CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0501 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0501.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
580645c0953b73bd8807f31e94a96c04
Hi,
I have a server running CentOS 5.5 with KVM capabilities. I need to migrate
all the VMs to another server with the exact same hardware specs. The
problem is it is running on individual harddisks, not shared storage. What
is the best way to migrate to minimise downtime?
Thanks!
YongSan
On 24/06/10 7:17 AM, Poh Yong Hwang yong...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a server running CentOS 5.5 with KVM capabilities. I need to migrate
all the VMs to another server with the exact same hardware specs. The problem
is it is running on individual harddisks, not shared storage. What is the
I often use rsync -a for remote systems or cp -a for local systems.
I've also used dd. You can have dd output to stdout, pipe it to ssh and
have ssh output to dd on the other end.
You can also connect to a SAN device on the source and dd from the local
block device to the SAN device.
Lots of
Note, the -x argument will keep the copy to a single partition
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 14:12 -0300, Lucas Timm LH wrote:
Create a new virtual machine on your storage. After this, boot some
Linux distribution in your new virtual machine (I like SysrescueCD).
Enable your ssh server, change the
Hi,
I have only one ethernet port in a remote server. (eth0)
I have a public address with x.x.x.164 netmask 255.255.255.240 gw x.x.x.161
and want to use in my guest OS the next available ip address (x.x.x.165 netmask
255.255.255.240 gw x.x.x.161)
Is this posible with brctl to achieve this?
I
This can be useful in some cases:
http://www.bouncybouncy.net/ramblings/posts/xen_live_migration_without_shared_storage/
With the blocksync.py script on that page you can first make a copy of the
block device while the VM is still running. Then shut down the VM and make
another run only this
From: Matt lm7...@gmail.com
Is there something like iotop in rpm form available for
Centos 4.x?
The iotop homepage (http://guichaz.free.fr/iotop/) has rpms...
Older versions can be found here: http://guichaz.free.fr/iotop/files/
JD
___
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Dominik Zyla
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 13:55
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] How to specify the default route?
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 07:57:13PM -0400, Rick Thomas
Hello all,
For (system) certification purposes, we have to upgrade our 4.4 machines to
4.7.
In the past I usually have just reinstalled machines to save the (perceived)
headaches of upgrading. That is not an option in this case.
Are there any pitfalls to watch out for when upgrading? Is it even
At Thu, 24 Jun 2010 07:53:47 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Hello all,
For (system) certification purposes, we have to upgrade our 4.4 machines to
4.7.
In the past I usually have just reinstalled machines to save the (perceived)
headaches of upgrading. That is not
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 22, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Alex Still alex.rans...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
On some servers this behavior returned despite rsize being set to 32k,
I had to set it to 8k to get reasonnable throughput. So there's
Only going to 4.7 because the required app is not certified for 4.8 (In the
RHEL world which is what we are basing this on). 4.7 is as high as they will
go. I know I will be doing this again in a month's time when they have 4.8
certified...
I just do as I am told...To an extent...
Thanks,
John
On
John Kennedy wrote:
Only going to 4.7 because the required app is not certified for 4.8 (In
the RHEL world which is what we are basing this on). 4.7 is as high as
they will go. I know I will be doing this again in a month's time when
they have 4.8 certified...
I just do as I am told...To
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 23:45 -0400, Brandon Wood wrote:
If you have feedback or questions please let me know,
---
3) Build the kernel config
[r...@server ~]# cd /usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-194.3.1.el5-x86_64
[r...@server 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5-x86_64]# make oldconfig make
prepare
---
What's the
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, John Kennedy wrote:
For (system) certification purposes, we have to upgrade our 4.4 machines to
4.7.
* nod *
In the past I usually have just reinstalled machines to save
the (perceived) headaches of upgrading. That is not an
option in this case. Are there any
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
John Kennedy wrote:
Only going to 4.7 because the required app is not certified for 4.8 (In
the RHEL world which is what we are basing this on). 4.7 is as high as
If you can find a copy of the 4.7 iso you can upgrade from that.
These older ISO images
Hi,
I'm currently working through Sander Van Vugt's Beginning the Linux
Command Line (Apress), just for fun. Right now I'm just trying out all
the examples in chapter 5, dedicated to managing partitions and logical
volumes. After some work with fdisk (which I normally use), the book
Why would u install psp with out a proliant??
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 24, 2010, at 9:47 AM, JohnS jse...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 23:45 -0400, Brandon Wood wrote:
If you have feedback or questions please let me know,
---
3) Build the kernel config
[r...@server ~]# cd
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:47 PM, JohnS jse...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the purpose of this? Is there an rpm that triggers something
after this step? I'm just curious about it and would like to try it but
I have no Proliant to test on.
Sorry, you are right this is a part of the document I
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:16:43AM -0400, John Kennedy wrote:
Only going to 4.7 because the required app is not certified for 4.8 (In the
RHEL world which is what we are basing this on). 4.7 is as high as they will
go. I know I will be doing this again in a month's time when they have 4.8
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 11:49 -0400, Cliff wrote:
Why would u install psp with out a proliant??
---
You don't get my point.
John
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 16:10 +, Brandon Wood wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:47 PM, JohnS jse...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the purpose of this? Is there an rpm that triggers
something
after this step? I'm just curious about it and would like to
try it but
At Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:16:52 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:16:43AM -0400, John Kennedy wrote:
Only going to 4.7 because the required app is not certified for 4.8 (In the
RHEL world which is what we are basing this on). 4.7 is as high as
On another list I'm told there is a newer HP PSP version
that comes with an installer so all this may be moot.
Brandon,
Check the itrc forum, the PSP Developer participated in a
thread with myself and another user and cleared up a good
chunk of info wrt the psp.
Not only does the new installer
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 15:11 -0400, William Hooper wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:02 PM, David Mansfield cen...@dm.cobite.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 09:25 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 8:02 AM, David Mansfield cen...@dm.cobite.com
wrote:
Hi All:
error:
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 14:07 -0400, David Mansfield wrote:
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 15:11 -0400, William Hooper wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:02 PM, David Mansfield cen...@dm.cobite.com
wrote:
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 09:25 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 8:02 AM, David
On 06/24/2010 05:24 PM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently working through Sander Van Vugt's Beginning the Linux
Command Line (Apress), just for fun. Right now I'm just trying out all
the examples in chapter 5, dedicated to managing partitions and logical
volumes. After some work with
Hello,
I've sent this mail when I didn't subscribe this mailing list.
Now I subscribe and I sent again.
I'm sorry to bother you.
Our company make and sell some measurement system controlled by PC.
We use Red Hat Enterprise Linux on the PC currently.
We are thinking CentOS is another option for
Hi,
There's a RHEL5 system somewhere across the internet with a trashed root
file system. I have VPN access to the subnet where it lives. But the
system is not talking to the network.
The current plan is having an onsite person boot from a CentOS Live CD, copy
a small script to configure
I'll create a new lvm logical volume, create a file system, and restore from a
level 0 dump taken from a lvm snapshot just before things broke.
Ok.
The part I'm not certain about is the grub voodoo to get the system to boot to
the lvm with the restored root file system.
Look at
Whether I like it or not I need to get a version of PHP that is greater than
5.2.1
as the latest SugarCRM version require this and as I am a module developer
I need to have one of the later versions of PHP on my machines.
Does anyone know of a reliable and good archive for PHP that provides
Whether I like it or not I need to get a version of PHP that is greater than
5.2.1
http://blog.famillecollet.com/pages/Config-en
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 10:14 +0900, Shinobu Takasugi wrote:
Question 1
Is there no problem from the view point of CentOS license?
Question 2
Should we donate to CentOS community?
In FAQ http://www.centos.org/modules/smartfaq/faq.php?faqid=49,
there is a description concerning donation
On 06/24/10 7:50 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
Whether I like it or not I need to get a version of PHP that is greater than
5.2.1
as the latest SugarCRM version require this and as I am a module developer
I need to have one of the later versions of PHP on my machines.
so, basically,
W dniu 2010-06-25 04:50, Jobst Schmalenbach pisze:
Whether I like it or not I need to get a version of PHP that is greater than
5.2.1
as the latest SugarCRM version require this and as I am a module developer
I need to have one of the later versions of PHP on my machines.
Does anyone know
2010/6/25 Jobst Schmalenbach jo...@barrett.com.au:
Whether I like it or not I need to get a version of PHP that is greater than
5.2.1
as the latest SugarCRM version require this and as I am a module developer
I need to have one of the later versions of PHP on my machines.
Does anyone know
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 04:50, Jobst Schmalenbach jo...@barrett.com.au wrote:
Whether I like it or not I need to get a version of PHP that is greater than
5.2.1
as the latest SugarCRM version require this and as I am a module developer
I need to have one of the later versions of PHP on my
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com
wrote:
The part I'm not certain about is the grub voodoo to get the system to
boot to
the lvm with the restored root file system.
Look at ./etc/lvm/backup/* in your dumped files, it will show you the VG,
LV and
39 matches
Mail list logo
