[CentOS-docs] Wiki: Table Border

2008-07-18 Thread Marcus Moeller
Hi all. Is there a way to create a table without a border in the wiki? Btw. could anybody please tell me which software is used for the wiki? Is it a well-known system or something self-created? Best Regards Marcus Möller ___ CentOS-docs mailing list

Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki: Table Border

2008-07-18 Thread Marcus Moeller
Hi Ralph Is there a way to create a table without a border in the wiki? Btw. could anybody please tell me which software is used for the wiki? Is it a well-known system or something self-created? I thought it says MoinMoin all over the place? Yes, already got it now. Thanks Best

Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki: Table Border

2008-07-18 Thread Marcus Moeller
Hi all. I have now started studying the MoinMoin Syntax eg. on: http://moinmo.in/HelpOnLinking Now I want to align an image on the right side of the page. I have tried to use the following command: {{attachment:an image.png|alt text|align=right}} which does not work probably. How can I modify

[CentOS-docs] Re: Create page about rebuilding SRPMS and preparing RPM environment

2008-07-18 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, Without trying to start another heated discussion, are we going to create a specific page on creating a building infrastructure for RPMs and on how to rebuild a SRPM? My original e-mail from last week follows. Please let me know if you want me to contribute. Thanks a lot, Filipe On Fri,

Re: [CentOS-docs] Re: Create page about rebuilding SRPMS and preparing RPM environment

2008-07-18 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 16:44, Marcus Moeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would personally welcome such a Documentation (if it's maintained, of course) Yes, I *do* intend to maintain it. I would be more than glad to be able to help contribute to the CentOS project from which I have gotten so

Re: [CentOS-docs] Re: Create page about rebuilding SRPMS and preparing RPM environment

2008-07-18 Thread Marcus Moeller
Dear Filipe. I would personally welcome such a Documentation (if it's maintained, of course) Yes, I *do* intend to maintain it. I would be more than glad to be able to help contribute to the CentOS project from which I have gotten so much. So I don't really understand the discussion. Ask

Re: [CentOS-docs] Re: Create page about rebuilding SRPMS and preparing RPM environment

2008-07-18 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 17:04, Marcus Moeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would personally welcome such a Documentation (if it's maintained, of course) Yes, I *do* intend to maintain it. I would be more than glad to be able to help contribute to the CentOS project from which I have gotten so

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0598 Critical CentOS 4 s390(x) firefox - security update

2008-07-18 Thread Pasi Pirhonen
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0598 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0598.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/firefox-1.5.0.12-0.21.el4.centos.s390.rpm s390x:

Re: [CentOS-es] montar USB en centos 5.1

2008-07-18 Thread Miguel A. Velasco
Hola Jaime, prueba poniendo $tail -f /var/log/messages cuando conectes la memoria usb y ves si el sistema te está reconociendo la unidad. Si la reconoce tienes que revisar donde y luego montarla con el comando mount. Saludos, Miguel Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez escribió: Jaime H. Díaz G. wrote:

[CentOS-es] eBox para Centos 5.1

2008-07-18 Thread Abelardo Ramírez Ferrer
Hola a todos, estoy tratando de instalarlo, he tratado con yum, en rpmforge o en eboxproject los fuentes y nada. Por otra parte no aparece nada explicito en google. ¿ Alguien lo ha instalado, me pueden ayudar ? Saludos ___ CentOS-es mailing list

[CentOS-es] Problemas con instalacion de centos y ubuntu

2008-07-18 Thread Rene Parrado
Hola, acabo de tratar de instalar 2 distribuciones (Centos y Ubuntu 8.04), pero lastimosamente tengo serios problemas, que paso a detallar para ver quien me pueda dar una mano. 1. primero instale centos con la siguiente estructura: /hda1 /boot /hda2 /swap /hda3 / 2. en segundo lugar instale

Re: [CentOS] Getting printer to work under 5.2

2008-07-18 Thread Anne Wilson
On Friday 18 July 2008 00:48:17 Donald Buchan wrote: Yes on both counts. That's where I was dealing with the parts about the one-dependancy-mentionned-at-a-time part. No luck, hence the reason for uninstalling it and reverting to the yum repository. Please don't top-post, Donald. It makes

[CentOS] Re: Bonding and Xen

2008-07-18 Thread Axel Thimm
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 03:34:56PM -0500, Victor Padro wrote: Does anyone has implemented this sucessfully? Yes and no. :/ I am asking this because we are implementing Xen on our test lab machines, which they hold up to three 3com and intel Nics 10/100mbps based. These servers are meant to

[CentOS] Spamassassin as root and pyzor

2008-07-18 Thread Hywel Richards
I've just set up a new mailserver using Centos5.2 (sendmail+clamav-milter+spamass-milter). I'm using the spamass-milter package from rpmforge (spamass-milter-0.3.1-1.el5.rf). I notice that the default setup is to run it as root. I set up my previous mailserver on Centos4, and I can't

[CentOS] Setting max limits in /etc/security/limits.conf

2008-07-18 Thread Dr R L Oswald
What we would like to do on a server running CENTOS 4.6 is to restrict max cpu time for most interactive users but ensure that processes for system users such as root special userids that provide services are kept as unlimited. The documentation for limits.conf is not very extensive but I

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 41, Issue 9

2008-07-18 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can

Re: [CentOS] Raw device gone after reboot (Centos 5.2)!!!

2008-07-18 Thread mcclnx mcc
Thank you for answer.   CENTOS 5.2 does not have rawdevices services and also NO /etc/udev/permissions.d file any more. --- 08/7/17 (星期四),Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 寫道: 寄件者: Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 主旨: Re: [CentOS] Raw device gone after reboot (Centos 5.2)!!! 收件者: CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] bcm43xx CentOS5

2008-07-18 Thread Michael Simpson
I have other wireless devices using the same AP with no problems, and the same laptop performs well when booted into Windows, so this appears to be a problem with the bcm43xx drivers. I keep hoping that each kernel update will improve the situation, but so far in vain. b43 is great with the

Re: [CentOS] Raw device gone after reboot (Centos 5.2)!!!

2008-07-18 Thread mcclnx mcc
Since CENTOS 5 does not have rawdevices service any more.  Raw device can not automatic mount on boot time.   Does there has way to work around? --- 08/7/17 (星期四),nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] 寫道: 寄件者: nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] 主旨: Re: [CentOS] Raw device gone after reboot (Centos 5.2)!!! 收件者:

[CentOS] End of support / life

2008-07-18 Thread Sam Drinkard
Since I'm not ready to upgrade to the CentOS 5 line anytime soon, Can someone tell me when support for the 4 line will come? Many thanks... Sam ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] End of support / life

2008-07-18 Thread Peter Kjellstrom
On Friday 18 July 2008, Sam Drinkard wrote: Since I'm not ready to upgrade to the CentOS 5 line anytime soon, Can someone tell me when support for the 4 line will come? Not very surprisingly available at the obvious place on www.centos.org:

Re: [CentOS] End of support / life

2008-07-18 Thread Jim Perrin
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Sam Drinkard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since I'm not ready to upgrade to the CentOS 5 line anytime soon, Can someone tell me when support for the 4 line will come? Many thanks... There's http://centos.org/product.html which lays it all out for you, specs

[CentOS] Difference between system-config-* and system-config-*-tui ?

2008-07-18 Thread Fabrice La Farina
Hello List, I have a little question. What is the difference between the system-config-* and system-config-*-tui ? Thank you. Fabrice ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Yum strangeness

2008-07-18 Thread Sam Drinkard
Hi all, I was about to do an update on my server, but looking at what the output was and here's the output from the beginning with other parts left off. I currently don't even have the clamav server installed, but am using the 0.93 version of clamav-milter. I've never seen yum throw in

Re: [CentOS] Difference between system-config-* and system-config-*-tui ?

2008-07-18 Thread drew einhorn
tui = text user interface runs in an terminal don't need X windows. On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 6:52 AM, Fabrice La Farina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello List, I have a little question. What is the difference between the system-config-* and system-config-*-tui ? Thank you. Fabrice

[CentOS] Send smtp email with mailx on centos

2008-07-18 Thread Miguel A. Velasco
Hi all, I´d like to know what may I configure to send emails from my server with mailx please. I need to send mails to my email adress ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) with logs and I am not able to do. Best regards and thanks for your time, Miguel ___ CentOS

[CentOS] nfs high load issues

2008-07-18 Thread Monty Shinn
Greetings. When I pull data from server A to server B, with nfs, server B reports a high load when viewed via uptime. The load is upwards of 6.x. Server A's load remains light. When I push the data, server A's and B's loads are relatively light. When I change the mount point from nfs to

Re: [CentOS] Raw device gone after reboot (Centos 5.2)!!!

2008-07-18 Thread Jeff
2008/7/18 mcclnx mcc [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thank you for answer. CENTOS 5.2 does not have rawdevices services and also NO /etc/udev/permissions.d file any more. OK, so I'm still on CentOS 4 which has /etc/udev/permissions.d. CentOS 5 has /etc/udev with different subdirectory structure, but I'm

RE: [CentOS] Getting printer to work under 5.2

2008-07-18 Thread John
Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anne Wilson Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 4:14 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Getting printer to work under 5.2 On Friday 18 July 2008 00:48:17 Donald Buchan wrote: Yes on both counts.

Re: [CentOS] Yum strangeness

2008-07-18 Thread Jeff
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Sam Drinkard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I was about to do an update on my server, but looking at what the output was and here's the output from the beginning with other parts left off. I currently don't even have the clamav server installed, but am

Re: [CentOS] preferred software RAID 10?

2008-07-18 Thread Linux
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 4:15 AM, David Mackintosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To get back to the OP: I've done a RAID-10 under CentOS, and the problem I encountered was that the kernel wasn't smart enough to assemble the RAID without a properly populated /etc/mdadm.conf file. Well, I have many

Re: [CentOS] Spamassassin as root and pyzor

2008-07-18 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Hywel Richards wrote: I've just set up a new mailserver using Centos5.2 (sendmail+clamav-milter+spamass-milter). I'm using the spamass-milter package from rpmforge (spamass-milter-0.3.1-1.el5.rf). I notice that the default setup is to run it as root. I set up my

[CentOS] Re: lvm errors after replacing drive in raid 10 array [SOLVED ?]

2008-07-18 Thread Mike
Just for the record I'm about 98.7% sure that the root problem here was that the LVM stuff (pvcreate, vgcreate, lvcreate) was done when booted from systemrescuecd and had nothing to do with replacing a failed drive. The ouptut from 'pvcreate --version' on the systemrescuecd is: LVM version:

Re: [CentOS] Getting printer to work under 5.2

2008-07-18 Thread Anne Wilson
On Friday 18 July 2008 15:10:11 John wrote: Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anne Wilson Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 4:14 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Getting printer to work under 5.2 On Friday 18 July 2008

Re: [CentOS] OT - Windows slowdown?

2008-07-18 Thread Guy Boisvert
Martyn Hare wrote: This is so barely on topic it's just plain _wrong_, but it's the only thing I can give useful input on based on [bad] experience. That said it's not _that_ offtopic given Xen can run Windows and CentOS includes Xen technology ;-) Then this list could become the list of

Re: [CentOS] Yum strangeness

2008-07-18 Thread Johnny Hughes
Jeff wrote: On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Sam Drinkard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I was about to do an update on my server, but looking at what the output was and here's the output from the beginning with other parts left off. I currently don't even have the clamav server

Re: [CentOS] Yum strangeness

2008-07-18 Thread William L. Maltby
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 09:17 -0500, Jeff wrote: On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Sam Drinkard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I was about to do an update on my server, but looking at what the output was and here's the output from the beginning with other parts left off. I currently

Re: [CentOS] OT - Windows slowdown?

2008-07-18 Thread Rainer Duffner
Guy Boisvert schrieb: A discussion about slowliness or not of Winblows SP3 is *SURELY* off topic in the CentOS list! I still don't know how the original poster came with all this in the CentOS list. I mean, for Winblows stuff, i'd post to a Winblows list first! Because the idiot-density

Re: [CentOS] OT - Windows slowdown?

2008-07-18 Thread Rudi Ahlers
Rainer Duffner wrote: Guy Boisvert schrieb: A discussion about slowliness or not of Winblows SP3 is *SURELY* off topic in the CentOS list! I still don't know how the original poster came with all this in the CentOS list. I mean, for Winblows stuff, i'd post to a Winblows list first!

Re: [CentOS] Yum strangeness

2008-07-18 Thread Lorenzo Quatrini
William L. Maltby ha scritto: And look at using the yum priorities plugin so you can safely mix repos. I have one question about this: Which is the safest setup for priorities? base, update and extras: priority=1 ATrpms (which should not replace _any_ base package): priority=10 rpmforge

RE: [CentOS] Difference between system-config-* andsystem-config-*-tui ?

2008-07-18 Thread Fabrice La Farina
Hello Drew Oh.., tank you :-) -- With best regards, Fabrice La Farina From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of drew einhorn Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 3:12 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Difference between system-config-* andsystem-config-*-tui ?

Re: [CentOS] Yum strangeness

2008-07-18 Thread Johnny Hughes
Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: William L. Maltby ha scritto: And look at using the yum priorities plugin so you can safely mix repos. I have one question about this: Which is the safest setup for priorities? base, update and extras: priority=1 ATrpms (which should not replace _any_ base

Re: [CentOS] OT - Windows slowdown?

2008-07-18 Thread William L. Maltby
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 17:19 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: Rainer Duffner wrote: Guy Boisvert schrieb: snip This list is not too busy - it's still a bearable volume. But I admit I don't read everything. snip empty lines and sig stuff I actually got kicked off a local Linux list for asking

[CentOS] semi OT: logwatch results

2008-07-18 Thread Robert - elists
Semi Off Topic My searching hasn't found what I consider superior info, and we are wondering from others experience on this list... In the logwatch results we all see the info below on almost a daily basis I have taken the liberty of combining logwatch results from centos 4 and 5 machines for

Re: [CentOS] semi OT: logwatch results

2008-07-18 Thread Brent L. Bates
We've been seeing the same type of entries in our Web server logs for at least a couple months now and not just a few entires. It isn't just `azenv.php', but references to other PHP files that do not exist on our systems. They've hit some of our servers so hard I figured it must be some

Re: [CentOS] OT - Windows slowdown?

2008-07-18 Thread Guy Boisvert
Rudi Ahlers wrote: Rainer Duffner wrote: Guy Boisvert wrote: A discussion about slowliness or not of Winblows SP3 is *SURELY* off topic in the CentOS list! I still don't know how the original poster came with all this in the CentOS list. I mean, for Winblows stuff, i'd post to a Winblows

[CentOS] Re-initialized luci database

2008-07-18 Thread Lopez, Denise
Hi all, I was just wondering if there was a way to re-initialize a luci database installation. I am trying to setup a 2 node cluster and keep getting error retrieving batch xxx information Also noticed a Configuration Version error so I wanted to recreate the luci database and start

Re: [CentOS] OT - Windows slowdown?

2008-07-18 Thread Anne Wilson
On Friday 18 July 2008 17:57:13 Guy Boisvert wrote: Majority of little companies choose Winblows by default thinking that you just put a server into a closet and forget about it.   The majority of little companies don't even know that there is an option. The one good thing that has come out of

[CentOS] configuration request

2008-07-18 Thread Sam Drinkard
I've apparently gotten myself into somewhat of a bind. I've been trying to exclude various packages from the different repos, and while I *think* I've gotten a working configuration again, it it still pulling stuff in that I have excluded I think in the right repos, but things I have no use

[CentOS] 2 questions on diskless client setup.

2008-07-18 Thread centos
Using Centos 5.2 upgraded from 5.0 using yum on a couple of old Dells in a lab environment. I don't think hardware is part of the problem, just need configuration help. 1: I can boot the diskless client and it come up, but when I do a mount command on the client, the output is

Re: [CentOS] configuration request

2008-07-18 Thread MJT
On Friday 18 July 2008 12:56:30 pm Sam Drinkard wrote: I've apparently gotten myself into somewhat of a bind. I've been trying to exclude various packages from the different repos, and while I *think* I've gotten a working configuration again, it it still pulling stuff in that I have excluded

[CentOS] Re: OT - Windows slowdown?

2008-07-18 Thread Scott Silva
on 7-18-2008 8:11 AM Rainer Duffner spake the following: Guy Boisvert schrieb: A discussion about slowliness or not of Winblows SP3 is *SURELY* off topic in the CentOS list! I still don't know how the original poster came with all this in the CentOS list. I mean, for Winblows stuff, i'd

[CentOS] Re: OT - Windows slowdown?

2008-07-18 Thread Scott Silva
snip Then one could probably say that if you get support for Linux, it could be as expansive as Winblows (hourly based) and that's true. But i always return to the root of the difference and illustrate the techniques used by Redmond to modify standards, to get clients captive, etc. I still

[CentOS] Re: Setting max limits in /etc/security/limits.conf

2008-07-18 Thread Scott Silva
on 7-18-2008 4:24 AM Dr R L Oswald spake the following: What we would like to do on a server running CENTOS 4.6 is to restrict max cpu time for most interactive users but ensure that processes for system users such as root special userids that provide services are kept as unlimited. The

Re: [CentOS] Re: OT - Windows slowdown?

2008-07-18 Thread MHR
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm glad you feel that way because I have been having this pain in my shoulder ;-P Scott, I thought you /were/ that pain in the shoulder ;^) mhr ___ CentOS mailing

Re: [CentOS] Re: OT - Windows slowdown?

2008-07-18 Thread MHR
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That is why Bill Gates is a billionaire, and Linus Torvalds isn't. I would argue that BG is a billionaire because he is a salesman, whereas Linus is a dedicated professional software engineer. Which is also why most of

Re: [CentOS] Re: OT - Windows slowdown?

2008-07-18 Thread Steve Thompson
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Scott Silva wrote: That is why Bill Gates is a billionaire, and Linus Torvalds isn't. And who is the happier, I wonder? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] How to examine crash dump of Centos Kernel

2008-07-18 Thread Nataraj
Hi, I have been able to successfully use crash to examine a crash dump of kernel-PAE-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5 using the following command: crash /boot/System.map-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5PAE /usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.6.el5PAE/vmlinux ./vmcore I then installed the package

Re: [CentOS] Send smtp email with mailx on centos

2008-07-18 Thread Paul Schoonderwoerd
On Friday 18 July 2008 15:42:31 Miguel A. Velasco wrote: Hi all, I´d like to know what may I configure to send emails from my server with mailx please. I need to send mails to my email adress ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) with logs and I am not able to do. Best regards and thanks for your time,

Re: [CentOS] semi OT: logwatch results

2008-07-18 Thread John Thomas
Robert - elists wrote: GET http://scifi.pages.at/myproxies/azenv.php HTTP/1.1 with response code(s) 404 1 responses I installed fail2ban from rpmforge and created a filter that bans these type of things. Here is my novice attempt at the failregex = HOST - - \[.*\] \GET

RE: [CentOS] Getting printer to work under 5.2

2008-07-18 Thread John
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anne Wilson Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 10:39 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Getting printer to work under 5.2 On Friday 18 July 2008 15:10:11 John wrote: Original Message-