CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0326 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0326.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
e043c7a35fa15bf1440c8108ec56f091
Hola!
Quiero instalar un programa para realizar copias de seguridad llamadofbackups (
http://www.diffingo.com/oss/fwbackups/download )
Lo primero que hice fue bajarme los archivos fuente, e intentar compilarlo a
mano ( ./configure make install etc )
./configure
checking for a BSD-compatible
muchos dicen postfix pero yo personalmente te recomendaria sendmail.
Hola,
Estoy empezando con el mundo Linux, y hasta la fecha tengo un servidor con
CentOS 5.2 y varias aplicaciones funcionando (sugarCRM, Dotproject, etc.)
Para que mis clientes me manden correos y los vea en SugarCRM
Mmm igual necesitas *imap* para que eso te funcione.
saludos
2009/4/1 Leandro Blanco Amat lbla...@alimaticgr.co.cu
muchos dicen postfix pero yo personalmente te recomendaria sendmail.
Hola,
Estoy empezando con el mundo Linux, y hasta la fecha tengo un servidor
con
CentOS 5.2 y varias
Así empesamos
te recominedo
sendmail
mailscanner-clamav
http://www.alcancelibre.org/staticpages/index.php/como-mailscanner-clamav
en alcance libre o en www.ecualug.org existen comos donde te puedes
asesorar y seguir adelante con linux
bien venido
2009/4/1 Ramón Cervantes
mira este es mi ftp aqui hay documentacion sobre todo eso y mas,
ftp://mail.alimaticgr.co.cu
sendmail
dovecot
mailscanner-clamav
squirrelmail
Así empesamos
te recominedo
sendmail
mailscanner-clamav
http://www.alcancelibre.org/staticpages/index.php/como-mailscanner-clamav
en alcance
A quien le sea de interés utilizar CentOS 5.3 en Acer Aspire One
A150/D150 (discos SATA de 120/160 GB), acabo de publicar un documento
que detalla procedimientos para lograrlo. CentOS 5.3 funciona muy
bien, mejor de lo esperado, en estas ultra-portátiles. Solo hay que
poner en lista negra
vanguardia. Lo único que me falto documentar es cómo hacer funcionar
el lector de tarjetas, sobre lo cual estoy trabajando ahora. Resto de
dispositivos funciona correctamente.
http://www.alcancelibre.org/article.php/centos53-en-acer-aspire-one-a150
Comentarios y sugerencias, bienvenidas.
Alguien tiene alguna idea como hago una whitelist manual para Mimedefang,
pues
este me esta tomando un correo de Lan entrante como spam y necesito que
llegue .
Estuve indagando creo que es una foto que viene dentro del correo de Lan
se llama d.jpg , la revise y efectivamente es una foto valida
Mark Porter wrote:
Jerry,
To use kickstart off usb, we just use
linux ks=hd:sde1:/ourkickstart.cfg
(Of course, the e will change depending on your drives, on our 10-drive
systems it is
linux ks=hd:sdk1:/ourkickstart.cfg)
And it works great. We have NOT yet had any success with putting
Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Gilbert Sebenste
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 7:44 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] I see 5.3 ISO images on the mirrors
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Florin
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 08:00:12 Tony Molloy wrote:
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 03:34:03 Ned Slider wrote:
Thomas Dukes wrote:
Hello,
Just did yum update. There were numerous packages to be updated. I
get this is the newest release of Centos.
The update bombed stating I
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Gilbert Sebenste
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 7:44 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] I see 5.3 ISO images on the mirrors
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Florin Andrei wrote:
On one
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 03:34:03 Ned Slider wrote:
Thomas Dukes wrote:
Hello,
Just did yum update. There were numerous packages to be updated. I get
this is the newest release of Centos.
The update bombed stating I need nss-3.12.2.0-2.el5. I did a rpm -q nss
and
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Michael A. Peters
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 8:57 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] I see 5.3 ISO images on the mirrors
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Minor version upgrades (eg 5.2
Hi,
Is the tracker for the 5.3-release working properly?
The only torrent I see actually downloading is CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-1to6. The
other three for the i386 DVD and ditto for x86_64 (cd+dvd) are just sitting
there. The availability and the number of connected peers in the swarm for
each
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Hi,
Is the tracker for the 5.3-release working properly?
The only torrent I see actually downloading is CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-1to6. The
other three for the i386 DVD and ditto for x86_64 (cd+dvd) are just sitting
there. The availability and the number of connected peers in
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of John R Pierce
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 10:23 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Torrent tracker for CentOS v5.3 working properly?
Is the tracker for the 5.3-release
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:01:29PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Bill Campbell wrote:
Les has been around a long time and certainly is knowledgeable about
many forms of UNIX, Linux, Windows and OS X. He seems to enjoy fomenting
discussions about what it is that Red Hat does in general that
You didn't wait for the official release announcement ;)
Why should he? Is he only allowed to run yum update after each
official announcement?
I still see no release announcement yet, but packages are already
available.
In turn, I can see the release announcement, but no packages :-(
A
Thanks for the info. Checked the tracker in my torrent-client, and it's the
same as yours. Seems I have a possible firewall-issue on my hands here.
OTOH, it's weird, as the one torrent works fine. Strange...
Maybe this would help:
http://www.dessent.net/btfaq/#ports
JD
Ned Slider wrote on Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:34:03 +0100:
You didn't wait for the official release announcement ;)
Why should he? Is he only allowed to run yum update after each official
announcement?
I still see no release announcement yet, but packages are already
available.
I think there is a
On 01/04/2009, Christopher Chan christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
Is
OpenSolaris still closely controlled by Sun?
I don't know if Sun still governs OpenSolaris, I know they are very
tight as often new technologies are rolled from OpenSolaris to
Solaris, but OpenSolaris might
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of John Doe
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:32 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Torrent tracker for CentOS v5.3 working properly?
Thanks for the info. Checked the tracker
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Timo Neuvonen
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:40 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Upgrade
In turn, I can see the release announcement, but no packages :-(
A few more hours
Thomas Dukes wrote:
Hello,
Just did yum update. There were numerous packages to be updated. I get
this is the newest release of Centos.
The update bombed stating I need nss-3.12.2.0-2.el5. I did a rpm -q nss and
nss-3.12.2.0-4.el5 is install in Cento 5.2.
You need to *also* enable the
Hi,
I'm currently busy finishing Linux aux petits oignons, a practical
introduction to Linux, aimed primarily at the frustrated Windows user.
This is the first of two volumes, it's written in french, and all
examples in the book are based on CentOS. (Note: looks like I'll have to
update some
I've now upgraded a server and a handful of clients with CentOS 5.2 i386. All
is spiffy and works really good! Like the new theme too.
Thanks guys, good work! It was well worth the wait.
--
BW,
Sorin
---
# Sorin Srbu
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Yum upgrade or yum update? What's the take on that one here on the list?
Oh God, Not Again!
upgrade and update do exactly the same, except if *YOU* yourself turned
off obsoletes=1 in /etc/yum.conf. There is *NO* difference.
Ralph
pgpVyeA6g4iwZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I'm just wondering if anyone else here is using this?
The majority of jobs on our CentOS5 server fail by Communications failure
right at the end, apparently on the very last file which, however, is
recoverable, as is the whole archive. In more than half these failures, the
Linux agent has
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of John R Pierce
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:23 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Torrent tracker for CentOS v5.3 working properly?
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Thanks for the info.
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Thanks for the info. Checked the tracker in my torrent-client, and it's the
same as yours. Seems I have a possible firewall-issue on my hands here.
OTOH, it's weird, as the one torrent works fine. Strange...
Anyway, I've contacted the university-wide helpdesk for a possible
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Ned Slider
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 10:34 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Upgrade
Thomas Dukes wrote:
Hello,
Just did yum update. There were
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Tony Molloy
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 3:00 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Upgrade
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 03:34:03 Ned Slider wrote:
Thomas Dukes
Hi all
I got there is 2xM spike traffic in ntop about Kazaa service
How can I check this?
Thank you
-
Now with a new friend-happy design! Try the new Yahoo! Canada Messenger___
CentOS mailing
Thomas Dukes wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Ned Slider
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 10:34 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Upgrade
Thomas Dukes wrote:
Hello,
Just did yum update.
Steve Snyder wrote:
It seems that the mirrors are now all sync'd with the binary RPMs, but
where are the source packages?
The source RPMs are available for the few packages updated since the
upstream 5.3 release, but the SRPMS for the release itself are
missing.
Coming later. Please let
At Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:38:40 +0200 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently busy finishing Linux aux petits oignons, a practical
introduction to Linux, aimed primarily at the frustrated Windows user.
This is the first of two volumes, it's written in french, and
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Michael A. Peters
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 7:31 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Upgrade
Thomas Dukes wrote:
-Original Message-
From:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Sorin Srbu
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 12:03 PM
To: 'CentOS mailing list'
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Torrent tracker for CentOS v5.3 working properly?
I just now noticed that the Openoffice3
nate wrote:
I thought if it treated each ip as a separate target portal on the
initiator you would be able to connect to two different targets at
the same time and let dm-multipath figure out it's the same disk. No?
You can do this, I'm sure of it. But the catch is this doesn't
aggregate the
Robert Heller a écrit :
At Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:38:40 +0200 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently busy finishing Linux aux petits oignons, a practical
introduction to Linux, aimed primarily at the frustrated Windows user.
This is the first of two volumes, it's
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote:
grabbed my DVD and did an install. When partitioning the disk I did not see
a selection for ext4.
Is this enabled after the fact some how?
Yes. Since it's a preview release, it's not available as an install target.
--
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Hakan Koseoglu hakan.koseo...@gmail.com wrote:
I have the same problem here on an i386 box. Funnily enough, I don't
even have nss-devel installed. I attempted the upgrade just a couple
of minutes ago. The repositories might not have synchronised yet but I
wasn't
From: Steve Snyder swsny...@snydernet.net
It seems that the mirrors are now all sync'd with the binary RPMs, but
where are the source packages?
I think I read, a few posts ago, something about source rpms being delayed a
bit to reduce the traffic...
JD
Jerry Geis wrote:
grabbed my DVD and did an install. When partitioning the disk I did not see
a selection for ext4.
Is this enabled after the fact some how?
You might have to give 'ext4' on the installer boot command line to
enable ext4
Anaconda fsset.py has the code:
# this is
Ralph Angenendt napsal(a):
Coming later. Please let the mirrors handle the load of people updating
their machines first. When the first wave of updates have gone down, the
SRPMS will be put onto the mirrors.
Regards,
Ralph,
I don´t like this solution. When things go wrong I want to look at
Thomas Dukes wrote:
The error I got when I ran 'yum update' was:
Error: Missing Dependency: nss = 3.12.2.0-2-el5.centos is needed by package
nss-devel
Yes, that will do it - devel packages do need to be the same EVR.
Sounds like you figured it out.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Mike A. Harris
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:31 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] I see 5.3 ISO images on the mirrors
I did the update by yum -y update and for whatever
On 04/01/09 14:45, David Hrb?? enlightened us:
Ralph Angenendt napsal(a):
Coming later. Please let the mirrors handle the load of people updating
their machines first. When the first wave of updates have gone down, the
SRPMS will be put onto the mirrors.
Regards,
Ralph,
I don?t
Matthew Hyclak wrote:
On 04/01/09 14:45, David Hrb?? enlightened us:
Ralph Angenendt napsal(a):
Coming later. Please let the mirrors handle the load of people updating
their machines first. When the first wave of updates have gone down, the
SRPMS will be put onto the mirrors.
I don?t like
Hi,
Has anyone tried upgrading xen domu's from 5.2 to 5.3? I just did a
yum upgrade glibc yum upgrade yum. All appeared to go well but when I
rebooted and tried to connect to the network, I could not. Looking at
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts I see that the that there is now an ifcfg-eth0
and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Tom Diehl spake:
| Hi,
|
| Has anyone tried upgrading xen domu's from 5.2 to 5.3? I just did a
| yum upgrade glibc yum upgrade yum. All appeared to go well but when I
| rebooted and tried to connect to the network, I could not. Looking at
|
From: David Hrbáč hrbac.c...@seznam.cz
Ralph Angenendt napsal(a):
Coming later. Please let the mirrors handle the load of people updating
their machines first. When the first wave of updates have gone down, the
SRPMS will be put onto the mirrors.
Ralph,
I don´t like this solution. When
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Thomas Dukes wrote:
The error I got when I ran 'yum update' was:
Error: Missing Dependency: nss = 3.12.2.0-2-el5.centos is needed by package
nss-devel
Yes, that will do it - devel packages do need to be the same EVR.
Sounds like you figured it out.
I have
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Christian Wahlgren
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 3:37 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] I see 5.3 ISO images on the mirrors
2009/4/1 Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se:
d2009/4/1 Ralph Angenendt ra+cen...@br-online.de:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
The caution about first updating glibc (?) is important. I recall from
the update to 5.2, there is a difference, between yum upgrade and
yum update.
No, there is not. Except if you fiddled with the configuration and
Tom Diehl wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone tried upgrading xen domu's from 5.2 to 5.3? I just did a
yum upgrade glibc yum upgrade yum. All appeared to go well but when I
rebooted and tried to connect to the network, I could not. Looking at
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts I see that the that there
Mufit Eribol wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Thomas Dukes wrote:
The error I got when I ran 'yum update' was:
Error: Missing Dependency: nss = 3.12.2.0-2-el5.centos is needed by package
nss-devel
Yes, that will do it - devel packages do need to be the same EVR.
Sounds like you
David Hrbáč wrote:
Ralph Angenendt napsal(a):
Coming later. Please let the mirrors handle the load of people updating
their machines first. When the first wave of updates have gone down, the
SRPMS will be put onto the mirrors.
Regards,
Ralph,
I don´t like this solution. When things go
Hi Timo,
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Timo Schoeler wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Tom Diehl spake:
| Hi,
|
| Has anyone tried upgrading xen domu's from 5.2 to 5.3? I just did a
| yum upgrade glibc yum upgrade yum. All appeared to go well but when I
| rebooted and
And everyone involved with this release! I followed the instructions
(including removing the two packages, lam and I forget what other one
it was now, and updating glibc first), and the update was completely
painless. And, with that yum fastest repo add-on thingy, wow! I had 2
megaBYTE/sec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
just installed their NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-180.44-pkg2 driver. I had it
running on my CentOS 5.2 x64 machine, and I'm happily surprised that it
builds and runs okay on 5.3 also.
Cheers,
Timo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5
Hi all,
trying to do an install on a ATI radeon 3200 system
I am using a kickstart file from 5.2 that works fine in 5.2
First two lines of my post section I do:
init 3
chvt 3
This is not happening ?
When I try and do a CTRL-ALT-F2 the screen goes black,
ALT-F6 to go back has a white screen
Jerry Geis wrote:
This is not happening ?
install using text mode instead of X11, I think it will work
better then.
nate
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi, I was searching for the system wide bash_logout and couldn't find any
documentation on it.
If I create a file ~/.bash_logout file it gets executed when the user logs
out but when I create a system wide /etc/bash_logout it doesn't work.
Not what the issue is since I couldn't find anything on
John Doe wrote:
Why don't you just wait until the mirors are fully in sync (srpms included)?
Waiting for a few extra hours should not be that big of a deal...
Because it will be more than a few extra hours.
Ralph
pgppdLq9lotP1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Christian Wahlgren wrote:
But when I looked in the Release Notes for CentOS-5.3, it doesn't mention
yum update glibc at all, so maybe that upstream bug has been solved
for CentOS-5.3?
Ummm. It does. In the Known Issues section.
Ralph
pgpSP072szgj9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi, I was searching for the system wide bash_logout and couldn't find any
documentation on it.
There is no system wide bash_logout, according to the bash man page,
CentOS 4.7.
Instead look at the way a system wide bashrc is included in ~/.bashrc:
[ -f /etc/bashrc ] . /etc/bashrc
You
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Mufit Eribol wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Thomas Dukes wrote:
The error I got when I ran 'yum update' was:
Error: Missing Dependency: nss = 3.12.2.0-2-el5.centos is needed by
package
nss-devel
Yes, that will do it - devel
Timo Schoeler wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
just installed their NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-180.44-pkg2 driver. I had it
running on my CentOS 5.2 x64 machine, and I'm happily surprised that it
builds and runs okay on 5.3 also.
Cheers,
Timo
I'm still using
Thanks chris!
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Christoph Neuhaus
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:35 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] bash_logout
Hi, I was searching for the system wide bash_logout and
Is it possible to have two sets of clusters in the one IP subnet?
Indeed, it is
If yes what do I have to change so these clusters don't send messages
to the wrong nodes.
Somebody might be able to help if you post your configuration files
(ha.cf and haresources) for both clusters.
Even better do it your self it's not really difficould:
try assigning different udp port for broadcast in both the
clusters, default port used is #udpport 694 you also need them to be
running in different chroot environments.
Per
--- Original message follows ---
SUBJECT: Re: [CentOS] Two sets of
From: Paul A ra...@meganet.net
Hi, I was searching for the system wide bash_logout and couldn’t
find any documentation on it.
If I create a file ~/.bash_logout file it gets executed when
the user logs out but when I create a system wide /etc/bash_logout it doesn’t
work.
Not what the issue
From: Ralph Angenendt ra+cen...@br-online.de
John Doe wrote:
Why don't you just wait until the mirors are fully in sync (srpms included)?
Waiting for a few extra hours should not be that big of a deal...
Because it will be more than a few extra hours.
Like... 6 months?
My point was that
Paul A wrote on Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:12:06 -0400:
If I create a file ~/.bash_logout file it gets executed when the user logs
out but when I create a system wide /etc/bash_logout it doesn't work.
Not what the issue is since I couldn't find anything on that.
AFAIK, there is no basic mechanism
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
David Hrbáč wrote:
Ralph Angenendt napsal(a):
Coming later. Please let the mirrors handle the load of people updating
their machines first. When the first wave of updates have gone down, the
SRPMS will be put onto the mirrors.
Regards,
Ralph,
I don´t like this solution. When things go
Devraj Mukherjee wrote:
Hi all,
I am new to Hearbeat so please be kind :) I also posted this on
Linux-HA lists with no responses so I posted it here.
I have successfully configure two machines to use heartbeat to cluster
httpd. The two nodes are called etk-1 and etk-2. I am trying to
Think here is a faq somewhere on the heartbeat website that recommended
using multicast and 2 different ports. Perhaps you could just use 2
diffent udp ports though. Have a look at the halinux faq.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Thomas Dukes tdu...@sc.rr.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Ned Slider
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 10:34 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Upgrade
Thomas Dukes wrote:
Fabian Arrotin napsal(a):
Right, if you don't like this solution, feel free to take a RHN
account .. btw you can always fetch Upstream SRPMs , no ?
Fabian,
well, I've got feeling that the mantra is get the RH for every point
coming out from the community. What do I have to think about this
John Doe wrote:
From: Ralph Angenendt ra+cen...@br-online.de
John Doe wrote:
Why don't you just wait until the mirors are fully in sync (srpms included)?
Waiting for a few extra hours should not be that big of a deal...
Because it will be more than a few extra hours.
Like... 6 months?
My
Fabian Arrotin wrote:
David Hrbáč wrote:
Ralph Angenendt napsal(a):
Coming later. Please let the mirrors handle the load of people updating
their machines first. When the first wave of updates have gone down, the
SRPMS will be put onto the mirrors.
Regards,
Ralph,
I don´t like this
David Hrbáč wrote:
Fabian Arrotin napsal(a):
Right, if you don't like this solution, feel free to take a RHN
account .. btw you can always fetch Upstream SRPMs , no ?
Fabian,
well, I've got feeling that the mantra is get the RH for every point
coming out from the community. What do I have
Michael A. Peters wrote:
However, I don't believe it needs to be made available by http, CentOS
would probably be in GPL compliance if they distributed it on IBM punch
cards to those who requested it.
FLOPPY DISKS! FOR A MEDIA HANDLING FEE of $5/disk!
(thats totally legal per GPL, the
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 11:35 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
However, I don't believe it needs to be made available by http, CentOS
would probably be in GPL compliance if they distributed it on IBM punch
cards to those who requested it.
FLOPPY DISKS! FOR A
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 11:21 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
John Doe wrote:
From: Ralph Angenendt ra+cen...@br-online.de
John Doe wrote:
Why don't you just wait until the mirors are fully in sync (srpms
included)?
Waiting for a few extra hours should not be that big of a deal...
2009/4/1 Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.com
Scott Silva wrote:
What are you attempting to achieve? Having both nics on the same subnet
doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
Scott
Good point, I guess I'm suffering from incremental additions over the last
4 years and no real look at the
This update is not applying for the following reasons.
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
-- Running transaction check
--- Package gstreamer-plugins-good.x86_64 0:0.10.9-1.el5_3.1 set to
be updated
...
-- Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing Dependency:
I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the
filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /home is an
NFS filesystem.
I sorta-kinda remember this when going from 5.1 to 5.2, but that
memory is hazy.
--
Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com http://www.madboa.com/
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Well, technically the source has to be made available from CentOS to
anyone they distribute the software to.
However, I don't believe it needs to be made available by http, CentOS
would probably be in GPL compliance if they distributed it on IBM punch
cards to
John R Pierce wrote:
FLOPPY DISKS! FOR A MEDIA HANDLING FEE of $5/disk!
(thats totally legal per GPL, the recipient is free to redistribute any
way they wish)
The recipient - yes. The distributor - no.
Ralph
pgpt3hDwpUlS8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
James B. Byrne wrote:
This update is not applying for the following reasons.
Error: Missing Dependency: libgstfft-0.10.so.0()(64bit) is needed by
package gstreamer-plugins-good
gstreamer-plugins-base (0.10.9-6.el5.x86_64) is installed and up to
date.
Is this a problem with the package or
James B. Byrne wrote:
This update is not applying for the following reasons.
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
-- Running transaction check
--- Package gstreamer-plugins-good.x86_64 0:0.10.9-1.el5_3.1 set to
be updated
...
-- Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing
on 3-31-2009 8:26 PM Rob Kampen spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote:
on 3-30-2009 9:19 PM Rob Kampen spake the following:
Hi folk,
I am trying to get iptables working on a samba server but find it is
blocking something that prevents the windoze clients from being able to
access the
OK, here's a new one.
Changed all references in repo file to baseurl from mirror, ran yum clean
all.
Now I get:
ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
Package pyzor needs python-abi = 2.3, this is not available.
Of course, I ran yum install python-abi with no luck.
Something is broken.
For those who may forget, usin torrents to download and share the new
images will get you faster downloads (if enough folks participate) if
you have a fat pipe and alleviate the load on the CentOS servers.
I have a chubby pipe (~ 1.2MB/sec) and got the stuff really quickly
earlier today.
If your
Thomas Dukes wrote:
OK, here's a new one.
Changed all references in repo file to baseurl from mirror, ran yum clean
all.
Now I get:
ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
Package pyzor needs python-abi = 2.3, this is not available.
Of course, I ran yum install python-abi with no
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
