CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1684
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1684.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
1d58de78efa1e19bd48a45d65100e8fc
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1684
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1684.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
54e37f9c00efe8dde0b23164d0ef326e
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1685
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1685.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
e171c3c7476f85cd62a2adc86ad580dd
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1685
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1685.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
45d7a0fd2743aab95f9a8f99acca52ca
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1686
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1686.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
f404c9f8103f0856bdd7df193f9269c7
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1686
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1686.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
058f327042da7a20f1421f4649306e2e
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1691
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1691.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
14c08603cac40072aeb5ce2e4bb7d826
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1691
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1691.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
db02737bf9e3ba935d889abf65d8f050
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1693
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1693.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
e12fb7c7907da947b384a796c952c2c8
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1693
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1693.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
d7aabdd3ace12953cad28aab6a397b0f
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0010
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0010.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
09d128002ae22b71d53dee9bd93f123f
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0010
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0010.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
d096f767bd2dff7455784ff3ce1b72f4
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0012
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0012.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
f5a1f76c8e4eb8abc9ead2ec352e807a
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0012
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0012.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
62ae450cc19163a2ae0b3af8e03d406b
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0013
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0013.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
8ce6f2418e16726c36b3353c1db6a515
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0013
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0013.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
5e06210a4c2567329defd11f26049f32
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2010:0014
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2010-0014.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
e76342576743d5acced49752939bedc3
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2010:0014
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2010-0014.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
4e96fa32a118b160a04f1a015fb823fb
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0018 Moderate
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0018.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
0fd8eaaee5089abd6e72445c42ca7d07
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0018 Moderate
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0018.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
0a7c9308558b1c25a053b283a7edef46
Ben M. wrote:
Duh, fixed. PC Repair 101: Check the motherboard battery.
I'm so peeved with myself for overlooking the first step of computer
repair for 3 days. This motherboard snaps to default of Virtualization
OFF on a dead batt.
___
CentOS-virt
I think 5.4 added some hypervisor/dom0 side fixes, that might be needed
for F12 guests. I'm not totally sure. You can go through redhat bugzillas
if you want :)
I will take a look into the changes, thanks.
I've been successfully running both 32bit and 64bit Fedora 12
domUs/guests on
Hola a Todos!!!
Estoy estudiando algunas cuestiones de configuración/funcionamiento del
Logwatch pues tengo intenciones de implementar algunas cositas de reportes.
Entonces segun he podido estudiar un poquito sobre este software,
entiendo que cuando genera el reporte, el lo envía por correo
but who subscribes from a work-address anyway?
With all the disclaimers...
I personally do, and encourage people working with me to do it as well.
But we are in the FLOSS industry (our software does not even pretend
to fit a particular purpose ;), so it definitely does not apply to
LinkedIn.
I have created a YUM repo.
Just add a file /etc/yum.repos.d/argeo.repo with the following content:
[argeo-plus]
name=Argeo-EL-$releasever - Plus
baseurl=http://www.argeo.org/linux/argeo-el/$releasever/plus/$basearch
#includepkgs=java-1.6.0-openjdk*
gpgcheck=0
[argeo-plus-source]
From: Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com
This is not directly related to CentOS but still: we are trying to set up some
storage servers to run under Linux - most likely CentOS. The storage volume
would be in the range specified: 8-15 TB. Any recommendations as far as
hardware?
Depends on your
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:34 AM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com
This is not directly related to CentOS but still: we are trying to set up
some storage servers to run under Linux - most likely CentOS. The storage
volume would be in the range specified:
Jim Perrin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Adrian Sevcenco adrian.sevce...@cern.ch
wrote:
Hi! I try to compile an vanilla kernel 2.6.32.2 on centos 5.4 and i have
this error :
Out of curiosity, why are you rebuilding the kernel? Is there a driver
you need which isn't supplied by
On Wednesday 06 January 2010, Anas Alnaffar wrote:
Dears,
I hope this email finds you well and in a very good health,
I've been installed Centos5 on HP DL380 G5 server(Dual Processor), but
actually we are unable to see the other CPU
Centos-5 works correctly with HP DL380 G5 server(Dual
Oh, that's just great, I finally get my Thunderbird, filtering nicely,
and everything, rarely see spam.. it was all Thunderbirds are Go!...
and then.. it pops in through mailing list :| Didn't see that one
coming. (I have my mailing list on full mode, rather than digest, which
is why I'm a tad
On 01/07/2010 10:12 AM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
Jim Perrin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Adrian Sevcencoadrian.sevce...@cern.ch
wrote:
Hi! I try to compile an vanilla kernel 2.6.32.2 on centos 5.4 and i have
this error :
Out of curiosity, why are you rebuilding the kernel? Is
On 01/07/2010 11:36 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
Depends what hardware you have. ELRepo has a fixed powernow-k8 driver
for AMD processors that allows correct scaling on multicore processors.
See here:
OP has a VIA nano, the K8 stuff isnt going to work there.
I wonder if its possible to manually set
On 01/07/2010 10:56 AM, Jake Shipton wrote:
But if you want to truly block spam, you'll need to block out all
accounts from: gmail, hotmail, yahoo any other free provider, but
clearly that cannot happen for fairly obvious reasons :| Though if you
don't already block out all the temporary 1
Hello,
We are testing the Centos LDAP Directory Server but are running into issues
with applications (SOGo) authenticating against the LDAP system. The crux
of my question is, can I just treat the Centos Directory Server as a generic
OpenLDAP configuration on the client side?
In more detail
On Thursday 07 January 2010 11:49:32 Karanbir Singh wrote:
Actually, the only way to totally block spam is to setup a rotational
moderation team and moderate everything. Dont think I need to go into
the issues that would come with that setup.
Besides which, more spam comes from threads like
Karanbir Singh schrieb:
On 01/07/2010 11:36 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
Depends what hardware you have. ELRepo has a fixed powernow-k8 driver
for AMD processors that allows correct scaling on multicore processors.
See here:
OP has a VIA nano, the K8 stuff isnt going to work there.
I wonder if
John Doe wrote:
From: Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com
This is not directly related to CentOS but still: we are trying to set up
some storage servers to run under Linux - most likely CentOS. The storage
volume would be in the range specified: 8-15 TB. Any recommendations as far
as
Quoting Chan Chung Hang Christopher christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk:
John Doe wrote:
From: Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com
This is not directly related to CentOS but still: we are trying to
set up some storage servers to run under Linux - most likely
CentOS. The storage volume
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Geoff Galitz ge...@galitz.org wrote:
ldapadd -f sogo.ldif -x -W -D cn=Directory Manager,dc=XXX,dc=de
Enter LDAP Password:
ldap_bind: No such object (32)
matched DN: dc=XXX,dc=de
---
It is my
Yes, tried that. it doesn't list vdpau. however strings mplayer |
grep -y vdpau turns up a number of instances of vdpau.
Um, yes. But:
[ra...@reboot ~]$ mplayer -vo help|grep vdpau
vdpau VDPAU with X11
[ra...@reboot ~]$
Regards,
Ralph
___
On 01/07/2010 03:28 AM, earl ramirez wrote:
You can have a look at this, I don't know what your budget is like
http://www.drobo.com/Products/drobopro/index.php
I have a drobo and it worked off the bat with a few linux distros
I've had 2 drobo's at work - and i can assure you that it is
We have CENTOS 5.3 on DELL server. there has a cron job supposedly should run
on 1st and 3rd week on Saturday but it run everyday. anyone know what wrong?
01 08 1-7,15-21 * 6 program.sh
___
您的生活即時通 － 溝通、娛樂、生活、工作一次搞定！
2010/1/7 Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org:
I've had 2 drobo's at work - and i can assure you that it is essentially
a wasted device.
I agree with this. We had a Drobo on loan for a while, I found it
sluggish and detested the way it over-reports its free space.
Couldn't wait to hand it
On 01/06/2010 09:35 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
Hello everyone,
This is not directly related to CentOS but still: we are trying to set
up some storage servers to run under Linux - most likely CentOS. The
storage volume would be in the range specified: 8-15 TB. Any
recommendations as far as
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 01/06/2010 09:35 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
Hello everyone,
This is not directly related to CentOS but still: we are trying to set
up some storage servers to run under Linux - most likely CentOS. The
storage volume
This was just recently
2010/1/7 mcclnx mcc mcc...@yahoo.com.tw:
We have CENTOS 5.3 on DELL server. there has a cron job supposedly should
run on 1st and 3rd week on Saturday but it run everyday. anyone know what
wrong?
This was just covered recently in another mail thread with loads of
2010/1/7 mcclnx mcc mcc...@yahoo.com.tw:
We have CENTOS 5.3 on DELL server. there has a cron job supposedly should
run on 1st and 3rd week on Saturday but it run everyday. anyone know what
wrong?
01 08 1-7,15-21 * 6 program.sh
From man 5 crontab
The time and date fields are:
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:51 AM, fortin.pie...@bell.ca wrote:
Hi
We deployed centos 4.8 on HP DL380 G2, G3 and G4 servers (same number of
cpus). The same software is running on all servers.
Only on G2 servers we see a low cpu utilization combined with high
load-average.
For example,
Hi
I have problem in tar command
Can you help?
tar -cv --exclude /var/named/chroot/proc/* -zf backup.tar.gz /var/named
/var/named/chroot/proc/net/route
/var/named/chroot/proc/net/udp
/var/named/chroot/proc/net/tcp
tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
Thank you
Send instant messages
Try tar --exclude=/var/named/chroot/proc/* -zcvf backup.tar.gz /var/named
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:06 PM, adrian kok adriankok2...@yahoo.com.hkwrote:
Hi
I have problem in tar command
Can you help?
tar -cv --exclude /var/named/chroot/proc/* -zf backup.tar.gz /var/named
On 1/7/2010 9:30 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Karanbir Singhmail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 01/06/2010 09:35 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
Hello everyone,
This is not directly related to CentOS but still: we are trying to set
up some storage servers to run
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 07:06:11AM -0800, adrian kok wrote:
Hi
I have problem in tar command
Can you help?
tar -cv --exclude /var/named/chroot/proc/* -zf backup.tar.gz /var/named
You must escape the *, so that shell doesn't convert the command to:
tar -cv --exclude
On 01/07/2010 02:30 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
KB, thanks. When you say dont go over 1 TiB in storage per spindle
what are you referring to as spindle?
disk. it boils down to how much data do you want to put under one
read/write stream.
the other thing is that these days 1.5TB disks are the
At Thu, 7 Jan 2010 09:30:17 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 01/06/2010 09:35 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
Hello everyone,
This is not directly related to CentOS but still: we are trying to set
At Thu, 7 Jan 2010 07:06:11 -0800 (PST) CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Hi
I have problem in tar command
Can you help?
tar -cv --exclude /var/named/chroot/proc/* -zf backup.tar.gz /var/named
/var/named/chroot/proc/net/route
/var/named/chroot/proc/net/udp
Hello,
tar -cv --exclude '/var/named/chroot/proc/*' -zf backup.tar.gz /var/named
I think this is the best way to use wildcards in expressions to avoid
problems. ;)
tar -cv --exclude /var/named/chroot/proc -zf backup.tar.gz /var/named
Yes, it works, but it didn't create the proc
From: Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org
On 01/07/2010 02:30 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
KB, thanks. When you say dont go over 1 TiB in storage per spindle
what are you referring to as spindle?
disk. it boils down to how much data do you want to put under one
read/write stream.
the
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Chan Chung Hang Christopher
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
John Doe wrote:
From: Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com
This is not directly related to CentOS but still: we are trying to set up
some storage servers to run under Linux - most likely CentOS.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Matty matt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Chan Chung Hang Christopher
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
John Doe wrote:
From: Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com
This is not directly related to CentOS but still: we are trying to
On 1/7/2010 10:54 AM, John Doe wrote:
From: Karanbir Singhmail-li...@karan.org
On 01/07/2010 02:30 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
KB, thanks. When you say dont go over 1 TiB in storage per spindle
what are you referring to as spindle?
disk. it boils down to how much data do you want to put under
I also heard that disks above 1TB might have reliability issues.
Maybe it changed since then...
I remember rumors about the early 2TB Seagates.
Personally, I won't RAID SATA drives over 500GB unless they're
enterprise-level ones with the limits on how long before the drive
reports a problem
Yes, the Sun Fire Xs are costly...
Here, 35k euros for 48 x 1TB by example, or 22k for 48 x 500GB...
Our 12TB HP is around 6k. So 12k for almost the same as the 22k
But if you use 1TB disks on the Sun, you end up using half the Us (and save
some power) in your bay; which might be nice if you are
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 05:28:34PM +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I also heard that disks above 1TB might have reliability issues.
Maybe it changed since then...
I remember rumors about the early 2TB Seagates.
Personally, I won't RAID SATA drives over 500GB unless they're
I have a defective HP-Compaq nx9420 and so I am looking to replace
it. I have pretty much decided to buy no further MicroSoft based
products and would very much like to hear recommendations for a
suitable notebook host to provide me with Linux based alternative.
Given that all the basic
On 1/7/10 8:37 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
I have a defective HP-Compaq nx9420 and so I am looking to replace
it. I have pretty much decided to buy no further MicroSoft based
products and would very much like to hear recommendations for a
suitable notebook host to provide me with Linux based
All,
I did contact the HP Launchpad site and receive instructions to re-install
their driver with some changes I hadn't done. I plan on attempting that
this evening and I'll reply tomorrow and let everyone know how it went.
Thanks,
Gene Poole
___
At Thu, 7 Jan 2010 13:37:46 -0500 (EST) CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
I have a defective HP-Compaq nx9420 and so I am looking to replace
it. I have pretty much decided to buy no further MicroSoft based
products and would very much like to hear recommendations for a
suitable
Eero Volotinen wrote:
On 1/7/10 8:55 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
On 1/7/10 8:37 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
I have a defective HP-Compaq nx9420 and so I am looking to replace
it. I have pretty much decided to buy no further MicroSoft based
products and would very much like to hear
On 1/7/2010 1:14 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
Low-end (read: cheap) Dell laptops tend to be junk. Dell is somewhat
between a rock and a hard place WRT selling computers with an O/S
*other* then MS-Windows, due to M$ OEM licensing. Also, Dell (and other
makers) have had troubles with people
Another alternitive is an older model IBM Thinkpad -- they have
*Intel's* wireless adapters built-in -- Intel's wireless adaptors are
the most painless wireless adapters in existence since they are
supported by an open-source driver that is included with the base
kernel distro. Almost all
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 03:10:59PM +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Yes, tried that. it doesn't list vdpau. however strings mplayer |
grep -y vdpau turns up a number of instances of vdpau.
Um, yes. But:
[ra...@reboot ~]$ mplayer -vo help|grep vdpau
vdpau VDPAU with X11
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/7/2010 1:14 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
Low-end (read: cheap) Dell laptops tend to be junk. Dell is somewhat
between a rock and a hard place WRT selling computers with an O/S
*other* then MS-Windows, due to M$ OEM
On 1/7/2010 1:49 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Les Mikeselllesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/7/2010 1:14 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
Low-end (read: cheap) Dell laptops tend to be junk. Dell is somewhat
between a rock and a hard place WRT selling computers with an O/S
Roger K. Wells wrote:
Eero Volotinen wrote:
On 1/7/10 8:55 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
On 1/7/10 8:37 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
I have a defective HP-Compaq nx9420 and so I am looking to replace
it. I have pretty much decided to buy no further MicroSoft based
At Thu, 7 Jan 2010 14:49:40 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/7/2010 1:14 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
Low-end (read: cheap) Dell laptops tend to be junk. Dell is somewhat
between a rock and a
On 1/6/2010 2:35 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
we are trying to set
up some storage servers to run under Linux
You should also consider FreeBSD 8.0, which has the newest version of
ZFS up and running stably on it. I use Linux for most server tasks, but
for big storage, Linux just doesn't have
Kay Diederichs wrote:
Karanbir Singh schrieb:
On 01/07/2010 11:36 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
Depends what hardware you have. ELRepo has a fixed powernow-k8 driver
for AMD processors that allows correct scaling on multicore processors.
See here:
OP has a VIA nano, the K8 stuff isnt going to work
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:37 AM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote:
I have a defective HP-Compaq nx9420 and so I am looking to replace
it. I have pretty much decided to buy no further MicroSoft based
products and would very much like to hear recommendations for a
suitable notebook
Le jeudi 07 janvier 2010 19:37:46, James B. Byrne a écrit :
PREFER:
64 bit
core duo 2
2-4+ Gb RAM
120+ Gb HDD
writable multi-mode DVD/CD drive
CentOS-5+
Your system suggestions, both for hardware and OS, are most welcome.
Not a Panasonic CF-52 :-(
Am 07.01.10 20:43, schrieb fred smith:
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 03:10:59PM +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Yes, tried that. it doesn't list vdpau. however strings mplayer |
grep -y vdpau turns up a number of instances of vdpau.
Um, yes. But:
[ra...@reboot ~]$ mplayer -vo help|grep vdpau
Hey
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 6:37 PM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote:
WANT:
Robust construction
Reliable quality
Reasonable weight ( 2.5 kg all in)
Supported sound and video reproduction of reasonable quality
15-17 lcd screen
Out-of-the-box support for wireless networking
John Doe wrote:
Yes, the Sun Fire Xs are costly...
Here, 35k euros for 48 x 1TB by example, or 22k for 48 x 500GB...
Our 12TB HP is around 6k. So 12k for almost the same as the 22k
But if you use 1TB disks on the Sun, you end up using half the Us (and save
some power) in your bay; which
Christopher Chan wrote:
Yes, the Sun Fire X4540 uses software raid but not necessarily zfs...if
you install another operating system that is not Solaris or OpenSolaris,
it won't be zfs.
the thing to note on the Thumper (X4540), each of those 48 SATA drives
has its own channel to the
Warren Young wrote:
On 1/6/2010 2:35 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
we are trying to set
up some storage servers to run under Linux
You should also consider FreeBSD 8.0, which has the newest version of
ZFS up and running stably on it. I use Linux for most server tasks, but
for big storage,
On 01/08/2010 01:01 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
That puts you right on the edge of workability with 32-bit hardware.
ext3's limit on 32-bit is 8 TB, and you can push it to 16 TB by
switching to XFS or JFS. Best to use 64-bit hardware if you can.
Probably XFS if you want data guarantees on
On 01/08/2010 12:53 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Yes, the Sun Fire X4540 uses software raid but not necessarily zfs...if
you install another operating system that is not Solaris or OpenSolaris,
it won't be zfs.
the thing to note on the Thumper (X4540), each of those 48
Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 01/08/2010 12:53 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Yes, the Sun Fire X4540 uses software raid but not necessarily zfs...if
you install another operating system that is not Solaris or OpenSolaris,
it won't be zfs.
the thing to note on the Thumper
On 01/07/2010 05:28 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
An often overlooked issue is the rebuild time with Linux software raid and
all hw raid controllers I have seen. On large drives the times are so long
as a result of the sheer size, if the array is degraded you are exposed during
the rebuild.
As
cause when I did - the x45xx's/zfs were between 18 to 20% slower on disk
i/o alone compared with a supermicro box with dual areca 1220/xfs.
the thumpers make for decent backup or vtl type roles, not so much for
online high density storage.
Speaking of thumpers and Supermicro, it looks
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:37 AM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote:
So, my desires are:
WANT:
Robust construction
Reliable quality
Reasonable weight ( 2.5 kg all in)
Supported sound and video reproduction of reasonable quality
15-17 lcd screen
Out-of-the-box support for wireless
I need to do some testing with 5.3 as its suggested that 5.4 has
some bugs in the toolchain and libc. That being the case, I can
install with a url and repo line pointing to a mirror with 5.3 still
but how does one properly make sure during subsequent uses of yum it
doesn't attempt to use 5.4
On 07/01/10 18:37, James B. Byrne wrote:
I have a defective HP-Compaq nx9420 and so I am looking to replace
it. I have pretty much decided to buy no further MicroSoft based
products and would very much like to hear recommendations for a
suitable notebook host to provide me with Linux based
On 1/7/2010 6:01 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
I'm not recommending OpenSolaris on purpose.
Serious system administrators are not Linux fans I don't think.
I think I must have been sent back in time, say to 1997 or so, because I
can't possibly be reading this in 2010. I base this on the fact
Thanks all for the help.
I will boot in rescue mode, then rename all directories, install the
64bit version
and then restore all the files.
I have been upgrading this server in redhat 4.2 i386, so this time there
is a need
for platform upgrade also.
It has been a long way from a P2 to a
My CentOS 5.4 box has a single HBA card with 2 ports connected to my
Storage. 2 Luns are assigned to my HBA card. Under /dev instead of seeing 4
devices I can see 12 devices from sdb to sdm. I am using qlogic driver that
is bulitin to the OS. Has any one seen this kind of situation?
Paras
Warren Young wrote:
On 1/7/2010 6:01 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
I'm not recommending OpenSolaris on purpose.
Serious system administrators are not Linux fans I don't think.
I think I must have been sent back in time, say to 1997 or so, because I
can't possibly be reading this in 2010. I
Greetings,
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Paras pradhan pradhanpa...@gmail.com wrote:
My CentOS 5.4 box has a single HBA card with 2 ports connected to my
Storage. 2 Luns are assigned to my HBA card. Under /dev instead of seeing 4
devices I can see 12 devices from sdb to sdm. I am using
On 1/8/10 6:38 AM, Paras pradhan wrote:
My CentOS 5.4 box has a single HBA card with 2 ports connected to my
Storage. 2 Luns are assigned to my HBA card. Under /dev instead of
seeing 4 devices I can see 12 devices from sdb to sdm. I am using qlogic
driver that is bulitin to the OS. Has any one
On 1/8/10 7:21 AM, Paras pradhan wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi
mailto:eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
On 1/8/10 6:38 AM, Paras pradhan wrote:
My CentOS 5.4 box has a single HBA card with 2 ports connected to my
Storage. 2 Luns are
Yes here is th o/p of fdisk -l. Two Luns are assigned. one of 323 G and
another of 359 G as seen blow. sda is my local disk.
So do you think incorrect zoning can lead to this?
Thanks
Paras.
-
[r...@prd1 ~]# fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 146.1 GB,
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
