Dear Russ,
There's always going to be an argument about whether to put /boot and swap
on RAID. It's all about performance most of the time being slightly better
versus stability in the event of device failure.
I can't think of a good argument for not having /boot on the raid1.
Then you
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 08:02 -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Akemi Yagi wrote:
..
If I'm not mistaken, adding a ?action=raw to the URL will show the raw
text regardless of the edit rights. ??
Senility strikes again! Akemi has this knack for coming up with all the
things that I should know
Sean Gilligan wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
...
Maybe someone with a bit better java background than I have would like to
chime in?
Ned-style disclaimer, I am not a Java expert; OTOH, I have
built/rebuilt-from-SRPM a lot of Java packages over the years using the
HowTo or variations
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Phil Schaffner wrote:
R P Herrold wrote:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Ned Slider wrote:
unknown prior wrote ...
There's always going to be an argument about whether to
put /boot and swap on RAID. It's all about performance
most of the time being slightly better versus
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Marcus Moeller wrote:
I personally cannot agree on that. Syncing /boot 'manually' adds much
more complexibility, unless you add scripts that automate the process.
Setup:
/etc/yum.conf contains a:
exclude=kernel\*
/etc/yum-kernel.conf does not
Actions:
On 04/30/2009 10:22 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
...
To respond to 'the consensus ... overwhelmingly' remark, the
mice also overwhelmingly voted to bell the cat. Counting
noses does not make a bad answer more correct; using raid
rather than flat RO /boot partitions is still less robust
Phil Schaffner wrote:
I have
built/rebuilt-from-SRPM a lot of Java packages over the years using the
HowTo or variations on that theme, so I'm chiming in anyway.
And I'm assuming that you're hoping those days are behind you? Also, am
I correct in assuming that almost nobody uses the
R P Herrold wrote:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Phil Schaffner wrote:
R P Herrold wrote:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Ned Slider wrote:
unknown prior wrote ...
There's always going to be an argument about whether to
put /boot and swap on RAID. It's all about performance
most of the time being
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Sean Gilligan wrote:
Russ Herrold added the special note on OpenJDK, hopefully he will
chime in.
Sean, I think you are on the right track; I would refactor
the java articles into a couple of them in a sub-tree, with
a chooser at the head, probably forming on pre/post
Dear Ned,
...
That's pretty much what the article started with if you follow the long
history of the first thread on the contribution, but the consensus of
the people who commented was overwhelmingly in favor of /boot on RAID1,
...
My response was simply in reply to the 'I can't think
R P Herrold wrote:
Sean, I think you are on the right track; I would refactor
the java articles into a couple of them in a sub-tree, with
a chooser at the head, probably forming on pre/post 5.3, and
on Method A and Method B, to better handle sub issues, and aid
maintenance.
Thanks,
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, pjwelsh wrote:
On 04/30/2009 10:22 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
...
To respond to 'the consensus ... overwhelmingly' remark, the
mice also overwhelmingly voted to bell the cat. Counting
noses does not make a bad answer more correct; using raid
rather than flat RO /boot
Mathew S. McCarrell wrote:
Well, I'm actually not using a PAExen kernel but I don't believe that I
need to be since I'm running the 64-bit version of CentOS. Am I
mistaken in that assumption?
Matthew, you are right.
Also, the idea of running a PAE kernel on CentOS is non relevant
--
Karanbir, can you please, in short, explain to me current status of
64-bit CentOS compared to i386? Is it's maturity same as of i386?
I started to actively use CentOS when 4.2 was last version. My decision
to use i386-only was based on issues with some (or many?) drivers like
madwifi for
I've discovered what the issue is.
The machine is rebooting when a sector error occurs on one of the drives
that is part of a software RAID where the VMs are currently being stored.
Thanks for the help though.
Matt
--
Mathew S. McCarrell
Clarkson University '10
mccar...@gmail.com
Tengo el tema bastante currado porque he tenido que preparar un par de
servidores así (para varios cientos de usuarios).
Te recomiendo que empieces leyéndote Samba-3 by example, muy ilustrativo. En
especial capítulos 3 a 5.
Sigue con esto:
*Buenos días, soy novato en Centos, he instalado el centos 5.1 en una
máquina y quiero colocar allí un servidor web, un servidor de correo y un
proxy para una red que actualmente funciona bajo Windows 2003 Server; les
agradezco cualquier indicación que me pueda ayudar a conseguir este
objetivo. *
HOLA BUEN DÍA
TENGO YA TIEMPO SIGUIENDO LOS CORREOS DE ESTA LISTA, Y DE ECHO ME HAN
AYUDADO EN VARIAS INQUIETUDES CON ÉXITO TOTAL PERO ESTOY PERDIDO
TENGO LA INQUIETUD DE APRENDER A MANEJAR BIEN CENTOS PERO NO TENGO
IDEA DE POR DONDE EMPEZAR, Y LLEVO ALGÚN TIEMPO PICANDO DE TEMA EN
TEMA SIN
El día 30 de abril de 2009 10:05, Mario Villela Larraza
mario.villelalarr...@gmail.com escribió:
HOLA BUEN DÍA
TENGO YA TIEMPO SIGUIENDO LOS CORREOS DE ESTA LISTA, Y DE ECHO ME HAN
AYUDADO EN VARIAS INQUIETUDES CON ÉXITO TOTAL PERO ESTOY PERDIDO
TENGO LA INQUIETUD DE APRENDER A MANEJAR
hola, mira, esas preguntas son extremadamente genericas y de amplia
respuesta, lo mejor seria que empiezes a hacerlo y envies consultas
puntuales con las que podremos darte una solucion mas exacta, anyway, en
esta direccion podras encontrar lo necesario para empezar;
http://wiki.centos.org/es/
Hola, mira, yo tambien soy un poco nuevo en esto, pero ayer mismo acabé de
montar eso mismo que quieres. Todo depende en primer lugar de que
servidores piensas utilizar, que tipos de conexiones tienes y otras cosas
así
Yo, por ejemplo, monté
Dovecot+postfix como server de correo
Squid como proxy
Tienes que empezar leyendo sobre apache, proxy puede usar squid, sendmail,
Mailscanner, spamassasin
De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En
nombre de Jaime H. Díaz G.
Enviado el: Jueves, 30 de Abril de 2009 09:50 a.m.
Para: centos-es
Asunto: [CentOS-es]
todo en uno solo? se puede hacer aunque no es lo apropiado, se recomienda
hacerlo en equipos separados.
puedes optar primero por hacer un firewall/proxy y detras de ellos tu
servidores web y correo o puedes poner tu servidor web y correo delante
del firewall/proxy.
ahora bien sino tienes
iptraf
2009/4/30 Freddy Angulo samilo...@yahoo.com
amigos necesito de su ayuda, me podrian decir de algun software en linux
que me indicque en linea que ip de mi lan satura mi ancho de banda, por mas
q el firewall este en drop veo mucha saturacion dentro de mi red.
gracias por sus
Compañeros y amigos, en breves palabras ¿cual es la ventaja de usar samba en
conjunto con ldap frente a usar samba tal y como viene con el centos?
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
El 30 de abril de 2009 13:37, Freddy Angulo samilo...@yahoo.com escribió:
amigos necesito de su ayuda, me podrian decir de algun software en linux
que me indicque en linea que ip de mi lan satura mi ancho de banda, por mas
q el firewall este en drop veo mucha saturacion dentro de mi red.
el tema es q tengo mi fw con politica en DROP la cual impide cualquier red p2p,
pero a veces obervo que mi ancho de banda se satura y no se como ver que ip de
mi lan esta realizando tantas consultas a la internet.
--- El jue 30-abr-09, Freddy Angulo samilo...@yahoo.com escribió:
De:
Hola.
Podrias usar de pronto esta herramienta, creo que ayudaria a lo que deseas
hacer.
http://bandwidthd.sourceforge.net/
Saludos
El 30 de abril de 2009 12:37, Freddy Angulo samilo...@yahoo.com escribió:
amigos necesito de su ayuda, me podrian decir de algun software en linux
que me
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 23:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
JohnS wrote on Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:09:56 -0400:
If you don't mind when you come to an answer would you please let me
know. I am interested to know.
I could not find a real solution. I had to go to another way of creating
the
Beartooth wrote:
I try never to install Ffx anywhere without NoScript, Adblock,
and several more.
I do not use Adblock because I am a member of an online community that
specifically forbids blocking of advertisements, their primary revenue
source.
An exception is made for noscript
From: Agnello George agnello.dso...@gmail.com
I have small query, all our server are centos based 5 and 5.2 . We are
looking
ofr a tool to that measure packet loss. we have servers in two IDC's bothin
the US and we are trying to download a 2gb file from the internet. Some
server are
JohnS wrote on Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:17:13 -0400:
Kai, I read the Xen list and the way your doing it (the last option)
looks like something I may try for testing in VMs.
It works fine, I'm converting all my setups to that now.
Indeed also I when I installed Xen I had to manually take out peth0
nate wrote:
(There are even some things the simpler Red Hattish tools can do that
the Debian ones can't, easily. rpm -qa, for one.)
rpm -qa typically just lists all of the packages on the system,
the equivalent in debian is dpkg -l.
Not really equivalent. The output is only sort of
Following a hard drive corruption I have reinstalled the latest
version of CentOS and all current patch files.
For most applications I selected the default options. By doing this I
expected that the packages would play nice with one another and I
could customize as necessary.
Setting
R P Herrold wrote:
oh please -- move advocacy to a new thread raher than
hijacking.
It's just a natural evolution of the conversation. IMO, the answer to
the original question is No, so the obvious next direction to the
conversation is okay, what instead, then?
Nate's answer was
Agnello George wrote:
Hi
I have small query, all our server are centos based 5 and 5.2 . We are
looking ofr a tool to that measure packet loss. we have servers in two IDC's
bothin the US and we are trying to download a 2gb file from the internet.
Some server are able to download the file at
On Apr 30, 2009, at 7:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com
wrote:
JohnS wrote on Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:17:13 -0400:
Kai, I read the Xen list and the way your doing it (the last option)
looks like something I may try for testing in VMs.
It works fine, I'm converting all my setups to
Hi
Dovecot is trying to open a socket, and procmail is trying to execute
spamc, You should be able to fix these issues using audit2allow.
Andrew.
On 30 Apr 2009, at 4:07 PM, Dan Roberts wrote:
Following a hard drive corruption I have reinstalled the latest
version of CentOS and all
Ok, but how?
There appear to be a lot of different options when employing
audit2allow and I am reluctant to start blazing away trying different
elements. I am missing the details of what socket an dhow the
execution is occuring so that I can begin to develop the proper
audit2allow
Hi does anyone know what the problem here is
[r...@dnstest lib]# ps
ps: error while loading shared libraries: libproc-3.2.3.so: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
[r...@dnstest lib]# ln -s libproc-3.2.7.so libproc-3.2.3.so
[r...@dnstest lib]# ps
ps:
The audit.log should contain more detail than is being provided here,
if it is a unix socket you should see the path, i suspect it is the
unix socket not the tcp sockets (pop3/imap)
On 30 Apr 2009, at 4:50 PM, Dan Roberts wrote:
Ok, but how?
There appear to be a lot of different
P.A wrote:
Hi does anyone know what the problem here is
[r...@dnstest lib]# ps
ps: error while loading shared libraries: libproc-3.2.3.so: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
rpm -qf $(which ps)
rpm -V procps
[r...@dnstest lib]# ln -s libproc-3.2.7.so
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I have a directory shared out via Samba for Quickbooks and seem
to have some issues with permissions. The directory being shared
is a subdirectory in an ext3 partition being mounted with the acl
option.
It has been setup as follows:
chown root:DOMAIN\AD_Group
I've handled these kind of complex samba rights problems by either using
acls or if it's particularly thorny, an inotify script - needs
inotify-tools-3.13-1.el5.rf.
Nice tool! That's far more elegant than what I had planned.
Thanks!
jlc
___
CentOS
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009, P.A wrote:
Hi does anyone know what the problem here is
[r...@dnstest lib]# ps
ps: error while loading shared libraries: libproc-3.2.3.so: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
When programs like ps, sed, find, etc. start showing shared
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Dan Roberts d...@jlazyh.com wrote:
Following a hard drive corruption I have reinstalled the latest version of
CentOS and all current patch files.
For most applications I selected the default options. By doing this I
expected that the packages would play nice
Bill, good point but I looked and don't think that is what happened. This
box is not in production and has a private ip.
I took care of the ps issue by reinstalling procps-3.2.7-11.1.el5.i386. The
RPM issue was fix by reinstalling the rpm package.
-Original Message-
From:
Dan Roberts wrote:
Ok, but how?
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SELinux
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I would like not to disable SELinux, and I have the guide from the
nsa. But try as I might these three things are being difficult.
Given that it was a default install for them I have no idea how or why.
Some google searches and even the SELinux FAQ suggest remedy options
that involve
James Bensley wrote:
I have a win2k3 server that its backing up to a CentOS 5.3 server. On
the Win2k3 machine I plan to have rsync back up nightly to the CentOS
server through ssh. The command I am using is as follows:
rsync -vrPtz -e ssh myu...@myserver:/remote/backup/folder/
I am trying to get esata working. my lspci is below.
When I plug in the disk an turn it on - dmesg reports nothing.
Is it supposed to report anything like a usb disk does?
Is there a module to load?
My motherboard is GA-MA78GM-US2H.
Jerry
-
00:00.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices
Gordon Messmer wrote:
James Bensley wrote:
I have a win2k3 server that its backing up to a CentOS 5.3 server. On
the Win2k3 machine I plan to have rsync back up nightly to the CentOS
server through ssh. The command I am using is as follows:
rsync -vrPtz -e ssh
Thanks - this is helpful but still not quite a fix. The suggested
fixes seem general for the three issues of dovecot, nmbd, and spamc -
but audit2allow does at least create them.
[...@trailrunner ~]$ cat dovecotsocketselinux.te
module dovecotsocketselinux 1.0;
require {
type
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 07:34:13AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I never thought of that given that they come from the plus repo. So its
only
iirc, the xfs kmod's are not kernel ver
54 matches
Mail list logo
