On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Garry.Dale garry.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote on 10/19/2009 04:00 PM:
snip
Could I also remind people to proof read it.
I made a few minor spelling and grammar updates.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Phil Schaffner
We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of CentOS-5.4 for
i386 and x86_64 Architectures.
CentOS-5.4 is based on the upstream release EL 5.4.0, and includes
packages from all variants including Server and Client. All upstream
repositories have been combined into one, to make it
Under Xen I am booting a virtual server from a recovery CD-Rom
(actually a iso image)
When the cd boots in the console window I have to
send the single key F12 to the window within 10 seconds
from start, otherwise it will try to boot from harddisk.
Pressing F12 in the console window does not
Hola gente tengo que migrar un servidor, en realidad mi idea es instalar en
el nuevo hardware con centos 5.4 de 64 bit los mismos sevicios que tengo en
el server viejo con centos 5.3 de 32 bit . La idea es no tener que volver a
configurar todo otra vez, si no instalar los mismos programas y
Saludos.
Tengo centos 5 y como proxy el squid 2.6. ahora me han pedido que tengo que
pasar el trafico por un ISA Server. :(
Puse en el conf. esto
cache_peer datos_del_ISA parent 8080 0 no-query no-digest
Hasta aqui todo ok pero ?
Cuando trato de acceder a paginas activas con metodos get o
Hola,
Podrias revisar si Selinux esta instalado y corriendo, en todo caso ahi esta
una guia de instalacion de zimbra para centos, es algo antigua pero sirve
para la version actual.
http://www.zimbra.com/forums/installation/8726-centos-5-install-guide.html
Saludos.
El 20 de octubre de 2009
El 20 de octubre de 2009 12:34, Renato Covarrubias Romero
rcova...@alumnos.inf.utfsm.cl escribió:
El 19/10/09 17:14, Rodrigo Julio P�rez escribió:
Estimados Listeros, Buenas Tardes, tengo una pequeña duda, y necesito
vuestra ayuda.
Tengo un servidor de Nombres en un Centos 5.3 funciona
Estoy por levantar un servidor para compartir unidades de red e
investigando en la red me he topado con muchos fatores y distintas
formas de hacer esto, tengo varias preguntas:
1 que diferencia hay entre una vercion de 32 bits y de 64 bits, hablando del SO?
2 cual es la mejor forma de certificar
hola
al momento de querer repoducir un video .wmv utilizando totem en centos 5.0 o
5.3 me aparece el siguieten error sabran de algun rpm para correir este errror
Se requiere un complemento de demultiplexor Advanced Streaming Format (ASF)
para reproducir este medio, pero no está instalado.
Hardy:
Recién ahora estoy mirando tu respuesta, y te quiero agradecer por las
aclaraciones.
Realmente me sirvieron para asentar un concepto que hace rato venia
confundiendo.
Osvaldo Rivas
- Original Message -
From: Hardy Beltran Monasterios h...@hardy.com.bo
To: centos-es@centos.org
From: rinos...@hotmail.com
To: centos-es@centos.org
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:04:24 -0500
Subject: [CentOS-es] problema compiz y reproductor de videos
hola
al momento de querer repoducir un video .wmv utilizando totem en centos 5.0 o
5.3 me aparece el siguieten error sabran de algun
muy buena respuesta Hardy
2009/10/7 Hardy Beltran Monasterios h...@hardy.com.bo
El mar, 06-10-2009 a las 09:42 -0400, Osvaldo Rivas escribió:
Que tal lista, me gustaría si no es mucha molestia, aclarar una duda
que tengo hace mucho tiempo.
La situación es esta,
Registre un dominio
Exelente
2009/10/21 Ricardo Martinez harisel...@gmail.com
muy buena respuesta Hardy
2009/10/7 Hardy Beltran Monasterios h...@hardy.com.bo
El mar, 06-10-2009 a las 09:42 -0400, Osvaldo Rivas escribió:
Que tal lista, me gustaría si no es mucha molestia, aclarar una duda
que
Hola si es solo un maquina para trabajo de escritorio yo recomendaría ubuntu
de la 8.04 hacia arriba, considero que centos es una distro optimizadas para
servidor.
Atte.
2009/10/21 Rubén González rhu...@msn.com
--
From: rinos...@hotmail.com
To:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
Remember that windows integration website ( don't remember the name
but related to nLite and ryanvm) shutdown by Microsoft - it made a
great deal of news because they had scripts to take out annoyances
such as
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:12 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote
Simple, it's only a NAS device, and not really a file server / web
server / data base server as well. The purposes I needed is to replace
SMB on the network, and iSCSI seemed like a good alternative.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 9:25 PM, MHR mhullr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Rob Townley rob.town...@gmail.com wrote:
Acrobat isn't easy to use either. i find it kinda clunky and not
intuitive. Maybe it is the nature of vector graphics and text.
InkScape for graphics
Rudi Ahlers schrieb
John, you're right. iSCSI isn't an SMB replacement as I have learned
through all of this. SMB is good for sharing data between many PC's,
and even servers, but from what I understand it's also slower that
iSCSI and won't allow me to scale the storage by simply adding
Hi list,
I run quite a few centos 5.3 servers and have a local yum repository
which is working fine.
Below a list of what I'm rsyncing at the moment + an extract from my /
etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo file
I copied the OS directory from the install media and ran createrepo on
that dir.
On 10/20/2009 12:15 PM Benjamin Franz wrote:
ken wrote:
Okay, here's one. Maybe someone here can figure it out.
Upgrading from 4.5 to 4.5. From a 4.6 ISO I copied all the RPMs into a
directory... let's call it c:/install :). Now the oracle dba has
strict parameters on what versions can be
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
Rudi Ahlers schrieb
John, you're right. iSCSI isn't an SMB replacement as I have learned
through all of this. SMB is good for sharing data between many PC's,
and even servers, but from what I understand it's also
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 08:58:59PM -0400, Mathew S. McCarrell wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:08 PM, fred smith
fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.uswrote:
Now that it appears that some folks are able to get the 5.4 downloads
(and a GREAT BIG THANK YOU to all the centos team members who make this
Rudi Ahlers schrieb:
Hi Rainer,
I honestly don't want to spend a lot of cash on a proprietary system
like NetApp and actually want to use a lot of old tower machines (i.e.
limited space for hard drives, and no redundancy, slower CPU's, etc)
we already have. CentOS is my preferred OS of
List archive: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Daniel Bird db...@sgul.ac.uk wrote:
Hi all,
A while back I vaguely remember someone posting a link to documentation
on how to prioritise console access (for want of a better expression).
For the life of
Sorry, don't have time to read the whole thread (busy day!), so please excuse
me if I just add to the noise, but this may work for you (at a bash prompt):
for x in *; do rpm --freshen --repackage $x; done
If it's not what you're looking for, I apologize in advance. :)
--
David Fix
Hi :)
- Paul Herbosch paul.herbo...@tbwaworld.com escreveu:
I run quite a few centos 5.3 servers and have a local yum repository
which is working fine.
Below a list of what I'm rsyncing at the moment + an extract from my
/etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo file
I copied the OS directory
The problem with such a loop is that only one pkg is the arg to each
invocation of the rpm command. So if there are any dependencies for a
particular invocation, nothing will be installed.
From:
David Fix dav...@mrxfx.com
To:
CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Date:
10/21/2009 07:32 AM
Lincoln Zuljewic Silva wrote:
List archive: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/
Thanks for not reading my post. See I can't find it in the archives or
via Google in the text below.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Daniel Bird db...@sgul.ac.uk wrote:
Hi all,
A while back I
On 21 Oct 2009, at 13:48, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote:
Hi :)
Hi Antonio.
- Paul Herbosch paul.herbo...@tbwaworld.com escreveu:
I run quite a few centos 5.3 servers and have a local yum repository
which is working fine.
Below a list of what I'm rsyncing at the moment + an
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
John, you're right. iSCSI isn't an SMB replacement as I have learned
through all of this. SMB is good for sharing data between many PC's,
and even servers, but from what I understand it's also slower that
iSCSI and won't allow me to scale the storage by simply adding
On 10/21/2009 02:36 PM, Paul Herbosch wrote:
...
another question:
do 5.4 rpms at some point end up in the 5.3 update repo?
(if this is the case I don't have to do anything but wait for them to
show up)
or do I always have to rsync 5.4 over and arrange my files so that yum
finds them in the
nate wrote:
Clustering is a really complex thing to get right, it can often
cause more problems than it would otherwise prevent. Even some
high end clustering is really poor. A couple of jobs ago I had
to use BEA Weblogic application clustering for a massive J2EE
app. Ran us roughly $10 or
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Daniel Bird db...@sgul.ac.uk wrote:
Lincoln Zuljewic Silva wrote:
List archive: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/
Thanks for not reading my post. See I can't find it in the archives or
via Google in the text below.
Spent a few minutes looking at the
Hi there folks. I've been watching the never ending CentOS 5.4 OMG
WHEN? threads for the last few days / weeks and had a question. I'm
pretty new to anything rpm based. I used Red Hat 9 back in college,
but that's about it. Currently, I do have a few Cent OS servers and
we're slowly migrating
On 21 Oct 2009, at 14:52, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
On 10/21/2009 02:36 PM, Paul Herbosch wrote:
...
another question:
do 5.4 rpms at some point end up in the 5.3 update repo?
(if this is the case I don't have to do anything but wait for them to
show up)
or do I always have to rsync 5.4 over and
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
You can, if you connect the iscsi block devices into one machine that can
combine them in one or more md raid devices, put a filesystem on them, and
export via nfs and/or smb to the systems that want shared space.
Jonathan Moore wrote:
Hi there folks. I've been watching the never ending CentOS 5.4 OMG
WHEN? threads for the last few days / weeks and had a question. I'm
pretty new to anything rpm based. I used Red Hat 9 back in college,
but that's about it. Currently, I do have a few Cent OS servers
Jonathan Moore wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
You can, if you connect the iscsi block devices into one machine that can
combine them in one or more md raid devices, put a filesystem on them, and
export via nfs and/or smb to the systems
At Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:25:53 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Hi there folks. I've been watching the never ending CentOS 5.4 OMG
WHEN? threads for the last few days / weeks and had a question. I'm
pretty new to anything rpm based. I used Red Hat 9 back in college,
but
Chan Chung Hang Christopher schrieb:
I suspect so. After all, it is just seen as a disk as far as md is
concerned and it will do the same normal thing if you unplugged a single
disk from the array.
But the latency over the net is much higher.
Who knows if the kernel can handle this in
Fedora does not have 'point releases'.
Right...
One does a 'fresh' re-install every 6 months to a year (or something like
that).
Well, not quite. Although it being what it is and sometimes breaking, you
can yum upgrade it[1], but the suggested method involves using anaconda to
upgrade it,
On Oct 21, 2009, at 5:38 AM, Rudi Ahlers rudiahl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rainer,
I honestly don't want to spend a lot of cash on a proprietary system
like NetApp and actually want to use a lot of old tower machines (i.e.
limited space for hard drives, and no redundancy, slower CPU's,
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
But the latency over the net is much higher.
Who knows if the kernel can handle this in all situations?
I could see it taking longer to notice a failed disk then it normally
*should*. I wonder
what type of impact
Thanks for the input folks. I think I see now that it's going to be a
pretty easy going process, and I don't need to screw around with crazy
update processes. Very good to know.
-jonathan
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, ken wrote:
On 10/20/2009 12:15 PM Benjamin Franz wrote:
ken wrote:
Okay, here's one. Maybe someone here can figure it out.
Upgrading from 4.5 to 4.5. From a 4.6 ISO I copied all the RPMs into a
directory... let's call it c:/install :). Now the oracle dba has
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Jonathan Moore
supermegat...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the input folks. I think I see now that it's going to be a
pretty easy going process, and I don't need to screw around with crazy
update processes. Very good to know.
The documentation here should
ken wrote, On 10/21/2009 05:12 AM:
On 10/20/2009 12:15 PM Benjamin Franz wrote:
ken wrote:
SNIP
Yeah, this directory contains 1507 rpms (IIRC)... which is a lot, but it
should still work. This is Linux, after all. And there's plenty enough
memory and cpu to handle it.
Running
rpm
Hi all,
I have a local user account call panel on a machine.
When I use the mail command to manually send email to the panel account
it over 1 minute until that mail actually deposited in the mail account.
What setting is that reduces this time?
I changed /etc/sysconfig/sendmail the QUEUE=10s
Jerry Geis wrote:
Hi all,
I have a local user account call panel on a machine.
When I use the mail command to manually send email to the panel account
it over 1 minute until that mail actually deposited in the mail account.
What setting is that reduces this time?
I changed
Ross Walker wrote:
On Oct 21, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de
wrote:
Chan Chung Hang Christopher schrieb:
I suspect so. After all, it is just seen as a disk as far as md is
concerned and it will do the same normal thing if you unplugged a
single
disk from the
Hi there folks. I've been watching the never ending CentOS 5.4 OMG
WHEN? threads for the last few days / weeks and had a question. I'm
pretty new to anything rpm based. I used Red Hat 9 back in college,
but that's about it. Currently, I do have a few Cent OS servers and
we're slowly
OK, I've never done an upgrade before either, so I go to this URL :
http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.4/#head-29511ff6659f6463d444feb92326ed2232fc8c08
And I execute these commands
yum clean all
yum update glibc\*
yum update yum\* rpm\* python\*
yum clean all
yum update
Jerry Geis wrote:
Hi all,
I have a local user account call panel on a machine.
When I use the mail command to manually send email to the panel account
it over 1 minute until that mail actually deposited in the mail account.
What setting is that reduces this time?
I changed
Alan McKay wrote:
OK, I've never done an upgrade before either, so I go to this URL :
http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.4/#head-29511ff6659f6463d444feb92326ed2232fc8c08
And I execute these commands
yum clean all
yum update glibc\*
yum update yum\* rpm\* python\*
yum
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 14:46:05 Robert Heller wrote:
Yes. Generally, doing yum update or yum upgrade will pick up new point
releases as they become available. *Sometimes* you need to do something
special (the 5.2 to 5.3 update required an upgrade of glibc on its own
before the main
it will work when your mirror has 5.4
ahhh, OK. What if my mirror is the same box? Will that work too?
I cannot see any reason from here why it would not.
I keep a local mirror on my desktop (the box in question) and am just
bringing down 5.4 now, with rsync
thanks,
-Alan
--
“Don't eat
Alan McKay wrote:
it will work when your mirror has 5.4
ahhh, OK. What if my mirror is the same box? Will that work too?
I cannot see any reason from here why it would not.
I keep a local mirror on my desktop (the box in question) and am just
bringing down 5.4 now, with rsync
sure,
Hey,
The recent discussion on NAS/SAN and the Thecus N8800 got me to thinking.
Bit of background. I have an old Dual Athlon MP2800+ that I'm using
for a home web/file server. It runs fine but between the noise of the
various fans and it's location in the living room, I've been asked by
my spouse
Say, I had 4 devices with 500 GB drives exported using iSCSI. If a
single larger server
took those four iSCSI export drives, and created one md RAID 5 device,
could a single
server be turned off, and just degrade the array until it was either
replaced entirely
or brought back online?
Les Mikesell wrote:
Jerry Geis wrote:
Hi all,
I have a local user account call panel on a machine.
When I use the mail command to manually send email to the panel account
it over 1 minute until that mail actually deposited in the mail account.
What setting is that reduces this time?
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:
Just curious, why the move from Debian to CentOS?
There is very little in the way of technical reasoning for it. Mostly it
was a call by those in charge.
We still have several servers running Debian doing various network
related
John R Pierce wrote:
Say, I had 4 devices with 500 GB drives exported using iSCSI. If a
single larger server
took those four iSCSI export drives, and created one md RAID 5 device,
could a single
server be turned off, and just degrade the array until it was either
replaced entirely
or
Jonathan Moore wrote:
Spent a few minutes looking at the the archive at gmane.org and found one
post that might be of interest. It's from back in 2006, but a quick read
seems
to be on the same track. HTH.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.centos.general/31549/focus=31588
Thanks
Drew wrote:
Hey,
The recent discussion on NAS/SAN and the Thecus N8800 got me to thinking.
Bit of background. I have an old Dual Athlon MP2800+ that I'm using
for a home web/file server. It runs fine but between the noise of the
various fans and it's location in the living room, I've been
Trying to install CentOS 5.4 with Xfce and I have enabled the extras
repo, but Xfce doesn't show up when I customize the software selections.
Is this because 5.4 hasn't hit all of the mirrors yet, or is Xfce not
around for 5.4?
Ryan
___
CentOS
Drew schrieb:
Hey,
The recent discussion on NAS/SAN and the Thecus N8800 got me to thinking.
Bit of background. I have an old Dual Athlon MP2800+ that I'm using
for a home web/file server. It runs fine but between the noise of the
various fans and it's location in the living room, I've been
Hello,
Someone knows which security updates i have to apply to a host with Centos
5.3 x_64.
Thank you in advance and greetings
SLCC
-
Este mensaje y cualquier archivo que se adjunte al mismo es
propiedad de Grupo Iusacell y contiene informacion
slchavar...@iusacell.com.mx wrote:
Hello,
Someone knows which security updates i have to apply to a host with Centos
5.3 x_64.
Just run yum update and you'll get all of the updates that
you need that are available.
nate
___
CentOS mailing list
nate wrote:
slchavar...@iusacell.com.mx wrote:
Hello,
Someone knows which security updates i have to apply to a host with Centos
5.3 x_64.
Just run yum update and you'll get all of the updates that
you need that are available.
Except that you'll probably end up with 5.4 or maybe an
On Wednesday 21 October 2009, slchavar...@iusacell.com.mx wrote:
Hello,
Someone knows which security updates i have to apply to a host with Centos
5.3 x_64.
All, that is yum update with a standard configuration (note that All here
includes updates all the way to 5.x latest (which, as of
My guess would be a resolving problem also.
Its usually what causes sendmail to slow down.
Check your /etc/hosts file
Dan
My /etc/hosts file is only has the nameserver x.x.x.x entry.
the /var/log/maillog shows the entry right away when mail on the
command line is done.
Again, this is
Jerry Geis wrote:
My guess would be a resolving problem also.
Its usually what causes sendmail to slow down.
Check your /etc/hosts file
Dan
My /etc/hosts file is only has the nameserver x.x.x.x entry.
That should be in /etc/resolv.conf.
the /var/log/maillog shows the entry right away
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 11:11 -0500, slchavar...@iusacell.com.mx wrote:
Someone knows which security updates i have to apply to a host with
Centos 5.3 x_64.
Yum knows :)
$ yum --security check-update
You may have to install yum-security first:
# yum install yum-security
.t.
Are there any good options to configure a filesystem so most activity
takes place in the RAM buffer with the flush to physical media allowed
to lag very far behind? OpenNMS does some data collection that keeps
the disk very busy. I don't want to lose the history completely in a
crash like
Jerry Geis wrote:
/ My guess would be a resolving problem also.
// Its usually what causes sendmail to slow down.
// Check your /etc/hosts file
// Dan
//
// My /etc/hosts file is only has the nameserver x.x.x.x entry.
/
That should be in /etc/resolv.conf.
Your right. it is - my
Jerry Geis wrote:
That's a few DNS timeouts.
/ I have 127.0.0.1 localhost in the /etc/hosts file.
//
// Very odd, any thoughts?
/
Are you mailing to localhost?
I tried:
mail panel
mail pa...@localhost
mail pa...@localhost.localdomain
mail pa...@machine.domain.com (insert actual
Les Mikesell wrote:
Are there any good options to configure a filesystem so most activity
takes place in the RAM buffer with the flush to physical media allowed
to lag very far behind? OpenNMS does some data collection that keeps
the disk very busy. I don't want to lose the history
/
// That's a few DNS timeouts.
//
// / I have 127.0.0.1 localhost in the /etc/hosts file.
// //
// // Very odd, any thoughts?
// /
// Are you mailing to localhost?
//
// I tried:
// mail panel
// mail panel at localhost http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
// mail
Jerry Geis wrote:
How do I make this resolve faster or something. I have no way to make an
MX record
for this box. its all just local email. it never leaves the box.
have you seen
http://www.sendmail.org/faq/section3#3.22
?
nslookup only looks at DNS. So if you are trying to resolve
Jerry Geis wrote:
/
You still haven't answered how long nslookup takes to respond with these
or your IP addresses. I think sendmail will ask DNS for an MX record
first because that's how mail is supposed to work - then if that fails
it goes for an A record or your hosts file.
Sorry
nate wrote:
Jerry Geis wrote:
How do I make this resolve faster or something. I have no way to make an
MX record
for this box. its all just local email. it never leaves the box.
have you seen
http://www.sendmail.org/faq/section3#3.22
?
nslookup only looks at DNS. So if you are
Brent L. Bates wrote:
It is not odd. You just refuse to listen to those trying to help. How
many times do they have to say `Check your DNS'?
Check your /etc/nsswitch.conf and make sure it has a line like this:
hosts:files dns
`files' comes FIRST and `dns' LAST.
Jerry Geis wrote:
My guess would be a resolving problem also.
Its usually what causes sendmail to slow down.
Check your /etc/hosts file
Dan
My /etc/hosts file is only has the nameserver x.x.x.x entry.
the /var/log/maillog shows the entry right away when mail on the
command line
Les Mikesell wrote:
But sendmail is going to ask DNS first and if DNS fails with a timeout
instead of a quick NXDOMAIN, delivery will be slow.
My reading of that FAQ says you can turn off DNS support in
sendmail entirely, just use a host file.
nate
On 10/21/2009 11:08 PM, Torkil Zachariassen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 11:11 -0500, slchavar...@iusacell.com.mx wrote:
Someone knows which security updates i have to apply to a host with
Centos 5.3 x_64.
Yum knows :)
$ yum --security check-update
You may have to install yum-security
At Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:26:05 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
/
// That's a few DNS timeouts.
//
// / I have 127.0.0.1 localhost in the /etc/hosts file.
// //
// // Very odd, any thoughts?
// /
// Are you mailing to localhost?
//
// I tried:
//
nate wrote:
But sendmail is going to ask DNS first and if DNS fails with a timeout
instead of a quick NXDOMAIN, delivery will be slow.
My reading of that FAQ says you can turn off DNS support in
sendmail entirely, just use a host file.
But that won't fix all the other things that expect a
Dan Carl wrote:
Jerry Geis wrote:
My guess would be a resolving problem also.
Its usually what causes sendmail to slow down.
Check your /etc/hosts file
Dan
My /etc/hosts file is only has the nameserver x.x.x.x entry.
the /var/log/maillog shows the entry right away
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 16:31:13 Alan McKay wrote:
it will work when your mirror has 5.4
ahhh, OK. What if my mirror is the same box? Will that work too?
I cannot see any reason from here why it would not.
I keep a local mirror on my desktop (the box in question) and am just
I am trying to get cyrus-imapd and saslauthd running together so
that I can get squirrelmail to work. I have accomplished this on
several other servers and have relatively complete documentation on
how to do this. What I am running into in this case has me baffled.
If I start saslauthd as a
Les Mikesell wrote:
But that won't fix all the other things that expect a working DNS - and
will keep you from sending mail anywhere else.
smarthost
I'm not sure what the original thread started as just seemed
specific to sendmail.
nate
___
CentOS
What exactly does the home-server do that couldn't be done on the
clients connected to it, once they are running?
Run Linux 24/7. :-)
For what I do with my PC it's far safer to store my files on a
seperate machine. I tend to tweak linux a lot (I run Gentoo) so
breakage is a regular thing. I've
Hello:
I am looking for a recommendation for a PCI-e
RAID card for my server. The server has a
PCI-e x16 low profile slot so the card has
to be at most 6.6 inches long x 2.536 inches
high. I would like to use RAID 5 with 3 drives
so I have to have those capabilities.
It has to be CentOS 5.4
On Wed, October 21, 2009 15:25, James B. Byrne wrote:
I am trying to get cyrus-imapd and saslauthd running together so
that I can get squirrelmail to work. I have accomplished this on
several other servers and have relatively complete documentation on
how to do this. What I am running into
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Neil Aggarwal n...@jammconsulting.com wrote:
Hello:
I am looking for a recommendation for a PCI-e
RAID card for my server. The server has a
PCI-e x16 low profile slot so the card has
to be at most 6.6 inches long x 2.536 inches
high. I would like to use
On 10/22/2009 01:56 AM, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
Hello:
I am looking for a recommendation for a PCI-e
RAID card for my server.
Areca's have worked well for me over the last few years, and they have
some small formfactor hba's too ( eg like being able to host a bbu in a
1U chassis. I've never
If you have a card you are happy with, I would
appreciate a recommendation.
I use the LSI's, they are pretty solid with a good cli, snmp and rhel
support.
Keep in mind airflow, these cards get hot without good airflow.
6.6 long, and half height? I just went and measured the 1068's
I have
Neil Aggarwal wrote:
Hello:
I am looking for a recommendation for a PCI-e
RAID card for my server. The server has a
PCI-e x16 low profile slot so the card has
to be at most 6.6 inches long x 2.536 inches
high. I would like to use RAID 5 with 3 drives
so I have to have those capabilities.
It
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I use the LSI's, they are pretty solid with a good cli, snmp and rhel
support.
Sorry to hijack, but really quick question. What cli do you
use for the LSI cards? Do you have a URL?
johnny
___
CentOS mailing list
Hi Everyone
I am looking at setting up a File Server that uses ISCSI storage. It is
the first time I have done this, so I am wanting to get peoples thoughts
on whether for CentOS systems you should use Hardware based ISCSI HBA's?
If so do I need to be careful about what HBA I use ? Currently
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
