On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, JohnS wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 14:56 -0400, JohnS wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 22:14 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Marcus Moeller wrote:
Will the newsletter be published via email subscibtion or only on the wiki?
Well, currently the plan is to
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 08:37 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, JohnS wrote:
Dag Can you send me an email address that will accept html only + one
for text.
I don't know what you mean with this. d...@centos.org accepts both.
I just need an email address that will accecpt email
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, JohnS wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 08:37 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, JohnS wrote:
Dag Can you send me an email address that will accept html only + one
for text.
I don't know what you mean with this. d...@centos.org accepts both.
I just need an email
Gerald and P.J.,
I just finished setting up VNC services following
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/VNC-Server
and have a few comments.
2.3. Edit the server configuration
The last line should be corrected from
VNCSERVERARGS[1]=-geometry 800x600
to
VNCSERVERARGS[3]=-geometry 800x600
2.4.
Greetings: I would like to add a future Event to the Wiki:
cPanel Conference, October 5-7, 2009, Houston, TX, US
I would also like to maintain a personal homepage on the Wiki.
My Wiki username is GarryDale
Thank you.
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
RHSA-2009:1076-01 End Of Life
This is the End Of Life notification for CentOS-2.
As per the upstream vendors errata support policy, updates for CentOS-2
ended on May 31, 2009.
It is recommended that any system still running CentOS 2 should be
upgraded to a more recent version of CentOS to
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1083
cups security update for CentOS 3 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1083.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
updates/x86_64/RPMS/cups-1.1.17-13.3.62.x86_64.rpm
database 4114 (20090528) __
The message was checked by ESET Mail Security.
http://www.eset.com
__ Information from ESET Mail Security, version of virus signature
database 4126 (20090603) __
The message was checked by ESET Mail Security.
http://www.eset.com
) __
The message was checked by ESET Mail Security.
http://www.eset.com
__ Information from ESET Mail Security, version of virus
signature database 4126 (20090603) __
The message was checked by ESET Mail Security.
http://www.eset.com
efectivamente no es correcto, lo corregí y ahora si está funcionando como debe,
el samba se conecta perfectamente, pero no se que me pasó que no vi el error,
creo que estaba bloqueado ya que estaba con este error casi todo el dia y ya
estaba viendo todo igual.
gracias por tu ayuda, el proble
Estimados
Estoy tratando de implementar proxy transparente , pero no he podido dar con
la configuracion en squid, mi proxy escucha por el puerto 8080, y he
aplicado la sentencia http_port 80 transparent, pero nada.
la version de squid que estoy utlizando es 2.6.STABLE20.
alguna sugerencia,
Debes agregar al Iptables las reglas para que acepte peticiones del puerto
de tu Proxy
Iptables -I INPUT 10 -p tcp --dport 8080 -j ACCEPT
con esto solventas el problema
Walter Cervini
movil: 0424-1543350
0412-2042186
Pin: 20911CF3
2009/6/4 Hector Martínez Romo pela...@gmail.com
esa regla ya la tenia, ya lo soluciones, el problema era que esta ecribiendo
mal la sentencia en squid.
la reemplace por http_port 8080 transparent y funciono , muchas gracias por
tu respuesta.
El 3 de junio de 2009 18:36, Walter Cervini wcerv...@gmail.com escribió:
Debes agregar al Iptables
Saludos.
2009/6/3 Hector Martínez Romo pela...@gmail.com
Estimados
Estoy tratando de implementar proxy transparente , pero no he podido dar
con la configuracion en squid, mi proxy escucha por el puerto 8080, y he
aplicado la sentencia http_port 80 transparent, pero nada.
la version de
El 1 de junio de 2009 17:55, Mauricio Cesar Ramirez Torres
mauricio.rami...@axtop.com escribió:
Buen día, les comento que tengo un servidor que es mail server (kerio) y
web server (apache), pero me solicitaron que deje de usar MD5 y quiero
usar SHA-256 o algún otro, pero la solución que yo
El 1 de junio de 2009 10:30, Victor Padro vpa...@gmail.com escribió:
2009/5/31 german suarez germansuar...@gmail.com
Cordial saludo.
Alguno de ustedes me puede indicar donde encuentro material de estudio
para el examen RH133.
Gracias por sus aportes.
¿Google? ¿
Hola amigos que tal espero que se encuentren bien a ver si me hechan una mano
con una pregunta que tengo, tengo un server dedicado para hosting con una
empresa el mismo que tiene Centos 5.3 normalmente cada 8 días realizo una
actualización con este comando yum -a upgrade se supone que con esto
Hola a todos tengo una urgencia, tengo una maquina con windows algo no
se que vercion es, el chiste es que nesecito un CDLive para poder
acceder a mis documentos pero ya trate con Centos live y me marca un
error de desbordamiento de memoria necesito una distor que consuma la
menor cantidad de
gparted
2009/6/4 Mario Villela Larraza mario.villelalarr...@gmail.com
Hola a todos tengo una urgencia, tengo una maquina con windows algo no
se que vercion es, el chiste es que nesecito un CDLive para poder
acceder a mis documentos pero ya trate con Centos live y me marca un
error de
Greetings,
Wondering if anyone could assist with this. I have many SuperMicro 5015B-MTB
servers. These all have the X7SBi Motherboards. After upgrading to
CentOS 5.3 the Hard
Drive LED's on some of the servers started blinking red(drive fail) but
all is functioning
normally. All servers are
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 01:57 -0400, JohnS wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 00:46 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 12:30:10AM -0500, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
It would be prudent to review his web code to see
if he did something in an insecure way. If his code
is open
On 6/3/09, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote:
on 6-2-2009 2:46 PM Rudi Ahlers spake the following:
On 6/2/09, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote:
on 6-2-2009 2:30 PM Rudi Ahlers spake the following:
Hi all,
One of our CentOS 5.3 randomly reboots, at different times of the day,
and I
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 01:57:20AM -0400, JohnS wrote:
Dollars to Donuts ehhh???
How many donuts you think it will take to pay for legal costs and clean
up if there are customer data on the machine? I think right about now I
4 chocolate eclairs should cover it :)
But
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 02:04 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 01:57:20AM -0400, JohnS wrote:
Dollars to Donuts ehhh???
How many donuts you think it will take to pay for legal costs and clean
up if there are customer data on the machine? I think right about now I
Hey Guys,
I can not find the corrent syntax for what I am trying to acheive with a
while loop. Having said that I'm not exactly sure what you would call it so
I have been googling with no success probably for that reason.
I am just working with some sub directories except there is one I don't
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 08:44:29AM +0100, James Bensley wrote:
There are many ways to do this; building on your code
snippet it would be:
#!/bin/bash
find ./ -maxdepth 1 -type d | while read FOLDER
do
if [ $FOLDER = ./not_this_folder_oh_no! ]; then
Thanks guys the continue command was what I was looking for. Also to those
who pointed out the lack of quotation marks around the string, they are on
my original script but somehow vanished during the copy and paste operation
between my shell window and browser...werid?!?!
Still If I hadn't of
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 02:59 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 08:44:29AM +0100, James Bensley wrote:
There are many ways to do this; building on your code
snippet it would be:
#!/bin/bash
find ./ -maxdepth 1 -type d | while read FOLDER
do
if [
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 04:33:21AM -0400, JohnS wrote:
---
I'm no Bash expert but is there a real good reason pass would not be
used in place of continue? I'm just really currious
Because pass is not a valid bash language construct, at least in
3.2.25.
Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 06/01/2009 07:52 PM, Michael A. Peters wrote:
I've read a lot of different reports that suggest at this point in time,
kernel software raid is in most cases better than controller raid.
There are certainly a lot of people who feel that way. It depends on
what your
Rudi Ahlers пишет:
Hi all,
One of our CentOS 5.3 randomly reboots, at different times of the day,
and I can't see why it's doing it.
I have looked through the logs, but don't see any thing in there that
shows me why it has rebooted. How can I debug this?
Hi,
try to enable kdump to
j...@rossberry.com wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
AFAIK, this never happened. Is the 5.x.z tree concept dead-before-birth?!
For CentOS: Yes.
For Upstream: Ask Red Hat.
I have asked RHT repeatedly to walk me through the life of a
Epilogue:
I've tried to disable TSO (ethtool -K eth0 tso off), as was suggested on
the poweredge list. This did not help.
I've configured the machine to start with the 5.2 kernel in
/boot/grub/grub.conf, changing the default. It has been running for 6
1/2 days, now. I would say that this
Hey Listees,
I have a question (hopefully quite simple) about the system V init scripts
in /etc/init.d. I have an app installed and for some reason it had no system
V init script. It has been installed a long while now so I can't quite
remember whats going on but basically I remember I wrote the
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 10:29:08AM +0100, James Bensley wrote:
restart)
echo -n Stopping my_app:
pgrep my_app | while read PIDS; do # I have chosen this method because
my_app spawns various child processes
kill -9 $PIDS # and they all need to DIE!
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 10:29 +0100, James Bensley wrote:
Hey Listees,
I have a question (hopefully quite simple) about the system V init
scripts in /etc/init.d. I have an app installed and for some reason it
had no system V init script. It has been installed a long while now so
I can't
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 04:42:09AM -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
I'd think that the pgrep is matching both the processes you want
to kill _and_ the init.d script itself. Try pgrep -x which
will exactly match the specified command.
Even better, use pkill -x -9
As you spotted john my killing loop was killing the system V script itself
also hence it never starting my_app again, so instead a simple if skips the
process ID of the system V script itself so it can continue on to start
my_app again:
I'd think that the pgrep is matching both the
Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:17:35 +0200:
One of the reasons CentOS chose not to do it
It appears that only a very very small number of people need it or *think*
they need it. It would have surely been a great waste of time and
ressources if CentOS had adopted it and no real
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 06:09:37 John R. Dennison wrote:
He's running an apache instance on cent5. He has processes he
can not readily identify running under apache named atack;
where does windows come into the equation?
Several of the links returned by google have
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:17:35 +0200:
One of the reasons CentOS chose not to do it
It appears that only a very very small number of people need it or *think*
they need it.
Probably the latter. CentOS 5 SP 3 would maybe have been a better choice
William Warren wrote:
http://www.derkeiler.com/Newsgroups/comp.os.linux.security/2004-05/0202.html
This has nothing to do with the issue at hand (neither did the other URL
from your earlier mail).
It can *clearly* be seen that there are processes running as the apache
user on that box - so why
bruce wrote:
nope...
not kidding... the majority of windows based attacks on an apache system
running on linux systems are obnoxiousm but not harmful... the kinds of
attacks that are looking to exploit windows buffer overflows are harmless to
linux systems..
Aha. How are active running
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 06:09:37 John R. Dennison wrote:
He's running an apache instance on cent5. He has processes he
can not readily identify running under apache named atack;
where does windows come into the equation?
Several of the
After some enabling/disabling new repos (pgdg for PostgreSQL
specifically) and admittedly some yum action that may have gone
uncompleted, I am advised to run yum-complete-transaction. However,
when I attempt to do this, yum warns that 225 packages will be erased,
all of which I deeply care for.
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 12:44:58 Ralph Angenendt wrote:
where does windows come into the equation?
The question I replied to was where does windows come into the equation?.
Anne
--
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase
From: James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com
I have pasted the code below from my restart clause but from what I can
tell, it is killing the app but not restarting it, I think because the
killing process is still in action so when it start the app again it just
gets killed straight away. If I
Eduardo Grosclaude wrote:
After some enabling/disabling new repos (pgdg for PostgreSQL
specifically) and admittedly some yum action that may have gone
uncompleted, I am advised to run yum-complete-transaction. However,
when I attempt to do this, yum warns that 225 packages will be erased,
all
Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:14:55 +0200:
Probably the latter. CentOS 5 SP 3 would maybe have been a better choice
than CentOS 5.3
Not if one wants to stay in sync with the RHEL naming scheme :-)
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:
On 06/03/2009 01:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Probably the latter. CentOS 5 SP 3 would maybe have been a better choice
than CentOS 5.3
Not if one wants to stay in sync with the RHEL naming scheme :-)
I dont think that will be a problem, since we have never been in sync
with Red Hat's naming
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 06:09:37 John R. Dennison wrote:
He's running an apache instance on cent5. He has processes he
can not readily identify running under apache named atack;
where does windows come into the equation?
Several of the links
Michael A. Peters wrote:
I guess from the discussion that hardware raid is definitely still the
way to go for servers, where the guy at the colo can simply swap out a
dead drive if need be w/o any serious downtime etc.
On the flip side, you generally have to install some vendor-specific
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:14:55 +0200:
Probably the latter. CentOS 5 SP 3 would maybe have been a better choice
than CentOS 5.3
Not if one wants to stay in sync with the RHEL naming scheme :-)
It clearly is the other way round, Red Hat has adopted
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 12:44:58 Ralph Angenendt wrote:
where does windows come into the equation?
No, I did not write that.
The question I replied to was where does windows come into the equation?.
And I asked what made you think that this had anything to do with
My replies below i m just so down in the dumps nowaaah
- Original Message
From: Neil Aggarwal n...@jammconsulting.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2009 1:38:05 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 - Apache - Under Attack ? Oh
- Original Message
From: Anne Wilson cannewil...@googlemail.com
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 06:09:37 John R. Dennison wrote:
He's running an apache instance on cent5. He has processes he
can not readily identify running under apache named atack;
where
I am getting the following yum update error this morning. C 5.3 x86_64.
What shall I do?
Jerry
---
yum update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: centos.mirror.nac.net
* updates: centos.mirror.nac.net
* addons: mirrors.unbornmedia.com
*
as an aside? did he say if he even looked on the net for anything related to
this??
i tried googling for 'centos apache atack but did not get anything
substantial.
i tried locating a binary file called ' atack' but got nothing.
___
I have a one problem with Raid controller Tekram TR-822...
I'm using dmraid software:
r...@ns1: / $ dmraid -r
/dev/sda: sil, sil_ajacddafagff, mirror, ok, 156299440 sectors, data@ 0
/dev/sdb: sil, sil_ajacddafagff, mirror, ok, 156299440 sectors, data@ 0
When I'm start dmraid -ay:
r...@ns1: / $
- Original Message
From: John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com
I stand by my previous advice - the box is compromised, can not
be trusted, and as a responsible admin he should be working on
re-installing it, evaluating what web-apps he had running that
led to this
Maco:
i am not worried abt reinstalling ( i loathe doing it ) but
my worry here ( as some of you have accurately pointed out )
is that the 'issue' will repeat again bcos i just downt know
what happened. I m just surprised that a centos box was compromised.
If you are only running
Maco:
i have other mandriva boxes and they all are ok. i m just so
surprised that a centos box got compromised.
If you are not doing anything silly in your server
configuration, this is not a CentOS issue.
Anything *can* be hacked. It just so happens
that it was your CentOS box this time.
Try: yum clean all
Then try yum update again
~Ron
Jerry Geis wrote:
I am getting the following yum update error this morning. C 5.3 x86_64.
What shall I do?
Jerry
---
yum update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base:
Linux Advocate wrote:
- Original Message
From: John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com
I stand by my previous advice - the box is compromised, can not
be trusted, and as a responsible admin he should be working on
re-installing it, evaluating what web-apps he had
This is my first post here on the CentOS forums. I've been running Fedora since FC4, and have been working with RHEL 4 at work. But this is my first foray into CentOS.I followed the multimedia guidance on the wiki, and now have the ability to view a lot of different video clips on the Internet,
How do I back out of these directions?"yum install iwl4965-firmwarermmod iwl4965; modprobe iwl4965Your wireless device should be working now. Enable NetworkManager to use it. Starting from CentOS 5.3 (kernel 2.6.18-128) the kernel includes the iwlagn kernel module. If you are running an older
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:12 AM, David McGuffey
davidmcguf...@verizon.net wrote:
BTW, it appears that support for the Broadcom wireless device is not in the
CentOS repositories. I think I 'm going to have to download the Broadcom
files and make the firmware module. I'd like to avoid that...any
David McGuffey wrote:
How do I back out of these directions?
yum install iwl4965-firmware
rmmod iwl4965; modprobe iwl4965
rmmod iwl4965
yum erase iwl4965-firmware
Your wireless device should be working now. Enable NetworkManager to use it.
Starting from CentOS 5.3 (kernel 2.6.18-128)
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Linux Advocate linuxhous...@yahoo.com wrote:
i am not worried abt reinstalling ( i loathe doing it ) but my worry here (
as some of you have accurately pointed out ) is that the 'issue' will repeat
again bcos i just downt know what happened. I m just
- Andrey Garkin ad...@kipalex.ru wrote:
I have a one problem with Raid controller Tekram TR-822...
I'm using dmraid software:
r...@ns1: / $ dmraid -r
/dev/sda: sil, sil_ajacddafagff, mirror, ok, 156299440 sectors,
data@ 0
/dev/sdb: sil, sil_ajacddafagff, mirror, ok, 156299440 sectors,
On Jun 2, 2009, at 9:53 PM, Christopher Chan christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk
wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
I've read a lot of different reports that suggest at this point
in time,
kernel software raid is in most cases better than controller raid.
David McGuffey wrote:
This is my first post here on the CentOS forums. I've been running
Fedora since FC4, and have been working with RHEL 4 at work. But this
is my first foray into CentOS.
I followed the multimedia guidance on the wiki, and now have the ability
to view a lot of
Bill:
Just an FYI to all those who may not know:
$ cat test.c
#include stdlib.h
#include stdio.h
#include string.h
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
sleep(15);
strcpy(argv[0],test.c);
sleep(15);
exit(0);
}
That is a very cool demonstration.
Thanks for the info.
Neil
--
Neil
Tim Nelson wrote:
- Andrey Garkin ad...@kipalex.ru wrote:
I have a one problem with Raid controller Tekram TR-822... I'm
...
Remove the RAID configuration from the card's BIOS and just run
them as standard SATA volumes. Then, use software raid to accomplish
your mirror. The 'fake-raid'
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 11:06 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
snip
I just thought of this too.
There are two IDs tracked by the system. Effective (EUID) and the real
ID (UID). If the process has changed UID, by either suid bit or by
program call (I think it has to start as root for that to
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 06:29 -0700, Linux Advocate wrote:
snip
i tried googling for 'centos apache atack but did not get anything
substantial.
i tried locating a binary file called ' atack' but got nothing.
Just an FYI to all those who may not know:
$ cat test.c
#include stdlib.h
#include
Neil Aggarwal wrote:
Maco:
i have other mandriva boxes and they all are ok. i m just so
surprised that a centos box got compromised.
If you are not doing anything silly in your server
configuration, this is not a CentOS issue.
Anything *can* be hacked. It just so happens
that it was
See my reply to nate. If you are using boards with 12GB of cache,
software raid is not even on the radar.
True, but I feel an important point is being missed here.
In order to avoid a lot of the random I/O file systems use page cache
to combine I/O operations and transaction logs
Michael A. Peters wrote:
I'd recommend looking at backuppc instead of amanda if you mostly want
on-line storage. Its storage scheme will hold a much longer history in
the same amount of space and it has a handy web interface for browsing
and restores.
I'd rather have something that
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
BRUCE U ARE A F*** GENIUS MAN !
u were right brothanx for spending the time on this man
more info below !
- Original Message
From: bruce bedoug...@earthlink.net
To: linuxhous...@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2009 9:53:24 PM
Subject: RE: [CentOS]
on 6-3-2009 2:27 AM Peter Hopfgartner spake the following:
Epilogue:
I've tried to disable TSO (ethtool -K eth0 tso off), as was suggested on
the poweredge list. This did not help.
I've configured the machine to start with the 5.2 kernel in
/boot/grub/grub.conf, changing the default. It
so you're going to need to figure out what the hole in your system is/was...
you're going to need to patch it... you're going to need to examine the logs
for logins to your other systems.. as well as examine the ssh logs for
outgoing login attempts from the hacked box to other boxes in your
on 6-3-2009 6:10 AM Ralph Angenendt spake the following:
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:14:55 +0200:
Probably the latter. CentOS 5 SP 3 would maybe have been a better choice
than CentOS 5.3
Not if one wants to stay in sync with the RHEL naming scheme :-)
on 6-2-2009 11:53 PM Rudi Ahlers spake the following:
On 6/3/09, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote:
on 6-2-2009 2:46 PM Rudi Ahlers spake the following:
On 6/2/09, Scott Silva ssilva-m4n3GYAQT2lWk0Htik3J/w...@public.gmane.org
wrote:
on 6-2-2009 2:30 PM Rudi Ahlers spake the following:
Anyone have any idea as to why setroubleshootd would be dominating the
system:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND
2371 root 25 0 1884m 1.8g 4100 R 100.2 44.7 680:06.40
setroubleshootd
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
Systems Programmer MCP,
on 6-2-2009 9:09 PM John R. Dennison spake the following:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 09:01:35PM -0700, Linux Advocate wrote:
o godd.
i have a quite a few linux boxes and not even one has been hacked. oh
man !!
That you have
Further googling indicates that UnixCod is a brute force ssh scanner... what
is is odd is that i have fail2ban ruunning ( which blocks IPs after 2 failed
attempts) and a 8 letter passwd but i still got hacked
Hi Marco,
Just because the app is an SSH scanner doesn't automatically mean
I have the following kernels on my /boot:
2.6.18-128.1.6
2.6.18-92.1.18
2.6.18-92.1.22
I'm low on /boot space and need to remove the oldest version. It
appears that I cannot use yum to remove since all of the versions are
the same (only the release is different). I believe that I can use rpm
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:
I have the following kernels on my /boot:
2.6.18-128.1.6
2.6.18-92.1.18
2.6.18-92.1.22
I'm low on /boot space and need to remove the oldest version. It
appears that I cannot use yum to remove since all of the versions are
the same (only the
On Jun 3, 2009, at 1:40 PM, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:
I have the following kernels on my /boot:
2.6.18-128.1.6
2.6.18-92.1.18
2.6.18-92.1.22
I'm low on /boot space and need to remove the oldest version. It
appears that I cannot use yum to remove since all of the versions are
the same (only
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 12:40:08 -0500
Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:
Any other considerations and/or methods?
yum install yum-utils
package-cleanup --oldkernels
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
on 6-2-2009 10:18 PM bruce spake the following:
you and i agreee on him figuring out what web apps are causing the issues..
or in fact, exactly what the 'atack' process is? i didn't see the initial
threads.. was this simething that he discussed? did he say what the atack
process was doing?
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 14:09:35 Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 12:44:58 Ralph Angenendt wrote:
where does windows come into the equation?
No, I did not write that.
True. An error in snipping, somewhere.
The question I replied to was where does
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 14:24:43 Linux Advocate wrote:
- Original Message
From: Anne Wilson cannewil...@googlemail.com
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 06:09:37 John R. Dennison wrote:
He's running an apache instance on cent5. He has processes he
can not readily
Epilogue:
I've tried to disable TSO (ethtool -K eth0 tso off), as was suggested on
the poweredge list. This did not help.
I've configured the machine to start with the 5.2 kernel in
/boot/grub/grub.conf, changing the default. It has been running for 6
1/2 days, now. I would say that this helped
Running Transaction
Erasing: kernel
[1/1]
Removed: kernel.i686 0:2.6.18-92.1.18.el5
Complete!
That seemed to work, but I still have some 92.1.18 elements left:
ls -l /boot/*92.1.18*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 65438 Nov 12 2008
/boot/config-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5debug
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root
Nevermindfigured it out.
Thanks,
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
Systems Programmer MCP, MCP+I, MCSE RHCE
American Income Life Insurance Co. Phone: (254)761-6649
1200 Wooded Acres Dr.Fax: (254)741-5777
Waco, Texas 76710
-Original Message-
Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:
Running Transaction
Erasing: kernel
[1/1]
Removed: kernel.i686 0:2.6.18-92.1.18.el5
Complete!
That seemed to work, but I still have some 92.1.18 elements left:
ls -l /boot/*92.1.18*
/boot/config-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5debug
On Jun 3, 2009, at 2:37 PM, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:
That seemed to work, but I still have some 92.1.18 elements left:
ls -l /boot/*92.1.18*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 65438 Nov 12 2008
/boot/config-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5debug
for each file, find out what package it belongs to, and then remove
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
