May 2008 14:11:31 John wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of david chong Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 6:21 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] samba question Hi, I am running Centos5.1, trying to configure

[CentOS] Failed boot drive

2008-05-22 Thread Dean Maluski
Unclear on how to recover from failed boot drive? SDA has failed but I'm still able to boot. I need to replace primary boot drive. Upon initial build I created a RAID 1 mirror of /boot dir/partition. How do I get system to boot off second or third drive so that I can replace /sda? I've

Re: [CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?

2008-05-22 Thread John R Pierce
mcclnx mcc wrote: we have DELL 6800 server with 12 internal disks in it. O.S. is CENTOS 4.6 and SCSI control card is PERC 4e/di. We plan to configure 4 disks (5,8,9,10) as RAID5 or RAID50. This logical volume will be use as file systems and store database backup files. Can anyone tell me

Re: [CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?

2008-05-22 Thread Jason Clark
You're going to need two RAID controllers and 6 drives to do RAID 50. RAID 50 will be faster, but costs more in drives and controllers. Jason www.cyborgworkshop.org mcclnx mcc wrote: we have DELL 6800 server with 12 internal disks in it. O.S. is CENTOS 4.6 and SCSI control card is PERC

Re: [CentOS] Strange NTP problem

2008-05-22 Thread Alfred von Campe
I'm still having this issue. Here is another update. I noticed that the drift file for the system with the problem contained 0.000. On most other systems this contains a positive number (and on two a negative number). I deleted the drift file, resynch'ed the time with ntpdate hostname,

[CentOS] IPTables help

2008-05-22 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I have a dual homed server in an install for someone who is very cost sensitive. This server originally is being setup as an Asterisk server, but now the simplest thing for me to do is also set it up to provide internet access for the small shop as well. So it will have one external, WAN

Re: [CentOS] Strange NTP problem

2008-05-22 Thread Jason Clark
I had a similar problem on a different server that I fixed last night. Evidently it had a BIOS level feature that tried to modify the CPU clock rate, much like cpu-freq does within the kernel, and was doing so by messing with the system clock impacting the RTC. I was drifting all over the place

Re: [CentOS] samba question

2008-05-22 Thread Guy Boisvert
david chong wrote: Hi, I am running Centos5.1, trying to configure samba now. I am quite new in this area and hope help from the list. I could not connect to it from a windows xp pc From the console, I log in and do a smbclient -L localhost -U% Domain=[MYGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba

Re: [CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?

2008-05-22 Thread Warren Young
John R Pierce wrote: raid50 requires 2 or more raid 5 volumes. with 4 disks, thats just not an option. for file storage (including backup files from a database), raid5 is probably fine... for primary database tablespace storage, I'd only use raid1 or raid10. RAID-10 has only one perfect

Re: [CentOS] IPTables help

2008-05-22 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Joseph L. Casale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have limited experience with iptables and would love some guidelines. Any pointers would be greatly appreciated! This CentOS wiki may help: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Network/IPTables Akemi

Re: [CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?

2008-05-22 Thread Rudi Ahlers
Warren Young wrote: John R Pierce wrote: raid50 requires 2 or more raid 5 volumes. with 4 disks, thats just not an option. for file storage (including backup files from a database), raid5 is probably fine... for primary database tablespace storage, I'd only use raid1 or raid10. RAID-10 has

Re: [CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?

2008-05-22 Thread Guy Boisvert
Jason Clark wrote: You're going to need two RAID controllers and 6 drives to do RAID 50. RAID 50 will be faster, but costs more in drives and controllers. Jason www.cyborgworkshop.org mcclnx mcc wrote: we have DELL 6800 server with 12 internal disks in it. O.S. is CENTOS 4.6 and

RE: [CentOS] COBOL

2008-05-22 Thread James B. Byrne
On : Wed, 21 May 2008 16:57:37 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would just buy the RH licenses for the project. CentOS may work well for development and testing platform, but the production code should be on fully supported RHEL. Having been on RHEL support, and having had

Re: [CentOS] 1333/8GB Intel motherboard for C5.1

2008-05-22 Thread MHR
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 5:42 AM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps I was not clear in my original email, the point being that you dont need to rebuild drivers when kernels update ( in 99% of the cases ) Is that now true also of the nvidia driver(s)? I haven't seen anything so to

RE: [CentOS] COBOL

2008-05-22 Thread Ross S. W. Walker
James B. Byrne wrote: On : Wed, 21 May 2008 16:57:37 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would just buy the RH licenses for the project. CentOS may work well for development and testing platform, but the production code should be on fully supported RHEL. Having been

[CentOS] Re: RAID5 or RAID50 for database?

2008-05-22 Thread Scott Silva
on 5-22-2008 9:12 AM Rudi Ahlers spake the following: Warren Young wrote: John R Pierce wrote: raid50 requires 2 or more raid 5 volumes. with 4 disks, thats just not an option. for file storage (including backup files from a database), raid5 is probably fine... for primary database

Re: [CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?

2008-05-22 Thread nightduke
I prefer raid level of ibm For Dell you can find more info about raid level at http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/storage/RAID/RAIDbk0.pdf But add hot spare disks Nightduke 2008/5/22, Warren Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Rudi Ahlers wrote: So, how does it perform with 6 discs for

AW: [CentOS] question on minimal install using CF as /dev/sda

2008-05-22 Thread Marc Rebischke
Hi all, We're attempting to use CentOS 5.1 on a test platform which uses a CF card as it's primary storage. (MB: ETX-LX) The BIOS supports booting from CD and/or the CF. Issues we've run into are: During installation of CentOS 5.1, it appears all goes well through partitioning, package

Re: [CentOS] Re: Need help with rsync. [solved]

2008-05-22 Thread James B. Byrne
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On: Wed, 21 May 2008 10:22:19 -0700, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 8:37 AM, James B. Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This indeed turned out to be an SELinux policy problem which I have since resolved. Whoa, whoa, whoa, nice shooting,

[CentOS] Current Chipset Compatibility

2008-05-22 Thread John Paulson
Can someone make a recommedation as far as best chipset for Centos 5.0 or 5..1 using a Q6600 series CPU with chipsets that have onboard VGA?  From poking around it looks like the G33 and P35 are not supported or have problems until the newer 2.6.22 kernel (the iso's appear to be earlier than

RE: [CentOS] COBOL

2008-05-22 Thread Michael Peterson
We use COBOL on Unix. I have worked with NCR/ATT Unix and since 1995 have been supporting COBOL on SCO Unix. I am in the process of porting to CentOS and RHEL. We use RM/COBOL. It is supported by Liant at www.liant.com We use it for internal and Internet programming. They also support Web

[CentOS] CentOS 5.2 ?

2008-05-22 Thread Florin Andrei
Anybody knows when CentOS 5.2 will be made available? http://www.linux.com/feature/135980 -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 ?

2008-05-22 Thread Heiko Adams
Am Donnerstag, den 22.05.2008, 12:03 -0700 schrieb Florin Andrei: Anybody knows when CentOS 5.2 will be made available? On 5.1 it took nearly 3 weeks so expect at least the same period of time for 5.2 - otherwise: it's done when it's done :D -- Heiko Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 ?

2008-05-22 Thread Matt Hyclak
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:03:23PM -0700, Florin Andrei enlightened us: Anybody knows when CentOS 5.2 will be made available? http://www.linux.com/feature/135980 When it's done. For crying out loud, upstream has only released 5.2 less than 24 hours ago. It will be at least a couple of weeks

Re: [CentOS] Re:Re:Can't get past the splash screen

2008-05-22 Thread Alex White
Eon Strife wrote: Hi, Thanks, it's Gnome, and I'm stuck when I login as root. By using Putty, I managed to create a new user, and then I tried to login to desktop(using nomachine) as that user, and yes, it works. The problem now is that I stuck when I login as the root. NX 596 Session

Re: [CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?

2008-05-22 Thread Linux
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Guy Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You do not need two (2) raid controllers unless you want to have redundancy at the controller level. Adaptec, 3Ware, etc do RAID 50. For RAID 50, you need at least 6 disks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID For

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 ?

2008-05-22 Thread Florin Andrei
Matt Hyclak wrote: For crying out loud, upstream has only released 5.2 less than 24 hours ago. I was just curious, I was not demanding it right now or anything like that. Sorry if my inquiry seemed inconsiderate. -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/

RE: [CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?

2008-05-22 Thread Joseph L. Casale
And stick with md-raid 10 (also known as software raid) because it is much more intelligently designed than any closed-source-embedded-raid-controller. Pretty strong opinion that would be disputed by many don't you think? I would venture to say that any large system involved in SLA's with 5 9's

Re: [CentOS] samba question

2008-05-22 Thread Christopher Chan
david chong wrote: Hi, I am running Centos5.1, trying to configure samba now. I am quite new in this area and hope help from the list. Have you ever tried going through the Samba Howto or the Using Samba book material that comes free with samba in html format? If you want help, then you

Re: [CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?

2008-05-22 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Warren Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At any rate, RAID-10 shouldn't be *slower*. I've actually seen equipments where RAID-10 was slower for reading than RAID-5 with the same number of disks. RAID-10 depends on the ability of the controller of balancing reads

Re: [CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?

2008-05-22 Thread Christopher Chan
Your way has the advantage of letting you add disks in pairs, but to get that you get only single-disk redundancy: if a second disk goes out, your array is gone, no matter which disk it is. Nah, if you lose both disks that belong to the same stripe array, the other stripe array is still

Re: [CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?

2008-05-22 Thread Christopher Chan
And stick with md-raid 10 (also known as software raid) because it is much more intelligently designed than any closed-source-embedded-raid-controller. This was valid until...quite a few years ago. Nowadays hardware raid frightens me because of the need to have spare raid-controllers for

Re: [CentOS] samba question

2008-05-22 Thread david chong
Have you ever tried going through the Samba Howto or the Using Samba book material that comes free with samba in html format? If you want help, then you need to tell us also what you have done...why should we try to walk you through each and every step? Hi All, Thanks for all your

Re: [CentOS] samba question

2008-05-22 Thread Christopher Chan
I notice in the example running smbclient -L localhost -U% will output the line below: ADMIN$ IPC IPC Service (Samba 3.0.20) but from my C5.1, I don't have this line, other lines are the same, can anyone explain this line, wondering if this is where the problem lies. Run testparm and tell us

RE: [CentOS] IPTables help

2008-05-22 Thread Joseph L. Casale
This CentOS wiki may help: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Network/IPTables Akemi Akemi, That was helpful (I should have checked the wiki:). After reading that and the RH related links, I think I have what I need but I am unclear about one aspect. What is the correlation between filtering LAN

RE: [CentOS] samba question

2008-05-22 Thread John
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of david chong Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 10:19 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] samba question Have you ever tried going through the Samba Howto or the Using Samba book material that

[CentOS] How to move my MBR

2008-05-22 Thread Scott Moseman
I removed an ATA drive (/home) for a new SATA and my system would not boot. I'm guessing that it put the MBR on that drive instead of the drive that holds the / partition. What's the best way confirm where the MBR resides and, after I verify that's my problem, how I can move (or make a copy)

[CentOS] Re: How to move my MBR

2008-05-22 Thread Scott Moseman
Just in case this makes any difference... # cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 4.6 (Final) Thanks, Scott On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Scott Moseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I removed an ATA drive (/home) for a new SATA and my system would not boot. I'm guessing that it put the MBR

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 ?

2008-05-22 Thread Paul
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 15:42 -0400, Matt Hyclak wrote: On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:03:23PM -0700, Florin Andrei enlightened us: Anybody knows when CentOS 5.2 will be made available? http://www.linux.com/feature/135980 When it's done. For crying out loud, upstream has only released 5.2

Re: [CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?

2008-05-22 Thread Guy Boisvert
Linux wrote: And stick with md-raid 10 (also known as software raid) because it is much more intelligently designed than any closed-source-embedded-raid-controller. More intelligently designed - Could you please tell us more on this one? i Nowadays hardware raid frightens me because of the

[CentOS] Re:Re:Re:Can't get past the splash screen

2008-05-22 Thread Eon Strife
Hi, Thanks, I check those folders, and they are already empty. Now, I tried to remove the freenx by using yum, and then I removed the files it left behind manually in: /usr/bin/nxserver /usr/lib/nx /var/lib/nxserver /etc/nxserver along with the nx user and group and reinstall. The problem