Una pregunta, el correo esta en tu mismod FW o esta en tu LAN, si esta
en tu lan te hace falta nacer un NAT y si estuviera en tu FW ent basta con
abrir el puerto 25 y listo
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 12:13:49 -0500, jose soto
carrasco wrote: Gente disculpen las molestias pero necesito de su ayuda.
Billy Huddleston wrote on Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:35:43 -0500:
I'm trying to install CentOS 5.4 on a machine with a LSI SAS 1068E
controller.
It should work out of the box. I have several Dell and HP machines that
have cards based on this LSI chip and they worked straight out of the box.
You
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Tait Clarridge t...@clarridge.ca wrote:
peter.pelto...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am unable to get my LAN masqueraded using SNAT with CentOS 5.3 and
iptables.
I have the following setup:
eth0: connects to internet with static public IP 1.2.3.1
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009, Tait Clarridge wrote:
Steve: What module does your Dell Perc use? I don't have access to my
server to check.
From one of my Dell R410 systems:
% lspci | grep LSI
03:00.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS 1078 (rev
04)
and from
Finally moved my home desktop from Fedora to CentOS. My spouse was
unhappy with me upgrading from F9--F10--f11 etc and wanted something
more stable.
I built a second machine which is now running in parallel to the old F11
desktop. I moved my data (mail and files) from the F11 box to the
CentOS
KERNEL==eth?, SYSFS{address}==00:21:e9:17:64:b5, NAME=eth1 #
Now, all three network cards get assigned as eth0! eth1 and eth2 are
no longer found. The pci-express nics (onboard) get detected first,
and the pci nic is last, so it ends up owning the eth0 alias.
Changing SYSFS to ATTR should
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 21:17 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
nate wrote:
Tait Clarridge wrote:
Steve: What module does your Dell Perc use? I don't have access to my
server to check.
megaraid_sas is what my PERC 5i and 6i use
I'm pretty sure the PERC 5i/6i are more than
Billy Huddleston wrote:
I'm trying to install CentOS 5.4 on a machine with a LSI SAS 1068E
controller. I've googled all over the place and found a few different
drivers for RHEL5 for it.. and tried a few of them.. Some will load,
some complain that this isn't the correct version.. non of
On 11/22/2009 8:38 PM, Gordon McLellan wrote:
I have two servers with identical hardware ... TYAN i3210w system
boards with dual intel gigabit interfaces, and a PCI intel gigabit
nic. I'm running Centos 5.4, x86_64, 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5
Every other time I reboot, the nics initialize in a
Digging around google a bit more I came up with different rules, and
fingers crossed, they seem to work!
SUBSYSTEM==net, SYSFS{address}==00:1b:21:4d:c3:e8, NAME=eth0 #
pro/1000gt
SUBSYSTEM==net, SYSFS{address}==00:e0:81:b5:7a:30, NAME=eth1 #
internal 1
SUBSYSTEM==net,
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:53 AM, David McGuffey
davidmcguf...@verizon.net wrote:
Finally moved my home desktop from Fedora to CentOS. My spouse was
snip
and files
transferred A-OK...but the Evolution address book did not.
Any tips on getting the old /home/.../.evolution/addressbook which
Digging around google a bit more I came up with different rules, and
fingers crossed, they seem to work!
SUBSYSTEM==net, SYSFS{address}==00:1b:21:4d:c3:e8, NAME=eth0
# pro/1000gt
SUBSYSTEM==net, SYSFS{address}==00:e0:81:b5:7a:30, NAME=eth1
# internal 1
SUBSYSTEM==net,
Tom H wrote:
Digging around google a bit more I came up with different rules, and
fingers crossed, they seem to work!
SUBSYSTEM==net, SYSFS{address}==00:1b:21:4d:c3:e8, NAME=eth0
# pro/1000gt
SUBSYSTEM==net, SYSFS{address}==00:e0:81:b5:7a:30, NAME=eth1
# internal 1
SUBSYSTEM==net,
On Nov 28, 2009, at 2:15 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
Digging around google a bit more I came up with different rules,
and
fingers crossed, they seem to work!
SUBSYSTEM==net, SYSFS{address}==00:1b:21:4d:c3:e8, NAME=eth0
# pro/1000gt
SUBSYSTEM==net,
On Nov 28, 2009, at 3:10 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Tom H wrote:
Digging around google a bit more I came up with different rules,
and
fingers crossed, they seem to work!
SUBSYSTEM==net, SYSFS{address}==00:1b:21:4d:c3:e8, NAME=eth0
# pro/1000gt
SUBSYSTEM==net,
On 11/28/09, David McGuffey davidmcguf...@verizon.net wrote:
Finally moved my home desktop from Fedora to CentOS. My spouse was
unhappy with me upgrading from F9--F10--f11 etc and wanted something
more stable.
I built a second machine which is now running in parallel to the old F11
desktop.
Starting with a fresh load and after I finish hardening the load
following the Center for Internet Security (CIS) guidance, I'm wondering
whether AIDE or OSSEC would be a better intrusion detection system.
I installed AIDE and did a quick test of AIDE and after initializing the
db and applying
David McGuffey wrote:
Seems to me that any IDS must be tied to the yum update process so that
one is not dealing with hundreds/thousands of changes that were brought
in by a yum update that I choose to apply.
Is OSSEC any less noisy?
Nope.
-Alan
The formula that ended up working for me:
undo modifications to udev rules
comment out the alias ethX lines that anaconda had placed in my modprobe.conf
use HWADDR= in the ifcfg-ethX config files.
slave interfaces have onboot=yes in them, despite no IP address information
The nics are correctly
David McGuffey wrote:
Starting with a fresh load and after I finish hardening the load
following the Center for Internet Security (CIS) guidance, I'm wondering
whether AIDE or OSSEC would be a better intrusion detection system.
snip
We've just started with OSSEC at work. I'm told they'd tried
I have a zone that has several hosts update their ip with Dynamic DNS updates.
This morning a client had updated its ip, but bind wasn't returning the new ip
when queried until I restarted the daemon?
Google hasn't yielded anything useful as I am prolly missing the boat with my
search criteria.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 6:57 PM, David McGuffey
davidmcguf...@verizon.net wrote:
Starting with a fresh load and after I finish hardening the load
following the Center for Internet Security (CIS) guidance, I'm wondering
whether AIDE or OSSEC would be a better intrusion detection system.
I
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Billy Huddleston bi...@ivdc.com wrote:
I'm trying to install CentOS 5.4 on a machine with a LSI SAS 1068E
controller. I've googled all over the place and found a few different
drivers for RHEL5 for it.. and tried a few of them.. Some will load,
some complain
24 matches
Mail list logo
