CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0965
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0965.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/lynx-2.8.5-18.2.c4.1.s390.rpm
s390x:
Kenneth Tanzer wrote:
Unfortunately, as it turns out, there are then a bunch of additional
Asterisk modules that I would need to build for the xen kernel, and I
didn't have any luck finding the source, so I think I might give up on
this for a while.
If you are using paravirtualisation then
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Kenneth Tanzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I ended up doing was looking at my working CentOS PV guest, listing all
the modules, and finding the ones that were not loaded in my AsteriskNow
guest. That seemed to do the trick, and it booted. (Once I realized
Hola gente,
Estoy necesitando recomendaciones sobre softwares para implementacion
de Change Controls.
La finalidad es hacer los paso entre ambientes de desarrollo y
produccion, con una aplicacion de control de cambios, teoricos no
necesito que mueva los archivos solo que maneje el flujo de
Hello,
Just in case anyone wants to follow my original problem in the future, I
resolved my no swap problem according to Nate's advice as follows:
1. Confirmed that /dev/VolGroup00/swap was not in use by the system
2. Ran the following commands:
mkswap /dev/VolGroup00/swap
swapon
Thanks guys for help!
Work is done, everything went fine ..
Have a nice day,
D.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:24 PM, William L. Maltby
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 10:15 -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
snip
Reduce the filesystem to 78G or 79G with resize2fs, then reduce
Hi,
for what it's worth, I'm running CentOS 5 with the planet-core,
planet-ccrma and novell-mono repos which exist for centos/rhel5 these
days. The planet-core repo contains the 2.6.24.7 with realtime patches
and other goodness for audio/video stuffs. I've been using this setup
for about 6 months
On Thursday 30 October 2008 21:00:35 Marc Wiatrowski wrote:
I'm trying to set the context on an nfs mounted /home. I believe
exactly like in Redhat's Deployment Guide at
http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5.2/html/Deployme
nt_Guide/ch45s02s03.html
On my system
John R Pierce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) kirjoitteli (30.10.2008 17:39):
and what about the user accounts in /etc/passwd ?
Hm, yes, never thought of that! That would be a very good (certainly easy)
approach, though with its own limitations (it misses those users whose mail
is forwarded in /etc/aliases
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 08:59:46PM -0700, John R Pierce enlightened us:
nate wrote:
ESX is not based on linux at all. ESX(not ESXi) includes
a service console that is based off of RHEL-3 though
that is for management only, virtualization runs entirely
within the hypervisor which is
David Mackintosh wrote:
[...] ignorant, unappreciative, self-centered, and emotionally immature [...]
You tripped the irony detector.
That's exactly what I was thinking.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Dear All,
its a offtopic question but really apprecite if someone would advise n help
i have been running a mil server with sendmail
and have sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org as my dnsbl.
i had other servers which are alredy out now
that is relays.ordb.org and dsbl.org have already been out of my
fabian dacunha wrote:
its a offtopic question but really apprecite if someone would advise n help
i have been running a mil server with sendmail
and have sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org as my dnsbl.
i had other servers which are alredy out now
that is relays.ordb.org and dsbl.org have already been
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
fabian dacunha wrote:
its a offtopic question but really apprecite if someone would advise n help
i have been running a mil server with sendmail
and have sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org as my dnsbl.
i had other servers which are alredy out now
that is relays.ordb.org and dsbl.org
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Ned Slider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
fabian dacunha wrote:
its a offtopic question but really apprecite if someone would advise n
help
i have been running a mil server with sendmail
and have sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org as my dnsbl.
i had
Phil Schaffner wrote:
IMHO should be a separate repo, or at least a naming scheme that would
let people still use the traditional centos-plus kernels
Sure, thats a bridge to cross when we have someone offering to maintain
this. And I was already thinking along those lines..
- KB
John R Pierce wrote:
does ESX have all its own direct hardware support?
Yes it does. You shall be OK if you want to go for branded hardware from
Sun, Dell, HP, IBM etc. But for the whitebox PC, it is quite (and
sometimes costly) to get the right combination.
My best combo are now :
a.
snip
Anyone have any experience dealing with SURBL? I have a client who's
domain and IP is not listed in SURBL, but their client in China is using
SURBL and my client's emails are getting blocked. Can't seem to find
how SURBL is blocking them
Could the client in China either have an old
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Anyone have any experience dealing with SURBL? I have a client who's
domain and IP is not listed in SURBL, but their client in China is using
SURBL and my client's emails are getting blocked. Can't seem to find
Thanks guys for ur immediate reply
do apprecite
i try to incoporate some of the RBLS and check it out
regards
simon
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Ned Slider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
fabian dacunha wrote:
its a offtopic question but really apprecite if
Alle,
Here is our situation:
Our customer leases their machines from us and contract us to to manage
them (as far as all systems administration issues). The customer does
not have root access to any machine (by their own choice, as they want
us to be responsible if something goes
At 01:34 PM 10/31/2008, you wrote:
Thanks guys for ur immediate reply
do apprecite
i try to incoporate some of the RBLS and check it out
regards
simon
Depending upon your outcome, there are other methods you can use to
modify for better results. You may find inserting the RBL in sendmail
on 10-31-2008 10:14 AM Matt Shields spake the following:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Scott Silva
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Anyone have any experience dealing with SURBL? I have a client who's
domain and IP is not listed in SURBL, but
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Camron W. Fox wrote:
[Our customer has] asked, that we change the default directory
permission/ownership of /var/www/html,cgi-bin, instead of using the
Documentroot and ScriptAlias parameters in the apache configuration.
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jan 11 2008
on 10-31-2008 10:32 AM Camron W. Fox spake the following:
Alle,
Here is our situation:
Our customer leases their machines from us and contract us to to
manage them (as far as all systems administration issues). The customer
does not have root access to any machine (by their own
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Camron W. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What argument, if any, would you use to try and convince the customer
that this is a bad idea/bad practice?
Well, it's entirely possible that on update, the permissions they set
will be overridden since the httpd
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Michael Semcheski [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 2:30 AM, Niki Kovacs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The GIMP probably is going to require a very *long* learning curve. It
has the power of
Adobe Photoshop and may not be something casual users
At 02:57 PM 10/31/2008, you wrote:
I recommend taking a good look at Digicam. For the types of tasks
listed above, its very good and fairly easy. It also supports bulk
processing, tagging images, etc.
Its part image database and part image manipulator.
Link? Please? Digicam gives too many
On Friday 31 October 2008 19:26:20 Glenn wrote:
At 02:57 PM 10/31/2008, you wrote:
I recommend taking a good look at Digicam. For the types of tasks
listed above, its very good and fairly easy. It also supports bulk
processing, tagging images, etc.
Its part image database and part image
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
John R Pierce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) kirjoitteli (30.10.2008 17:39):
and what about the user accounts in /etc/passwd ?
Hm, yes, never thought of that! That would be a very good (certainly easy)
approach, though with its own limitations (it misses those users
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Anne Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 31 October 2008 19:26:20 Glenn wrote:
At 02:57 PM 10/31/2008, you wrote:
I recommend taking a good look at Digicam. For the types of tasks
listed above, its very good and fairly easy. It also supports bulk
CentOS 5.2 with OpenLDAP 2.3.27, nss_ldap_253.13, using TLS, i686 and
x86_64.
If a user with an expired password (shadowLastChange + shadowMax current
day) logs in to a system where ldap.conf points first to a consumer-only
LDAP server, the password change operation (exop) proceeds and fails
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 16:32 -0400, Steve Thompson wrote:
CentOS 5.2 with OpenLDAP 2.3.27, nss_ldap_253.13, using TLS, i686 and
x86_64.
LDAP password information update failed: Referral
If I comment out ssl start_tls, the referral to the master is followed
and the password change
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Scott McClanahan wrote:
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 16:32 -0400, Steve Thompson wrote:
CentOS 5.2 with OpenLDAP 2.3.27, nss_ldap_253.13, using TLS, i686 and
x86_64.
LDAP password information update failed: Referral
If I comment out ssl start_tls, the referral to the
Fabian dacunha wrote on Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:49:18 +0300 (AST):
its a offtopic question
That doesn't mean that you can't give it a meaningful subject. Thanks.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 18:32, Steve Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the common name in the certificate or the x509 v3 extensions match
the hostname used in the referral in your slapd.conf? Is the
certificate issued by the ldap server you are being referred to signed
by a trusted
36 matches
Mail list logo
