Marcus Moeller wrote:
As the 'translation community' is growing I would like to suggest to
add the 'revision number' of the original article on which the
translation is based on, so someone else could easily diff to keep
translations up to date. It would be great if translators add
something
I also think that's good idea.
Truly,
YoungHoon Park
--- 09/3/4 (수)에 Marcus Moeller m...@gcug.de님이 쓰신 메시지:
보낸 사람: Marcus Moeller m...@gcug.de
제목: [CentOS-docs] revision numbers on translated articles
받는 사람: Mail list for wiki articles CentOS-docs@centos.org
날짜: 2009년 3월 4일 (수요일) 오후 6:34
Marcus Moeller napsal(a):
'translation based on #N'
as footnote where N is the version of the original article.
Marcus,
I like that idea.
David
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:0313
wireshark security update for CentOS 3 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0313.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/wireshark-1.0.6-EL3.3.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:0313
wireshark security update for CentOS 3 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0313.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
updates/x86_64/RPMS/wireshark-1.0.6-EL3.3.x86_64.rpm
Primero, verifica que esten usando el mismo formato de fichero, por
ejemplo, que le estes indicando al Postfix que te guarde los correos en
Maildir, y le estes confugurando al Dovecot que te revise mbox. o
tambien los directorios donde esten revisando, como planteas.
Yoinier.
El mar, 03-03-2009
Hola listeros
Tengo un CentOS 5.2 x86_64 en el cual voy a montar el servicio de correo
para esto voy a usar postfix+dovecot.
Ahora, lo que quiero es montar usuarios virtuales, para esto he
encontrado varios manuales en howtoforge y otros muy buenos sites, pero
en todos me dicen que tengo que
El Wednesday 04 March 2009 19:34:36 luisito escribió:
Hola listeros
Tengo un CentOS 5.2 x86_64 en el cual voy a montar el servicio de correo
para esto voy a usar postfix+dovecot.
Ahora, lo que quiero es montar usuarios virtuales, para esto he
encontrado varios manuales en howtoforge y otros
Estimados
Tengo un servidor de correos en Centos 5 y lo que pasa que cuando ingreso al
squirremail via web solo me permite adjuntar maximo 2 mB de tamaño de
archivo por diferentes necesidades debo ampliarlo a 5MB.
La pregunta es donde y como se hace.
Espero que me puedan ayudar
--
Saludos
Saludos.
La limitacion de 2MB es impuesta por PHP.
En el archivo /etc/php.ini se encuentran las directivas que controlan tal
comportamiento. Si mal no recuerdo en estos momentos las directivas
relacionadas a tal comportamiento son upload_max_filesize y creo que tambien
post_max_size. Prueba a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(Sorry if this is a dupe. Sent originally from unregistered email address)
All,
I am trying to make a custom install CD for CentOS 5.2. I am building
the iso in a VirtualBox image and testing the iso in another VirtualBox
image so I don't keep
Hello,
I noticed, that whenever I install a package on CentOS 5.x, rpms for
multiple architectures are installed:
yum install sqlite-devel
Loading fastestmirror plugin
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: centos.intergenia.de
* updates: centos.intergenia.de
* addons:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Marten Lehmann lehm...@cnm.de wrote:
Hello,
I noticed, that whenever I install a package on CentOS 5.x, rpms for
multiple architectures are installed:
See, for example, for a solution:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=17812
Thats
At Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:47:51 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Hello,
I noticed, that whenever I install a package on CentOS 5.x, rpms for
multiple architectures are installed:
This is normal for a 64-bit Intel/AMD flavored system. You have both
the 64-bit libraries
Robert Heller wrote:
At Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:29:48 -0600 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Any hope of getting my laptop's Broadcom BCM94311 wireless running
on CentOS 5? I find lots of references to using fwcutter to get
the needed firmware from Windows drivers, but there's a
Good Day!
We have some troubles with installation of CentOS 5.0 on Supermicro server with
Adaptec AIC-9410 SAS Controller, but installation complete successfully on
CentOS 4.5.
This issue has been solved in version 5.2? Or it will be solved in version 5.3?
Sorry for my English ;(
--
wbr -
On 3-Mar-09, at 3:01 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
Am 03.03.2009 um 23:57 schrieb Jerry Franz:
Paul Hussein wrote:
there still doesnt seem to be a 64bit java plugin
You can use the 32bit plugin if you change the launcher script to
launch
the 32 bit version of firefox instead of the 64
on 3-4-2009 6:49 AM Maxim Odinintsev spake the following:
Good Day!
We have some troubles with installation of CentOS 5.0 on Supermicro server
with Adaptec AIC-9410 SAS Controller, but installation complete successfully
on CentOS 4.5.
This issue has been solved in version 5.2? Or it will
Scott Silva wrote:
Why not try it with 5.2 and see if it works. It shouldn't take that long.
Hello
Because, first production server now work under CentOS 4.5 and don't need to
reinstall.
Now we want to buy some new servers, and want to now, before they bayed, which
OS
install on its, without
on 3-4-2009 8:25 AM Maxim Odinintsev spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote:
Why not try it with 5.2 and see if it works. It shouldn't take that long.
Hello
Because, first production server now work under CentOS 4.5 and don't need to
reinstall.
Now we want to buy some new servers, and
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:47:51 +0100
Marten Lehmann wrote:
How can I get rid of it?
If all you need exists in x86_64, there is no need to use i386
packages.
You may try to uninstall all all non x86_64 and noarch packages (doing
test run first):
rpm -qa --qf %{NAME}.%{ARCH}\n | grep -v
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Maxim Odinintsev gwynn@gmail.com wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
Why not try it with 5.2 and see if it works. It shouldn't take that long.
Hello
Because, first production server now work under CentOS 4.5 and don't need to
reinstall.
Now we want to buy some
I did a complete clean install of CentOS 5 from CD yesterday.
I took the default selinux configuration.
After that I ran yum update and found 600 plus updates and installs.
I let it go to do the updates and during that process I saw a large number of
issues in the selinux troubleshooter.
I also
When doing my updates, I got this message:
error: unpacking of archive failed on file /boot/System.map-2.6.9-78.0.
13.EL;49a
Unfortunately, I installed Centos 4 about two years ago on my server
that sits in the corner and does it's job of faithfully providing
services without me touching it
The result is that I have forgotten my
Linux know how!
and your google know-how.
I just googled it and got bucketloads of results. Maybe you should try
that.
--
Spiro Harvey Knossos Networks Ltd
021-295-1923www.knossos.net.nz
signature.asc
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 11:38 -0800, Todd Cary wrote:
When doing my updates, I got this message:
error: unpacking of archive failed on
file /boot/System.map-2.6.9-78.0.
13.EL;49a
Unfortunately, I installed Centos 4 about two years ago on my server
that sits in the corner and does it's
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 08:31:01AM +0100, Andrzej Szymański wrote:
Does anybody know how to avoid the file fragmentation when a file is
created over NFSv3?
A file created locally is OK:
dd bs=32k if=/dev/zero of=test count=32x1024 conv=fsync
filefrag test
test: 10 extents found,
Je serai absent(e) à partir du 04/03/2009 de retour le 09/03/2009.
Je répondrai à votre message dès mon retour. En cas d'urgence, vous pouvez
contacter l'équipe technique d'infofrance.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Chuck Campbell wrote:
I did a complete clean install of CentOS 5 from CD yesterday.
I took the default selinux configuration.
After that I ran yum update and found 600 plus updates and installs.
That's a lot of updates. Do you really mean CentOS 5 rather than 5.2?
I let it go to do the
on Centos 5.2
2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus
Has anyone gotten HPLIP 3.9.2 to work? If so what was done
about python-dbus and PyQt4-dbus? They don't seem to included
after installing PyQt4-4.4, sip 4.4.5, and hplip 3.9.2.
thanks,
roger wells
--
Roger Wells, P.E.
SAIC
221 Third St
Newport,
Bill -
Thank you! My boot partition does not have any space available. Now
there are what appears to be many files in there that are not needed,
*but* with my sparse knowledge, I am reluctant to start erasing them.
Here is a sample:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1310809 Mar 17 2008
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 14:38 -0800, Todd Cary wrote:
Bill -
Thank you! My boot partition does not have any space available. Now
there are what appears to be many files in there that are not needed,
*but* with my sparse knowledge, I am reluctant to start erasing them.
Here is a sample:
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:38:45 -0800
Todd Cary wrote:
Thank you! My boot partition does not have any space available. Now
there are what appears to be many files in there that are not needed,
*but* with my sparse knowledge, I am reluctant to start erasing them.
# yum install yum-utils
#
Bill -
I did remove some of the older files (only a few) and there was then
enough room to unpack the update. Is there some basic guideline on how
many to remove?
Todd
William L. Maltby wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 11:38 -0800, Todd Cary wrote:
When doing my updates, I got this
Chuck Campbell wrote:
I did a complete clean install of CentOS 5 from CD yesterday.
If you really updated from 5.0 to 5.2 ...
I took the default selinux configuratio
**Unmatched Entries** (Only first 10 out of 49031 are printed)
audit: audit_backlog=262 audit_backlog_limit=256
audit:
on 3-4-2009 2:48 PM Todd Cary spake the following:
Bill -
I did remove some of the older files (only a few) and there was then
enough room to unpack the update. Is there some basic guideline on how
many to remove?
Todd
William L. Maltby wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 11:38 -0800, Todd
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 14:48 -0800, Todd Cary wrote:
Bill -
I did remove some of the older files (only a few) and there was then
enough room to unpack the update. Is there some basic guideline on
how many to remove?
I suspect you have a minor mess-up in /etc/yum.conf (man yum.conf).
IIRC,
--- On Wed, 3/4/09, Roger Wells roger.k.we...@saic.com wrote:
From: Roger Wells roger.k.we...@saic.com
Subject: [CentOS] HPLIP 3.9.2
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Date: Wednesday, March 4, 2009, 1:26 PM
on Centos 5.2
2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus
Has anyone gotten HPLIP
perhaps my mind isn't working today.
I'm trying to update a system that hasn't been updated in a while which
I believe is CentOS 5.2 but it's possible that it's 5.1. I am pretty
sure that it has php installed from CentOS-Extras and when I do yum
update, it's stumbling on php
-- Finished
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 10:42 -0700, Craig White wrote:
perhaps my mind isn't working today.
I'm trying to update a system that hasn't been updated in a while which
I believe is CentOS 5.2 but it's possible that it's 5.1. I am pretty
sure that it has php installed from CentOS-Extras and when I
I asked on Saturday and I didn't get reply. I'm trying again.
I'm porting one project to centos where we use gnet and gio libraries. Will
be these libraries part of centos in future? I'm not sure what relationship
is between these libraries and glib.
Regards
Ondrej Filip
41 matches
Mail list logo
