[CentOS-docs] CentOS 5.4 Network install

2009-11-01 Thread Toshikazu Aiyama
I have just completed to write up the procedure to install 5.4 through network It takes quite a time to start X from command line by # startx _ Windows Live: Make it easier for your

[CentOS-docs] Contributing to the Wiki for Mactel and desktop

2009-11-01 Thread Mathieu Baudier
Hello, I just registered to the wiki under the login: MathieuBaudier I'm currently testing a lot CentOS (see below: To introduce myself quickly) and although I target server deployments, I have also spent some time configuring desktops. I went through some of the pain and I would have been happy

Re: [CentOS-virt] img partitioning swap

2009-11-01 Thread Brett Worth
Christopher G. Stach II wrote: I'd recommend not using LVM inside the images because if you just have a raw disk image in there with regular partitions you can mount it on dom0 (with losetup) for maintenance. I don't think that would be possible with LVM. But it is. I guess that's

Re: [CentOS-virt] img partitioning swap

2009-11-01 Thread Dennis J.
On 11/01/2009 10:51 AM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: On 11/01/2009 08:37 AM, Brett Worth wrote: Christopher G. Stach II wrote: I'd recommend not using LVM inside the images because if you just have a raw disk image in there with regular partitions you can mount it on dom0 (with losetup) for

Re: [CentOS-virt] img partitioning swap

2009-11-01 Thread Adam
There is no need for a second img to use as swap right? -Adam On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Dennis J. denni...@conversis.de wrote: On 11/01/2009 10:51 AM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: On 11/01/2009 08:37 AM, Brett Worth wrote: Christopher G. Stach II wrote: I'd recommend not using LVM

Re: [CentOS-virt] img partitioning swap

2009-11-01 Thread Christopher G. Stach II
- Adam adam0...@gmail.com wrote: There is no need for a second img to use as swap right? Correct, unless you were in a pinch and strangely needed to add more swap, had no unallocated space in your image, and couldn't shut down the guest to resize the image. -- Christopher G. Stach II

Re: [CentOS-virt] img partitioning swap

2009-11-01 Thread Christopher G. Stach II
- Adam adam0...@gmail.com wrote: There is no need for a second img to use as swap right? Rereading your original message got me to wondering whether the examples you saw were putting swap on local storage and the filesystems on remote storage. You can do that for swap performance, but

Re: [CentOS-virt] img partitioning swap

2009-11-01 Thread Ben M.
There is no need for a second img to use as swap right? Yes and no. On physical machines I am very used to putting swaps on separate controllers and drives for performance reasons as am sure many others here are. I have yet to see that pay off on Xen, but I really haven't had a hammered on

Re: [CentOS] Keeping iptables in sync across multiple machines

2009-11-01 Thread Marcus Moeller
Dear Karan. ... So, what I am looking for really is feedback on what people are using in the wild on multiple machines, and bonus points for people who only use tools and mechanisms already built into the CentOS [base] repo. We are using Spacewalk to manage /etc/sysconfig/iptables files. The

Re: [CentOS] iptables -d fqdn instead of IP

2009-11-01 Thread Marcus Moeller
Hi again.  and I have some examples from my own personal experience. So I don't  believe that you can say there is a best method, for all situations. Yes I can.  Host information can be spoofed.  So can IP Addresses.  Here is the point you are missing, if he is going to connect to your

[CentOS] Problem mounting CIFS shares with credential file after SAMBA update

2009-11-01 Thread José María Terry Jiménez
Hello all, This morning i updated my CentOS (5.4) and that included: samba-3.0.33-3.14.el5.i386.rpm samba-client-3.0.33-3.14.el5.i386.rpm samba-common-3.0.33-3.14.el5.i386.rpm samba-swat-3.0.33-3.14.el5.i386.rpm I have several mounts if fstab using a .credentials file that worked until i

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4: yum-priorities seems to be MIA

2009-11-01 Thread David McGuffey
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 16:56 -0400, Boris Epstein wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I just installed 5.4 on a machine here... All seems running fine, except I

Re: [CentOS] No entry in /var/log/boot.log

2009-11-01 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Rod Rook wrote on Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:55:52 -0500: The problem mentioned in the thread you referred to is usually caused by Network Manager, which has nothing to do with boot.log. You may want to elaborate what your *problem* really is. And please trim your answers, thanks. Kai -- Kai

Re: [CentOS] Problem mounting CIFS shares with credential file afterSAMBA update

2009-11-01 Thread Samuel Contesse
Hi, I've the same problem on RHEL 5.4 after samba update. I almost tried everything but I had to switch to -username=...,-password=... to get CIFS mount point to work. I opened a case which has been closed because a second system also running on RHEL 5.4 works with this update. Hope they

[CentOS] Automatical resync of MD, why?

2009-11-01 Thread happymaster23
Hello, I have three MDs on two HDDs in RAID 1. In last days, thanks to my monitoring (which is installed longer time), I have recognized, that one of these MDs is automatically started resync. First was at 25th October and second resync of the same MD was today. It started in same daytime (about

Re: [CentOS] Problem mounting CIFS shares with credential file afterSAMBA update

2009-11-01 Thread José María Terry Jiménez
Hello I've just solved this (because i remembered what happened last time) The problem is that the credentials file must be being parsed incorrectly and any char after the password is passed as part of password (don't know if you understand me because my poor english). What i did is editing

Re: [CentOS] Keeping iptables in sync across multiple machines

2009-11-01 Thread mark
Marcus Moeller wrote: Dear Karan. ... So, what I am looking for really is feedback on what people are using in the wild on multiple machines, and bonus points for people who only use tools and mechanisms already built into the CentOS [base] repo. We are using Spacewalk to manage

Re: [CentOS] No entry in /var/log/boot.log

2009-11-01 Thread Robert
Rod Rook wrote: snip Hi, Lee, The problem mentioned in the thread you referred to is usually caused by Network Manager, which has nothing to do with boot.log. Thanks to you anyway. Perhaps he meant the thread beginning at http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-October/084836.html

Re: [CentOS] No entry in /var/log/boot.log

2009-11-01 Thread Rod Rook
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Robert kerp...@sbcglobal.net wrote: Rod Rook wrote: snip Hi, Lee, The problem mentioned in the thread you referred to is usually caused by Network Manager, which has nothing to do with boot.log. Thanks to you anyway. Perhaps he meant the thread

Re: [CentOS] Problem mounting CIFS shares with credential file afterSAMBA update

2009-11-01 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Samuel Contesse samuel.conte...@softcomponent.ch wrote: Hi, I've the same problem on RHEL 5.4 after samba update. I almost tried everything but I had to switch to -username=...,-password=... to get CIFS mount point to work. I opened a case which has been closed

Re: [CentOS] relatime in plus kernel

2009-11-01 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote: A CentOS forum user (gulikoza) has a patch, tested it with the 2.6.18-164.2.1 kernel, and offered it in this post: https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php? viewmode=flattopic_id=22924forum=37 I am going to give

Re: [CentOS] Problem mounting CIFS shares with credential file afterSAMBA update

2009-11-01 Thread José María Terry Jiménez
Akemi Yagi escribió: On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Samuel Contesse samuel.conte...@softcomponent.ch wrote: Hi, I've the same problem on RHEL 5.4 after samba update. I almost tried everything but I had to switch to -username=...,-password=... to get CIFS mount point to work. I opened a

Re: [CentOS] Problem mounting CIFS shares with credential file afterSAMBA update

2009-11-01 Thread Akemi Yagi
2009/11/1 José María Terry Jiménez j...@tssystems.net: Akemi Yagi escribió: On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Samuel Contesse samuel.conte...@softcomponent.ch wrote: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3960 The upstream bugzilla entries: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532153  

Re: [CentOS] No entry in /var/log/boot.log

2009-11-01 Thread Robert
Rod Rook wrote: Robert, I responded to Lee's statement which referred to http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-October/083346.html It is all there if you follow the thread. Anyway, you agree with me that there is a bug or bugs in CentOS 5.4. As I said earlier, it is not a

Re: [CentOS] No entry in /var/log/boot.log

2009-11-01 Thread Robert
Robert wrote: Rod Rook wrote: Robert, I responded to Lee's statement which referred to http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-October/083346.html It is all there if you follow the thread. Anyway, you agree with me that there is a bug or bugs in CentOS 5.4. As I said earlier, it

Re: [CentOS] Automatical resync of MD, why?

2009-11-01 Thread RedShift
happymaster23 wrote: Hello, I have three MDs on two HDDs in RAID 1. In last days, thanks to my monitoring (which is installed longer time), I have recognized, that one of these MDs is automatically started resync. First was at 25th October and second resync of the same MD was today. It

Re: [CentOS] No entry in /var/log/boot.log

2009-11-01 Thread Rod Rook
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Robert kerp...@sbcglobal.net wrote: Rod Rook wrote: Robert, I responded to Lee's statement which referred to http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-October/083346.html It is all there if you follow the thread. Anyway, you agree with me that

Re: [CentOS] Automatical resync of MD, why?

2009-11-01 Thread happymaster23
Thank you very much, this is new feature of 5.4? 2009/11/1 RedShift redsh...@pandora.be: happymaster23 wrote: Hello, I have three MDs on two HDDs in RAID 1. In last days, thanks to my monitoring (which is installed longer time), I have recognized, that one of these MDs is automatically

Re: [CentOS] No entry in /var/log/boot.log

2009-11-01 Thread Benjamin Donnachie
2009/11/1 Rod Rook rod.r...@gmail.com: Anyway, you agree with me that there is a bug or bugs in CentOS 5.4. As I said earlier, it is not a critical matter, but it does not instill confidence in me about CentOS distro. What other bugs are there? The interesting thing, at least to me, is that

[CentOS] Disk error (kicking from MD) during smartctl -t short

2009-11-01 Thread happymaster23
Hello, I started smartctl -t short of disk in RAID1, but during this operation this disk was kicked from RAID (only from one MD of three). /var/log/messages: Nov  1 16:45:45 server kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0 Nov  1 16:45:45 server kernel: ata1.00: cmd

Re: [CentOS] No entry in /var/log/boot.log

2009-11-01 Thread Robert Nichols
Rod Rook wrote: Having used Fedora 8 and 10 for a long time and Fedora 11 for a few months and never experienced this in these distros, I can say this bug occurs only in old versions of Red Had distros like CentOS. Now that I know this is a bug, I will move on hoping that others will solve

[CentOS] DoveCot and Postfix Setup? or Zimbra?

2009-11-01 Thread ML
Hi All, I have not really setup e-mail serving on Linux before by myself. I have a setup now where it was setup for me running Dovecot and postfix. The setup works. I want to set this up again on my own system. Does anyone have a good tutorial? Zimbra...does it replace dovecot and postfx

Re: [CentOS] DoveCot and Postfix Setup? or Zimbra?

2009-11-01 Thread Bazy
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 9:19 PM, ML mailingli...@mailnewsrss.com wrote: Hi All, I have not really setup e-mail serving on Linux before by myself. I have a setup now where it was setup for me running Dovecot and postfix. The setup works. I want to set this up again on my own system. Does

Re: [CentOS] DoveCot and Postfix Setup? or Zimbra?

2009-11-01 Thread John R Pierce
ML wrote: Hi All, I have not really setup e-mail serving on Linux before by myself. I have a setup now where it was setup for me running Dovecot and postfix. The setup works. I want to set this up again on my own system. Does anyone have a good tutorial? Zimbra...does it replace dovecot

Re: [CentOS] Keeping iptables in sync across multiple machines

2009-11-01 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 11/01/2009 07:51 AM, Marcus Moeller wrote: So, what I am looking for really is feedback on what people are using in the wild on multiple machines, and bonus points for people who only use tools and mechanisms already built into the CentOS [base] repo. We are using Spacewalk to manage

Re: [CentOS] Keeping iptables in sync across multiple machines

2009-11-01 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 10/31/2009 10:01 PM, Christoph Maser wrote: Just wondering what people use / recommend to keep multiple machines in sync with their iptables policy. I did use fwbuilder it can create and deploy rules. For a small number of machines it worked well for me. how do you achieve the actual

Re: [CentOS] Automatical resync of MD, why?

2009-11-01 Thread Jancio Wodnik
Hi. My question is the same, why so many times my RAID 1 is resynced, when i upgrade to CentOS 5.4 ? Any idea ? With may RAID1 is no all OK ? It is to worry about it ? Jancio Wodnik ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] loading a program in memory for faster startup

2009-11-01 Thread Jerry Geis
more /etc/readahead.d/impress.later /usr/bin/soffice /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin I created the above file /etc/readahead.d/impress.later Put in it the two lines above. The /etc/init.d/readahead_later script takes any file name *.later so I made a new file instead of editing

Re: [CentOS] Keeping iptables in sync across multiple machines

2009-11-01 Thread Christoph Maser
Am Sonntag, den 01.11.2009, 21:07 +0100 schrieb Karanbir Singh: On 10/31/2009 10:01 PM, Christoph Maser wrote: Just wondering what people use / recommend to keep multiple machines in sync with their iptables policy. I did use fwbuilder it can create and deploy rules. For a small number

Re: [CentOS] DoveCot and Postfix Setup? or Zimbra?

2009-11-01 Thread Ned Slider
ML wrote: Hi All, I have not really setup e-mail serving on Linux before by myself. I have a setup now where it was setup for me running Dovecot and postfix. The setup works. I want to set this up again on my own system. Does anyone have a good tutorial? Yes, on the CentOS Wiki:

Re: [CentOS] DoveCot and Postfix Setup? or Zimbra?

2009-11-01 Thread Jon Moore
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 1:19 PM, ML mailingli...@mailnewsrss.com wrote: ---8 Zimbra...does it replace dovecot and postfx setup? Yes, it does. I *think* it's possible to change the ports that Zimbra listens on, but by default it will install it's on mta, pop, and imap servers, and installs

[CentOS] CentOS Mirrored On RapidShare [Links Here]

2009-11-01 Thread James Bensley
Hey List, Firstly I am sorry for the length of this email and that you are all having too receive it but the point is that this email will now go into the archive and be indexed by Google (hopefully) and thusly, people will be able to find these links through Google. My goal is to mirror CentOS

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

2009-11-01 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com wrote: I have here a box which I dual-boot between CentOS 5.4 and an older version of that other OS that I'm using to check out the ELrepo version of kmod-ntfs.  After installing as per the directions on the ELrepo site, I

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Mirrored On RapidShare [Links Here]

2009-11-01 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 11/01/2009 10:15 PM, James Bensley wrote: for premium account holders RapidShare can deliver up 100Mbps download speeds. Just want to point out that there are centos mirrors that deliver 700mbps fairly regularly, and there are ( specially if you are on I2 ) mirrors that do a gigabit as

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Mirrored On RapidShare [Links Here]

2009-11-01 Thread Victor Padro
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 4:15 PM, James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com wrote: Hey List, Firstly I am sorry for the length of this email and that you are all having too receive it but the point is that this email will now go into the archive and be indexed by Google (hopefully) and thusly, people

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

2009-11-01 Thread Ron Loftin
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 14:49 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com wrote: I have here a box which I dual-boot between CentOS 5.4 and an older version of that other OS that I'm using to check out the ELrepo version of kmod-ntfs.

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

2009-11-01 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com wrote: On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 14:49 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: Could you show us the output returned by: uname -mr ls -l `find /lib/modules -name ntfs.ko` ls -l `find /lib/modules -name fuse.ko` uname -mr 2.6.18-164.2.1.el5

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

2009-11-01 Thread Ron Loftin
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 15:20 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com wrote: On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 14:49 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: Could you show us the output returned by: uname -mr ls -l `find /lib/modules -name ntfs.ko` ls -l

[CentOS] connection refused resolving - after 5.4 upgrade

2009-11-01 Thread Rob Kampen
Hi all, prior to 5.4 upgrade, my two DNS servers would only get 'connection refused resolving .' on rare infrequent occasions (once or twice a month) after upgrade to 5.4 I get 500+ per day. Google has suggestions for |logging category lame-servers null; ; ; |however this strikes me as

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

2009-11-01 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com wrote: On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 15:20 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: Something is wrong here.  You are missing /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko that the symlinks are pointing to.  Are those symlinks red-blinking? It's

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

2009-11-01 Thread Ron Loftin
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 16:41 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com wrote: On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 15:20 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: Something is wrong here. You are missing /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko that the symlinks

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Mirrored On RapidShare [Links Here]

2009-11-01 Thread Bazy
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Victor Padro vpa...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 4:15 PM, James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com wrote: Hey List, Firstly I am sorry for the length of this email and that you are all having too receive it but the point is that this email will now go into

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Mirrored On RapidShare [Links Here]

2009-11-01 Thread John R. Dennison
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 03:15:36AM +0200, Bazy wrote: This is spam, since CentOS has mirrors in most of the world's countries. The 174 lines of noise you didn't bother to trim out of your reply can be construed as spam too. Folks, can you please trim replies to mailing

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Mirrored On RapidShare [Links Here]

2009-11-01 Thread Bazy
       The 174 lines of noise you didn't bother to trim out of your        reply can be construed as spam too.        Folks, can you please trim replies to mailing list posts in        the future?  Please?  It's every bit as annoying as top-posting.        Thanks :)                  

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Mirrored On RapidShare [Links Here]

2009-11-01 Thread Victor Padro
My apologies, it won't happen again. Cheers. -- Linux User #452368 http://twitter.com/vpadro Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

2009-11-01 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com wrote: If ntfs-3g is working for you, I would expect the ntfs module from kmod-ntfs works, too. That's what I thought.  However, when I mount a partition created with Windoze 2000, I can read files and directories, but not

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

2009-11-01 Thread Ron Loftin
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 17:38 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com wrote: If ntfs-3g is working for you, I would expect the ntfs module from kmod-ntfs works, too. That's what I thought. However, when I mount a partition created with

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

2009-11-01 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com wrote: On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 17:38 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: Looks like you are doing everything just fine.  Perhaps, we should move this conversation to the ELRepo mailing list because this is now all about kmod-ntfs and not

[CentOS] Bug in freeradius 1.1.3-1.5.el5_4 rpm

2009-11-01 Thread Ian Forde
I upgraded one of my servers to CentOS 5.4 today. The freeradius service (radiusd) didn't start up due to permissions errors. I tracked it to the permissions on the /etc/raddb/certs/ directory being set to 640 rather than 750, so the radius user couldn't enter the directory. In the spec file

[CentOS] Free or low cost online backup?

2009-11-01 Thread Neil Aggarwal
Hello: Does anyone know a free or low cost online backup system for CentOS? Thanks, Neil -- Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, http://www.JAMMConsulting.com CentOS 5.4 KVM VPS $55/mo, no setup fee, no contract, dedicated 64bit CPU 1GB dedicated RAM, 40GB RAID storage, 500GB/mo premium BW,

Re: [CentOS] Free or low cost online backup?

2009-11-01 Thread John R Pierce
Neil Aggarwal wrote: Does anyone know a free or low cost online backup system for CentOS? tar(1) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Free or low cost online backup?

2009-11-01 Thread Neil Aggarwal
John: tar(1) I can use that on the server, but what is the other side to store the files? I want the storage to be remote. Thanks, Neil -- Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, http://www.JAMMConsulting.com CentOS 5.4 KVM VPS $55/mo, no setup fee, no contract, dedicated 64bit CPU 1GB

Re: [CentOS] Free or low cost online backup?

2009-11-01 Thread Frank Cox
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:21:15 -0600 Neil Aggarwal wrote: I can use that on the server, but what is the other side to store the files? I want the storage to be remote. I use rsync to do backups, which automatically works over a ssh connection. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~

Re: [CentOS] Free or low cost online backup?

2009-11-01 Thread Les Mikesell
Neil Aggarwal wrote: John: tar(1) I can use that on the server, but what is the other side to store the files? I want the storage to be remote. Did you mean you want to run something yourself remotely to collect and store backups or do you want a service? For the former case, look at

Re: [CentOS] Free or low cost online backup?

2009-11-01 Thread John R Pierce
Neil Aggarwal wrote: Did you mean you want to run something yourself remotely to collect and store backups or do you want a service? I want a service. and what exactly do you want this 'service' to do? ___ CentOS mailing list

[CentOS] OFFTOPIC MAILSERVER PROBLEM WITH JAMMCONSULTING.COM Re: Free or low cost online backup?

2009-11-01 Thread Frank Cox
I have made several attempts to send you this privately so as not to embarrass you here, but there appears to be no other way to get an email to you. On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:46:19 -0600 Neil Aggarwal wrote: I want a service. You haven't got much of a service going on there now. I have sent an

Re: [CentOS] Automatical resync of MD, why?

2009-11-01 Thread Oliver Ransom
When you cat /proc/mdstat does it actually say syncing or does it say checking? I believe a newer version of mdadm creates a weekly cron job to check the arrays. I first mistakenly assumed it was resyncing and started worrying since it was doing all 8 of my RAID1 arrays at once, but after