#304;nternette takip etti#287;in
t#252;m siteler tek t#305;k #246;tede! #8220;Benim
Mynetrsquo;im#8221; de!
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
Michael Klinosky wrote:
Hello.
I've been using Fedora since about the FC6 era, for home use. I don't
like the 6 month upgrade (or re-install) concept, and I don't need the
latest greatest versions of apps. So, CentOS sounds enticing.
A lot of desktop users come to CentOS for exactly that
Chan Chung Hang Christopher schrieb:
md1 will read from both disk is not true in general.
RAID1 md reads from one disk only; it uses the other one in case the
first one fails. No performance gain from multiple copies.
I beg to differ. I have disks in a raid1 md array and iostat -x 1 will
Kay Diederichs wrote:
hdparm -tT tests one type of disk access, other tools test other
aspects. I gave the hdparm numbers because everyone can reproduce them.
For RAID0 with two disks you do see - using e.g. hdparm - the doubling
of performance from two disks.
If you take the time to read
Michael A. Peters wrote:
5.2 has FireFox 3.0.5 (maybe has 3.0.6, I haven't done a yum update in
awhile) and started with Firefox 1.5 in CentOS 5.0
http://centos.org/docs/5/html/5.2/Package_Manifest/ar01s03.html
states 'firefox-3.0-0.beta5.6.el5'.
Are you saying that yum will bump it to at
Edited for brevity
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 05:08:07AM -0800, bruce wrote:
goat a bunch of files in different dirs.. the files might have spaces
1foo_ aa_bb_cc.dog
2foo_aa__cc.dog
3foo_aa_bb _ccc.dog
4foo_aa_bb_cc.dog
5foo_aa_bb_cc.dog
6foo_aa_bb_cc.dog
...how i can do a
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 06:04:00PM -0800, Michael A. Peters wrote:
CentOS 5.2 64-bit
I needed some space.
I have a hard drive that had an old Linux install I don't use anymore.
Lets call this your auxiliary drive.
So I edited /etc/fstab and removed the entries for it (entries I only
jk...@kinz.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 06:04:00PM -0800, Michael A. Peters wrote:
CentOS 5.2 64-bit
I needed some space.
I have a hard drive that had an old Linux install I don't use anymore.
Lets call this your auxiliary drive.
So I edited /etc/fstab and removed the entries
On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 07:02 -0500, Michael Klinosky wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
5.2 has FireFox 3.0.5 (maybe has 3.0.6, I haven't done a yum update in
awhile) and started with Firefox 1.5 in CentOS 5.0
http://centos.org/docs/5/html/5.2/Package_Manifest/ar01s03.html
states
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 6:04 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Kay Diederichs wrote:
hdparm -tT tests one type of disk access, other tools test other
aspects. I gave the hdparm numbers because everyone can reproduce them.
For RAID0 with two disks you do see - using e.g. hdparm -
Would running two CP command to copy 2 different set of files to two
different targets suffice as a basic two thread test?
So long as you generate disk access through a file system and not hdparm.
Is there a way to monitor actual disk transfers from command line without
having to do manual
Kay Diederichs wrote:
Chan Chung Hang Christopher schrieb:
md1 will read from both disk is not true in general.
RAID1 md reads from one disk only; it uses the other one in case the
first one fails. No performance gain from multiple copies.
I beg to differ. I have disks in a
What is the situation with multi-media additions (e.g. SWflash, mpeg)?
Do the repositories have decoders and such?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Michael Klinosky m...@enter.net wrote:
I've been using Fedora since about the FC6 era, for home use. I don't
like the 6 month upgrade (or re-install) concept, and I don't need the
latest greatest versions of apps. So, CentOS sounds enticing.
snip
I want to add
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Chan Chung Hang Christopher
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
Would running two CP command to copy 2 different set of files to two
different targets suffice as a basic two thread test?
So long as you generate disk access through a file system and
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Michael Klinosky m...@enter.net wrote:
What is the situation with multi-media additions (e.g. SWflash, mpeg)?
Do the repositories have decoders and such?
Hmmm. I answered your question about Multimedia, before I read it.
:-) I am listening on Streamaudio.com
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 09:02 +0100, Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Dick Holland
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 8:45 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Michael Klinosky m...@enter.net wrote:
What is the situation with multi-media additions (e.g. SWflash, mpeg)?
Do the repositories have decoders and such?
Follow on: You can get Google's Picasa for Linux. My wife uses it on
M$ Windows. I had her help me with it
At Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:01:58 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
What is the situation with multi-media additions (e.g. SWflash, mpeg)?
Do the repositories have decoders and such?
Adobe has a repository for Linux RPMs (acrobat reader, flash player,
etc.).
mplayer is in the
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
We were talking about RAID1; RAID5/6 is a different area. Linux software
RAID1 is a safeguard against disk failure; it's not designed for speed
increase. There is a number of things that could be improved in Linux
software RAID; read performance of
Stephen Leonard Character wrote:
So, to change my swap to raid1, I would need to unmount it, delete
the
md2 device, and rebuild it as a raid1 md2 device?
swapoff /dev/md2
# now delete the raid0 and build a raid1
mkswap /dev/md2
swapon /dev/md2
and you probably don't have to
On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 08:40 +0800, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Ian Forde wrote:
I'd have to say no on the processing power for RAID 5. Moore's law has
grown CPU capabilities over the last 15 or so years. HW RAID
controllers haven't gotten that much faster because they haven't
A good place to start comparing benchmark numbers for different RAID
levels is
http://linux-raid.osdl.org/index.php/Performance
in particular the links given in section Other benchmarks from 2007-2008
HTH,
Kay
___
CentOS mailing list
Ian Forde wrote:
Might not be a bad idea to see how they're able to use
mdadm to detect and autosync drives. I don't *ever* want to go through
something like:
http://kev.coolcavemen.com/2008/07/heroic-journey-to-raid-5-data-recovery/
Not when a little planning can help me skip it... ;)
On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 17:24 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
Ian Forde wrote:
Might not be a bad idea to see how they're able to use
mdadm to detect and autosync drives. I don't *ever* want to go through
something like:
Ian Forde wrote:
On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 17:24 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
Ian Forde wrote:
Might not be a bad idea to see how they're able to use
mdadm to detect and autosync drives. I don't *ever* want to go through
something like:
Hi,
Is anyone else noticing a problem updating Firefox and its dependencies?
It appears that xulrunner-devel 1.9.0.6-1.el5 wants xulrunner 1.9.0.5-1.el5,
but this is not available. Following is the output from Yum when I attempt
to update Firefox on CentOS 5.2 X86_64:
Resolving
listmail wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone else noticing a problem updating Firefox and its dependencies?
It appears that xulrunner-devel 1.9.0.6-1.el5 wants xulrunner 1.9.0.5-1.el5,
but this is not available. Following is the output from Yum when I attempt
to update Firefox on CentOS 5.2 X86_64:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 01:07:14 +, Ned Slider wrote
listmail wrote:
Is anyone else noticing a problem updating Firefox and its dependencies?
It appears that xulrunner-devel 1.9.0.6-1.el5 wants xulrunner 1.9.0.5-1.el5,
but this is not available. Following is the output from Yum when I
On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 17:23 -0800, listmail wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 01:07:14 +, Ned Slider wrote
listmail wrote:
Is anyone else noticing a problem updating Firefox and its dependencies?
It appears that xulrunner-devel 1.9.0.6-1.el5 wants xulrunner
1.9.0.5-1.el5,
but this
Dear All,
I am sorry for posting this query here but hope someone can help me out
i have been running Centos 5 as my prinamry DNS n Mail server with bind 9.2
every thing works fine but in my/var/messages log i see continuosly the
below meesages
Feb 22 09:14:46 kmdns1 named[2087]: client
Feb 22 09:14:52 kmdns1 named[2087]: client 62.109.4.89#59870: query
(cache) './NS/IN' denied
now in my firewall i tryied to block this ip but the messages
dont stop
i also upgraded bind to version bind-9.3.4-6.0.3.P1.el5_2 but
no avail the problem still there
i jus like to know
32 matches
Mail list logo
