Una consulta para maestros de la lista.
El comando yum solo funciona con el Internet???
Porque ni siquiera puedo hacer un yum info sin que me de este error.
Error: Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: addons
Ojo pregunto esto porq no tengo una conexion a internet en mi maquina virtual.
Ah.. olvide mencionar algo importante. SI tengo montado la imagen del
Instalador..
Les agradeceria que alguien me diga cual es el problema ya que estoy chocando
contra la pared cada vez que intento una forma de instalar algunos paquetes que
si logro instalarlos con el comando RPM!!! Pero no
No necesariamente, ya que vos podes armar tu propio repo interno, entonces
tenes un server actualizando desde los repos de CentOS y el resto apuntando
a ese.
Saludos ...
*Lic. Christian G. Araquistain*
M. araqu...@gmail.com
2010/7/25 Ru-Benz Cáceres ru.be.ns.4...@hotmail.com
Una consulta
Como ya te mencionaron YUM no necesariamente debe ser utilizado mediante
internet.
YUM es un sistema de instalacion de paquetes (software,librerias,etc). A
diferencia de RPM, YUM realiza un analisis de tu SO y determina si necesitas
actualizar algo (librerias,compiladores,interpretes,etc) y
On 07/25/2010 06:09 PM, Ru-Benz Cáceres wrote:
Una consulta para maestros de la lista.
El comando yum solo funciona con el Internet???
Porque ni siquiera puedo hacer un yum info sin que me de este error.
Error: Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: addons
Ojo pregunto esto porq no tengo una
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Jim Perrin jper...@gmail.com wrote:
Step 1: Configure virtualbox to see the drive you want.
Step 2:
http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5.5/html/Installation_Guide/index.html
Hadi, as much as I enjoy this community, learning from it,
In this way I will disable the virtual NIC's , but I steel need networking
:) .
I just want to get rid of the iptables rules inserted at boot by libvirt
tools.
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 8:25 AM, aditya hilman aditya.hil...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 2:20 AM, Silviu Hutanu
thnx for the response guys
Apparently the problem lies with the bios not detecting both sata dirives early
enough in its boot process. so i patched both drives to another port on the
motherboard and now it works like a charm.
but i'm not sure what i've to add to the grub.conf?
wessel
On Jul
Hi all. I need to run X on a headless server, and I am having a hard
time configuring null devices in xorg.conf. Here are the server's
vital stats as per the getinfo.sh script on centos.org:
http://pastebin.centos.org/33908
When I try to start X:
[r...@centos-55-32-minimal ~]# startx
xauth:
On 25 July 2010 16:15, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
experiments. Should I post the logfiles? Note that my goal is to start
X, then ssh in and run Firefox remotely from a Fedora desktop. The
server itself has no monitor.
I'm not sure what you are trying to do. Using VNC server or ssh
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 18:26, Hakan Koseoglu ha...@koseoglu.org wrote:
I'm not sure what you are trying to do. Using VNC server or ssh with
X11 tunneling (-X or -Y) would make more sense.
You don't need X itself running for either of these.
Yes, my intention is to ssh in then run the app
Am 25.07.2010 17:15, schrieb Dotan Cohen:
Note that my goal is to start
X, then ssh in and run Firefox remotely from a Fedora desktop. The
server itself has no monitor.
Thanks in advance for any advice.
For that you do not need an X server on the remote machine all you need
is X11
Dotan,
On 25 July 2010 16:32, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
However, when I do this I get no response (no firefox window opens, no
terminal output), even after several minutes. I figured that was
because X is not running.
That's not the reason. You don't run X on the server for such
Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 18:26, Hakan Koseoglu ha...@koseoglu.org wrote:
I'm not sure what you are trying to do. Using VNC server or ssh with
X11 tunneling (-X or -Y) would make more sense.
You don't need X itself running for either of these.
Yes, my intention is to ssh
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
What you are trying should work without running X at the console, but you
might
like the freenx/NX client even better. That gives you a complete remote X
desktop with very good performance that you can disconnect and
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 18:38, Hakan Koseoglu ha...@koseoglu.org wrote:
Dotan,
On 25 July 2010 16:32, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
However, when I do this I get no response (no firefox window opens, no
terminal output), even after several minutes. I figured that was
because X is
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 19:14, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
What you are trying should work without running X at the console, but you
might
like the freenx/NX client even better. That gives you a complete
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 07:23:03PM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
I don't. After 15 minutes the square of the supposed Firefox window
came up. That's painful! But therein lies the problem.
Which shows it's working... but painfully slowly. Bandwidth and especially
latency is killing you.
FreeNX is
hadi motamedi wrote:
I tried to do it as the following :
#dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/sda
But it was not successful. The primary disk is 150GB and the external
usb disk is 20GB. As I check with the 'df -m' , with respect to the used
space , the 20GB capacity seems to be sufficient. Can you
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
What you are trying should work without running X at the console, but you
might
like the freenx/NX client even better. That gives you a complete remote X
desktop with very good performance that
On 07/23/2010 04:29 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
How about remote cpio?
cpio requires rsh/ssh to reach a remote system, and would be a poor
choice for copying an image to a block device.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 07/23/2010 01:50 PM, Marcelo Roccasalva wrote:
Anyway, what are the best practices to allow postgresql copy to a
subdirectory of a home directory (without disabling selinux)? I'm
running centos 5.5.
The first thing you'll want to do is enable auditing. One of the items
in Fedora's SELinux
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
You need to be somewhat careful these days about things that came from
centos-testing or extras as some now also appear in epel with the same names
and
version number that aren't likely to be coordinated. I haven't
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
You need to be somewhat careful these days about things that came from
centos-testing or extras as some now also appear in epel with the same names
and
version number that aren't likely to be
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 19:35, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
Which shows it's working... but painfully slowly. Bandwidth and especially
latency is killing you.
Other than getting a new ISP, is there anything that I can do about the latency?
FreeNX is designed to work around this
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 20:29, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
You need to be somewhat careful these days about things that came from
centos-testing or extras as some now also appear in epel
Dotan Cohen wrote:
EPEL is generally known to not overwrite distro files, but when it
starts showing conflicts with the CentOS extras repo, that needs an
additional note.
I think the point is that CentOS isn't 'the distro' that epel doesn't
overwrite.
And it really makes more sense for
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 08:46:08PM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 19:35, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
Which shows it's working... but painfully slowly. ??Bandwidth and especially
latency is killing you.
Other than getting a new ISP, is there anything that I can
On Jul 25, 2010, at 12:50 PM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
On 07/23/2010 04:29 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
How about remote cpio?
cpio requires rsh/ssh to reach a remote system, and would be a poor
choice for copying an image to a block device.
Better then dd over ssh, but
Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 19:35, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
Which shows it's working... but painfully slowly. Bandwidth and especially
latency is killing you.
Other than getting a new ISP, is there anything that I can do about the
latency?
I can smoothly run
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 19:35, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
Which shows it's working... but painfully slowly. Bandwidth and especially
latency is killing you.
Other than getting a new ISP, is there anything that I can do about
At Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:17:45 +0800 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 19:35, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
Which shows it's working... but painfully slowly. Bandwidth and especially
latency is killing you.
Other than
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
You can't do an image clone to a smaller target. If you need to do this,
get a
matching or larger target drive. Or, install from scratch on the USB
device and
then copy over any files you need from the source
33 matches
Mail list logo
