I see someone has noticed my lack of suggestions or recommendations for
placement of virtual host source files...
Since there are many places to put virtual host source files, I had
intentionally avoided the discussion due to the complexities and to keep the
document restricted to a single
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Ed Heron wrote:
I see someone has noticed my lack of suggestions or recommendations for
placement of virtual host source files...
That would be me
A questioner reading the page in IRC today was confused by the
article. I added the pointer to the 'official' doco
Ed Heron wrote:
I see someone has noticed my lack of suggestions or recommendations for
placement of virtual host source files...
Since there are many places to put virtual host source files, I had
intentionally avoided the discussion due to the complexities and to keep
the document
Hi all,
just to add some ideas to lvm snapshots.
As far as I know ist there no need to dd the hole disk. It should fit if you
just make the lvm snap ant mount it to any device you want. So you could pack
the hole img and store it via bacula or something else. And you normally dont
need to shut
2009/12/16 m...@johestephan.de m...@johestephan.de:
Hi all,
As far as I know ist there no need to dd the hole disk. It should fit if you
So just:
- take the snap
- mount it
- pack it
Yep, but you'll not be able to restore it into a bootable system again
if you only backup the files. You
Les escribo lo que hice, aclaro que sigo con el problema.
-inicie en modo monousuario.
-desde acá pase al nivel 3 (init 3).
-paso al nivel 3 correctamente, entonces configure el nivel 3 como defecto
para el inicio.
-probé iniciar el modo grafico (startx), funciono ok.
-ya decidido utilizarlo en
hola amigos..una consulta cuento con una ip-publica que es la de mi FW-Proxy /
iptables-squid (distr. centos5), ahora como solo cuento con una sola ip-publica
estoy redireccionando el trafico desde esa ip publica al servicio web que es
una ip 192.168.1.253 al puerto 89. La regla que pongo en mi
Hola,
2009/12/16 Osvaldo Rivas spad...@gmail.com
Les escribo lo que hice, aclaro que sigo con el problema.
-inicie en modo monousuario.
-desde acá pase al nivel 3 (init 3).
-paso al nivel 3 correctamente, entonces configure el nivel 3 como defecto
para el inicio.
-probé iniciar el modo
2009/12/16 Osvaldo Rivas spad...@gmail.com:
Les escribo lo que hice, aclaro que sigo con el problema.
-inicie en modo monousuario.
-desde acá pase al nivel 3 (init 3).
-paso al nivel 3 correctamente, entonces configure el nivel 3 como defecto
para el inicio.
-probé iniciar el modo grafico
Necesito saber por favor como compartir una carpeta en centos con winxp
Gracias
Gustavo Riego
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
2009/12/16 wilder Deza wildest...@yahoo.es
hola amigos..una consulta cuento con una ip-publica que es la de mi FW-Proxy
/ iptables-squid (distr. centos5), ahora como solo cuento con una sola
ip-publica estoy redireccionando el trafico desde esa ip publica al servicio
web que es una ip
What should I do to make an existing CentOS (5.4) disc boot up on a new
computer?
I just made on CentOS 5.3 installation on that machine, so I know the
hardware is compatible.
Would it be enough to boot with a DVD in rescue mode, or boot with
another hd, and install grub?
- Jussi
--
Jussi
Would it be enough to boot with a DVD in rescue mode, or boot with
another hd, and install grub?
Yes.
--
Eero
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
2009/12/16 Michel van Deventer mic...@van.deventer.cx
Hi,
What should I do to make an existing CentOS (5.4) disc boot up on a new
computer?
you may be required to rebuild initrd
--
Linux counter #213090
___
CentOS mailing list
On 16.12.2009 10:18, Michel van Deventer wrote:
If it doesn't boot (normally because the disk numbering is different) you
can use a rescue DVD and grub to fix things (probably grub-install and
maybe /etc/fstab for the /boot filesystem).
Is the old hd using LVM and/or labels for filesystems ?
I ran into trouble and decided to go another way.
The rescue CD did not find CentOS installations, most probably because
the ext3 partitions were hidden behind a md layer.
I could have stopped the raid devices first, then I would probably have
been able to use the rescue CD and rebuild initrd
Quoting Jussi Hirvi listmem...@greenspot.fi:
I ran into trouble and decided to go another way.
The rescue CD did not find CentOS installations, most probably because
the ext3 partitions were hidden behind a md layer.
Well, You can use rescue image from www.sysresccd.org
--
Eero
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Jussi Hirvi
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 9:07 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Old hd, new machine
What should I do to make an existing CentOS (5.4) disc boot up on a new
What should I do to make an existing CentOS (5.4) disc boot up on a new
computer?
[...]
Would it be enough to boot with a DVD in rescue mode, or boot with
another hd, and install grub?
On 16.12.2009 12:16, Sorin Srbu wrote:
For me it has worked to just install the old hd in the new machine
nate wrote:
James Pearson wrote:
It looks like this might be the same issue as:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520888
Which seems to suggest disabling MSI - i.e. load the bnx2 module with
disable_msi=1
Wow! that looks interesting, will try it! thanks!
Also, the pre-5.5 kernel
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Jussi Hirvi
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 11:39 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Old hd, new machine
On 16.12.2009 12:16, Sorin Srbu wrote:
For me it has worked to just
Alan McKay wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
A cluster filesystem
OK, but you've just given me a circular definition.
When you do not need/want a cluster file system
and again ...
Okay, a cluster/distributed file system
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I have a client with a handful of USB drives connected to a CentOS
box. I am charged with binding the USB drives together into a single
LVM for a cheap storage data pool (10 x 1 TB usb drives = 10 TB cheap
storage in a single mount point).
I tried
Hi,
Has anyone had any success using a Canon LBP5300 with CentOS or any other RH
type os for that matter, using the rpms and intructions downloaded from the
Canon website? I have it working on XP and OS X both via USB and network but
am having no success with either on CentOS 5.4 . Print jobs
On 12/16/09 4:12 PM, Colin Coles wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone had any success using a Canon LBP5300 with CentOS or any other RH
type os for that matter, using the rpms and intructions downloaded from the
Canon website? I have it working on XP and OS X both via USB and network but
am having no
Steve Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I have a client with a handful of USB drives connected to a CentOS
box. I am charged with binding the USB drives together into a single
LVM for a cheap storage data pool (10 x 1 TB usb drives = 10 TB cheap
storage in a single
On Wednesday 16 December 2009 14:19, Eero Volotinen wrote:
By looking page: http://www.openprinting.org/printer_list.cgi?make=Canon
looks like your printer is unsupported?
Thanks Eero, but Canon provide a cups driver here:
http://software.canon-europe.com/products/0010407.asp
However I am
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Steve Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I have a client with a handful of USB drives connected to a CentOS
box. I am charged with binding the USB drives together into a single
LVM for a cheap storage data pool
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I have a client with a handful of USB drives connected to a CentOS
box. I am charged with binding the USB drives together into a single
LVM for a cheap storage data pool (10 x 1 TB usb drives = 10 TB cheap
storage in a single mount point).
How about eSATA? Surely an
Steve Thompson wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Steve Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I have a client with a handful of USB drives connected to a CentOS
box. I am charged with binding the USB drives together into a single
LVM for a
On 12/16/2009 12:10 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
On 12/15/09 2:48 PM, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I have a client with a handful of USB drives connected to a CentOS
box. I am charged with binding the USB drives together into a single
LVM for a cheap storage data pool (10 x 1 TB usb drives = 10 TB
On 12/16/2009 9:34 AM, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Steve Thompson wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Steve Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I have a client with a handful of USB drives connected to a
On 12/15/2009 7:48 AM, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I have a client with a handful of USB drives connected to a CentOS
box. I am charged with binding the USB drives together into a single
LVM for a cheap storage data pool (10 x 1 TB usb drives = 10 TB cheap
storage in a single mount point).
(snip)
On 12/16/2009 9:41 AM, William Warren wrote:
On 12/16/2009 12:10 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
Still going to need 10TB of backups. And i can guarantee you the
chances of having a URE during rebuild are almost certain with this
setup so a backup is going to be crucial. Sounds like a nightmare
On 12/15/2009 4:22 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning to upgrade an old public/internal development
infrastructure and will use CentOS 5.4 x86_64 as basis.
The Subversion version in CentOS 5.4 is v1.4, whereas RPMForge provides v1.6.
I use the RPMForge version as my client on the
Has anyone installed sshfs on CentOS 5 and used it sucessfully?
Yup, running on 5.4 x86_64, connecting to i386 and FreeBSD
7.2-STABLE/i386. No problems.
Timo
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
Has anyone installed sshfs on CentOS 5 and used it sucessfully?
Yes, works nicely:
http://blog.toracat.org/2008/09/hello-world/
Please note that the blog is a bit old. In step (2), dkms-fuse is no
longer needed with the
Robert Heller wrote:
At Wed, 16 Dec 2009 07:33:38 -0600 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Jussi Hirvi wrote:
What should I do to make an existing CentOS (5.4) disc boot up on a new
computer?
[...]
Would it be enough to boot with a DVD in rescue mode, or boot with
another hd,
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Alan McKay wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
A cluster filesystem
OK, but you've just given me a circular definition.
When you do not need/want a cluster file system
and again ...
Okay, a
At Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:55:49 -0600 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Robert Heller wrote:
At Wed, 16 Dec 2009 07:33:38 -0600 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Jussi Hirvi wrote:
What should I do to make an existing CentOS (5.4) disc boot up on a new
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
Has anyone installed sshfs on CentOS 5 and used it sucessfully?
Yes, works nicely:
http://blog.toracat.org/2008/09/hello-world/
Please note that the blog
Thanks for your answers!
Nope. Works fine. Between the nightly hot-copy backups and the
internal design of the SVN FSFS storage engine, I'm not terribly
worried.
I tend to use svnadmin dump for my daily backups.
(some time ago, I ran into compatibility issues with hotcopy when
trying to
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 09:57:38AM -0500, Thomas Harold wrote:
Yah, RAID-6 at a minimum, I wouldn't depend on RAID-5, even with a
hot-spare. So to get 10TB, you'd need 13 drives (10 data, 2 parity, 1
hot-spare).
2TB drives are available for ~$300-$400 each. Eight 2TB disks would
provide
I've been unsuccessfully trying to get nss_ldap to work. I've chased down
hundreds of google searches over the last 3 days, and I can't seem to get a
centos system to authenticate against ldap.
Every daemon on the system is running into the same problem:
nss_ldap: could not search LDAP server -
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 11:24 -0800, Peter Serwe wrote:
I've been unsuccessfully trying to get nss_ldap to work. I've chased
down hundreds of google searches over the last 3 days, and I can't
seem to get a centos system to authenticate against ldap.
Every daemon on the system is running into
I've been unsuccessfully trying to get nss_ldap to work. I've chased down
hundreds of google searches over the last 3 days, and I can't seem to get
a
centos system to authenticate against ldap.
Every daemon on the system is running into the same problem:
nss_ldap: could not search LDAP
Desktop is CentOS 5.4 (32 bit). I have Google Earth version
4.2.205.5730 (13NOV2007 build date) installed. I have checkinstall
(spelling?) installed, but am not sure if that was installed before or
after Google Earth was installed. I have the Google Repository
installed, but apparently Google
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.comwrote:
forget 'telnet'
Can you do an ldapsearch?
ldapsearch -x -h localhost -D '$YOUR_ROOT_BIND_DN' -W '(ou=*)'
Craig
Sure I can, this is the output, slightly sanitized.
# extended LDIF
#
# LDAPv3
# base with scope
The easiest way to do this is to navigate to /opt/google-earth
then execute the following command from the command line
*./uninstall
*
[r...@commandcenter google-earth]# ./uninstall
Product: Google Earth
Installed in /opt/google-earth
Uninstalling desktop menu entries...
Uninstalling
Peter Serwe wrote:
I've been unsuccessfully trying to get nss_ldap to work. I've chased down
hundreds of google searches over the last 3 days, and I can't seem to get a
centos system to authenticate against ldap.
Every daemon on the system is running into the same problem:
Disable all
I was going to say no TLS on either side.
Specifically because I wanted to make sure that I was doing it with basic
auth prior to using tls, but I found TLS lines in the /etc/ldap.conf.
I commented those out, and guess what, no more nss_ldap messages in
/var/log/messages..
Now, I'm somewhat
I have a really silly question... but just want to ask...
I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other
boxes are all i386. As this x86_64 machine can, at most, house 4 GB of
RAM (currently only has 1 GB) - is there any advantage to my running
x86_64 on that machine
Scot P. Floess wrote:
I have a really silly question... but just want to ask...
I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other
boxes are all i386. As this x86_64 machine can, at most, house 4 GB of
RAM (currently only has 1 GB) - is there any advantage to my running
I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other
boxes are all i386. As this x86_64 machine can, at most, house 4 GB of
RAM (currently only has 1 GB) - is there any advantage to my running
x86_64 on that machine instead of i386... Long story as to why I am
asking - but
so to be honest...what really spawned this... I put all my VMs on an NFS
share. I've got an F11 VM I run...but on my x86_64 host - starting the
F11 VM (its an i386 VM) fails to start. If I run F11 x86_64 it works
fine. I' really just trying to simplify things and standards on one type
of
Found an ldif user recipe for CentOS5.2..
Added the user tactest with the password tactest.
Dec 16 12:05:30 ldap sshd[11705]pam_unix(sshd:auth): check pass; user
unknown
Dec 16 12:05:30 ldap sshd[11705]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication
failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=ldap
and, of course:
Dec 16 12:05:31 ldap sshd[11705]: Failed password for invalid user tactest
from 127.0.0.1 port 52949 ssh2
Peter
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Peter Serwe peter.se...@gmail.com wrote:
Found an ldif user recipe for CentOS5.2..
Added the user tactest with the password
All my machines - including my desktop - are 32 bit. This lone
x86_64 machine is a headless server (well I plug in a monitor from time to
time) - but
usually its headless (as are all my machines but my desktop)...
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, John Thomas wrote:
I have one box on my home network
I have a really silly question... but just want to ask...
I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other
boxes are all i386. As this x86_64 machine can, at most, house 4 GB of
RAM (currently only has 1 GB) - is there any advantage to my running
x86_64 on that machine
Scot P. Floess wrote:
Its a Dell Pentium D - basically x86_64 but does not support hardware
virtualization. Its a Dell Poweredge SC430 if that helps???
I believe those were a pair of the P4 Prescott chips in a single
package, and pretty much what I said, 64bit works, but there's little
Ah good point... Wasn't thinking in those terms... Well clearly wasn't
thinking at all ;)
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I have a really silly question... but just want to ask...
I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other
boxes are all i386. As
Hey thats an interesting bit of trivia - thanks :) Large memory - bah -
this silly machine maxes out at 4 GB...
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, John R Pierce wrote:
Scot P. Floess wrote:
Its a Dell Pentium D - basically x86_64 but does not support hardware
virtualization. Its a Dell Poweredge SC430
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 12:07 -0800, Peter Serwe wrote:
Found an ldif user recipe for CentOS5.2..
Added the user tactest with the password tactest.
Dec 16 12:05:30 ldap sshd[11705]pam_unix(sshd:auth): check pass; user
unknown
Dec 16 12:05:30 ldap sshd[11705]: pam_unix(sshd:auth):
At Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:53:01 -0500 (EST) CentOS mailing list
centos@centos.org wrote:
I have a really silly question... but just want to ask...
I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other
boxes are all i386. As this x86_64 machine can, at most, house 4 GB of
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:33 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
First question: do you have tls enabled on the client, and not the server,
or vice versa?
Second question: on the server, can you do a search?
Handy tool: webmin has a whole ldap section, and can give you a *lot* of
clues as to
I'm not really seeing what the response is, running tcpdump -vvv -i lo,
output of a whole transaction is:
tcpdump: listening on lo, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
12:33:48.197928 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 61456, offset 0, flags [DF], proto:
TCP (6), length: 60) ldap.48322
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 14:53 -0500, Scot P. Floess wrote:
is there any advantage to my running
x86_64 on that machine instead of i386...
A better question might be, do you have any particular reason not to run
x86_64 on that machine?
All of my machines and the machines that I look after are
I think not as well. The tactest user has been blown back out. I can
re-add it from ldif again.
[r...@ldap home]# getent passwd | grep example
[r...@ldap home]#
[r...@ldap home]# cat /etc/nsswitch.conf | grep -v \#
passwd: files ldap
shadow: files ldap
group: files ldap
hosts:
All my machines - including my desktop - are 32 bit. This lone
x86_64 machine is a headless server (well I plug in a monitor from time to
time) - but
usually its headless (as are all my machines but my desktop)...
All of our servers have been 64bit since '04 or '05? Whenever the first
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 12:39 -0800, Peter Serwe wrote:
I think not as well. The tactest user has been blown back out. I can
re-add it from ldif again.
[r...@ldap home]# getent passwd | grep example
[r...@ldap home]#
[r...@ldap home]# cat /etc/nsswitch.conf | grep -v \#
passwd:
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 12:39 -0800, Peter Serwe wrote:
I think not as well. The tactest user has been blown back out. I can
re-add it from ldif again.
and by the way... don't waste time trying to authenticate users/groups
that don't exist.
If they don't show up when you give commands
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Scot P. Floess sflo...@nc.rr.com wrote:
I have a really silly question... but just want to ask...
I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other
boxes are all i386. As this x86_64 machine can, at most, house 4 GB of
RAM (currently only
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 13:44 -0700, Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 12:39 -0800, Peter Serwe wrote:
I think not as well. The tactest user has been blown back out. I can
re-add it from ldif again.
[r...@ldap home]# getent passwd | grep example
[r...@ldap home]#
getent still fails, now I'm getting can't connect messages again.
Dec 16 12:59:58 ldap nscd: nss_ldap: could not search LDAP server - Server
is unavailable
Also, the People container was removed and not re-added when I re-created
the tree with webmin,
hence, I modified the lines in
I just had those users in there because I didn't want to attempt to hit ldap
for known local users.
Peter
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.comwrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 13:44 -0700, Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 12:39 -0800, Peter Serwe wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.comwrote:
allow bind_anon_dn
access to attrs=userPassword,sambaNTPassword,sambaLMPassword
by self write
by anonymous auth
by * none
access to dn.regex=^uid=([^,]+)ou=People,dc=azapple,dc=com$$
On 12/14/2009 11:12 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
nope - updates will only start flowing once the issues are resolved -
given the way things are looking right now, I'd expect that to be
sometime tomorrow evening.
all pending c5 updates are now syncing to the mirrors, wait for the
announcements
Lanny Marcus wrote:
Desktop is CentOS 5.4 (32 bit). I have Google Earth version
4.2.205.5730 (13NOV2007 build date) installed. I have checkinstall
(spelling?) installed, but am not sure if that was installed before or
after Google Earth was installed. I have the Google Repository
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 13:02 -0800, Peter Serwe wrote:
getent still fails, now I'm getting can't connect messages again.
Dec 16 12:59:58 ldap nscd: nss_ldap: could not search LDAP server -
Server is unavailable
Also, the People container was removed and not re-added when I
re-created the
Do any of them happen to include a fix for ldap? ;)
Peter
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.orgwrote:
On 12/14/2009 11:12 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
nope - updates will only start flowing once the issues are resolved -
given the way things are looking right
Which part did I discard that was relevant?
I don't have a People container at the moment.
There was something that looked like ?one on the end of the string, I
couldn't make sense of it.
Which part are you offended by the discard of?
Peter
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Craig White
OMG.
My bad.
I thought ?one was an artifact of your copy of MailScanner.
I added it and logged in.
The People container is not present and I didn't put that back in.
I can now log in as exam...@$host.
Peter
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Peter Serwe peter.se...@gmail.com wrote:
Which
And since I forgot. Thanks!
Silly question, is any of this documented anywhere?
Peter
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Peter Serwe peter.se...@gmail.com wrote:
OMG.
My bad.
I thought ?one was an artifact of your copy of MailScanner.
I added it and logged in.
The People container is
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 13:38 -0800, Peter Serwe wrote:
Which part did I discard that was relevant?
I don't have a People container at the moment.
There was something that looked like ?one on the end of the string, I
couldn't make sense of it.
Which part are you offended by the discard
You wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:33 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
First question: do you have tls enabled on the client, and not the
server, or vice versa?
Second question: on the server, can you do a search?
Handy tool: webmin has a whole ldap section, and can give you a *lot*
of
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Longer answer: every single move, down at the machine/assembly level, can
move twice as many bits as on a 32-bit system. That will show up as a very
serious speed increase in your software.
actually, the pentiums have had a 64bit physical memory bus since the
first
On 16/12/09 19:53, Scot P. Floess wrote:
I have a really silly question... but just want to ask...
I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other
boxes are all i386. As this x86_64 machine can, at most, house 4 GB of
RAM (currently only has 1 GB) - is there any
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:44 PM, earl ramirez earlarami...@gmail.com wrote:
The easiest way to do this is to navigate to /opt/google-earth
then execute the following command from the command line
./uninstall
[r...@commandcenter google-earth]# ./uninstall
Product: Google Earth
Installed in
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Robert kerp...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
Desktop is CentOS 5.4 (32 bit). I have Google Earth version
4.2.205.5730 (13NOV2007 build date) installed. I have checkinstall
(spelling?) installed, but am not sure if that was installed before or
I am largely, vehemently against webmin or any other gui tools for system
administration, including the X11 tools..
And, to be honest, it pisses me off that virt-install is broken, but
virt-manager can create a new VM for me just fine, even though it hangs on
granular package selection..
gui
On 12/15/2009 09:03 PM Thomas Dukes wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jim Perrin
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 11:13 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] mod_security
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Robert kerp...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
Desktop is CentOS 5.4 (32 bit). I have Google Earth version
4.2.205.5730 (13NOV2007 build date) installed. I have checkinstall
Lanny, if you don't have an /opt/google-earth/uninstall, welcome to the
I am largely, vehemently against webmin or any other gui tools for system
administration, including the X11 tools..
I'm not vehemently, but I do almost all of my sysadmin work in shell, also.
snip
And webmin is a big hairy security hole.
It was useful for a moment though.
Yes - it was
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Rogelio scubac...@gmail.com wrote:
Someone told me that if you have a CentOS or Fedora server, you can pay a
Red Hat yearly fee and get them to support it (because the environments are
so similar).
Can anyone here substantiate this claim?
No support from Red
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Rogelio scubac...@gmail.com wrote:
Someone told me that if you have a CentOS or Fedora server, you can pay a
Red Hat yearly fee and get them to support it (because the environments are
so similar).
Can anyone here
I have a user with C5.4 64-bit, fully updated, performed a yum install
glade, it claimed to have installed everything, but we cannot get it
to run. Neither whereis nor locate revleal an executable.
We obtained the latest glade source from the project's web site,
attempted to configure it, until
Connie Sieh wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Rogelio scubac...@gmail.com wrote:
Someone told me that if you have a CentOS or Fedora server, you can pay a
Red Hat yearly fee and get them to support it (because the environments are
so similar).
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Connie Sieh cs...@fnal.gov wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Rogelio scubac...@gmail.com wrote:
Someone told me that if you have a CentOS or Fedora server, you can pay a
Red Hat yearly fee and get them to support
I recently came across the need to convert jpg images with IM, did a
standard install of yum -y install ImageMagick and found that
images converted with CentOS's base port of IM would actually corrupt the
images, yet using the same (albiet different version, different distro)
software
didn't
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
