On 14/07/2008, Antti J. Huhtala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just looked at the updated I Need the Kernel Source HowTo and in my
eyes it is now perfect. No doubt a careful person could now succeed in
building the kernel tree in one go.
Thank you for kind words and very helpful feed-back,
ma, 2008-07-14 kello 06:07 -0700, Akemi Yagi kirjoitti:
This is most likely because you missed the step of adding the # i386
(or #x86_64) line. Could you check this out?
Akemi
That was it, indeed. Looks like Custom Kernel HowTo survived the
idiot test by me. One question though: when
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0561
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0561.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/irb-1.8.1-7.el4_6.1.ia64.rpm
updates/ia64/RPMS/ruby-1.8.1-7.el4_6.1.ia64.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0562
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0562.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/irb-1.6.8-12.el3.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/ruby-1.6.8-12.el3.s390.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0561
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0561.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/irb-1.8.1-7.el4_6.1.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/ruby-1.8.1-7.el4_6.1.s390.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0561
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0561.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
x86_64:
ruby-1.8.5-5.el5_2.3.x86_64.rpm
ruby-devel-1.8.5-5.el5_2.3.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0561
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0561.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
i386:
ruby-1.8.5-5.el5_2.3.i386.rpm
ruby-devel-1.8.5-5.el5_2.3.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0581
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0581.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
i386:
bluez-libs-2.10-3.i386.rpm
bluez-libs-devel-2.10-3.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0581
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0581.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
x86_64:
bluez-libs-2.10-3.x86_64.rpm
bluez-libs-2.10-3.x86_64.rpm
The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded to the
centos mirror:
RHSA-2008:0562-01 Moderate: ruby security update
Files available:
irb-1.6.4-6.el2.i386.rpm
ruby-1.6.4-6.el2.i386.rpm
ruby-devel-1.6.4-6.el2.i386.rpm
ruby-docs-1.6.4-6.el2.i386.rpm
ruby-libs-1.6.4-6.el2.i386.rpm
John Thomas wrote on Sun, 13 Jul 2008 07:44:14 -0700:
but I think everything is the same, as if you
have physical machines.
It's not, see my remark about forwarding ;-) Maybe you need forwarding on
your physical machines, I do not ;-)
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at
Any ideal when 3.2 xen will be avail for centos?
Thanks!
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Hi All,
I was hoping to run a Windows 2003 server in production on Centos 5.2
however the performance isn't very good.
The host is Centos 5.2 64 bit. I did some file transfers and I'm seeing
about 12Mb/s on a Windows 2003 VM and about 8Mb/s on a Windows 2003 32
bit VM. Numbers are measured
Short story:
Would it be possible to get
kernel-debuginfo-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL.x86_64.rpm on di.c.o?
I have a need to run crash on a 2.6.9-67.0.20.ELxenU xm dump-core.
Long story:
Two Dell 6950 (now called R905, 4 Dual-Core AMD Opteron 8200 series)
heartbeat/drbd nodes running the stock CentOS 5.2
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Justin Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any ideal when 3.2 xen will be avail for centos?
When the upstream distribution provides it. I am not sure if it is on
their roadmap. Of course, you could also use Xen 3.2 from XenSource,
but that's not supported here.
Take
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Jerry Amundson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Short story:
Would it be possible to get
kernel-debuginfo-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL.x86_64.rpm on di.c.o?
I have a need to run crash on a 2.6.9-67.0.20.ELxenU xm dump-core.
Debuginfo packages are available from:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Daniel de Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Jerry Amundson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Short story:
Would it be possible to get
kernel-debuginfo-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL.x86_64.rpm on di.c.o?
I have a need to run crash on a
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Daniel de Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Justin Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any ideal when 3.2 xen will be avail for centos?
When the upstream distribution provides it. I am not sure if it is on
their roadmap. Of course, you
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I was hoping to run a Windows 2003 server in production on Centos 5.2
however the performance isn't very good.
The host is Centos 5.2 64 bit. I did some file transfers and I'm seeing
about 12Mb/s on a Windows 2003 VM
El 13/07/08, O. T. Suarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Hola:
Una de las grandes ventajas de que el núcleo (kernel) GNU/Linux sea
equipamiento lógico libre (Software Libre) es el poder descargar el
equipamiento lógico libre no me sabia esa :)
Si, esa es una innovación que saqué de
--- El lun 14-jul-08, Andre Aspée G. [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
De:: Andre Aspée G. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: [CentOS-es] Problemas para dar atributos de acceso archivos y carpetas
A: centos-es@centos.org
Fecha: lunes, 14 julio, 2008, 12:22 pm
Hola,
Tengo la siguiente situación:
Tengo
Prueba utilizando
chmod R 774 *
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Andre Aspée G.
Sent: Lunes, 14 de Julio de 2008 12:56 p.m.
To: centos-es@centos.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Problemas para dar atributos de acceso archivos
https://hardware.redhat.com/list.cgi?version=4internal_whiteboard=Component/Per
ipheral has no results
https://hardware.redhat.com/list.cgi?product=Red+Hat+Hardware+Certificationquic
ksearch=ethernet has a few results for RHEL2.x and one for RHEL4.x on IA64.
Where should I start on my quest to
Jason Pyeron wrote:
Where should I start on my quest to find gigabit ethernet cards for all our
workstations?
Intel pro1000 cards or onboard chips.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 1:48 AM, John R Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Pyeron wrote:
Where should I start on my quest to find gigabit ethernet cards for all
our
workstations?
Intel pro1000 cards or onboard chips.
___
CentOS mailing
On Monday 07 July 2008, William L. Maltby wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 09:29 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
snip
Anyway, so here comes the upgrade to firefox 3. On my test system, Java
was working with 1.5, and now it is not. So I anticipate the same event
here. I need these Java
Ryan Nichols schrieb:
So its junk?
Basically, yes.
Just worded more politely in the original mail by Paul.
What would you recommend we move to then?
RAID5+6: Areca, recent 3Ware SATA2 controllers, cciss (HP/CPQ).
RAID1: If the system doesn't come with a decent RAID-controller, I'd
John R Pierce schrieb:
Jason Pyeron wrote:
Where should I start on my quest to find gigabit ethernet cards for
all our
workstations?
Intel pro1000 cards or onboard chips.
I'm not sure if RHEL4 has support for the latest Intel Pro 1000 cards -
though Intel cards are definitely
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rainer Duffner
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 3:57 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Hardware Compatibility List (looking
for a gigabit nicon RHEL4)
John R Pierce schrieb:
Jason
Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Sunday, July 13, 2008 7:59 AM -0700 John Thomas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to know about new software (rpms) with a general description
as they become available in the major repos.
Is there a way to get an RSS feed?
Most have an -announce mailing
I am trying to install phpBB forum on version 5.2. It requires that I have
imagemagick and gd graphics support. What rpm packages provide these. I
have tried a yum install ImageMagicK with yum responding nothing todo. Is
imageMagicK not available with 5.2? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
--
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 10:25 -0400, Bo Lynch wrote:
I am trying to install phpBB forum on version 5.2. It requires that I have
imagemagick and gd graphics support. What rpm packages provide these. I
have tried a yum install ImageMagicK with yum responding nothing todo. Is
imageMagicK not
I think you just need to change the capital K at the end to a small k.
Try:
yum install ImageMagick
It looks like it is in the base repository:
=
Package Arch Version Repository
On Mon, July 14, 2008 10:25 am, Bo Lynch wrote:
I am trying to install phpBB forum on version 5.2. It requires that I have
imagemagick and gd graphics support. What rpm packages provide these. I
have tried a yum install ImageMagicK with yum responding nothing todo. Is
imageMagicK not available
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 17:42 +0100, John Horne wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 12:12 +0200, Santi Saez wrote:
So, appears that yum-updatesd can download, notify and install
updates.. but none of this works on a fresh CentOS 5.2 :-(
Well I tested this on Centos 5.1 and 5.2, as well as
Is there a way to tell from the OS whether the PCI-X bus is version 2
or not?
Tony Schreiner
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Ian Blackwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
Question: The next time I connect our Backup IPCop box, should I put
the 2 IP addresses for opendns.com there, or, the IP of our ADSL
Modem? Which will be faster? If I understand, you have the IP
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 5:56 AM, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
OK, I can verify that for me (CentOS-5.2 updated, Firefox-3.0-2.el5.centos)
this link:
http://wiki.contribs.org/SME_Server:Documentation:Administration_Manual:Booklet
Causes X to crash.
I can replicate it every
On Mon, July 14, 2008 11:43 am, Tony Schreiner wrote:
Is there a way to tell from the OS whether the PCI-X bus is version 2
or not?
Tony Schreiner
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
If you
Try lshw (http://www.ezix.org/project/wiki/HardwareLiSter) or ask google for
ioscan for Linux :)
Regards,
--
Laurentiu Coica
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
The RPMForge Tools list appears to be dead, so maybe someone here can
help:
I am mirroring the Centos4 updates repo using mrepo. My systems are all
servers and have no need of OpenOffice, so I would like to be able to
exclude the 4GB (i386 x86_64) of OpenOffice rpms when I mirror the
repo. I
On Jul 14, 2008, at 12:28 PM, Bo Lynch wrote:
On Mon, July 14, 2008 11:43 am, Tony Schreiner wrote:
Is there a way to tell from the OS whether the PCI-X bus is version 2
or not?
Tony Schreiner
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
on 7-13-2008 10:06 AM Lanny Marcus spake the following:
On 7/11/08, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I just played with one of my test vmware ipcop images and set it to dhcp on
our internal network (which should simulate your natted connection through
your adsl modem) for the red
on 7-13-2008 10:06 AM Lanny Marcus spake the following:
On 7/11/08, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I just played with one of my test vmware ipcop images and set it to dhcp on
our internal network (which should simulate your natted connection through
your adsl modem) for the red
on 7-12-2008 9:00 AM Miguel Filho spake the following:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Emmanuel Borlet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
We can see
# lspci
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B
PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 01)
Change the
on 7-13-2008 2:58 PM Ryan Nichols spake the following:
Rainer Duffner wrote:
Am 13.07.2008 um 22:14 schrieb Ryan Nichols:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
If it works ok on the old kernel, it should also work OK on the new
one.
Not if it's a binary-driver...
on 7-13-2008 3:42 PM Ryan Nichols spake the following:
Paul wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
If it works ok on the old kernel, it should also work OK on the new
one.
Not if it's a binary-driver...
I'm familiar with the card driver ... it's a binary blob with a bit of
Centos continues to fall behind in with the state of bluetooth development.
Nothing new from 5.1 to 5.2.
Has anyone got a more recent version working and have compile and rpm
build instructions?
Here are the rpms that I have:
bluez-gnome-0.5-5.fc6.i386.rpm
bluez-hcidump-1.32-1.i386.rpm
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Centos continues to fall behind in with the state of bluetooth development.
Well, what do you want? A bleeding edge distro with a few months of
life expectancy, or a stable, tested distro with a long shelf-life?
You
on 7-14-2008 12:04 PM Robert Moskowitz spake the following:
Centos continues to fall behind in with the state of bluetooth development.
Nothing new from 5.1 to 5.2.
Has anyone got a more recent version working and have compile and rpm
build instructions?
Here are the rpms that I have:
I have been installed CENTOS 5.2 on several DELL servers and have following
problems (even latest patches apply):
1. DELL 2650 can NOT boot under CENTOS 5.2 PAE mode
2. DELL R900 can NOT boot under CENTOS 5.2 PAE mode (inifinite boot loop)
3. DELL R900 with 128 GB RAM can only see 15 GB
On Jul 14, 2008, at 3:24 PM, mcclnx mcc wrote:
Anyone know why? IS CENTOS 5.2 certify with DELL server?
the Red Hat Hardware Catalog is here:
https://hardware.redhat.com/
the PowerEdge 2650 is supported for i386:
https://hardware.redhat.com/show.cgi?id=232318
the R900 is supported under
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 1:24 PM, mcclnx mcc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been installed CENTOS 5.2 on several DELL servers and have following
problems (even latest patches apply):
1. DELL 2650 can NOT boot under CENTOS 5.2 PAE mode
Is the 2650 PAE compatible?
Does the system have the
Scott Silva wrote:
on 7-14-2008 12:04 PM Robert Moskowitz spake the following:
Centos continues to fall behind in with the state of bluetooth
development.
Nothing new from 5.1 to 5.2.
Has anyone got a more recent version working and have compile and rpm
build instructions?
Here are the
on 7-14-2008 12:24 PM mcclnx mcc spake the following:
I have been installed CENTOS 5.2 on several DELL servers and have
following problems (even latest patches apply):
1. DELL 2650 can NOT boot under CENTOS 5.2 PAE mode
2. DELL R900 can NOT boot under CENTOS 5.2 PAE mode (inifinite
I have used the package-cleanup utility to remove old kernel packages,
but I noticed that it only removes the 'kernel' and 'kernel-devel'
packages. It does not touch 'kernel-smp', 'kernel-hugemem', etc. What
is the recommended method of cleaning up these other kernel packages?
Should I just 'yum
mcclnx mcc wrote:
I have been installed CENTOS 5.2 on several DELL servers and have following
problems (even latest patches apply):
1. DELL 2650 can NOT boot under CENTOS 5.2 PAE mode
Did you install the PAE kernel and are you booting the PAE kernel?
2. DELL R900 can NOT boot under
Dear All,
I have been using centos 5.1 for quite some time as out DNS and mail server
and been workin fine
i use sendmail as my mail server
i did setup a backup mail server as per docs and ran th dns test from
http://www.checkdns.net
and it says both the mail servers are fine
but i would
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have used the package-cleanup utility to remove old kernel packages,
but I noticed that it only removes the 'kernel' and 'kernel-devel'
packages. It does not touch 'kernel-smp', 'kernel-hugemem', etc. What
is the
On Monday 14 July 2008 15:24:55 mcclnx mcc wrote:
I have been installed CENTOS 5.2 on several DELL servers and have
following problems (even latest patches apply):
1. DELL 2650 can NOT boot under CENTOS 5.2 PAE mode
2. DELL R900 can NOT boot under CENTOS 5.2 PAE mode (inifinite boot loop)
Jim Perrin wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have used the package-cleanup utility to remove old kernel
packages, but I noticed that it only removes the 'kernel' and
'kernel-devel' packages. It does not touch 'kernel-smp',
'kernel-hugemem',
On Monday 14 July 2008 16:45:39 fabian dacunha wrote:
how would i really know if my main primary server is down all my mails r
goin to my secondary mail server
and when my primary is up are the mails copied back to my primary
i did put down my mail server for abt 3 hrs cause cant keep it
on 7-14-2008 1:45 PM fabian dacunha spake the following:
Dear All,
I have been using centos 5.1 for quite some time as out DNS and mail server
and been workin fine
i use sendmail as my mail server
i did setup a backup mail server as per docs and ran th dns test from
http://www.checkdns.net
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Kurt Hansen wrote:
I just installed Centos 5.2 on my wife's IBM thinkpad T41 with Atheros
wireless.
It looks like I need to install madwifi to get the wireless to work. Our home
wireless network uses WPA2
I found the EL5 rpms at atrpms, but there is no madwifi-kmdl
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Hywel Richards wrote:
Bo Lynch wrote:
I am trying to install phpBB forum on version 5.2. It requires that I have
imagemagick and gd graphics support. What rpm packages provide these. I
have tried a yum install ImageMagicK with yum responding nothing todo. Is
imageMagicK
on 7-11-2008 4:17 PM Al Sparks spake the following:
I was tasked with migrating a bunch of printer entries from one box to another.
What I did is I got a list of printer names along with IP addresses and using
the CUPS
lpadmin -p printer-name -E -v lpd://IP_ADDR/lp
I loaded them onto the
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 7-11-2008 4:17 PM Al Sparks spake the following:
I was tasked with migrating a bunch of printer entries from one box to
another.
What I did is I got a list of printer names along with IP addresses and
using the CUPS
Dag Wieers wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Kurt Hansen wrote:
I just installed Centos 5.2 on my wife's IBM thinkpad T41 with
Atheros wireless.
It looks like I need to install madwifi to get the wireless to work.
Our home wireless network uses WPA2
I found the EL5 rpms at atrpms, but there is
on 7-14-2008 3:14 PM Akemi Yagi spake the following:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Scott Silva ssilva-m4n3GYAQT2lWk0Htik3J/[EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
on 7-11-2008 4:17 PM Al Sparks spake the following:
I was tasked with migrating a bunch of printer entries from one box to
another.
What I
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Kurt Hansen wrote:
Dag Wieers wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Kurt Hansen wrote:
I just installed Centos 5.2 on my wife's IBM thinkpad T41 with Atheros
wireless.
It looks like I need to install madwifi to get the wireless to work. Our
home wireless network uses WPA2
I
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Kurt Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dag Wieers wrote:
If you actually looked at the CentOS wiki, you would have found this when
searching for madwifi:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless
which should help. If it doesn't, we'd be pleased to
on 7-14-2008 3:14 PM Akemi Yagi spake the following:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Scott Silva ssilva-m4n3GYAQT2lWk0Htik3J/[EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
on 7-11-2008 4:17 PM Al Sparks spake the following:
I was tasked with migrating a bunch of printer entries from one box to
another.
What I
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Perrin wrote:
http://linux.duke.edu/~skvidal/useful-scripts/kernel-prune.py
this will generate a list of old kernel bits you don't need. You can
pipe it through rpm -e for cleanup.
So what you are saying is that it
Hello,
I have found the sysctl setting to net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_max value
reset everyday, may I know is there a way to set it permanently?
I have set it to 15, but it reset to 65535 in few hours.
The running Centos is version 4 and kernel version is 2.6.9-55.0.12.ELsmp.
Do I
There seems to be some hostility to the idea of this being a GNOME or
Evolution problem:
Bug 542280 – Refuses to report bugs because gnome 2.16.x is too old
View Bug Activity
Product:bug-buddy
Component: general
Version:2.16.x
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: WONTFIX
I am bringing up a Miredo server and relay on my new iPv6 network.
I have been reading the RFC and the man pages.
One of the many vague points is the udp port used by the Miredo client
in relay mode. Is it 'random' or is it 3545? How do I find out what it is?
Plus how do I set up my server
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I set up this environment variable on my notebook. Would I modify my
.bash_profile file, and is the format of the added line:\
VNC_VIA_CMD=/usr/bin/ssh -p 7722 -f -L $L:$H:$R $G sleep 20
You could actually do
MHR wrote:
There seems to be some hostility to the idea of this being a GNOME or
Evolution problem:
Bug 542280 – Refuses to report bugs because gnome 2.16.x is too old
View Bug Activity
Product:bug-buddy
Component: general
Version:2.16.x
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, the fact is that bug buddy is NOT required to make bugzilla entries
for RHEL. If you have a bug, file a bug against the component that is the
problem. The fact that bug buddy does not file it directly to gnome
79 matches
Mail list logo
