- Yukio Yamaishi yukio.yamai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'm using xen 3.0 on CentOS 5 with VLAN.
#vconfig add eth0 100
#/etc/xen/script/network-bridge start vifnum=1 netdev=eth0
bridge=xenbr0.100
I know that after xen 3.2 the procedure of bridge configuration is
changed.
What
2009/12/9 Gustavo Riego gustavo_ri...@tigo.com.py:
Hola yo soy nuevo en Linux, siempre trabaje en Windows y ahora estoy
queriendo aprender a utilizar Centos.
Yo instale centos en un disco duro y ahora estoy queriendo agregar un disco
duro de una maquina que tenia Linux Ubuntu y tiene mucha
HOLA LISTEROS, MI PREGUNTA ES SI EXISTE ALGÚN TIPO DE SOFTWARE PARA
RESPALDAR TODO MI SERVIDOR CENTOS EN IMAGENES ISO PARA PODER SACAR RESPALDOS
EN DVD, Y QUE SE CREE UN TIPO DE INSTALADOR CON TODOS LOS PAQUETES Q YO
TENGO INSTALADO, INCLUIDO LAS MODIFICACIONES QUE HE REALIZADO EN ALGUNOS
Hola
has probado ghost for linux (G4L) te dejo el link
http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
Atte.
Mario Ganga Castro.
2009/12/10 Jorge Herrera jorge20...@yahoo.es
HOLA LISTEROS, MI PREGUNTA ES SI EXISTE ALGÚN TIPO DE SOFTWARE PARA
RESPALDAR TODO MI SERVIDOR CENTOS EN IMAGENES ISO
podrias utilizar un router vyatta
www.vyatta.com/
http://blacklunaredes.blogspot.com/2009/07/configuracion-basica-de-vyatta.html
Saludos
Paúl Vizuete
Universidad Central del Ecuador
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
El protocolo, llamado SPICE pasó a manos de Red Hat en 2008 con su
adquisición de su empresa creadora Qumranet.
Este tecnología es diseñada para escritorios que usan servidores remotos
para procesamiento de datos, SPICE mejora la experiencia del usuario
renderizando las aplicaciones de consumo de
2009/12/10 mauricio mauri...@efts.uo.edu.cu:
Alguien me puede mandar algun ejemplo de reglas de iptables para hacer una
pc como pcrouter.
Para hacer funcionar una PC Linux como router básicamente sólo hace
falta activar la función de forwarding (que no depende de iptables)...
pero hay muchas
Buenas tardes, estoy haciendo pruebas y quería saber si varias versiones de
Linux cada una en una partición pueden compartir la partición Swap?
Además otra duda es si la instalación es con la partición cifrada, crea una
partición de arranque, esta partición también se puede compartir?
Más que
mount -t ext2/3 /dev/hda/sda /mnt/disconuevo
ext2/3 es para que escoja el formato y lo mismo pasa con /dev/hda/sda
El día 09/12/09, Gustavo Riego gustavo_ri...@tigo.com.py escribió:
Hola yo soy nuevo en Linux, siempre trabaje en Windows y ahora estoy
queriendo aprender a utilizar Centos.
Tambien puedes buscar como balanceo de cargas te puedes encontrar con router
y marcado de paquetes
El día 09/12/09, Alvaro Schneider Guevara alvaro.schnei...@iguanae.com
escribió:
Un saludo a todos.
Me pregunto si es posible parametrizar un sistema CentOS para que enrute
dos canales de
2009/12/10 Ricardo Isaza sopo...@puntodered.com:
Tambien puedes buscar como balanceo de cargas te puedes encontrar con router
y marcado de paquetes
El día 09/12/09, Alvaro Schneider Guevara alvaro.schnei...@iguanae.com
escribió:
Un saludo a todos.
Me pregunto si es posible parametrizar un
2009/12/10 O§many Oconnor ocon...@gera.uo.edu.cu:
Saludos a todos.
soy nuevo en los quehaceres de la administraci'on de CentOS y me
gustaria contar con algunos documentos basicos, si me pudiera ayudar.
por ahora estoy probando comandos que utilizaba en consolas de comandos
y me gustar'ia
2009/12/10 O§many Oconnor ocon...@gera.uo.edu.cu:
Saludos a todos.
soy nuevo en los quehaceres de la administraci'on de CentOS y me
gustaria contar con algunos documentos basicos, si me pudiera ayudar.
por ahora estoy probando comandos que utilizaba en consolas de comandos
y me gustar'ia
Ve a la pagina http://www.alcancelibre.org/filemgmt/visit.php?lid=1 para el
manual Implementacion de Servidores Linux CentOs
El 10 de diciembre de 2009 07:00, O§many Oconnor
ocon...@gera.uo.edu.cuescribió:
Saludos a todos.
soy nuevo en los quehaceres de la administraci'on de CentOS y me
También puedes usar un live CD de Ubuntu, Fedora o de la distribución que
prefieras en cualquiera de los 2 computadores (el de Centos o el de Ubuntu) con
los 2 discos instalados. Y desde allí pasas la información que quieres
respaldar del un disco al otro mientras también navegas, haces
Mira esta pagina y te ayudara mucho
http://easyfwgen.morizot.net/gen/
Saludos
Raúl Eduardo Arboleda Zapata
Ingeniero de Sistemas Unninca
Cel +573 300 620 66 13
+573 312 288 90 86
Medellín, Antioquia
Colombia, S.A.
-Mensaje original-
De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org
2009/12/10 MHR mhullr...@gmail.com
I found out today that Google Chrome is now available for Linux.
However, and this is a big but:
$ sudo rpm -ivh google-chrome-beta_current_x86_64.rpm
Password:
warning: google-chrome-beta_current_x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA
signature: NOKEY, key ID
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Alvaro Schneider Guevara
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 1:40 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Linux router with CentOS
Hello everybody.
I'm wondering here if is it possible to setup a CentOS machine
I noticed that although I'd fetched the latest update to ntp from the
mirror it wasn't being installed.
It seems that the version numbers have got out of step. According to
the changelog the update that was released in August should have had
the version number 4.2.0.a.20040617-8.el4_7.2, whereas
[off list]
Thanks for your eMail, Ross. So, reading all the stuff here I'm really
concerned about moving all our data to such a system. The reason we're
moving is mainly, but not only the longisch fsck UFS (FreeBSD) needs
after a crash. XFS seemed to me to fit perfectly as I never had
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Ron Yorston r...@tigress.co.uk wrote:
I noticed that although I'd fetched the latest update to ntp from the
mirror it wasn't being installed.
It seems that the version numbers have got out of step. According to
the changelog the update that was released in
Timo Schoeler wrote:
[off list]
Thanks for your eMail, Ross. So, reading all the stuff here I'm really
concerned about moving all our data to such a system. The reason we're
moving is mainly, but not only the longisch fsck UFS (FreeBSD) needs
after a crash. XFS seemed to me to fit
From: john blair mailtome200420032...@yahoo.com
I want to write a script to find the latest version of rpm of a given package
available from a mirror for eg:
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/os/x86_64/CentOS/
Is there any existing script that does this? Or can someone give me a general
Hello,
does anybody know if quagga for CentOS 5.3 is compiled with
-enable-multipath?
I want to implement ECMP over 2 ISP.
Thanks,
Cristi Carstea
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I don't see how to do it.
I had to telnet into a firewall and run a trace, and I had to stop it,
copy and paste to gedit, then start again, etc.
I find it interesting, and sad, that there is no easy 'output to file'
profile setting.
___
CentOS
On 12/10/2009 08:05 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I don't see how to do it.
I had to telnet into a firewall and run a trace, and I had to stop it,
copy and paste to gedit, then start again, etc.
I find it interesting, and sad, that there is no easy 'output to file'
profile setting.
man
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 08:05:06AM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I don't see how to do it.
I had to telnet into a firewall and run a trace, and I had to stop it,
copy and paste to gedit, then start again, etc.
I find it interesting, and sad, that there is no easy 'output to file'
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Cristian Carstea c...@crisnet.ro wrote:
Hello,
does anybody know if quagga for CentOS 5.3 is compiled with
-enable-multipath?
I want to implement ECMP over 2 ISP.
You can look in the /boot/config-* files. Those are the configs that
it was built with. In my
On Dec 10, 2009, at 4:28 AM, Timo Schoeler
timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote:
[off list]
Thanks for your eMail, Ross. So, reading all the stuff here I'm
really
concerned about moving all our data to such a system. The reason
we're
moving is mainly, but not only the longisch fsck UFS
I have CentOS 4.x installed on a single 500GB SATA drive. Drive is
about 10 percent used. I would like to migrate to software RAID 5
without reinstalling the OS. Was thinking 3 500GB drives. Is that
possible or must I reinstall?
Matt
___
CentOS
I see this virtualization howto for Ubuntu
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UEC/CDInstall
It goes into how to make your own cloud. Is there a similiar howto
anywhere for CentOS 5.4 or anything?
Matt
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Matt:
It goes into how to make your own cloud. Is there a similiar howto
anywhere for CentOS 5.4 or anything?
Does the RHEL Virtualization Guide help?
http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5.4/html/Virtualiz
ation_Guide/index.html
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal,
Mathieu Baudier wrote:
LVM like md raid and drbd is a layered block device and
If you turn the wire caches off on the HDs then there is no problem,
but HDs aren't designed to perform to spec with the write cache
disabled they expect important data is written with FUA access (forced
unit
You will have to reinstall because if you add two more 500GB drives to make
your set up into a three drive horse, you then need to format each drive
and synchronise them together creating the new logical RAID volume so no
data can be kept on said disks prior to the creation of the RAID.
HTH!
--
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote:
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Alvaro Schneider Guevara
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 1:40 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Linux router with CentOS
Victor Padro wrote:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote:
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Alvaro Schneider Guevara
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 1:40 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Linux
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Victor Padro vpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Another Vote for Pfse3nse, the best router7firewall distro around,
well just my opinion.
One caveat is hardware support. I assume because it is FreeBSD and not Linux
About a month or two ago I decided to go out and google
Rick Barnes wrote:
On 12/10/2009 08:05 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I don't see how to do it.
I had to telnet into a firewall and run a trace, and I had to stop it,
copy and paste to gedit, then start again, etc.
I find it interesting, and sad, that there is no easy 'output to file'
profile
Hi everyone!!
Does someone have configured a plotter HP designjet 500?,
what driver did you use?,
or what did you do?
I'm using centos 5.4
--
Alejandro Rodriguez Luna
E-mail: el_alexl...@yahoo.com.mx
--
Encuentra las
yes, that's right, but i am asking here about Quagga, which is a routing
software (OSPF, BGP etc.), not about kernel multipath, i mean if Quagga
is compiled with Equal Cost MultiPath (ECMP), the -enable-multipath
compile option. Can someone post here the spec file from which quagga
rpm was
At Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:39:25 -0600 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
I have CentOS 4.x installed on a single 500GB SATA drive. Drive is
about 10 percent used. I would like to migrate to software RAID 5
without reinstalling the OS. Was thinking 3 500GB drives. Is that
I have recently been told I will have to maintain some CentOS servers at
work. Since I have only been using Slackware for the last 16 years, I
decided to install CentOS on one of my servers at home to get an idea of
the differences. I installed CentOS 5.4 from CD with no problems, did a
yum
Bob McConnell wrote:
[...]
Everything looks ok, but I keep seeing this message on the active
console. I have no idea where it comes from nor what it means.
type=1400 audit(1260446462.444:9): avc: denied { getattr } for pid=2200
comm=smbd path=/proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc dev=binfmt_misc
I have recently been told I will have to maintain some CentOS servers at
work. Since I have only been using Slackware for the last 16 years, I
decided to install CentOS on one of my servers at home to get an idea of
the differences. I installed CentOS 5.4 from CD with no problems, did a
yum
Rick Barnes wrote:
On 12/10/2009 08:05 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I don't see how to do it.
I had to telnet into a firewall and run a trace, and I had to stop it,
copy and paste to gedit, then start again, etc.
I find it interesting, and sad, that there is no easy 'output to file'
profile
Google say no to RAID 5
http://baarf.com/
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/RAID-5-Doomed-2009,6525.html
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of In Defense of Food
___
CentOS mailing list
On Thursday 10 December 2009, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:
I have CentOS 4.x installed on a single 500GB SATA drive. Drive is
about 10 percent used. I would like to migrate to software RAID 5
without reinstalling the OS. Was thinking 3 500GB drives. Is that
possible or must I reinstall?
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 07:23:06PM +0200, Cristian Carstea wrote:
yes, that's right, but i am asking here about Quagga, which is a
routing software (OSPF, BGP etc.), not about kernel multipath, i
mean if Quagga is compiled with Equal Cost MultiPath (ECMP), the
-enable-multipath compile option.
Hi all,
I have a PowerEdge 1950 that was acting weird. Network connectivity was
only performing at a quarter of what was expected (if that). Even if I
scp'd something to localhost it would perform poorly. Rather than fight
with it, I just decided to reload it. It was running 5.3, and it is
Benjamin Franz wrote:
Bob McConnell wrote:
[...]
Everything looks ok, but I keep seeing this message on the active
console. I have no idea where it comes from nor what it means.
type=1400 audit(1260446462.444:9): avc: denied { getattr } for pid=2200
comm=smbd
Ryan Pugatch wrote:
Wondering if anyone has an idea..
Run hardware diagnostics?
Check power management settings in the bios?
nate
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I don't know why I haven't signed up for this list before since we use
CentOS all over the place. The list is very useful and it is good for
me to participate and give back to the community.
Anywho, I wanted to post this response to a thread that was created back
in November 2008 about the
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Mathieu Baudier wrote:
LVM like md raid and drbd is a layered block device and
If you turn the wire caches off on the HDs then there is no problem,
but HDs aren't designed to perform to spec with the write cache
disabled they expect important data is
Alan McKay wrote:
Google say no to RAID 5
http://baarf.com/
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/RAID-5-Doomed-2009,6525.html
Say goodbye to whole-disk based RAID solutions and hello to
next generation sub-disk RAID solutions, dramatically
extending the real world lifetime of RAID 5(and RAID 6
On Thursday 10 December 2009 17:28:45 Bob McConnell wrote:
I have recently been told I will have to maintain some CentOS servers at
work. Since I have only been using Slackware for the last 16 years, I
decided to install CentOS on one of my servers at home to get an idea of
the differences. I
Bob McConnell wrote:
I also have a problem with syslogd. I added '-r' to SYSLOGD_OPTIONS in
/etc/rc.d/init.d/syslog, but after a restart it still won't accept
network traffic, and that flag doesn't show up in the command line in
the 'ps ax' dump. What do I have to do to enable traffic into
Thanks for all the input everyone,
Basically I trashed the smb.conf and the folder I wanted to share, restarted
the machine, re-wrote the smb.conf (again) and re-made the directory and
set permissions etc, restarted the machine and all is well!
Thanks all for your input it has helped me write
On Dec 10, 2009, at 1:39 PM, Ausmus, Matt wrote:
Anywho, I wanted to post this response to a thread that was created
back in November 2008 about the ntop daemon failing to start. I’m
currently setting up ntop as a NetFlow SFlow collector and came
across the issue. A quick refresher,
On 05.12.2009 18:15, Miguel Medalha wrote:
And, as of CentOS 5.4, xfs is now enabled in the kernel, so
no need for any external kernel module. But yes, this is available for
x86_64 only
... a decision that many people have trouble at understanding!
XFS is not stable on 32-bit systems. You
On 05.12.2009 22:04, John R Pierce wrote:
that same OS/2 JFS was backported to AIX as JFS2, I believe.
When JFS was implemented on OS/2 it was based on JFS on AIX. After that,
JFS for Linux and JFS2 was based on the same code. Not sure I would say
backported, but there you go
There are
On 08.12.2009 13:34, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Speaking for me (on Linux systems) on top of LVM on top of md. On IRIX
as it was intended.
That is a disaster combination for XFS even now. You mentioned some
pretty hefty hardware in your other post...
If XFS doesn't play well with
XFS is not stable on 32-bit systems. You should not use it there. You
need a 64-bit kernel.
Default for servers should be 64-bit now anyway. Not many reasons left
for a 32-bit system, and more and more 3. party applications have less
and less support for 32-bit platforms in general.
Mark Caudill wrote:
Rick Barnes wrote:
On 12/10/2009 08:05 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I don't see how to do it.
I had to telnet into a firewall and run a trace, and I had to stop it,
copy and paste to gedit, then start again, etc.
I find it interesting, and sad, that there is no
Les Mikesell wrote:
Rick Barnes wrote:
On 12/10/2009 08:05 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I don't see how to do it.
I had to telnet into a firewall and run a trace, and I had to stop it,
copy and paste to gedit, then start again, etc.
I find it interesting, and sad, that there is no
Miguel Medalha wrote:
XFS is not stable on 32-bit systems. You should not use it there. You
need a 64-bit kernel.
Default for servers should be 64-bit now anyway. Not many reasons left
for a 32-bit system, and more and more 3. party applications have less
and less support for 32-bit
If they do what you want without making you wait, why even consider changing
the
filesystem that has been working for years on these machines?
Adding new, bigger disks and new filesystems? Wanting these to be the
fastest that is reasonably possible?
As for the system that arose the
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Mark Caudill wrote:
Rick Barnes wrote:
On 12/10/2009 08:05 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I don't see how to do it.
I had to telnet into a firewall and run a trace, and I had to stop it,
copy and paste to gedit, then start again, etc.
I find it interesting,
Hi,
I'm trying to write .htaccess Rewrite rules and it doesn't seem to
work for me:
Match the string between the domain and the question mark: ?
http://www.abc.com/blog:long-name-of-page?action=diff and I want to
redirect it to: http://www.abc.com/blog:long-name-of-page
Any suggestion?
Thanks
You might have to enable re-writes in you Apache conf? Or did I imagine that???
--
Regards,
James ;)
Stephen Leacock - I detest life-insurance agents: they always argue
that I shall some day die, which is not so.
___
CentOS mailing list
Miguel Medalha wrote:
If they do what you want without making you wait, why even consider changing
the
filesystem that has been working for years on these machines?
Adding new, bigger disks and new filesystems? Wanting these to be the
fastest that is reasonably possible?
As for the
I just created a 4 drive mdadm --level=raid10 on a centos 4.8-ish system
here, and shortly thereafter remembreed I hadn't updated it in a while,
so i ran yum update...
while installing/updating stuff, got these errors:
Installing: kernel ###
On 12/10/2009 10:39 AM, Matt wrote:
I have CentOS 4.x installed on a single 500GB SATA drive. Drive is
about 10 percent used. I would like to migrate to software RAID 5
without reinstalling the OS. Was thinking 3 500GB drives. Is that
possible or must I reinstall?
Moving to RAID-1 is
I have CentOS 4.x installed on a single 500GB SATA drive. Drive is
about 10 percent used. I would like to migrate to software RAID 5
without reinstalling the OS. Was thinking 3 500GB drives. Is that
possible or must I reinstall?
Moving to RAID-1 is going to be fairly easy. Moving to
Benjamin Franz wrote:
Bob McConnell wrote:
I also have a problem with syslogd. I added '-r' to SYSLOGD_OPTIONS in
/etc/rc.d/init.d/syslog, but after a restart it still won't accept
network traffic, and that flag doesn't show up in the command line in
the 'ps ax' dump. What do I have to do
Matt wrote:
I have CentOS 4.x installed on a single 500GB SATA drive. Drive is
about 10 percent used. I would like to migrate to software RAID 5
without reinstalling the OS. Was thinking 3 500GB drives. Is that
possible or must I reinstall?
Moving to RAID-1 is going to be fairly easy.
I have CentOS 4.x installed on a single 500GB SATA drive. Drive is
about 10 percent used. I would like to migrate to software RAID 5
without reinstalling the OS. Was thinking 3 500GB drives. Is that
possible or must I reinstall?
Moving to RAID-1 is going to be fairly easy. Moving to
Morten Torstensen wrote:
On 08.12.2009 13:34, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Speaking for me (on Linux systems) on top of LVM on top of md. On IRIX
as it was intended.
That is a disaster combination for XFS even now. You mentioned some
pretty hefty hardware in your other post...
If
No mention of barriers in the man page, I'm also getting confused. is
device mapper used for software raid - i.e. /dev/mdX?
Nope. Software raid is the md layer. Nothing to do with dm. Two separate
layers although they share a bit of stuff.
If so what are the implications of barriers and
John R Pierce wrote:
I just created a 4 drive mdadm --level=raid10 on a centos 4.8-ish system
here, and shortly thereafter remembreed I hadn't updated it in a while,
so i ran yum update...
while installing/updating stuff, got these errors:
Installing: kernel
Christopher Chan wrote:
If anaconda is doing the update here, I guess it is because anaconda in
4.x does not have raid10 personality support. The raid10 personality is
NOT the same as nested raid1+0. It is an entirely new module from Neil
Brown that has a poor choice of a name imho. It does
Christopher Chan wrote:
Morten Torstensen wrote:
On 08.12.2009 13:34, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Speaking for me (on Linux systems) on top of LVM on top of md. On IRIX
as it was intended.
That is a disaster combination for XFS even now. You mentioned some
pretty hefty hardware in
Mark Caudill wrote:
Wait, just to be clear, are you saying that all use of LVM is a bad idea
unless on hardware RAID? That's bad it if it's true since it seems to me
that most modern distros like to use LVM by default. Am I missing something?
if LVM is ignoring write barriers, its not a
John R Pierce wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
If anaconda is doing the update here, I guess it is because anaconda in
4.x does not have raid10 personality support. The raid10 personality is
NOT the same as nested raid1+0. It is an entirely new module from Neil
Brown that has a poor choice
John R Pierce wrote:
Mark Caudill wrote:
Wait, just to be clear, are you saying that all use of LVM is a bad idea
unless on hardware RAID? That's bad it if it's true since it seems to me
that most modern distros like to use LVM by default. Am I missing something?
if LVM is ignoring
Mark Caudill wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Morten Torstensen wrote:
On 08.12.2009 13:34, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Speaking for me (on Linux systems) on top of LVM on top of md. On IRIX
as it was intended.
That is a disaster combination for XFS even now. You mentioned some
pretty
On Dec 10, 2009, at 7:52 PM, Mark Caudill mar...@codelulz.com wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Morten Torstensen wrote:
On 08.12.2009 13:34, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Speaking for me (on Linux systems) on top of LVM on top of md.
On IRIX
as it was intended.
That is a disaster
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of KJS
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 6:16 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Linux router with CentOS
PFSense or IPCop, IPCop is a little easier to configure IMO.
Is IPCop
87 matches
Mail list logo
