Ok con lo que te indico Ernesto
Te ayudo, algo que aprendi con la practica espero que te ayude
*Crea el mismo usuario que tienes en win2 en tu CentOS
*Luego en un terminal pon smbpasswd -L -a usuario y te pedira que ingreses
tu password ojo pon el mismo de tu win2
saludos
El 10 de agosto
2009/8/14 Darrin Khan medav...@gmail.com:
Hello Gavin,
We have a large number of locations around the world with a number of
servers in each. We use rsyslog to handle this, as we are able to use
encrypted connections back to the central servers.
Also each location has an aggregation host,
- Original Message
From: Chan Chung Hang Christopher christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Friday, 14 August, 2009 3:31:32
Subject: [CentOS] OT: Fortunate clueless dd chum - lvm recovery
Looks like the chum did not have to lose any data.
Ian Murray a écrit :
Niki,
I am perfectly comfortable with my email client and I prefer top posting
because I don't like wading through constantly re-quoted stuff I already
read. I will on occasion interleave and bottom post if it serves my
purpose, though. If you don't like it, don't
First of all, I would dd a copy of the whole drive off to another drive, so
you can have a few goes at this.
How do you know only those bits where lost?
The dd command zeros the first 64 sectors, that is, the mbr and then the
next 63 sectors which would the bootsector of the first
- Original Message
From: Chan Chung Hang Christopher christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Friday, 14 August, 2009 10:00:41
Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Fortunate clueless dd chum - lvm recovery
First of all, I would dd a copy of the
Ian Murray a écrit :
Nobody said I was breaking rules, only that I annoyed them.
Then let me apologize for having bothered you with outdated concepts
like respect, politeness or consideration. Believe it or not, I just
took a peek in my Oxford Dictionary: egoism, n (usu derog) state of
Hi all.
Julien Tinnes and Tavis Ormandy from the Google Security Team have
recently found a Linux kernel vulnerability which affects all 2.4 and
2.6 kernels since 2001 on all architectures. Please read the
announcement on LWM: http://lwn.net/Articles/347006/ for further
information about the
Marcus Moeller wrote on Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:24:39 +0200:
The only workaroud that is known to me atm is to disable the affected
kernel modules (which should be handled with care as some of them may
provide necessary functionality in your operating environment):
If vm.mmap_min_addr is 0 you
On Friday 14 August 2009, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Marcus Moeller wrote on Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:24:39 +0200:
The only workaroud that is known to me atm is to disable the affected
kernel modules (which should be handled with care as some of them may
provide necessary functionality in your
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Chan Chung Hang
Christopherchristopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
First of all, I would dd a copy of the whole drive off to another drive, so
you can have a few goes at this.
How do you know only those bits where lost?
The dd command zeros the first 64
Hi again.
alias net-pf-24 # PPPoE
Sorry, typo in pf-24.
grep -q '^alias net-pf-3 off' /etc/modprobe.conf || \
echo 'alias net-pf-3 off' /etc/modprobe.conf
grep -q '^alias net-pf-4 off' /etc/modprobe.conf || \
echo 'alias net-pf-4 off' /etc/modprobe.conf
grep -q '^alias net-pf-5 off'
Upstream bugzilla to follow:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516949
Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Ross Walker
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 10:30
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Fortunate clueless dd chum - lvm recovery
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Chan
was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090814/8fd356e3/attachment-0001.bin
--
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:36:01 +0200
From: Tru Huynh
Ross Walker wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Chan Chung Hang
Christopherchristopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
Question now is, was the first sector of partition 1 damaged (was it
63 or 64 sectors dd'd)?
If so it will require a more tricky procedure to fix.
No, the ext2 file
Hello all,
Have installed eclipse 3.5 x86_64 from the eclipse site, with CDT and QT
integration.
I am just starting to learn C++ but I would like to know how to set up
the ability to compile for 32 bit as well?
At the moment I am googleing this as well.
Regards,
Coert
Hi All:
I am looking for some possible recommendations on the handling of our
internal DNS services. First some background...
Until recently our entire network was located within a single facility
with internal DNS services provided by our CentOS 4.7 (using BIND).
While I had problems with
Coert Waagmeester wrote:
Hello all,
Have installed eclipse 3.5 x86_64 from the eclipse site, with CDT and QT
integration.
I am just starting to learn C++ but I would like to know how to set up
the ability to compile for 32 bit as well?
specify -m32 as a gcc (or g++ or c++) compile
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Akemi Yagiamy...@gmail.com wrote:
Upstream bugzilla to follow:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516949
Just a note to say that the issue is also being tracked in the CentOS forums:
On Aug 14, 2009, at 12:48 PM, Robert Nichols
rnicholsnos...@comcast.net wrote:
Ross Walker wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Chan Chung Hang
Christopherchristopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
Question now is, was the first sector of partition 1 damaged (was it
63 or 64 sectors
On Friday 14 August 2009 17:17, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
Here are my questions...
1. Is the BIND master/slave the appropriate approach?
Yes, you should already have something like this in case the main/master
server would fail.
2. Can I have each subnet be a master for itself and a
grace rante wrote:
Does anybody know how to restart X in centos 5.3? /etc/init.d/gdm | xdm
seems to be missing.
CTRL+ALT+BACKSPACE ?
nate
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hello,
I'd like to get in to rpm building and am looking for a CentOS
specific document if any to get me going? I want to repackage an existing
rpm and give it different runtime options so it'll work on a server, and
make an rpm at least one probably more, and then submit them to the
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Dave dave.meh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to get in to rpm building and am looking for a CentOS
specific document if any to get me going? I want to repackage an existing
rpm and give it different runtime options so it'll work on a server, and
Dave,
--- On Fri, 8/14/09, Dave dave.meh...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Dave dave.meh...@gmail.com
Subject: [CentOS] building CentOS rpms?
To: centos@centos.org
Date: Friday, August 14, 2009, 5:31 PM
Hello,
I'd like to get in to rpm building and
am looking for a CentOS
specific document
Hello,
One of the rpms has a src.rpm file, the other one i need to make.
I'd also like to do this as a nonroot user.
Thanks.
Dave.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Mfawa Alfred Onen
Sent: Friday, August
Ross Walker wrote:
On Aug 14, 2009, at 12:48 PM, Robert Nichols
rnicholsnos...@comcast.net wrote:
Ross Walker wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Chan Chung Hang
Christopherchristopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
Question now is, was the first sector of partition 1 damaged (was it
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 4:40 PM, natecen...@linuxpowered.net wrote:
grace rante wrote:
Does anybody know how to restart X in centos 5.3? /etc/init.d/gdm | xdm
seems to be missing.
CTRL+ALT+BACKSPACE ?
Log out and log back in also works (which ctlaltbs will do, too).
mhr
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Kristopher
Kanekristopher.k...@gmail.com wrote:
I get to learn something new at his expense, (which is now just a scare)
nice successor eh? :-D
Maybe you could point him to this list for lunch time lesson reading,
however, you won't be able to talk about him
From: Robert Spangler Sent: August 14, 2009 16:18
On Friday 14 August 2009 17:17, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
Here are my questions...
1. Is the BIND master/slave the appropriate approach?
Yes, you should already have something like this in case the
main/master server would fail.
I
On Aug 14, 2009, at 9:22 PM, Robert Nichols
rnicholsnos...@comcast.net wrote:
Ross Walker wrote:
On Aug 14, 2009, at 12:48 PM, Robert Nichols
rnicholsnos...@comcast.net wrote:
Ross Walker wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Chan Chung Hang
Christopherchristopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk
On Friday 14 August 2009 21:29, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
From: Robert Spangler Sent: August 14, 2009 16:18
On Friday 14 August 2009 17:17, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
Here are my questions...
1. Is the BIND master/slave the appropriate approach?
Yes, you should already
Ross Walker wrote:
Since you don't know if LVM has a recovery path how can you imply it
doesn't?
I've seen plenty of evidence that tools for LVM recovery are lacking.
I see postings from people asking about recovery of damaged LVM
volumes and not getting any reasonable answers about how to
From: Robert Spangler Sent: August 14, 2009 19:22
I would suggest placing one on each site. That way you can cut
the traffic between sites for DNS lookups. I would also ensure that
only one does the updates per domain.
That makes sense and is essentially what I was planning to do.
The
Hugh:
I will check those out but what about the ease of use factor. Would
you suggest something like webmin over had tailoring the config files?
I use Webmin for managing DNS. It is a great tool and makes
life much easier.
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, www.JAMMConsulting.com
Will
36 matches
Mail list logo
