On 07/01/2009 04:03 PM, JohnS wrote:
Ofcourse this raises the question - what are we doing wrong - and so
badly - that people cant find content when they want to, even though it
exists and is quite well done.
Mostly because what you do find on the net is incorrect! So they expect
to find the
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 16:45 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 07/01/2009 04:03 PM, JohnS wrote:
Ofcourse this raises the question - what are we doing wrong - and so
badly - that people cant find content when they want to, even though it
exists and is quite well done.
Mostly because what
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1134
seamonkey security update for CentOS 3 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1134.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1134
seamonkey security update for CentOS 3 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1134.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
Tiene incluida la directiva client-to-client en al configuración del tunel
de tu vpn?
*# Uncomment this directive to allow different
# clients to be able to see each other.
# By default, clients will only see the server.
# To force clients to only see the server, you
# will also need to
Hola,
Podrias mirar este link, y revisa el asunto de ACL y habilitar el acceso a
la navegacion.
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/
Saludos.
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Hola listeros. Tengo problemas con mi tarjeta de red y video de computador al
tratar de
instalar centos 5.3, este no me las reconoce.
El equipo es un lenovo, si alguien me puede colaborar diciendome que puedo
hacer en este
caso para solucionar este gram problema o que programa parecido al
Hola, si tu maquina se está volviendo lenta puede deberse a varias
cosas, por ejemplo nu exceso de consumo de ram por parte de algun
proceso, o un exceso de consumo de cpu.
Si es un exceso de consumo en CPU, podrias verlo con
sar -u -P ALL 1 0
Aqui verias si alguno de tus procesadores tiene un
Hola, con lspci podrias ver el hardware que tienes, para luego ver que
drivers necesitas.
Salu2.
El mié, 01-07-2009 a las 12:18 -0400, Cesar Augusto Martinez Cobo
escribió:
Hola listeros. Tengo problemas con mi tarjeta de red y video de computador al
tratar de
instalar centos 5.3, este no me
Amigos de Centos: tengo un problema al querer instalar centos en una pc HP
DC5700, la instalaciòn se estanca en :
ACPI: Interpreter enabled
ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrup routing
ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (:00)
Si alguien tiene alguna idea , agradecere mucho su ayuda.
Marcelo Ochoa
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of John R Pierce
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 7:02 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Checked the site ou linked too, but I don't get
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 12:05 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
Try this one:
Single File PHP Gallery
http://sye.dk/sfpg/
Very simple.
Ned Slider napsal(a):
Bingo! That's the whole point Russ - members of the Community don't know
what's going on with *their* Community Enterprise OS because there is no
dissemination of information.
What I *do* know is that 5.3 took ~10 weeks to release, and before
that 4.7 took ~7 weeks.
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Sander Snel wrote:
10. use sudo instead of su -
How does that help?
I still don't understand how using sudo instead of su makes it more secure.
If the user does not have the root password that the only danger to su -
is brute force from local account, but you can
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 01:20:50AM -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
What would be a security enhancement would be to borrow the bsd su which
only allows you to su to root from a wheel group account.
Take a look at /etc/pam.d/su; the ability of restricting
su to root for
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of John R Pierce
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 12:19 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Sorin
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Ray Van Dolson
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 12:12 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
FYI, gallery2 is available in EPEL for EL-5.
I used the info
Even though I do not recommend it for production yet, I packaged and am
playing with php 5.3.0 - src.rpm at
http://www.clfsrpm.net/php53/
(needed epel to build)
Other than the suhosin loadable module messing up pear's ability to do
anything, initial tests show it working fairly well.
Looks
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Sorin Srbu
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 11:26 AM
To: 'CentOS mailing list'
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
FYI, gallery2 is available in EPEL for EL-5.
I used the info
I was wondering if anyone could advise me on this.
I've got two Samba servers, each using passdb.tdb for authentication.
All works well, but I've now been asked to let users change their own
passwords (a requirement of data secuity). What's the best way of
arranging this, preferably updating
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
What was the problem with audacious again ?
# yum install audacious
...
Resolving Dependencies
-- Running transaction check
--- Package audacious.i386 0:1.3.2-5.el5.rf set to be updated
-- Processing Dependency: audacious-plugins = 1.3.0
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
Anyway, as I said previously, I would rather see the CentOS
Project concentrate on the core product and do a really good
job on that (i.e, a move closer to the old 4 week release lag
than the current 10 week release lag), and I would much rather
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 03:43:41PM -0700, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
I Can not speak for others, but the only time i have
seen Karanbir be stern with anyone is when they do
deserve it.
Well, I've read him saying in various ways and on
several occasions something that would equate
Dag Wieers wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
Anyway, as I said previously, I would rather see the CentOS
Project concentrate on the core product and do a really good
job on that (i.e, a move closer to the old 4 week release lag
than the current 10 week release lag),
Mauriat Miranda wrote:
Hi. Looking for suggestions/ideas.
I have pretty loose requirements at this point, but I am looking for a
tool (or set of tools) where I can automate and control a large group
of tasks by a basic web front end.
I have a series of scripts that do various conversions
Hi all,
Is anybody here using Fortran90 and Fortran77 on their CentOS-machine(s)?
If so, did you get that from a repo or something? One of our PhD-students
needs a software that requires the Fortran compilers mentioned in order to
make the sources for our i7-machines.
The Fortran stuff that is
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Hi all,
Is anybody here using Fortran90 and Fortran77 on their CentOS-machine(s)?
If so, did you get that from a repo or something? One of our PhD-students
needs a software that requires the Fortran compilers mentioned in order to
make the sources for our i7-machines.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Marcelo M. Garcia
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 2:24 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Fortran90 and 77 on CentOS
Is anybody here using Fortran90 and Fortran77 on their
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Thorpe
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 5:43
I was wondering if anyone could advise me on this.
We allow users th change their passwords via ctrl-alt-del, and via the web using
the password change tool that comes with exchange.
I've got two Samba
My point being: audacious does build, but it has a missing
dependency.
Which still == broken repo.
You were referring the whole time to SRPMs that do not build.
But you never give me an example of one.
On the contrary, I mentioned Comix. But again, I never try the
SRPM, but the
On Jul 1, 2009, at 5:42 AM, Kevin Thorpe ke...@pibenchmark.com wrote:
What's the best way of
arranging this, preferably updating both servers at the same time?
What you should do is pick one server to manage the passwords and have
the other setup to authenticate users against the first. Use
On 01/07/2009 14:29, Jason Pyeron wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Thorpe
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 5:43
I was wondering if anyone could advise me on this.
We allow users th change their passwords via ctrl-alt-del, and via the web using
the password change tool that
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Marcelo M.
Garciamarcelo.maia.gar...@googlemail.com wrote:
I suggest sge. It doesn't have a web interface, but a GUI. Or torque.
Looks like most of the robust tools are Java based, including Hudson.
I also found the following:
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 01:20 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
I still don't understand how using sudo instead of su makes it more secure.
As implemented by Ubuntu and others, sudo does nothing to make things
more secure. In fact, as you pointed out, it can be less secure.
However, sudo has the
Mauriat Miranda wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Marcelo M.
Garciamarcelo.maia.gar...@googlemail.com wrote:
I suggest sge. It doesn't have a web interface, but a GUI. Or torque.
Looks like most of the robust tools are Java based, including Hudson.
I also found the following:
mcclnx mcc wrote:
Thank you for answer.
I change /etc/fstab and using UUID instead of LABEL. after reboot, UUID did
NOT change disk sequence back to what I want. Boot device original
/dev/sda1, it still /dev/sdc1 NO change.
Have you tried asking Dell? Your asking to change the boot device
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:45:05AM +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote:
FYI, gallery2 is available in EPEL for EL-5.
I used the info available at
http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/rhel-fedora-centos-linux-enable-epel-repo/ to
add the EPEL-repo.
Replying to myself... Googled some and found that Gallery2 is
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
The audacious package is willing to wait that long :)
Nope, because I've built it *for myself*, i.e. in my repo.
And was your patch rejected from the places you are complaining about?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
The audacious package is willing to wait that long
:)
Nope, because I've built it *for myself*,
i.e. in my repo.
And was your patch rejected from the places you are
complaining about?
There. Is. No. Question. About. Any. Patch.
When you build audacious from SPEC + tarball, it
2009/7/1 Kevin Thorpe ke...@pibenchmark.com:
On 01/07/2009 14:29, Jason Pyeron wrote:
We're missing some bits on this. We don't run Windows servers at all so the
Exchange route is out. Also most of our
workstations are only windows Home, not Professional so we can't use a
domain or the
2009/7/1 mcclnx mcc mcc...@yahoo.com.tw:
Thank you for answer.
I change /etc/fstab and using UUID instead of LABEL. after reboot, UUID did
NOT change disk sequence back to what I want. Boot device original
/dev/sda1, it still /dev/sdc1 NO change.
Modify modprobe.conf to list the disk
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
The audacious package is willing to wait that long
:)
Nope, because I've built it *for myself*,
i.e. in my repo.
And was your patch rejected from the places you are
complaining about?
There. Is. No. Question. About. Any. Patch.
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
My point being: audacious does build, but it has a missing
dependency.
Which still == broken repo.
Sure, but when you started that thread you didn't mention your problem
with the comix package. I was still confused why you would talk about
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Dag Wieersd...@wieers.com wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
What was the problem with audacious again ?
snip
Maybe the problem is indeed you, and not the repository. You expect too
much from people who volunteer their own time. As I said
I have a server with 4 nics. Two are using different internet connections,
both with static IP's, and two are connected to our private network.
The two internet facing nics seem to be battling over the gateway
designation. Which ever I designate as the gateway the other stops
responding to
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Sorin Srbusorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote:
snip
FYI, gallery2 is available in EPEL for EL-5.
I used the info available at
http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/rhel-fedora-centos-linux-enable-epel-repo/ to
add the EPEL-repo.
r...@kadath ~ [0 jobs]# yum repolist
Loaded
Buildlogs are available from:
http://packages.sw.be/comix/_buildlogs/
I hope you come back and tell me what was your problem.
I have to be back on my continent before addressing this issue.
So far, I can see that the build of Comix seems to have been done
by Dries, and that it was
I believe that YOU are the only person on this list
who has expressed an interest in audacious
(whatever it is does) for CentOS during these several
days of rant.
I believe that YOU are the only person on this list
(whoever you are do) to have suggested popularity as
a required raison
Thank you for your answer.
change adapter sequence on /etc/modprobe.conf and rebuild image always my first
try.
Unfortunately it does NOT work on DELL R900. The reason is DELL R900 internal
RAID and external RAID use same driver. There is NO way to change adapter
sequence on
As a really radical suggestion, perhaps you should consider moving this
discussion to the rpmforge mail list, since it seems that most of your
issues are focused on that repository. You might even find a larger
collection of viewpoints there.
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 11:32 -0700, Radu-Cristian
Unfortunately it does NOT work on DELL R900. The reason is DELL R900
internal RAID and external RAID use same driver. There is NO way to
change adapter sequence on /etc/modprobe.conf.
Well, I suspect a udev rule *might* work to rename the discs, but labels
or uuid's aren’t designed to *change*
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
- audacious has a missing dependency (audacious-plugins)
- comix SRPM does not rebuild
That's 2 packages, I think we do quite well if that is it :)
But this is only because I am not crazy
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Doug Coats wrote:
I have a server with 4 nics. Two are using different internet connections,
both with static IP's, and two
are connected to our private network.
The two internet facing nics seem to be battling over the gateway designation.
Which ever I designate as
At Thu, 2 Jul 2009 02:39:02 +0800 (CST) CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Thank you for your answer.
change adapter sequence on /etc/modprobe.conf and rebuild image always my
first try.
Unfortunately it does NOT work on DELL R900. The reason is DELL R900
internal RAID
Doug Coats schrieb:
I have a server with 4 nics. Two are using different internet connections,
both with static IP's, and two are connected to our private network.
The two internet facing nics seem to be battling over the gateway
designation. Which ever I designate as the gateway the other
Thanks for your responses. I have tried some of the configurations that you
have mentioned but not all of them. I will try the others tonight when the
server is less active. In the meantime I will read the links you sent.
Thanks again. This is starting to drive me crazy.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009
Michael A. Peters wrote:
I still don't understand how using sudo instead of su makes it more secure.
Let's start with the simple case where only one person needs superuser
type privileges on a given machine. What, then, is the difference
between sudo and su -? There has to be one
On 7/1/09 2:47 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
I still don't understand how using sudo instead of su makes it more secure.
Let's start with the simple case where only one person needs superuser
type privileges on a given machine. What, then, is the
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:05:58 -0700
Gary Greene wrote:
. With sudo,
you get a record of what command was executed with superuser rights by whom
at whenever given hour.
sudo bash
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
Frank Cox wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:05:58 -0700
Gary Greene wrote:
. With sudo,
you get a record of what command was executed with superuser rights by whom
at whenever given hour.
sudo bash
If that's a problem for you, don't let people run bash via sudo.
There's an entire body of
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 04:59:36PM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
Frank Cox wrote:
Gary Greene wrote:
. With sudo,
you get a record of what command was executed with superuser rights by whom
at whenever given hour.
sudo bash
If that's a problem for you, don't let people run bash
ip rule add from xx.yy.51.46 table Cable
ip rule add from aa.bb.166.2 table T1
Other people seem to be using this configuration successfully but I
seem to be missing something important.
Change the above rules to:
ip rule add from xx.yy.51.46 to default lookup Cable
ip rule add from
I changed those two rules to no affect. I have also done the above
mentioned things. My tcpdump shows connections comming in on eth3 but there
is no outbound communication.
Example:
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on eth3, link-type EN10MB
On 7/1/09 3:08 PM, Frank Cox thea...@sasktel.net wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:05:58 -0700
Gary Greene wrote:
. With sudo,
you get a record of what command was executed with superuser rights by whom
at whenever given hour.
sudo bash
I didn't think I had to be THAT pedantic of what you
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
Buildlogs are available from:
http://packages.sw.be/comix/_buildlogs/
I hope you come back and tell me what was your problem.
I have to be back on my continent before addressing this issue.
So far, I can see that the build of Comix seems to have been done
Michael A. Peters wrote:
How it interacts with epel I don't really care about, but it should not
update vendor packages, and anything that requires an updated vendor
package will be broken on yum configurations that protect the base install.
I think you've confused rpmforge with something
Hello Doug,
Here are the iproute2 commands for a multigateway setup I did.
ip route add 220.232.217.72/29 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src
220.232.217.78 table pacific
ip route add 10.9.0.0/17 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src
10.9.1.101 table pacific
ip route add default via
Thanks for your responce!
If I open up Iptables to accept everything on eth3 and eth2 or turn it off
all together I get the same results.
I will have to look through your iproute2 commands to see how they match up
to mine. Do you see anything different in mine that would indicate the
issue?
At Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:08:08 -0600 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:05:58 -0700
Gary Greene wrote:
. With sudo,
you get a record of what command was executed with superuser rights by whom
at whenever given hour.
sudo bash
Which in turn is
I am not understanding somethings very fundamental to me troubleshooting
this issue.
How do I clear the iproute2's that I have created?
How do I tell if they are in affect?
What should they look like when listed if they are configured properly?
Thanks for holding my hand in this!
Warren Young wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
I still don't understand how using sudo instead of su makes it more secure.
Let's start with the simple case where only one person needs superuser
type privileges on a given machine. What, then, is the difference
between sudo and su -? There
Robert Heller wrote:
At Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:08:08 -0600 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:05:58 -0700
Gary Greene wrote:
. With sudo,
you get a record of what command was executed with superuser rights by whom
at whenever given hour.
sudo bash
Which
Doug Coats wrote:
Thanks for your responce!
If I open up Iptables to accept everything on eth3 and eth2 or turn it
off all together I get the same results.
I will have to look through your iproute2 commands to see how they
match up to mine. Do you see anything different in mine that
I am convinced that my iproute2 tables are all messed upIn fact I found
some errors in my initial post.
# ip rule list
0: from all lookup 255
32766: from all lookup main
32767: from all lookup default
/etc/iproute2/rt_tables
#
# reserved values
#
255 local
254 main
253
Doug Coats wrote:
I am not understanding somethings very fundamental to me
troubleshooting this issue.
How do I clear the iproute2's that I have created?
They are cleared by being deleted or a reboot takes place.
Try 'ip route help' and 'ip rule help'
How do I tell if they are in
Doug Coats wrote:
I am convinced that my iproute2 tables are all messed upIn fact I
found some errors in my initial post.
# ip rule list
0: from all lookup 255
32766: from all lookup main
32767: from all lookup default
Boy, did we miss that...
/etc/iproute2/rt_tables
#
So if I run the following two commands the rules show up in the list.
ip rule add from 173.11.51.46 table Cable
ip rule add from 67.152.166.2 table T1
# ip rule list
0: from all lookup 255
32764: from 67.152.166.2 lookup T1
32765: from 173.11.51.46 lookup Cable
32766: from all lookup
Doug Coats wrote:
So if I run the following two commands the rules show up in the list.
ip rule add from 173.11.51.46 table Cable
ip rule add from 67.152.166.2 table T1
# ip rule list
0: from all lookup 255
32764: from 67.152.166.2 lookup T1
32765: from 173.11.51.46 lookup
Doug Coats wrote:
So if I run the following two commands the rules show up in the list.
ip rule add from 173.11.51.46 table Cable
ip rule add from 67.152.166.2 table T1
# ip rule list
0: from all lookup 255
32764: from 67.152.166.2 lookup T1
32765: from 173.11.51.46 lookup
Doug Coats wrote:
So if I run the following two commands the rules show up in the list.
ip rule add from 173.11.51.46 table Cable
ip rule add from 67.152.166.2 table T1
# ip rule list
0: from all lookup 255
32764: from 67.152.166.2 lookup T1
32765: from 173.11.51.46 lookup
80 matches
Mail list logo
