[r...@farm1 network-scripts]# grep -rl ip rule .
./ifdown-routes
./ifup-routes
On 13.5.2010 21.36, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Yes, those scripts will run ip rule to process the contents of the
rule-* files. The company I work for uses shorewall on all of their
multi-homed systems, so I'm not
is there an estimate when centos 5.5 will be released?
as far as i knew it was out - at least it seemed to drop on me on the 10th
eg centos-release-5-5.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 14 May 2010 10:22, Tom Brown t...@ng23.net wrote:
is there an estimate when centos 5.5 will be released?
as far as i knew it was out - at least it seemed to drop on me on the 10th
eg centos-release-5-5.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
or more public
On 05/14/2010 11:40 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
403's yet on repodata and some other important bits... not all the
mirrors updated yet either (eg http://mirror.centos.org/centos-5/)
5.5 isnt 'out' yet, were working on getting it to a release stage by
close of play today.
- KB
On 14 May 2010 05:37, sheraz naz sheraz...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I need to upgrade a system running 4.1 to 4.2, but before I do I want to
list out all the packages that will be updated/installed/removed. I can run
up2date -l to get a list of updates but does that show packages that need to
be
2010/5/14 Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org:
On 05/14/2010 11:40 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
403's yet on repodata and some other important bits... not all the
mirrors updated yet either (eg http://mirror.centos.org/centos-5/)
5.5 isnt 'out' yet, were working on getting it to a release stage
On 14 May 2010 12:02, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
2010/5/14 Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org:
On 05/14/2010 11:40 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
403's yet on repodata and some other important bits... not all the
mirrors updated yet either (eg http://mirror.centos.org/centos-5/)
On 05/14/2010 12:02 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
5.5 isnt 'out' yet, were working on getting it to a release stage by
close of play today.
err: looks like 5.5 image is downloadable from:
Till such time as centos/5/ points to 5.5/ we strongly discourage people
from installing those isos.At the
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 6:37 AM, sheraz naz sheraz...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I need to upgrade a system running 4.1 to 4.2, but before I do I want to
list out all the packages that will be updated/installed/removed. I can run
up2date -l to get a list of updates but does that show packages that
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Karanbir Singh
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 6:17 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] release of 5.5? (filesystem troubles)
On 05/14/2010 12:02 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
5.5
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:37 AM, sheraz naz sheraz...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I need to upgrade a system running 4.1 to 4.2, but before I do I want to
list out all the packages that will be updated/installed/removed. I can run
up2date -l to get a list of updates but does that show packages that
On 14 May 2010 13:51, Kwan Lowe kwan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:37 AM, sheraz naz sheraz...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I need to upgrade a system running 4.1 to 4.2, but before I do I want to
list out all the packages that will be updated/installed/removed. I can run
up2date
MHR wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com
wrote:
Or the yummable Adobe Reader?
http://www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2010/03/install-adobe-acrobat-pdf-reader-on-fedora-centos-red-hat-rhel/
Yummy.
g
No, seriously, I'm waiting for it to download -
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
MHR wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com
wrote:
Or the yummable Adobe Reader?
http://www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2010/03/install-adobe-acrobat-pdf-reader-on-fedora-centos-red-hat-rhel/
Yummy.
g
No, seriously, I'm waiting
Mike wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
MHR wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com
wrote:
Or the yummable Adobe Reader?
http://www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2010/03/install-adobe-acrobat-pdf-reader-on-fedora-centos-red-hat-rhel/
Yummy.
g
No, seriously,
On 5/14/2010 8:51 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Right, a document viewer, that lets you fill some stuff in once in a
while. That's only, oh, 8 times the size of firefox
Hmm, I wonder if it's actually a semi-stripped version of Adobe, with
most of the features disabled
When someone
Hi,
A directory/subdirectories just disappeared on our dev box, and we don't know
what happened. Is there a log file that logs this kind of stuff (such as
who/date did a 'rmdir'). The /var/log directory has a lot of files and I'm not
sure where to start.
Thanks in advance.
Mary
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Wang, Mary Y mary.y.w...@boeing.com wrote:
Hi,
A directory/subdirectories just disappeared on our dev box, and we don't know
what happened. Is there a log file that logs this kind of stuff (such as
who/date did a 'rmdir'). The /var/log directory has a lot
Thanks for the info. There are only three of us who have the root access and
I guess the date/time is more important to us. We are also concerned that
there might be a script did the rmdir unintentionally.
The .bash_history had some old stuff with an older timestamp of the file. Some
of us
On May 14, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Kwan Lowe kwan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:37 AM, sheraz naz sheraz...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Hi,
I need to upgrade a system running 4.1 to 4.2, but before I do I
want to
list out all the packages that will be updated/installed/removed. I
please bottom post, more at the bottom ...
On May 14, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Wang, Mary Y wrote:
Thanks for the info. There are only three of us who have the root
access and I guess the date/time is more important to us. We are
also concerned that there might be a script did the rmdir
On 14 May 2010 16:59, Tony Schreiner schre...@bc.edu wrote:
please bottom post, more at the bottom ...
On May 14, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Wang, Mary Y wrote:
Thanks for the info. There are only three of us who have the root
access and I guess the date/time is more important to us. We are
also
On 05/14/2010 11:40 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
403's yet on repodata and some other important bits... not all the
mirrors updated yet either (eg http://mirror.centos.org/centos-5/)
5.5 isnt 'out' yet, were working on getting it to a release stage by
close of play today.
err: looks like 5.5
Thanks for the info. There are only three of us who have the root
access and I guess the date/time is more important to us. We are also
concerned that there might be a script did the rmdir unintentionally.
The .bash_history had some old stuff with an older timestamp of the file.
Some of us
Thanks guys, this would work. FYI, as to why, well it is a mission critical
system that has been up and running for a while (on 4.1) but now we to update
it to minimum 4.2 to meet some requirements, so we want to keep the changes to
a minimum. As for security issues, the way it is setup
James,
Your comment about package manager (yum etc) not differentiating between 4.2
and 4.8 is the reason why I was asking the original question. If I just upgrade
it will patch it up all the way to 4.8 which I am trying to avoid (trying to
get least changes as possible).However Kwan's idea
On 5/14/2010 12:56 PM, sheraz naz wrote:
Thanks guys, this would work. FYI, as to why, well it is a mission
critical system that has been up and running for a while (on 4.1) but
now we to update it to minimum 4.2 to meet some requirements, so we want
to keep the changes to a minimum. As for
Thanks, that might work out too. Hehe, about the second one, it is the same old
tried story, I and other linux admins joined recently and fixing up stuff
slowly. The systems we could touch, are already getting patched from our local
repos (which never existed before), however there is too much
On 5/14/2010 1:05 PM, sheraz naz wrote:
James,
Your comment about package manager (yum etc) not differentiating between
4.2 and 4.8 is the reason why I was asking the original question. If I
just upgrade it will patch it up all the way to 4.8 which I am trying to
avoid (trying to get least
My current route for a box shows this:
route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
24.123.23.168 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.248 U 0 00 eth2
74.223.8.1760.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0 0
2010/5/14 Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com:
My current route for a box shows this:
route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
24.123.23.168 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.248 U 0 0 0 eth2
74.223.8.176
GATEWAY=74.223.8.177 on /etc/sysconfig/network file ?
Actually I have that in the ifcfg-eth1 and ifcfg-eth2. And this is hte
route I get.
DEVICE=eth1
ONBOOT=YES
BOOTPROTO=static
IPADDR=74.223.8.179
NETMASK=255.255.255.240
GATEWAY=74.223.8.177
DEVICE=eth2
ONBOOT=Yes
BOOTPROTO=static
Ah that makes sense
Been there, done that and bought the t-shirt ;)
For now use the 4.2 archive. Up2date will not remove packages without
telling you and then only if a new rpm has obsolete in its header info. Good
luck on your migrations to 5.x :-)
On May 14, 2010 7:15 PM, sheraz naz
GATEWAY=74.223.8.177 on /etc/sysconfig/network file ?
Actually I have that in the ifcfg-eth1 and ifcfg-eth2. And this is hte
route I get.
DEVICE=eth1
ONBOOT=YES
BOOTPROTO=static
IPADDR=74.223.8.179
NETMASK=255.255.255.240
GATEWAY=74.223.8.177
DEVICE=eth2
ONBOOT=Yes
I dont want 74.X traffic going out 24.X network. I want it going back
out the 74.X network.
Maybe the information on this link can help you:
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Adv-Routing-HOWTO/index.html
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
/
/Traffic will already route out the appropriate interface for a directly
connected network. So packets to an IP on the 74.223.8.176/28 subnet
should route out eth1 and packets to the 24.123.23.168/29 network will
route out eth2.
Are you trying to route other subnets within the
I am trying to get my two WAN ethernet connections into one box to work.
Eth2 is cable, eth1 is T1 and eth0 is office LAN. Eth2 works just fine.
connections on eth1 dont seem to go anywhere.
I thought it was the routing based on route -n info.
I am also using iptable to preroute and
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Wang, Mary Y mary.y.w...@boeing.com wrote:
Hi,
A directory/subdirectories just disappeared on our dev box, and we don't
know what happened. Is there a log file that logs this kind of stuff (such
as who/date did a 'rmdir'). The /var/log directory
Hello All,
I don't have any reason to believe CENTOS (5.4) is underlying my
difficulties but it's what I've got to work with so here's the setup:
I have a 2P motherboard with 2 Opteron 2376s and two ethernet ports.
The setup is fully virtualized, with Dom0, dom4 and Dom1 up and
running.
What exactly does not work? Connecting to what destination IP? Your
default route is pointing out eth2. So any traffic to a non-directly
connected network will go out eth2. (without some additional static
routes) What are you trying to accomplish?
I am attempting to have one box
On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 12:39 -0700, Dave Stevens wrote:
Hello All,
I don't have any reason to believe CENTOS (5.4) is underlying my
difficulties but it's what I've got to work with so here's the setup:
I have a 2P motherboard with 2 Opteron 2376s and two ethernet ports.
The setup is
On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 12:39 -0700, Dave Stevens wrote:
Hello All,
I don't have any reason to believe CENTOS (5.4) is underlying my
difficulties but it's what I've got to work with so here's the setup:
I have a 2P motherboard with 2 Opteron 2376s and two ethernet ports.
The setup is
Quoting JohnS jse...@gmail.com:
On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 12:39 -0700, Dave Stevens wrote:
Hello All,
I don't have any reason to believe CENTOS (5.4) is underlying my
difficulties but it's what I've got to work with so here's the setup:
I have a 2P motherboard with 2 Opteron 2376s and two
Greetings Jerry,
On 5/14/2010 3:45 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
What exactly does not work? Connecting to what destination IP? Your
default route is pointing out eth2. So any traffic to a non-directly
connected network will go out eth2. (without some additional static
routes) What are you
Yay! Just did it on my 32-bit and x-64 boxes. Got in without a hitch. Nice
work, CentOS team! Keep it up!
Now, what about the post-release updates. Any idea when those are coming?
***
Gilbert Sebenste
Yay! Just did it on my 32-bit and x-64 boxes. Got in without a hitch. Nice
work, CentOS team! Keep it up!
Now, what about the post-release updates. Any idea when those are coming?
***
Gilbert Sebenste
Now, what about the post-release updates. Any idea when those are coming?
Perhaps you missed the following section in the announcements:
+++
Pending Updates:
Since upstream released their 5.5 media, a series of updates have been
issued. These updates are currently syncing
Thanks for the help, a solution to this problem is to update the bios,
and after using the newest version of bios I can use AHCI mode on the
sata controller, and indeed this is the problem.
But I had to install windows server to update the bios, then installed
again using Linux.
--
Best
48 matches
Mail list logo
