Bueno es la primera vez que escribo y aprovecho la oportunidad para saludar
a los miembros de la lista y felicitar a todos los que colaboran con sus
ideas, ayudas y consejos.
Sepan que soy nuevo en lo de servidores, en general nuevo en Linux, pero ya
he practicado sus comandos. He revisado algo
Te recomiendo que instales ubuntu en una partición primaria al igual que la
partición del boot de centos, de esa forma podras iniciar cualquiera de los
dos sistemas sin problemas, a mi me paso que al estar instalado un sistema
en una partición logica no podía arrancar, y luego instale en
Hola,
Al 08/03/10 14:57, En/na Jaime Salinas ha escrit:
Te recomiendo que instales ubuntu en una partición primaria al igual que la
partición del boot de centos, de esa forma podras iniciar cualquiera de los
dos sistemas sin problemas, a mi me paso que al estar instalado un sistema
en una
Hola a todos:
quiero construir un repositorio de centos y ya tengo todos los archivos
src.rpm hay alguna forma de automatizar la conversion de estos en rpm
sin tener que construir uno por uno con rpmbuild
gracias en adelanto
___
CentOS-es
Hi all.
is there an easy way to kickstart a system using DHCP, but then use
the obtained settings to define static network configurations on the
installed system?
Best Regards
Marcus
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Am Montag, den 08.03.2010, 09:14 +0100 schrieb Marcus Moeller:
Hi all.
is there an easy way to kickstart a system using DHCP, but then use
the obtained settings to define static network configurations on the
installed system?
Best Regards
Marcus
A simple %post script comes to mind.
Hi Christoph,
is there an easy way to kickstart a system using DHCP, but then use
the obtained settings to define static network configurations on the
installed system?
Best Regards
Marcus
A simple %post script comes to mind.
And also to this list ?-)
Marcus
2010/3/8 Marcus Moeller m...@marcus-moeller.de:
Hi Christoph,
is there an easy way to kickstart a system using DHCP, but then use
the obtained settings to define static network configurations on the
installed system?
Best Regards
Marcus
A simple %post script comes to mind.
And also to
Hi,
Will CentOS be present at the Solutions Linux fair in Paris ?
Other question. I'm currently re-reading The Definitive Guide to
CentOS. The book's introduction mentions 10 million CentOS users
worldwide. Wow! I wouldn't have expected that much. How do you get this
figure? By the number of
Hey
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Niki Kovacs cont...@kikinovak.net wrote:
Will CentOS be present at the Solutions Linux fair in Paris ?
Not that I am aware of. [1] Maybe someone would want to go next year?
Cheers Didi
[1] http://wiki.centos.org/Events
--
Hoffmann Geerd-Dietger
I have Crashes with the b09 too. How did you upgrade the version?
We repackaged the Fedora SRPM.
(it was discussed on this list in December/January: [CentOS] stock
openjdk vs. epel)
You can find the SRPMs as well as x86_64 and i386 versions here:
http://www.argeo.org/linux/argeo-el/5/plus/
We
Hi,
I just started to set up a test ldap server and followed some tutorials.
One topic is the tuning/monitoring of the bdb.
So I installed the db4-utils and executed a db_stat -h /var/lib/ldap/ -m.
The answere is no stat, but:
db_stat: Program version 4.3 doesn't match environment version
Hi,
openldap-2.3.43 in centos 5.4 comes with db 4.4 build in ...
ldd /usr/sbin/slapd |grep db
libslapd_db-4.4.so = /usr/lib64/tls/libslapd_db-4.4.so
(0x2ab12959)
and also ships his own db-utilities ...
/usr/sbin/slapd_db_archive
/usr/sbin/slapd_db_checkpoint
John R Pierce wrote:
Gaurav Nangla wrote:
I can ping the google.com http://google.com ip addresses
(209.85.231.104) but can't ping the FQDN, obviously DNS is broken.
I can also ping the nameserver ip addresses specified in /etc/resolv.conf.
well, the DNS servers given by your
this is actually a new CentOS install on a VM and I was able to compile
and install
tripwire-2.4.1.2-src. I did find that I had to compile and then install
otherwise the linker
complained. Has anyone else used tripwire on CentrOS? Is aide better? Is
there another choice?
Bob
Working on a multiwan script based on the page
http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html
You can find the script at http://pastie.org/859350 I'm trying to make
sure that the logic is correct, and that it'll work I think it would,
and ideas to make it a better script, feel free to
Thanks to all of you for your help, and especially Tim Shubitz who faced the
same problem and his solution worked perfectly for me.
However, now that I have properly created a GPT partition of size 2.7TB, which
filesystem is best on it? This filesystem will be used to
store backups of various
On 08/03/2010 09:53, Khusro Jaleel wrote:
Thanks to all of you for your help, and especially Tim Shubitz who faced the
same problem and his solution worked perfectly for me.
However, now that I have properly created a GPT partition of size 2.7TB,
which filesystem is best on it? This
Hi,man!
I want to see the source code of konqueror and some of softwares in CentOS，so i
tried to down the SRPM,but i found that all in kdebase were patch files.
Where can i download the full source code.
By the way i had tried this:yumdownloader --source kdebase,but it could not
find kdebase.
On 3/6/2010 4:04 PM, nate wrote:
if you can upload source code,
you can upload a precompiled binary
True, but most attacks are automated, and try to attack as wide a range
of machines as possible.
If I were to write a bit of malware for *ix that needed a custom binary
on the target machine,
On 3/6/2010 4:04 PM, nate wrote:
if you can upload source code,
you can upload a precompiled binary
True, but most attacks are automated, and try to attack as wide a range
of machines as possible.
If I were to write a bit of malware for *ix that needed a custom binary
on the target
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Alan Hoffmeister wrote:
On 08/03/2010 09:53, Khusro Jaleel wrote:
Thanks to all of you for your help, and especially Tim Shubitz who faced the
same problem and his solution worked perfectly for me.
However, now that I have properly created a GPT partition of size 2.7TB,
Hello,
Can somebody recommend CentOS-OK, dual socket motherboards for compute
elements? A quick look up at Intel pages suggests they are thinking of
them as server boards, but then they recommend them as for SMB,
I'm somewhat puzzled about it.
It would be nice to know what MBs you are using, pros
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Eduardo Grosclaude
eduardo.groscla...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Can somebody recommend CentOS-OK, dual socket motherboards for compute
elements? A quick look up at Intel pages suggests they are thinking of
them as server boards, but then they recommend them as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eduardo Grosclaude wrote:
Hello,
Can somebody recommend CentOS-OK, dual socket motherboards for compute
elements? A quick look up at Intel pages suggests they are thinking of
them as server boards, but then they recommend them as for SMB,
I'm
If it helps: we're running several 10-15TB filesystems with ReiserFS and
never had even the slightest problem with it. The current limit, however,
is 16TB even for ext4. Or, to be more precise: the filesystem could
handle more than 16TB easily, however the tools necessary to create the
On 8 Mar 2010, at 16:09, Alan Hoffmeister wrote:
JFS.
http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/388
The article you linked to suggests XFS though? I'm also now thinking about EXT3
with a mkfs.ext3 -T news for example so that I get more inodes?
Hi,
5400 series CPU). I have an Asus board that runs Linux and
Opensolaris just fine, but will not allow any version of Windows to
install.
I want one of those :)
Regards,
Michel
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
I tried everything you put forward, but didn't work.
I had openSUSE 11.1 installed in a VM as well, DNS worked fine with it.
Best Regards,
Gaurav
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 11:19 AM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Gaurav Nangla wrote:
I can ping the google.com http://google.com ip
UPDATE:
I tried with FreeBSD8 as well and the DNS query didn't work. This is
beginning to look more and more like an issue with my UTStarcom *WA3002G4
ADSL2+ Router and its NAT config or the lack of it.*
*
*
*My setup and the ip addresses:*
*Router 192.168.1.1*
*Windows 192.168.1.2*
Here's the dig-google.pcap file attached, if it helps.
Best Regards,
Gaurav
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Gaurav N. gaurav.knan...@gmail.com wrote:
UPDATE:
I tried with FreeBSD8 as well and the DNS query didn't work. This is
beginning to look more and more like an issue with my UTStarcom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have a strange su hehavior on a CentOS 5.4 32Bit installation in a
VMware ESXi virtualizied environment:
If I am root and want to change the user to a non-root user, the system
prompts me for a password:
[r...@halifax ~]# useradd test00
Uwe Kiewel wrote:
[r...@halifax ~]# useradd test00
[r...@halifax ~]# su - test00
We trust you have received the usual lecture from the local System
Administrator. It usually boils down to these three things:
#1) Respect the privacy of others.
#2) Think before you type.
#3)
Hi,
I have a strange su hehavior on a CentOS 5.4 32Bit installation in a
VMware ESXi virtualizied environment:
If I am root and want to change the user to a non-root user, the system
prompts me for a password:
[r...@halifax ~]# useradd test00
[r...@halifax ~]# su - test00
on 2-25-2010 1:44 AM Sorin Srbu spake the following:
Hi all,
I installed BackupPC on one of my Centos 5.4-machines following the wiki at
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BackupPC#head-725ed151d366bcf182cea92f765c373900cfc9dc,
where BackupPC is installed from the c5-testing repo.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 08.03.2010 21:21, schrieb John R Pierce:
Uwe Kiewel wrote:
[r...@halifax ~]# useradd test00
[r...@halifax ~]# su - test00
We trust you have received the usual lecture from the local System
Administrator. It usually boils down to these three
Looking at the documentation of the /etc/group file including
some google searches, it appears to me that, contrary to the man
pages for group, Linux systems generally do not put membership
user names for the user's primary group in the record for it in
the /etc/group file, only for secondary
Hey folks,
Google brings up one concrete hit at
http://chadsikorra.com/?p=96
but I contacted the author and he said it is buggy and needs a fair
bit of work, so I decided against using it.
That's about all I was able to come up with.
Anything else out there?
thanks,
-Alan
--
“Don't eat
Alan McKay wrote:
Hey folks,
Google brings up one concrete hit at
http://chadsikorra.com/?p=96
but I contacted the author and he said it is buggy and needs a fair
bit of work, so I decided against using it.
That's about all I was able to come up with.
Anything else out there?
lshw,
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Uwe Kiewel
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 2:17 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] strange su behavior
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have a strange
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 12:48 -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
Looking at the documentation of the /etc/group file including
some google searches, it appears to me that, contrary to the man
pages for group, Linux systems generally do not put membership
user names for the user's primary group in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 08.03.2010 22:03, schrieb Dan Burkland:
[r...@halifax ~]# useradd test00
[r...@halifax ~]# su - test00
We trust you have received the usual lecture from the local System
Administrator. It usually boils down to these three things:
On Tuesday, March 09, 2010 06:40 AM, Lincoln Zuljewic Silva wrote:
Hello list,
I have a question about LVM.
My server has five disks and I will use it to create a LVM environment.
I saw in the lvcreate man page that I can use the “-i” option to set
the number of disks that I want to stripe
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction?
I am receiving these in my log file and do not know what they mean or what to
look for;
Mar 8 04:03:56 bms kernel: ata3.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0
action 0x0
Mar 8 04:03:56 bms kernel: ata3.00: cmd
On Tuesday, March 09, 2010 09:08 AM, Robert Spangler wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction?
I am receiving these in my log file and do not know what they mean or what to
look for;
Mar 8 04:03:56 bms kernel: ata3.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr
On Mar 8, 2010, at 7:31 PM, Christopher Chan christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk
wrote:
On Tuesday, March 09, 2010 06:40 AM, Lincoln Zuljewic Silva wrote:
Hello list,
I have a question about LVM.
My server has five disks and I will use it to create a LVM
environment.
I saw in the
On Sunday 07 March 2010 09:54:23 am Les Mikesell and MANY others wrote:
While I typically do have the compilers and kernel headers installed on
general purpose servers where I might want to run VMware server or rebuild
a source rpm, I would not be very comfortable if I did not have a
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Robert Spangler mli...@zoominternet.net wrote:
I was wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction?
I am receiving these in my log file and do not know what they mean or what to
look for;
Mar 8 04:03:56 bms kernel: ata3.00: exception Emask 0x0
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Eduardo Grosclaude
eduardo.groscla...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm targeting E5520. I'll buy in Argentina, with a high stack of all
sort of costs threw upon the product, so budget may not mean much to
foreigners.
Eduardo,
Are you going to be writing your own HPC
On Tuesday, March 09, 2010 12:34 AM, Eduardo Grosclaude wrote:
Hello,
Can somebody recommend CentOS-OK, dual socket motherboards for compute
elements? A quick look up at Intel pages suggests they are thinking of
them as server boards, but then they recommend them as for SMB,
I'm somewhat
Eduardo Grosclaude wrote:
Hello,
Can somebody recommend CentOS-OK, dual socket motherboards for compute
elements?
for real numeric stuff (as opposed to things like video processing that
utilizes sse3), the AMD processors often outperform Intel. current AMD
dual socket server processors
Gordon McLellan wrote:
If your application can't support GPU based processing, I think
Peter's suggestion is most fitting. Load up a rack of dual socket
5520 servers from Dell or HP and then save some money by building your
own shared-storage to feed the cluster. The big vendors crank out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 09.03.2010 02:16, schrieb Spiro Harvey:
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 21:28:44 +0100
Uwe Kiewel m...@kiewel-online.ch wrote:
that almost sounds like sudo, not su. is it aliased or something?
I don't think so:
[r...@halifax ~]# file /bin/su
You've
53 matches
Mail list logo
