Hola
Estoy montando un servidor de servicios en el cual tengo una base de
datos de usuarios en MySql.
Quiero montar FDS y que se nutra de esa base de datos para su
funcionamiento en cuanto a usuarios y contraseñas.
Alguien me puede proporcionar ayuda(enlaces o sus experiencias)???
Salu2
Hola lista.
He estado intentando instalar en mi escritorio el XFCE4.6, pero el
mismo me dice que tiene errores de dependencias.
todas las aplicaiones marcadas las tengo en versiones superiores en
mi sistema, ya que instale AL-Desktop.
Por ejemplo, me pide al ejecutar el
2009/3/6 Kevin Kempter ke...@kevinkempterllc.com:
On Friday 06 March 2009 12:25:31 Chris Geldenhuis wrote:
Glenn wrote:
Hello All,
Very sorry about WAY off-topic query, but you folks really are one of
my most International subscribed groups.
I am looking for a recommendation for a
Hi,
the date jumps within 30 seconds to a wrong value. ntp service is
stopped at the beginning.
Whereas hwclock seems more precise.
[r...@kerio ~]# service ntpd stop
Shutting down ntpd:[ OK ]
[r...@kerio ~]# ntpdate 0.centos.pool.ntp.org
13
Hi All,
I'm currently playing with smtp_recipient restrictions to try and knock
some of this spam on it's head. On my old debian server, I was using
this and successfully filtering out at least 90% if not more of all spam
emails which was great. I didn't even need spamassassin.
However,
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Helmut Drodofsky
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 8:25 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] date differs permanent some 3450 sec.
Hi,
the date jumps within 30 seconds to a wrong value.
Logan Moore wrote:
Hi All,
I'm currently playing with smtp_recipient restrictions to try and knock
some of this spam on it's head. On my old debian server, I was using
this and successfully filtering out at least 90% if not more of all spam
emails which was great. I didn't even need
Logan Moore wrote:
Logan Moore wrote:
Hi All,
I'm currently playing with smtp_recipient restrictions to try and knock
some of this spam on it's head. On my old debian server, I was using
this and successfully filtering out at least 90% if not more of all spam
emails which was great.
Logan Moore wrote:
Logan Moore wrote:
Logan Moore wrote:
Hi All,
I'm currently playing with smtp_recipient restrictions to try and knock
some of this spam on it's head. On my old debian server, I was using
this and successfully filtering out at least 90% if not more of all
From: Helmut Drodofsky drodof...@internet-xs.de
the date jumps within 30 seconds to a wrong value. ntp
service is stopped at the beginning.
[r...@kerio ~]# ntpdate 0.centos.pool.ntp.org
13 Mar 07:04:48 ntpdate[23003]: step time server
131.234.137.24 offset -3450.678273 sec
Not sure what is
Hi
Is the wodim package available for CentOS? I can only find cdrecord.
Thanks
Marcelo
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
From: Marcelo M. Garcia marcelo.maia.gar...@googlemail.com
Is the wodim package available for CentOS? I can only find cdrecord.
Maybe try the fedora rpm...
http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=wodim
JD
___
CentOS mailing list
Logan Moore wrote:
Logan Moore wrote:
Can anybody see where I've gone wrong. I can't fathom why this would
block all incoming emails from the web.
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated,
reject_invalid_hostname,
Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
Is the wodim package available for CentOS? I can only find cdrecord.
Are there any reasons you want to go that way instead of using cdrecord?
Ralph
pgpQvCG5m9AkN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
why don't you give any information about your system? If that is in a VM
you better read the posts in centos-virt.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
Logan Moore wrote on Fri, 13 Mar 2009 22:18:17 +1300:
Thanks, I
think posting to the list helped. I probably would have given up and put
it off until later otherwise.
Glad we could help you :-)
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:
Ntpdate sets the correct time. Within 30 seconds, time will be resettet! From
who?
Helmut
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] Im Auftrag
von John Doe
Gesendet: Freitag, 13. März 2009 10:59
An: CentOS mailing list
Betreff: Re:
On Thursday 12 March 2009 15:59:04 Roger Wells wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 12 March 2009 14:45:27 Roger Wells wrote:
I actually did install the home printer last night (Photosmart C6180).
hp-setup' ran fine, discovered the printer and installed it just as it
did for the LJ4350
On Mar 13, 2009, at 3:24 AM, Helmut Drodofsky drodof...@internet-xs.de
wrote:
Hi,
the date jumps within 30 seconds to a wrong value. ntp service is
stopped at the beginning.
Whereas hwclock seems more precise.
[r...@kerio ~]# service ntpd stop
Shutting down ntpd:
If your hwclock stores local time and your BIOS adjusts it for DST
that would cause a 3600 second time difference or if your hwclock
stores UTC and the BIOS adds an hour to that...
Turn off any BIOS DST adjust feature if it's enabled.
OP: Did the problem start when DST took affect?
hi all
I am trying to filter emails to a user (weather) based on the subject:
:0
*^Subject:.*Weather
| /usr/bin/formail | /path/to/executable
*^Subject:.*Tornado
| /usr/bin/formail | /path/to/executable
All it does is deliver the email to the weather inbox.
For testing I tried.
echo 1 | mail
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 12 March 2009 15:59:04 Roger Wells wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 12 March 2009 14:45:27 Roger Wells wrote:
I actually did install the home printer last night (Photosmart C6180).
hp-setup' ran fine, discovered the printer and installed
Jerry Geis wrote:
hi all
I am trying to filter emails to a user (weather) based on the subject:
:0
*^Subject:.*Weather
| /usr/bin/formail | /path/to/executable
*^Subject:.*Tornado
| /usr/bin/formail | /path/to/executable
All it does is deliver the email to the weather inbox.
I'm trying to test out an Equallogic PS5500 with a server running CentOS 4.7
I can create a volume and mount it fine using the standard
iscsi-initiator-utils tools.
The Equallogic box has 3 Gigabit interfaces and I would like to try to
set up things so I can read/write from/to the volume using
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 5:36 PM, James Pearson
jame...@moving-picture.com wrote:
I'm trying to test out an Equallogic PS5500 with a server running CentOS 4.7
Try reading this:
http://linfrastructure.blogspot.com/2008/02/multipath-and-equallogic-iscsi.html
On Friday 13 March 2009 14:06:10 Roger Wells wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 12 March 2009 15:59:04 Roger Wells wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 12 March 2009 14:45:27 Roger Wells wrote:
I actually did install the home printer last night (Photosmart C6180).
hp-setup' ran
James Pearson wrote:
I'm trying to test out an Equallogic PS5500 with a server running CentOS 4.7
I can create a volume and mount it fine using the standard
iscsi-initiator-utils tools.
The Equallogic box has 3 Gigabit interfaces and I would like to try to
set up things so I can read/write
Hi
Thanks for replying.
It's all good now, someone had edited the /etc/bash so it was looking in the
wrong place.
Kind regards
Per Qvindesland
On 3/12/09 9:08 PM, nate cen...@linuxpowered.net wrote:
Per Qvindesland wrote:
Hi List
Has anyone got any clue of why on a centos 4.3 when I am
George Negoita wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 5:36 PM, James Pearson
jame...@moving-picture.com wrote:
I'm trying to test out an Equallogic PS5500 with a server running CentOS 4.7
Try reading this:
http://linfrastructure.blogspot.com/2008/02/multipath-and-equallogic-iscsi.html
nate wrote:
Dell should be able to tell you this.
That's what I thought ... I asked if I could get more than 2Gbit+/sec
throughput to a single target from a single host - they said yes, but
have not (yet) provided any useful information on how to actually set
this up. I have a support call
The masquerading options are for a different purpose.
I'm glad you got it sorted out.
Although I'm able to send mail to most people without a problem using
smarthost, I still have a few that bounce back with errors like:
Your message was rejected by mail.lance.com for the following reason:
James Pifer wrote:
The masquerading options are for a different purpose.
I'm glad you got it sorted out.
Although I'm able to send mail to most people without a problem using
smarthost, I still have a few that bounce back with errors like:
Your message was rejected by mail.lance.com
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 14:51 -0400, James Pifer wrote:
The masquerading options are for a different purpose.
I'm glad you got it sorted out.
Although I'm able to send mail to most people without a problem using
smarthost, I still have a few that bounce back with errors like:
Your
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009, William L. Maltby wrote:
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 14:51 -0400, James Pifer wrote:
The masquerading options are for a different purpose.
I'm glad you got it sorted out.
Although I'm able to send mail to most people without a problem using
smarthost, I still have a few
At 02:05 PM 3/13/2009, you wrote:
James Pifer wrote:
The masquerading options are for a different purpose.
I'm glad you got it sorted out.
Although I'm able to send mail to most people without a problem using
smarthost, I still have a few that bounce back with errors like:
Your
The problem has nothing to do with the Smart host server entry.
Read the information in the URL above and contact your ISP.
I understand the problem is I'm in a residential range of dynamic IP,
even though I have commercial class, and I DID read the information in
the URL. That's how I
nate wrote:
If you want 2Gbit+/sec throughput what you should probably be looking
at instead of multipathing is something like 802.3ad, if the equalogic
box has different IPs on each interface you will be able to get up
to 3Gbit/s of throughput and still have fault tolerance and not have
to
Hi,
RR charges you an extra $50/mo for static ip! I don't have many other
choices for a decent high speed connection. DSL is too slow in my area.
We have some ISP's here in the Netherlands which have spam relayed
through their mailservers, which gives the same problem, blacklisted
smarthosts
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, James Pifer wrote:
RR charges you an extra $50/mo for static ip! I don't have many other
choices for a decent high speed connection. DSL is too slow in my area.
I have RR Business Class in in upstate NY, and TW charge me $20/mo for
a static IP.
Steve
Hi All,
I've been trying to locate a jboss application server rpm for CentOS 5,
but I haven't found any. I thought it would be included with CentOS.
Searching the yum repos hasn't turned anything up. Maybe my yum search
was sub-par.
Where should I look? Do any rpms exist?
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Am 13.03.2009 um 20:29 schrieb Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu:
Hi All,
I've been trying to locate a jboss application server rpm for CentOS
5,
but I haven't found any. I thought it would be included with CentOS.
Searching the yum repos hasn't turned anything up. Maybe my yum
search
was
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rainer Duffner
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 15:36
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] jboss application server rpm
Am 13.03.2009 um 20:29 schrieb Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu:
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 15:39 -0400, Jason Pyeron wrote:
Download the tgz from the jboss website and unpack it inside
the homedirectory of the user you want to run it as.
Creating a user specifically for that purpose also hasn't
hurt anybody...
The only exception to this approach
On Mar 13, 2009, at 3:51 PM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 15:39 -0400, Jason Pyeron wrote:
Download the tgz from the jboss website and unpack it inside
the homedirectory of the user you want to run it as.
Creating a user specifically for that purpose also hasn't
hurt
I added via visudo my userid for authorization of
me ALL(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL
and I still cannot run yum as me. Is this just not possible?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
James Pifer wrote:
The masquerading options are for a different purpose.
I'm glad you got it sorted out.
Although I'm able to send mail to most people without a problem using
smarthost, I still have a few that bounce back with errors like:
Your message was rejected by mail.lance.com for
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 at 4:57pm, Robert Moskowitz wrote
I added via visudo my userid for authorization of
me ALL(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL
and I still cannot run yum as me. Is this just not possible?
What happens when you run sudo yum commands?
--
Joshua Baker-LePain
QB3 Shared Cluster
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:57:35 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I added via visudo my userid for authorization of
me ALL(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL
and I still cannot run yum as me. Is this just not possible?
What about joining the wheel group?
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~
on 3-13-2009 12:36 PM James Pifer spake the following:
The problem has nothing to do with the Smart host server entry.
Read the information in the URL above and contact your ISP.
I understand the problem is I'm in a residential range of dynamic IP,
even though I have commercial class, and
on 3-13-2009 11:53 AM Steve Thompson spake the following:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, James Pifer wrote:
RR charges you an extra $50/mo for static ip! I don't have many other
choices for a decent high speed connection. DSL is too slow in my area.
I have RR Business Class in in upstate NY, and TW
On Mar 13, 2009, at 1:50 PM, James Pearson jame...@moving-
picture.com wrote:
nate wrote:
Dell should be able to tell you this.
That's what I thought ... I asked if I could get more than 2Gbit+/sec
throughput to a single target from a single host - they said yes, but
have not (yet)
Please ignore this message, my previous atempt failed so i'm trying again.
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Frank Cox wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:57:35 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I added via visudo my userid for authorization of
me ALL(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL
and I still cannot run yum as me. Is this just not possible?
What about joining the wheel group?
That also has to be at least
Hi,
I have two servers in a drbd primary/secondary setup. Everything was fine
until I had to reboot both servers.
The primary rebooted first, the secondary assumed fine, but when the (old
primary) server got back online it was unable to mount the drbd fs
complaining about the modules.
I've
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 16:57, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
I added via visudo my userid for authorization of
me ALL(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL
Aren't you missing an = in that line? I think it should be:
meALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL
I wonder how you got passed through
robert mena wrote:
Hi,
I have two servers in a drbd primary/secondary setup. Everything was
fine until I had to reboot both servers.
The primary rebooted first, the secondary assumed fine, but when the
(old primary) server got back online it was unable to mount the drbd
fs complaining
56 matches
Mail list logo
