Hi,
this looks fine for me, thanks for your efforts!
I don't have the laptop with the Broadcom card here but I'll test your
procedure point by point in a few days when I'll upgrade the kernel
there.
Just one remark: I had to deactivate the 'network' service and
activate the 'NetworkManager'
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1671
kernel security update for CentOS 4 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1671.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.9-89.0.18.EL.i586.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1671
kernel security update for CentOS 4 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1671.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
updates/x86_64/RPMS/kernel-2.6.9-89.0.18.EL.x86_64.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1673
seamonkey security update for CentOS 4 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1673.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-51.el4.centos.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1673
seamonkey security update for CentOS 4 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1673.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1674
firefox security update for CentOS 4 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1674.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/firefox-3.0.16-4.el4.centos.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1674
firefox security update for CentOS 4 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1674.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1680
xpdf security update for CentOS 4 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1680.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/xpdf-3.00-23.el4_8.1.i386.rpm
source:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1680
xpdf security update for CentOS 4 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1680.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
updates/x86_64/RPMS/xpdf-3.00-23.el4_8.1.x86_64.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1681
gpdf security update for CentOS 4 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1681.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/gpdf-2.8.2-7.7.2.el4_8.6.i386.rpm
source:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1682
kdegraphics security update for CentOS 4 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1682.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/kdegraphics-3.3.1-17.el4_8.1.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1682
kdegraphics security update for CentOS 4 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1682.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
En teoría copie todo desde un Live-CD (se me olvido decirlo) a si que
supongo que no debería haber diferencias entre el original y la copia
(en cuanto a contenido),al no estar el sistema en uso.
No excluí directorios como /dev o /proc u otros directorios que se
podrían excluir, y puede que
tengo problemas con el servicio de mysql y revise los log y me dicen que
falta un fichero mysqld.sock
Alguien tiene idea como se crea este fichero.
Mauricio Yañes Cervantes ®
Administrador de Red
Escuela Formadora de Trabajadores
Sociales de Santiago de Cuba.
e_mail:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of John R. Dennison
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 12:00 AM
To: John R Pierce
Cc: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Urgent request
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 02:37:52PM -0800, John R
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Thomas Dukes
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 12:53 AM
To: 'CentOS mailing list'
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Urgent request
We have backups but its only database files. C-Systems got us good,
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 09:21:32AM +0100, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Fedora?? You're joking, right?
This is this a production server?
Note he mentioned Fedora 9, support for which has been EOL'd
how long ago? :(
John
--
After dealing with a couple of issues with OpenLDAP, I'd say it beats the
piss out of NIS all day long. NIS is ancient and decrepit.
Hard to believe, but certain very well known organizations refuse to get off
NIS for critical and secure systems.
Peter
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:50 AM, John R.
Hi,
I recetly set up a brand new fres Centos 5.4 64 bit system and found a
lot of i386 packages installed along with the x86_64 packages.
My questions: Why is this done?
May I remove the i386 packages? (rpm -e )
I wanted to update today the installed packages and do get some dep
messages:
gcc 4.3 was a technology preview in 5.3. It became 4.4 in 5.4.
4.1.2 is the supported version in 5.x.
Laurent.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Google doesn't do it...
I have an RPM package for a default firefox profile I deploy to our boxes -
that contains a 64bit gears install from somewhere. google linux 64bit
gears - there's plenty of places with it compiled to XPI thing it is
r3409 or something like that which is most recent
I run chkrootkit daily. For the first time I've got reports of a problem -
Checking `bindshell'... INFECTED (PORTS: 1008)
The page http://fatpenguinblog.com/scott-rippee/checking-bindshell-infected-
ports-1008/ suggests that this might be a false positive, so I ran 'netstat -
tanup' but unlike
Hi,
I want to configure CentOS on powerful server with gigabit
adapters as transparent bridge and deploy it in front of server farm.
Can you tell how to optimize the OS for hight packet processing? What
configurations I need to do to achieve very hight speeds and thousands of
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 3:22 AM
To: 'CentOS mailing list'
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Urgent request
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Peter Serwe wrote:
After dealing with a couple of issues with OpenLDAP, I'd say it beats the
piss out of NIS all day long. NIS is ancient and decrepit.
Agreed.
Hard to believe, but certain very well known organizations refuse to get off
NIS for critical and secure
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.com wrote:
I have updated my local repo and see that centos.plus has the new kernel
available.
yum update does not get it
yum clean all and another try and still it does not find it
what am I missing??
Anne Wilson wrote:
I run chkrootkit daily. For the first time I've got reports of a problem -
Checking `bindshell'... INFECTED (PORTS: 1008)
The page http://fatpenguinblog.com/scott-rippee/checking-bindshell-infected-
ports-1008/ suggests that this might be a false positive, so I ran
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Christoph Maser c...@financial.com wrote:
Am Freitag, den 18.12.2009, 06:42 +0100 schrieb Gilbert Sebenste:
Excellent. We're all caught up on updates now, except...
I didn't see the NTP update. That's a big one, with an easy denial of
sservice attack. Is that
On 18/12/09 13:11, Akemi Yagi wrote:
That was for CentOS-4. The update for CentOS-5 is indeed unavailable
as of today.
ntp and conga should both be available at some point today. I need to
run some tests first, lets see if I can get those done during my lunch
break at work.
- KB
From: Anne Wilson cannewil...@googlemail.com
I run chkrootkit daily. For the first time I've got reports of a problem -
Checking `bindshell'... INFECTED (PORTS: 1008)
The page http://fatpenguinblog.com/scott-rippee/checking-bindshell-infected-
ports-1008/ suggests that this might be a
Akemi Yagi schrieb:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator
goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de wrote:
Hi,
I recetly set up a brand new fres Centos 5.4 64 bit system and found a
lot of i386 packages installed along with the x86_64 packages.
My questions: Why is this
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 18/12/09 13:11, Akemi Yagi wrote:
That was for CentOS-4. The update for CentOS-5 is indeed unavailable
as of today.
ntp and conga should both be available at some point today. I need to
run some tests first, lets see if I can get those done
Hi folks
This question is about fetchmail running on my Centos 5.3 box.
I need to fetch my email from different accounts living on remote servers and
drop it on my local mailbox.
The question is wich way is faster for fetchmail... using POP3 or IMAP?
Thanks
David
On Fri, December 18, 2009 10:29 am, Davy Leon wrote:
Hi folks
This question is about fetchmail running on my Centos 5.3 box.
I need to fetch my email from different accounts living on remote servers
and drop it on my local mailbox.
The question is wich way is faster for fetchmail... using
Actually I'm using POP3, but just looking for improvements in speed. Plus,
fetchm,ail doesn't allow fetch more than one account at a time, and it's
kind slow in the secure handshaking. There is another package should I
explore using it to improve speed?
Thanks for your answer
David
-
You can configure fetchmail to grab email from more than one server - I'm
doing that now at home. I have a workstation VM that runs fetchmail - one
to pull mail from my mailserver and the other from Road Runner - one
config file, 2 different remote email accounts - 1 local user account...
On
[Top post moved to bottom]
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Davy Leon d...@scu.escambray.com.cu wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Brian Mathis brian.mat...@gmail.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Fetchmail
On Friday 18 December 2009, ken wrote:
Hey, Gang!
To ensure that a file hasn't been corrupted or tampered with, you can
use rpm to verify the package it came from. Well, I found this:
rpm -Vv util-linux
/usr/bin/cal
S.?./usr/bin/chfn
/usr/bin/chrt
You can definitely use the -f option to fetchmail. But the neat thing is,
you can supply multiple accounts - and multiple local users. For me I
supply 2 different pop servers and one local user - works great.
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Brian Mathis wrote:
[Top post moved to bottom]
On Fri,
Davy Leon wrote:
Hi folks
This question is about fetchmail running on my Centos 5.3 box.
I need to fetch my email from different accounts living on remote
servers and drop it on my local mailbox.
The question is wich way is faster for fetchmail... using POP3 or IMAP?
Thanks
David
D'oh... Sorry about that... I was quickly reading through the post. My
foot so easily fits into my mouth I sometimes forget its there :)
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Brian Mathis wrote:
[Top post again moved to the bottom]
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Scot P. Floess sflo...@nc.rr.com
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:55:54AM -0500, Scot P. Floess wrote:
You can definitely use the -f option to fetchmail. But the neat thing is,
you can supply multiple accounts - and multiple local users. For me I
supply 2 different pop servers and one local user - works great.
Yup, this is my
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:05:17AM -0500, Brian Mathis wrote:
You may notice that in the OPs 1st reply that the requirement is to
retrieve multiple accounts *at the same time* to increase speed.
AFAIK, if you use 1 file with fetchmail it will retrieve messages
sequentially from each account.
Would any of you be comfortable running the drbd packages
from the extras repo? If so, any particular version .. I
notice 8.0, 8.2, 8.3.
I'll do my own due diligence but just curious if the list has
any implementation based feedback. Thanks.
I've been running 8.0 for a year or more from
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
sadas sadas wrote:
Hi,
I want to configure CentOS on powerful server with gigabit
adapters as transparent bridge and deploy it in front of server farm.
Can you tell how to optimize the OS for hight packet processing? What
configurations I need to do to achieve very hight speeds and
I am currently playing with the 8.3 package (8.2 redirects to 8.3 btw).
so far I haven't had any issues with it.
Jacob Bresciani
Linux Systems Administrator
Advanced Economic Research Systems / Terapeak
Cell: 250 418-5412
On 2009-12-18, at 8:53 AM, Flaherty, Patrick
I'll second damn near everything nate said, and hopefully add a tidbit or
two.
If you're new to BSD, you may want to consider the pfsense project in the
aforementioned active-active configuration.
It gives you a nice, intuitive gui to manage your failover firewalls, if you
insist on putting a
On Friday 18 December 2009 16:55:04 nate wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
do the trick, and I simply didn't know what else to try. In case I meet
this
again, can you please advise me?
Are you doing anything with NFS? If not then turn off the nfs service,
and the rpc services
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:12 AM, James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.com wrote:
I have an RPM package for a default firefox profile I deploy to our boxes -
that contains a 64bit gears install from somewhere. google linux 64bit
gears - there's plenty of places with it compiled to XPI
I will explain more deeply. I need to deploy a firewall(s) in front of web
server farm because I need to do billing - I will use CentOS with iptables +
ipset to store a list if my clients so when client doesn't pay his server's IP
is out of the list and he can't access the web server.
Second
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:36 PM, sadas sadas mai...@abv.bg wrote:
I can't find information is there linux or BSD distribution with effective
firewall that uses optimized algorithm to store hundreds of IPs and to
forward huge traffic. Any idea?
I think you'll find that this kind of thing can be
sadas sadas wrote:
I can't find information is there linux or BSD distribution with effective
firewall that uses optimized algorithm to store hundreds of IPs and to
forward huge traffic. Any idea?
Hundreds?
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/tables.html
A table is used to hold a group of IPv4
after quick search in google:
http://postfactum.pl.ua/pf/
I will test to patch latest linux kernel with pf.
What do you thing?
sadas sadas wrote:
I can't find information is there linux or BSD distribution with effective
firewall that uses optimized algorithm to store hundreds of IPs
I can't find information is there linux or BSD distribution with effective
firewall that uses optimized algorithm to store hundreds of IPs and to
forward huge traffic. Any idea?
Hundreds?
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/tables.html
A table is used to hold a group of IPv4 and/or IPv6
after quick search in google:
http://postfactum.pl.ua/pf/
I will test to patch latest linux kernel with pf.
What do you thing?
Get OpenBSD. Honestly -- all the porting stuff of relatively
kernel-close stuff is just braindead.
Timo
sadas sadas wrote:
I can't find information is
Hi list,
after some discussion on #IRC on PowerPC I was waiting for some
commitment on supported architectures in RHEL 6. As I just learnt,
Itanic will be dumped, but there will be a PowerPC release:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/18/redhat_rhel6_itanium_dead/
Best,
Timo (happy PowerPC
What about NetBSD? I heard that NetBSD has the best network stack out there.
Maybe NetBSD with pf is the best choice?
I can't find information is there linux or BSD distribution with
effective
firewall that uses optimized algorithm to store hundreds of IPs and to
forward huge
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Stephen Harris wrote:
You can always run multiple copies of fetchmail in the background if you
want parallel fetching
or run just one tenth of those RC files (when well numbered)
present each time a script is invoked, if you are not in a
hurry to retrieve email from
What about NetBSD? I heard that NetBSD has the best network stack out
there. Maybe NetBSD with pf is the best choice?
NetBSD is a very nice OS, I personally like it most (out of all BSDs out
there); however, as can be read on
http://www.netbsd.org/docs/network/pf.html
there's the 'usual lag':
after quick search in google:
http://postfactum.pl.ua/pf/
I will test to patch latest linux kernel with pf.
Hey! Wait: The name of this patchset is not connected with BSD Packet
Filter. «pf» means «post-factum» in the short form.
What do you thing?
Get OpenBSD. Honestly -- all the
I don't know jack about IPSet, but I know enabling or disabling hosts in
bare stock PF without the gui in front of it is about as easy as it gets.
The PF configuration file syntax was designed from the ground up to be sane,
unlike iptables, which typically needs some decent sysadmin scripting or
Timo Schoeler wrote:
What about NetBSD? I heard that NetBSD has the best network stack out
there. Maybe NetBSD with pf is the best choice?
NetBSD is a very nice OS, I personally like it most (out of all BSDs out
there); however, as can be read on
http://www.netbsd.org/docs/network/pf.html
You can't patch the Berkeley Packet Filter into Linux. Linux kernel doesn't
support it.
and...
Despite a cacophonous chorus of replies directing you to the right tool for
the job, you insist on sticking with Linux.
If you want to use the wrong tool for the job, by all means, use
ipset/iptables
Hi
I mistype this shell#/rm a.tar.gz
it works but it won't confirm and the file is remove
why?
Thank you
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 12/18/2009 10:05 PM, Peter Serwe wrote:
I don't know jack about IPSet, but I know enabling or disabling hosts in
bare stock PF without the gui in front of it is about as easy as it gets.
The PF configuration file syntax was designed from the ground up to be sane,
unlike iptables, which
On 12/18/2009 10:12 PM, Peter Serwe wrote:
You can't patch the Berkeley Packet Filter into Linux. Linux kernel doesn't
support it.
and...
Despite a cacophonous chorus of replies directing you to the right tool for
the job, you insist on sticking with Linux.
If you want to use the
adrian kok wrote:
Hi
I mistype this shell#/rm a.tar.gz
it works but it won't confirm and the file is remove
why?
rm never asks for confirmation by default. The reason you think it does
is that you normally execute an alias instead of the real command when
running as root. You must
On 12/18/2009 4:12 PM, Peter Serwe wrote:
You can't patch the Berkeley Packet Filter into Linux. Linux kernel
doesn't support it.
and...
Despite a cacophonous chorus of replies directing you to the right tool
for the job, you insist on sticking with Linux.
If you want to use the
Hi,
I am configuring firewall for NFS.
I see that statd and mountd start at random port. Is there any way to
force it to start at specific port each time. The '-p ' option would
work, but how do I configure it to start at specific port number each
time. I mean where do statd and mountd look for
Hi,
I see that statd and mountd start at random port. Is there any way to
force it to start at specific port each time. The '-p ' option would
work, but how do I configure it to start at specific port number each
time. I mean where do statd and mountd look for default configuration
options?
On Friday 18 December 2009 16:05, Peter Serwe wrote:
I don't know jack about IPSet, but I know enabling or disabling hosts in
bare stock PF without the gui in front of it is about as easy as it gets.
IPTALES is the same;
iptables -A [INPUT/FORWARD] -d ip address -j [REJECT/DROP]
The PF
Great..! Thats helpful..
Thanks,
CS.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Christoph Neuhaus nihi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I see that statd and mountd start at random port. Is there any way to
force it to start at specific port each time. The '-p ' option would
work, but how do I configure it to
Hard to believe, but certain very well known organizations refuse to get off
NIS for critical and secure systems.
{{citation needed}}
:-)
--
Drew
Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood.
--Marie Curie
___
CentOS mailing list
Oldest son came back from college and wants a printer for his Dell
laptop. I built it with CentOS 5.3 x86_64 several months ago and will
upgrade it to 5.4
The Cannon printer he now has (bought with the laptop and Vista through
the university book store), doesn't seem to have linux drivers. I
What would the community recommend? His needs are simple...mostly BW
papers. On rare occasions he needs to print a paper with color
photos/graphs embedded. Not looking to spend a lot, just enough to
satisfy the requirement.
Install cups-pdf and have pdfs created by any application that can
adrian kok wrote:
Hi
I mistype this shell#/rm a.tar.gz
it works but it won't confirm and the file is remove
why?
And now you mistyped your mistyping. That would be a backslash
(\) not a forward slash (/). Escaping the command name with a
backslash bypasses the alias rm='rm -i' that is
Is there any decision about the donation programme?
The Web page still says: If you are looking to make a cash dontation to
the CentOS Project, please check back here after August 15th, 2009.
I assume that donations aren't refused, but is there a suggested amount,
as there used to be?
--
rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
If I'd have to buy one now, I'd look for an appropriate Brother model.
They seem to have decent support for Linux.
indeed, Brother BW laser printers have some of the best price oer page
printed too. they work fine with aftermarket toner and drums (mine uses
The syntax is not a problem. The problem is in the performance. I suppose that
if I configure OpenBSD to process the in/out packets only to layer 2 the
performance will be much more than linux with iptables.
I don't know jack about IPSet, but I know enabling or disabling hosts in
So basically, you're saying you'd want to allow or disallow traffic based on
mac address? Seems like you could put mac filters on a number switches,
Cisco being the most easily documented by Mr. Google.
Be a lot faster than any kernel, and a total waste of BSD. If you can do it
on Linux via
81 matches
Mail list logo
