Re: [CentOS-docs] Anaconda Slides Translations

2009-01-08 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
Hello While playing around I have noticed that both files below https://projects.centos.org/trac/artwork/browser/trunk/Translations/5/Themes/Anaconda/Progress/First/ include the following line: s!=VERSION=!6! Is it intended ? Shouldn't there be a 5 instead of 6?

Re: [CentOS-docs] Merging Documentation and Help pages

2009-01-08 Thread Dag Wieers
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote: Dag Wieers wrote: Can someone give me these rights so I can slaughter some of the MoinMoin stuff that is irrelevant to wiki contributors and users ? You need to be superuser for that, which is an ACL which cannot be given away in the wiki. Which

Re: [CentOS-docs] Anaconda Slides Translations

2009-01-08 Thread Alain Reguera Delgado
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Manuel Wolfshant wrote: Hello While playing around I have noticed that both files below https://projects.centos.org/trac/artwork/browser/trunk/Translations/5/Themes/Anaconda/Progress/First/ include the following line:

Re: [CentOS-docs] Anaconda Slides Translations

2009-01-08 Thread bulmoji-centos
--- 09/1/7 (수)에 Alain Reguera Delgado a...@ciget.cienfuegos.cu님이 쓰신 메시지: Register an account on https://projects.centos.org/trac/artwork/ then let it know to Karan. He is the artwork svn repo admin :D. Hello, I updated kr directory but I couldn't commit them. Can I have commit permission

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0002 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 thunderbird Update

2009-01-08 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0002 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0002.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: aa96f24e18be10c9a08de9526d077a6e

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0018 Important CentOS 5 i386 xterm Update

2009-01-08 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0018 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0018.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: a72234eabded09c1b96a3b714dd3c626

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0011 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 lcms Update

2009-01-08 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0011 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0011.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: f52faaaf9b87ae5872870a18ca4a051f

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0008 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 dbus Update

2009-01-08 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0008 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0008.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: fa62a17a3aceed66c51e847e3075c397

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0004 Important CentOS 5 i386 openssl Update

2009-01-08 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0004 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0004.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 2a913c110d33659b1252c68e35702817

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0011 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 lcms Update

2009-01-08 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0011 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0011.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 0ce59602baabebe04bc13fcb0dee7a0f

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0004 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 openssl Update

2009-01-08 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0004 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0004.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: f9f9060eea82c0853c32a3d75b306b9d

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0003 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 xen Update

2009-01-08 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0003 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0003.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: c926211dfbb52c38e607ff0dad77e62a

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0004 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 openssl Update

2009-01-08 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0004 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0004.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 157a0bf2b3cbd09c2b1c8ff75ea7bcc8

[CentOS-virt] Activity logger for Xen Guest Domains using libvirt

2009-01-08 Thread Devraj Mukherjee
Hi all, Wondering if anyone knows of any tools I can run on my Dom0 to log various stats (like CPU usage, memory usage, etc) for each guest domain for analysis over a period of time? I can see that xentop displays that information anyway but would be nice to be able to present that information on

Re: [CentOS-es] Error Qmail y maildrop

2009-01-08 Thread Sergio Villalba Moreno
Gracias por tu respuesta. MTA es qmail, maildrop lo uso con Vpopmail como dominios virtuales. Estoy investigando el problema, sino encuentro nada en claro, reinstalare todo el servidor. Gracias por todo. Saludos. -Mensaje original- De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org

[CentOS-es] consumo de espacio/transferencia

2009-01-08 Thread Sergio Villalba Moreno
Hola a t...@s, Conocéis alguna herramienta tipo panel de control o aplicación que me indique el espacio utilizado por virtualhost o carpeta y el tráfico generado por dominio o archivo .php .html. .jpg etc. es para un servidor Web PHP. Desde ya, Gracias.

[CentOS] Centos 4.3 Download

2009-01-08 Thread Per Qvindesland
Hello List Apologies but is there anyone that knows where I can download a x86_64 dvd iso? Regards Per Qvindesland ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos 4.3 Download

2009-01-08 Thread Tom Brown
Apologies but is there anyone that knows where I can download a x86_64 dvd iso? You wont find a DVD iso for 4.3 from http as its bigger than the standard apache filesize limit http://vault.centos.org/4.3/isos/i386/ Either get the CD iso's and make them into a DVD iso yourself or use

Re: [CentOS] Centos 4.3 Download

2009-01-08 Thread Tom Brown
http://vault.centos.org/4.3/isos/i386/ clearly that link should be http://vault.centos.org/4.3/isos/x86_64/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos 4.3 Download

2009-01-08 Thread Per Qvindesland
Hi Cheers, I decided to rather download the 4.3 server version then trying to find a 4.3 dvd download. Regards Per Qvindesland On 1/8/09 10:33 AM, Tom Brown t...@ng23.net wrote: Apologies but is there anyone that knows where I can download a x86_64 dvd iso? You wont find a DVD

Re: [CentOS] Centos 4.3 Download

2009-01-08 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Per Qvindesland wrote on Thu, 08 Jan 2009 10:24:26 +0100: Apologies You would not need to apologize if you would stop hijacking other threads. If you send a new question then hit the new message button, please! Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:

[CentOS] DNS Issues

2009-01-08 Thread Per Qvindesland
Hello List I am having a second thing and this time I made sure that I did not hijack any other threads :-) I have a pptp vpn server that works just fine except from dns, I can ping a server and it will resolv but no packages are being received, does anyone have any clues on how to sort this

Re: [CentOS] DNS Issues

2009-01-08 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Per Qvindesland wrote on Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:50:59 +0100: I have a pptp vpn server that works just fine except from dns, I can ping a server and it will resolv but no packages are being received, Maybe it's just me, but I don't understand this. Does except from dns mean you have some problem

Re: [CentOS] Working - Checking fan state

2009-01-08 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Kai Schaetzl wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 19:55:19 -0500: Then I went into the BIOS and set it for the fan to always run while on AC. Wow, I didn't know there are BIOS settings for *that*. I guess it falls under the power management catagory. Since your on

Re: [CentOS] Working - Checking fan state

2009-01-08 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Robert Moskowitz wrote on Thu, 8 Jan 2009 08:26:35 -0500: I guess it falls under the power management catagory. Since your on AC, you are not worried about battery performance, so keep the fan going and don't be so fancy with managing temperature Well, yes, I just haven't seen it in a

Re: [CentOS] Working - Checking fan state

2009-01-08 Thread jkinz
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 01:28:41PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 19:55:19 -0500: Then I went into the BIOS and set it for the fan to always run while on AC. Wow, I didn't know there are BIOS settings for *that*. Some have it, some don't. You'll

[CentOS] Hierarchial storage management or automated archival to tape

2009-01-08 Thread Bent Terp
Hi list! While regular backup solutions like amanda or bacula are very good at their job, ie keeping point2point copies of the files currently on disk, I find them less suited for archiving - having unused files move to tape in duplo and stay there until requested. I've even read of multi-tier

Re: [CentOS] Hierarchial storage management or automated archival to tape

2009-01-08 Thread Tony Placilla
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:37 AM, in message 77c4f5c60901080737ka0ee2fbr7f6badc9fc48e...@mail.gmail.com, Bent Terp b...@terp.se wrote: Hi list! While regular backup solutions like amanda or bacula are very good at their job, ie keeping point2point copies of the files currently on disk, I

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-08 Thread Max Hetrick
René Standfest wrote: We have running at the moment eGroupWare, but we plan to migrate to SOGo (http://sogo.opengroupware.org) in the next two months (we had some annoying problems with eGW in the past). It has a really cool Webfrontend (looks like Thunderbird with Lightning) and has a really

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-08 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
We have running at the moment eGroupWare, but we plan to migrate to SOGo (http://sogo.opengroupware.org) in the next two months (we had some annoying problems with eGW in the past). It has a really cool Webfrontend (looks like Thunderbird with Lightning) and has a really functional

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-08 Thread Lars Schelde
Bo Lynch wrote: Just wanted to get some thoughts from the list. We are a public k-12 school and are looking to migrate to a groupware style system for out staff to collaborate better. Currently we are using Squirrelmail/postfix for email. Does anyone have any

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-08 Thread Max Hetrick
Adam Tauno Williams wrote: I develop on OpenGroupware, not SOGo, but both use SOPE's LDAP library/bindings. If the DSA supports LDAPv3 binds you shouldn't have any problems using it. I'd recommend OpenLDAP any day, as it is far-and-away the faster and more feature-reach DSA. But I very

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 47, Issue 1

2009-01-08 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-08 Thread René Standfest
Max Hetrick schrieb am 08.01.2009 17:23: We have running at the moment eGroupWare, but we plan to migrate to SOGo (http://sogo.opengroupware.org) in the next two months (we had some annoying problems with eGW in the past). It has a really cool Webfrontend (looks like Thunderbird with

Re: [CentOS] How to change an executable into a directory

2009-01-08 Thread MHR
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:59 PM, CM cris...@mail.multinet.ro wrote: On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:16:08 -0800 Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote: So, is there a way to change a file into a directory? Or am I crazy? Thanks. mhr No and Maybe! ;-P I beg to differ on the first

[CentOS] Update to Centos 5 anaconda kickstart %post bug?

2009-01-08 Thread Warren, Eucke
Is there a process for finding status updates to open bugs within Centos? The particular bug I am talking about is 0002329 http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2329. This was assigned on 01-20-2008 and, as far as I can tell, there's been no action other than it being acknowledged. I've also

Re: [CentOS] DNS Issues

2009-01-08 Thread Scott Silva
on 1-8-2009 4:28 AM Kai Schaetzl spake the following: Per Qvindesland wrote on Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:50:59 +0100: I have a pptp vpn server that works just fine except from dns, I can ping a server and it will resolv but no packages are being received, Maybe it's just me, but I don't

Re: [CentOS] Update to Centos 5 anaconda kickstart %post bug?

2009-01-08 Thread Scott Silva
on 1-8-2009 1:28 PM Warren, Eucke spake the following: Is there a process for finding status updates to open bugs within Centos? The particular bug I am talking about is 0002329 http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2329. This was assigned on 01-20-2008 and, as far as I can tell, there's been

Re: [CentOS] Update to Centos 5 anaconda kickstart %post bug?

2009-01-08 Thread Scott Silva
on 1-8-2009 2:33 PM Scott Silva spake the following: on 1-8-2009 1:28 PM Warren, Eucke spake the following: Is there a process for finding status updates to open bugs within Centos? The particular bug I am talking about is 0002329 http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2329. This was assigned on

[CentOS] Update to Centos 5 anaconda kickstart %post bug?

2009-01-08 Thread R P Herrold
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Scott Silva wrote: on 1-8-2009 1:28 PM Warren, Eucke spake the following: Is there a process for finding status updates to open bugs within Centos? -- view it in a web browser, and optionally 'monitor' it so emails of updated state are received -- offer to buy support

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0004 Important CentOS 5 i386 openssl Update

2009-01-08 Thread Karanbir Singh
Chris Schanzle wrote: Forgive me if this email is inappropriate, but are i686 packages going to be made available? They were in the original 5.2 release and in the base install on modern CPU's. Thanks! --Chris yes! they are in the upgrade queue, should be online in 45 min or so. --

Re: [CentOS] Update to Centos 5 anaconda kickstart %post bug?

2009-01-08 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Warren, Eucke ewar...@wms.com wrote: snip I appreciate the response. If you recall I did post the link so it's a safe assumption that I read the page and understood it's content. What I'm after is whether there's any other information channel that might not be

Re: [CentOS] Update to Centos 5 anaconda kickstart %post bug?

2009-01-08 Thread Scott Silva
on 1-8-2009 3:14 PM Warren, Eucke spake the following: Scott Silva wrote: The bug page gives you the status. It was assigned (to Karanbir), and he ack'ed it. If it was fixed, it would be resolved. It shouldn't be that hard to apply the fix manually and your legal department is too rigid if

Re: [CentOS] Update to Centos 5 anaconda kickstart %post bug?

2009-01-08 Thread Warren, Eucke
Lanny Marcus Wrote: Does that mean that your Legal Department does not permit you to upgrade your box, to get the latest packages, issued for Security Stability reasons? 5.1, as you are well aware, is not the latest and greatest. That is correct. What they approve is based on the contents

Re: [CentOS] Update to Centos 5 anaconda kickstart %post bug?

2009-01-08 Thread John R Pierce
Warren, Eucke wrote: Lanny Marcus Wrote: Does that mean that your Legal Department does not permit you to upgrade your box, to get the latest packages, issued for Security Stability reasons? 5.1, as you are well aware, is not the latest and greatest. That is correct.

Re: [CentOS] Update to Centos 5 anaconda kickstart %post bug?

2009-01-08 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote: on 1-8-2009 3:14 PM Warren, Eucke spake the following: snip I appreciate the response. If you recall I did post the link so it's a safe assumption that I read the page and understood it's content. What I'm after is

Re: [CentOS] Update to Centos 5 anaconda kickstart %post bug?

2009-01-08 Thread Warren, Eucke
Scott Silva wrote: You might want to hint to your legal department that unpatched servers sitting on the internet are just waiting to be hacked and exploited. The fact that they make you sit with an older version without any patches says that they have no idea how much damage can be done, or

[CentOS] Problems with RPM Database, usual techniques not working to recover DB

2009-01-08 Thread Brian Lynch
I have a CentOS 5.2 i386 Development server that has a rpm db problem that I can't seem to solve. I have followed all the advice on Daniel Berrange's page on rpm db recovery: http://people.redhat.com/berrange/notes/rpmrecovery.html With no results, all I get from rpm -qa is list of two public

Re: [CentOS] Update to Centos 5 anaconda kickstart %post bug?

2009-01-08 Thread Scott Silva
on 1-8-2009 3:41 PM Lanny Marcus spake the following: On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Scott Silva ssilva-m4n3GYAQT2lWk0Htik3J/w...@public.gmane.org wrote: on 1-8-2009 3:14 PM Warren, Eucke spake the following: snip I appreciate the response. If you recall I did post the link so it's a safe

Re: [CentOS] Problems with RPM Database, usual techniques not working to recover DB

2009-01-08 Thread Scott Silva
on 1-8-2009 3:55 PM Brian Lynch spake the following: I have a CentOS 5.2 i386 Development server that has a rpm db problem that I can't seem to solve. I have followed all the advice on Daniel Berrange's page on rpm db recovery: http://people.redhat.com/berrange/notes/rpmrecovery.html

Re: [CentOS] Update to Centos 5 anaconda kickstart %post bug?

2009-01-08 Thread Richard Karhuse
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Warren, Eucke ewar...@wms.com wrote: I am restricted to 5.1 as approved by legal. 5.2 is not approved so 5.3 isn't an option either. Once I can sort out whether something official will fix this I can then determine how to pursue this internally. A workaround

Re: [CentOS] Hierarchial storage management or automated archival to tape

2009-01-08 Thread Bent Terp
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Tony Placilla aplac...@jhuadig.admin.jhu.edu wrote: We use SAM-FS to do just that here in the libraries. http://opensolaris.org/os/project/samqfs/What_are_QFS_and_SAM/ Thanks for the pointer! Do you use SAM with QFS or ZFS? Or some sort of combo? /Bent

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-08 Thread Bo Lynch
On Wed, January 7, 2009 7:19 pm, Craig White wrote: On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 18:54 -0500, Bo Lynch wrote: So are you required to run zimbras release of these packages? If you are forced to use them then how delayed are the releases. Are you able to use something other than amavis and clam for

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-08 Thread Bill Campbell
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009, Bo Lynch wrote: On Wed, January 7, 2009 7:19 pm, Craig White wrote: On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 18:54 -0500, Bo Lynch wrote: ... zimbra is pretty much of a closed box in that they have already decided what / how / where you will run stuff and no, you can't run anything other

[CentOS] yum update nfs

2009-01-08 Thread Agile Aspect
Hi - when I'm running CentOS 4.4, and I run the command yum update nfs which version of NFS do I get - the version for CentOS 4.4, or the version for CentOS 4.7 (which I presume is the latest release)? Any help would be appreciated. -- Article. VI. Clause 3 of the constitution of the

[CentOS] Tesseract OCR

2009-01-08 Thread Timothy Kesten
Hi Folks, Is here someone, which has experiences with tesseract-ocr and CentOS 5? Where are suitable rpm's? Thx Timothy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Tesseract OCR - solved

2009-01-08 Thread Timothy Kesten
found suitable rpm on http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/5020161/com/tesseract-2.01-1.fc7.i386.rpm.html and it works. Bye Timothy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos