I am running CentOS 5.3 x86_64 as my dom0 and CentOS 5.3 on my domU's. On
the dom0, I have two interfaces that are bonded and have tagged VLANs. I
can get the networks to the domU's by creating a bridge for each of the
VLANS (bond0.3, bond0.4, etc). On the domU, the interfaces show up as
Verifica en Firefox, en la pestaña del menu Archivo Trabajar sin
conexion este desactivada, a mi me sucede mucho
Saludos
El 31 de julio de 2009 15:55,
alejandroalejandro_garr...@click.com.py escribió:
hola, tengo el modem huawei E226 y fedora 11.
mi proble es que al conectar el modem al
Hola a todos.
Los que me comentaron lo del SELinux, ya lo deshabilite y nada pasó.. todo
está igual.
para deshabilitarlo usé el comando:
system-config-securitylevel
y luego en la opción: Deshabilitar.
Reinicié el equipo y nada.
Lo del smbldap-tools, claro que lo instalé y configuré, acá pongo
Mira el Log de samba que pasa cuando alguien intenta ingresar
'/var/log/samba'
¿Es posible realizar la prueba conectando un equipo linux?.
Entre el PDC y la red hay algún firewall?.
2009/7/31 samuel correa samuel.cor...@gmail.com
Hola a todos.
Los que me comentaron lo del SELinux, ya
Al final les cuento que hoy me decidi y descargue y compile el kernel
2.6.30.3 de kernel.org. Funciono perfecto y no tuve mayores problemas, salvo
unos modules para el kernel de sunray, gracias a dios alguien los habia
modificado para el kernel 2.6.29, y con esas modificaciones anduvo todo ok.
On Thursday 30 July 2009 19:23:24 Kwan Lowe wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Rob Kampenrkam...@kampensonline.com
wrote: [snip]
I have read many hundreds of pages, have purchased O'reilly's LDAP System
Administration but cannot seem to get my dirsrv based LDAP to function.
I do
Dear all,
I got weird permission on one of my server, when I ls -l the / i got
permission for all directory set to drwxr-xr-x. there are dot after
the executable permission for others. what dot mean in permission and
how to fix it? the actual problem is I could login via ssh but cannot
login via
Muhammad panji wrote on Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:48:29 +0700:
I got weird permission on one of my server, when I ls -l the / i got
permission for all directory set to drwxr-xr-x. there are dot after
the executable permission for others. what dot mean in permission and
how to fix it?
I have never
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
muhammad panji wrote:
Dear all,
I got weird permission on one of my server, when I ls -l the / i got
permission for all directory set to drwxr-xr-x. there are dot after
the executable permission for others. what dot mean in permission and
how to
On 07/31/2009 02:27 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I don't have any legal obligation to help old ladies cross the street,
or rescue cats from trees. It's what you do because you're a good
person. Doing this in a community sense is what makes you a good
neighbor, and what helps build community
Hi,
i have configured a Master DNS server, i have also created
records to delegate a zone to child dns server
But when named service is started it says
Jul 31 14:33:30 localhost named[21581]: dns.zone:9: ignoring out-of-zone data
(child.dns.com)
I am using
Friday, July 31, 2009, is the 10th annual System Administrator
Appreciation Day. On this special international day, give your System
Administrator something that shows that you truly appreciate their hard
work and dedication. (All day Friday, 24 hours, your local timezone).
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 05:46:53AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
IIRC, the . at the end of the permissions indicates that the file has
additional permission controls beyond the standard DAC bits, such as
filesystem ACLs, filesystem capabilities, or other attributes.
FACLs are normally indicated
In article 20090730170329.ge4...@roque.1407.org,
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra r...@1407.org wrote:
If possible, maintain the centos name.
Is there a .os tld? cent.os ? :)
No:
$ host -tns com.
com name server g.gtld-servers.net.
com name server h.gtld-servers.net.
com name server
I have very basic question:
I have downloaded *CentOS-5.3-i386-LiveCD* from CentOS website. Now I need
to install it on my Acer Laptop permanently not as a liveCD. How do I burn
it to a DVD to be able to install it by simply restarting my laptop?
Thank you,
Sam
At Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:56:14 +0300 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
I have very basic question:
I have downloaded *CentOS-5.3-i386-LiveCD* from CentOS website. Now I need
to install it on my Acer Laptop permanently not as a liveCD. How do I burn
it to a DVD to be able to
Tom Brown wrote:
why is everyone getting so jumpy - its only a domain name thats at
stake, he's been AWOL for a year or more and the project has been OK
people should worry less
I understand the worries. The news have reached the front page of
Slashdot, and thus might reach certain
On Friday 31 July 2009 13:05:52 Robert Heller wrote:
At Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:56:14 +0300 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
I have very basic question:
I have downloaded *CentOS-5.3-i386-LiveCD* from CentOS website. Now I
need to install it on my Acer Laptop permanently not as a
I understand the worries. The news have reached the front page of
Slashdot, and thus might reach certain technically inclined managers,
which in turn may cause questions about contingency plans to be directed
at the IT staff. I have a feeling that I have no contingency plan,
don't worry,
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:55:42 -0400, Clint Dilks cli...@scms.waikato.ac.nz
wrote:
Hi People,
I have a user who is regularly having X Crash. This seemed to happen
once a month but has increased to once or twice a week. It doesn't seem
to be application specific. The only information about
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 21:15 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Jim Perrinjper...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Johnny Hughesjoh...@centos.org wrote:
Why ... we are under no obligation to tell people how how we spend
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 08:20 +0100, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Thursday 30 July 2009 19:23:24 Kwan Lowe wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Rob Kampenrkam...@kampensonline.com
wrote: [snip]
I have read many hundreds of pages, have purchased O'reilly's LDAP System
Administration but
Hi,
I've installed recently OpenOffice.org 3.1 on Centos 5.3. I use OOo in
headless mode. I have no problem when running as root, but I'd prefer
run it as non-root user (oooserver user). When I run the script in
debug mode this is the output:
sh -x/tmp/ooo-headless-nonroot start
+ .
--On Friday, July 31, 2009 4:54 PM +0530 Gopinath Achari
gopin...@signal-networks.com wrote:
i have configured a Master DNS server, i have also created
records to
delegate a zone to child dns server But when named service is started it
says
Jul 31 14:33:30 localhost
Alan,
We set actimeo=3 and this has significantly improved our problem.
I saw this value in an HP thread and seemed reasonable.
Thanks for the heads up.
_
He's no failure. He's not dead yet.
William Lloyd George
-Original Message-
From:
Connie Sieh wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Has anyone considered joining forces with Scientific Linux to reduce the
workload and give both a more robust infrastructure?
Yes, but the goals are rather different.
I thought both
On Friday 31 July 2009 15:05:29 Craig White wrote:
snip
I'm going through the Howto:Samba from directory.fedoraproject.org at
the moment and hopefully that will get me started.
But what would be nice is:
1. Howto:migtate existing NIS to CentosDS
2. Howto:migrate existing Samba to
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 16:00 +0100, Tony Molloy wrote:
But this all would be virtually impossible without a decent
knowledge of
how LDAP works and that is regardless of whether you use CentOS-DS
or
OpenLDAP.
Craig
After reading Carter's book I think i've got some idea of how LDAP
Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
Connie Sieh wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Has anyone considered joining forces with Scientific Linux to reduce the
workload and give both a more robust infrastructure?
Yes, but the goals are rather different.
I thought both had upstream
On Friday 31 July 2009 16:12:12 Craig White wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 16:00 +0100, Tony Molloy wrote:
But this all would be virtually impossible without a decent
knowledge of
how LDAP works and that is regardless of whether you use CentOS-DS
or
OpenLDAP.
Craig
/attachments/20090731/6ee72b59/attachment-0001.bin
--
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 02:34:28 +0200
From: Tru Huynh t...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1185 Critical CentOS 3 x86_64
seamonkey - security update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
I have 2 video devices LML33 and PV155
$ lspci
06:00.0 Multimedia video controller: Zoran Corporation ZR36057PQC Video
cutting chipset (rev 02)
07:08.0 Multimedia video controller: Brooktree Corporation Bt878 Video
Capture (rev 11)
07:08.1 Multimedia controller: Brooktree Corporation Bt878
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Tony Molloytony.mol...@ul.ie wrote:
Installing centos-ds is not a problem. It's what you do after it. Especially
for people like me who have no experience with OpenLDAP.
Linux and Windows user authentication is straightforward, with GUI
based setup and
Les Mikesell wrote:
Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
Connie Sieh wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Has anyone considered joining forces with Scientific Linux to reduce the
workload and give both a more robust infrastructure?
Yes, but the goals are rather different.
I thought both
Hi all,
It appears that on my nice little CentOS 5.3 machines Apache only
allows me to store content in directories which are under /var/www/
For instance, putting content in /var/www/test and defining the following alias:
Alias /test /var/www/test
then accessing it under http://hostname/test
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:17, Boris Epsteinborepst...@gmail.com wrote:
Any idea why that would be?
It's SELinux. Files exported by Apache must have context
httpd_sys_content_t. You can use ls -Z to see the context of a
certain file. You can use chcon -R httpd_sys_content_t /home/test to
--On Friday, July 31, 2009 1:24 PM -0400 Filipe Brandenburger
filbran...@gmail.com wrote:
In general I would advise you to try to adapt your application so that
the files that need to be seen by Apache are under /var/www, if you
have that flexibility it will be simpler and have less chance of
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Filipe Brandenburger
filbran...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:17, Boris Epsteinborepst...@gmail.com wrote:
Any idea why that would be?
It's SELinux. Files exported by Apache must have context
httpd_sys_content_t. You can use ls -Z to see
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Boris Epsteinborepst...@gmail.com wrote:
I found an even simplier solution - disabled SELinux. I've got a
firewall and that is plenty.
No. It's really not. If someone exploits apache, or php, they'll be
coming in via port 80 or 443 which your firewall has
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Jim Perrinjper...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Boris Epsteinborepst...@gmail.com wrote:
I found an even simplier solution - disabled SELinux. I've got a
firewall and that is plenty.
No. It's really not. If someone exploits apache, or
tell said managers to open the coffers and pay for support if they are
that worried
Maybe they would, but there is no content on the Centos wiki on the
commercial support page. Considering the allegations of mishandling
of funds, I doubt any organization would donate directly Centos
at
sounds like current default apache security
near the begining you of httpd.conf you will find
Directory /
Options FollowSymLinks
AllowOverride None
/Directory
Directory /var/www/html
Options Indexes FollowSymLinks
AllowOverride None
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
--On Friday, July 31, 2009 2:07 PM -0400 Boris Epstein
borepst...@gmail.com wrote:
I am running mod_security and also if the intruder gets to the shell
level they will be able to bypass the SELinux entirely.
How? The selinux commands require root access. First you'd have to get a
root
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Boris Epsteinborepst...@gmail.com wrote:
I am running mod_security and also if the intruder gets to the shell
level they will be able to bypass the SELinux entirely. I believe in
security too but security should not be crippling.
Agreed, however your statement
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:36:51 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
[]
My 'dream' OS has always been one where the base install was extremely
minimal - just enough to install the rest over the network. Then there
would be a way that anyone could 'publish' their installed list of
repositories
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 06:59 -0700, Craig White wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 21:15 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Jim Perrinjper...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Johnny Hughesjoh...@centos.org wrote:
Why ... we are
Tom Brown wrote:
tell said managers to open the coffers and pay for support if they are
that worried
Well, it hasn't happened to me (yet). I just thought that it might be
why some people seem to be somewhat worried.
Regards
Ingemar
___
CentOS
Hi,
My 'dream' OS has always been one where the base install was extremely
minimal - just enough to install the rest over the network. Then there
would be a way that anyone could 'publish' their installed list of
repositories and packages and anyone else could duplicate that machine's
setup
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Marcus Moellerm...@marcus-moeller.de wrote:
But please note: CentOS itself has a clear strategy which means
upstream compatibility. Nothing more and nothing less. No focus on
specialized systems (which does not mean you can create a custom spin
for an specific
Boris Epstein wrote:
I found an even simplier solution - disabled SELinux. I've got a
firewall and that is plenty.
Wow, not sure I'd place all my faith in a firewall.
There is an SELinux tutorial on the Wiki that explicitly covers how to
handle Apache serving content outside of
Are you talking about this one:
http://ftp.itu.edu.tr/Mirror/CentOS/5.3/isos/i386/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-DVD.iso
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
At Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:56:14 +0300 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
I have very basic
Beartooth wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:36:51 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
[]
My 'dream' OS has always been one where the base install was extremely
minimal - just enough to install the rest over the network. Then there
would be a way that anyone could 'publish' their installed list
Marcus Moeller wrote:
Hi,
My 'dream' OS has always been one where the base install was extremely
minimal - just enough to install the rest over the network. Then there
would be a way that anyone could 'publish' their installed list of
repositories and packages and anyone else could
Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
My 'dream' OS has always been one where the base install was extremely
minimal - just enough to install the rest over the network. Then there
would be a way that anyone could 'publish' their installed list of
repositories and packages and anyone else could
First issue: I did an upgrade from 4.7 to 5.3 on an HP DL380G3 box.
I got yum working again and upgraded 160+ packages. During that
process I saw:
---
Installing : kernel-PAE[157/322]
WARNING: No module mptscsi found for kernel
Hello:
I keep getting these
An IOException occurred at
scim_bridge_client_imcontext_set_cursor_location ()
messages -- and I'd like to turn them off. I won't mind having scim
just plain turned off.
However, in using Google, I find a hint such as right click on the
tray, ... -- so where's
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:45 PM, James B. Byrnebyrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote:
However, having been bitten once, I feel that I must ask this more
formal question. What steps, if any, have been taken to establish
the CentOS project as a separate legal entity distinct from any
individual
On 07/30/2009 08:45 PM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 18:56 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
see around (it's there since 06.28):
http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/x86_64/virt/RPMS/libvirt-0.6.4-2.el5.x86_64.rpm
FYI: when I try to install libvirt from your repo,
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 15:01 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
snip
The idea of a minimal installation is interesting. Could this be done
snip
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
In spite of the fact that all thse ideas for what the new CentOS org
could or would do, they really don't
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 6:56 AM, sam Rsamca...@gmail.com wrote:
I have very basic question:
I have downloaded CentOS-5.3-i386-LiveCD from CentOS website. Now I need to
install it on my Acer Laptop permanently not as a liveCD. How do I burn it
to a DVD to be able to install it by simply
On 31/07/09 22:01, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 6:56 AM, sam Rsamca...@gmail.com wrote:
I have very basic question:
I have downloaded CentOS-5.3-i386-LiveCD from CentOS website. Now I need to
install it on my Acer Laptop permanently not as a liveCD. How do I burn it
to a DVD
James B. Byrne wrote on Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:45:21 -0400 (EDT):
However, having been bitten once, I feel that I must ask this more
formal question. What steps, if any, have been taken to establish
the CentOS project as a separate legal entity distinct from any
individual contributor? What
Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Craig Whitecraigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
snip
t totally agree and just want to add one more thing...I am very happy to
see Johnny posting to this list. It has been a long time and I hope you
are well.
+1 :-) I was planning to begin a new thread,
William L. Maltby wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 15:01 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
snip
The idea of a minimal installation is interesting. Could this be done
snip
In spite of the fact that all thse ideas for what the new CentOS org
could or would do, they really don't belong cluttering a
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Jake Shiptonjak...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
May also want to consider using the netinstall images if you have a
constant network connection during install. Saves downloading a whole
DVD or a bunch of CD's
;-)
Although do try the LiveCD as stated above.
On 07/31/2009 08:56 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
Sounds like all you folks need to get together, start a CentOS minimal
install CD SIG and get on with it :)
or a shared editor, and write a kickstart :)
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 16:17 -0400, Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
Hello:
I keep getting these
An IOException occurred at
scim_bridge_client_imcontext_set_cursor_location ()
messages -- and I'd like to turn them off. I won't mind having scim
just plain turned off.
However, in using
I'm already hearing
rumblings about risks from others in the company who don't know much
about the situation but know we are using Centos and saw a news posting
somewhere - and I suspect that is happening in every large company.
No doubt. And if the people who mange the CentOS servers in
At Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:49:46 +0300 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Are you talking about this one:
http://ftp.itu.edu.tr/Mirror/CentOS/5.3/isos/i386/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-DVD.iso
Yes, this is the install DVD image.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Robert Heller
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Mike A. Harrismhar...@mharris.ca wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
muhammad panji wrote:
Dear all,
I got weird permission on one of my server, when I ls -l the / i got
permission for all directory set to drwxr-xr-x. there are dot after
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Kai Schaetzlmailli...@conactive.com wrote:
Muhammad panji wrote on Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:48:29 +0700:
I got weird permission on one of my server, when I ls -l the / i got
permission for all directory set to drwxr-xr-x. there are dot after
the executable
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 13:55 -0500, Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Marcus Moellerm...@marcus-moeller.de wrote:
But please note: CentOS itself has a clear strategy which means
upstream compatibility. Nothing more and nothing less. No focus on
specialized systems (which
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 20:56 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
Marcus Moeller wrote:
Hi,
My 'dream' OS has always been one where the base install was extremely
minimal - just enough to install the rest over the network. Then there
...
Sounds like all you folks need to get together, start a
I've just built a new system and installed latest Centos 5.3 on it. My old
box also has an up to date Centos 5 on it.
Some things are just plain different between the two installations, and
it's stumping me why that would be. Example:
on the old box, the shutdown dialog offers restart, cancel,
On 07/31/2009 08:45 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
What steps, if any, have been taken to establish
the CentOS project as a separate legal entity distinct from any
individual contributor? What protections are being put in place to
prevent future misappropriations of donations and advertising
On 07/30/2009 06:34 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
This is an Open Letter to Lance Davis from fellow CentOS Developers
People looking for info about this and recent progress will find
relevant info being updated on http://www.centos.org/ as things develop.
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ :
76 matches
Mail list logo
