Re: [CentOS-docs] request for Wiki access

2010-08-25 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Am 24.08.10 18:47, schrieb Santanu Das: So, do I have the necessary access to the Wiki now? I got kinda confused. http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/UsingNetatalk - looking over your wiki article again, I think this is the most fitting place to put it at the moment. If the article gets

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0643 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 openoffice.org - security update

2010-08-25 Thread Tru Huynh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0643 openoffice.org security update for CentOS 4 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0643.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0653 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 ImageMagick - security update

2010-08-25 Thread Tru Huynh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0653 ImageMagick security update for CentOS 4 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0653.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0653 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 ImageMagick - security update

2010-08-25 Thread Tru Huynh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0653 ImageMagick security update for CentOS 4 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0653.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0632 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 qspice-client Update

2010-08-25 Thread Tru Huynh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0632 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0632.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 83a4232aec4a0af62cb87797e0044480

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0651 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 spice-xpi Update

2010-08-25 Thread Tru Huynh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0651 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0651.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 090f9894239a013ce8785da2eec64666

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0632 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 qspice-client Update

2010-08-25 Thread Tru Huynh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0632 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0632.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: cf03da15238bb30199d95a8e706b3201

Re: [CentOS-es] centos-es-requ...@centos.org

2010-08-25 Thread Carlos Hernandez
On 08/25/2010 01:09 PM, Herr Tod De Anima wrote: hola que tal soy muy nuevo en esto de linux y quiero saber como puedo hacer un backup del todo el disco tengo instalado red hat enterprise desde ya muchas gracias. ___ CentOS-es mailing list

[CentOS-es] Invitación a conectarnos en LinkedIn

2010-08-25 Thread Ricardo Carrillo
LinkedIn Ricardo Carrillo pidió añadirte como contacto en LinkedIn: -- Angelo, Me gustaría añadirte a mi red profesional en LinkedIn. -Ricardo Aceptar invitación de Ricardo Carrillo

[CentOS-es] Invitación a conectarnos en LinkedIn

2010-08-25 Thread Mario Villela Larraza
LinkedIn Mario Villela Larraza pidió añadirte como contacto en LinkedIn: -- Angelo, Me gustaría añadirte a mi red profesional en LinkedIn. -Mario Aceptar invitación de Mario Villela Larraza

Re: [CentOS] best way something thinks to upgrade dovecot to 1.2.* 2.0.* via atrpms, atrpms-testing

2010-08-25 Thread Tsuyoshi Nagata
ATrpms have dovecot 2.0 rpms for CentOS5(RHEL5) ATrpms http://ATrpms.net/ dovecot-2.0-0.3_108_beta4.el5.i386.rpm Using Repository is best way. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] I have a question about the 389 ds

2010-08-25 Thread sync
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote: On Aug 24, 2010, at 1:32 AM, sync jian...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Whitney, Matthew mwhit...@pima.edu mwhit...@pima.edu wrote: I don't believe there is a VNC client out there that will get

Re: [CentOS] best way something thinks to upgrade dovecot to 1.2.* 2.0.* via atrpms, atrpms-testing

2010-08-25 Thread Tsuyoshi Nagata
(2010年08月25日 08:23), fakessh wrote: what to do with errors: correct the error in the configuration file ? Sorry for poor response. You can list configration file by rpm command. rpm -qc dovecot I was update successfully from 1.2 to 2.0. because of no local setting with dovecot.

Re: [CentOS] I have a question about the 389 ds

2010-08-25 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:17 PM, sync jian...@gmail.com wrote: But I have a problem on how to create  a custom attribute in DS to hold geometry . Could someone can give me some suggestions  or  where is the   manual about  how to create   new  attribute ? +1 I too am a

[CentOS] process eggcups

2010-08-25 Thread Jerry Geis
hi all, Just wondering how starts the process eggcups? I have done a service cups stop but eggcups is still running. I then do chkconfig cups off and reboot and its still running. How do I stop it from running? Thanks, Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list

[CentOS] aide rpm requirement

2010-08-25 Thread Steve Campbell
I normally don't have yum upgrade anything automatically, but a server that I didn't set up does just that. Last night, aide was upgraded, and then failed to run due to libgcrypt mismatch. Shouldn't the rpm spec file for aide deal with the libgcrypt problem (meaning I think it should be part

[CentOS] Updates offered annoyance

2010-08-25 Thread Aleksandar Stoisavljevic
Hi all, I downloaded latest CentOS 5.5 DVD i386 image from one of FTP's in a list. I've burned that image to DVD and created new DVD to use for fresh installations. Now when I install fresh CentOS 5.5 (in VM) I am getting info that there are 50 packages updates. This is ok when I have good

Re: [CentOS] Updates offered annoyance

2010-08-25 Thread John R. Dennison
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 02:14:02PM +0200, Aleksandar Stoisavljevic wrote: This is ok when I have good internet speed (@work) but when I am home, this update takes a lot of time. Welcome to life on the internet. I guess I can skip updates but I wasn't experiencing such annoyance with

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

2010-08-25 Thread Gabriel Tabares
Not sure if it is RDNS. I had similar issues on Fedora, and for me it was to do with IP6. Konqueror web browser took ages to load a page. IIRC Firefox handled it OK. Try Googling for 'uninstalling ipv6 linux' I already tried that. The /etc/sysconfig/network has the IPV6_ENABLE=no.

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

2010-08-25 Thread Gabriel Tabares
On 23/08/2010 21:25, Keith Roberts wrote: On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Gabriel Tabares wrote: To: centos@centos.org From: Gabriel Tabaresgabriel.taba...@roboreus.com Subject: Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem On 23/08/2010 13:28, Joseph L. Casale wrote: Both files are the

Re: [CentOS] Updates offered annoyance

2010-08-25 Thread Les Mikesell
On 8/25/10 7:14 AM, Aleksandar Stoisavljevic wrote: Hi all, I downloaded latest CentOS 5.5 DVD i386 image from one of FTP's in a list. I've burned that image to DVD and created new DVD to use for fresh installations. Now when I install fresh CentOS 5.5 (in VM) I am getting info that there

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

2010-08-25 Thread Les Mikesell
On 8/25/10 7:26 AM, Gabriel Tabares wrote: Not sure if it is RDNS. I had similar issues on Fedora, and for me it was to do with IP6. Konqueror web browser took ages to load a page. IIRC Firefox handled it OK. Try Googling for 'uninstalling ipv6 linux' I already tried that. The

Re: [CentOS] Updates offered annoyance

2010-08-25 Thread Robert Heller
At Wed, 25 Aug 2010 07:19:25 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 02:14:02PM +0200, Aleksandar Stoisavljevic wrote: This is ok when I have good internet speed (@work) but when I am home, this update takes a lot of time. Welcome to life

Re: [CentOS] Best location in filesystem to have a samba share

2010-08-25 Thread Kevin Thorpe
On 25/08/2010 03:03, David McGuffey wrote: Everyone in the family has a digital camera or cell phone and they seem to be leaving picture files all over their home folders, and laptops with no sense of year/month/day taken or what they are about. Looking to consolidate all the family pics in

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

2010-08-25 Thread m . roth
Gabriel Tabares wrote: On 23/08/2010 21:25, Keith Roberts wrote: On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Gabriel Tabares wrote: From: Gabriel Tabaresgabriel.taba...@roboreus.com On 23/08/2010 13:28, Joseph L. Casale wrote: Both files are the default ones from CentOS: snip Keith, the issue happens resolving

Re: [CentOS] Updates offered annoyance

2010-08-25 Thread Hakan Koseoglu
Robert, On 25 August 2010 14:24, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote: The main problem is that yum is NOT well written to deal with a slow and *unreliable* dial-up interface -- it in fact behaves extremly Grab a copy of a repository at work, copy it home and set up a local repository. Yum

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

2010-08-25 Thread Keith Roberts
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Gabriel Tabares wrote: To: centos@centos.org From: Gabriel Tabares gabriel.taba...@roboreus.com Subject: Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem On 23/08/2010 21:25, Keith Roberts wrote: On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Gabriel Tabares wrote: To: centos@centos.org From:

Re: [CentOS] Updates offered annoyance

2010-08-25 Thread Todd Denniston
Les Mikesell wrote, On 08/25/2010 08:29 AM: On 8/25/10 7:14 AM, Aleksandar Stoisavljevic wrote: Hi all, I downloaded latest CentOS 5.5 DVD i386 image from one of FTP's in a list. I've burned that image to DVD and created new DVD to use for fresh installations. Now when I install fresh

Re: [CentOS] Updates offered annoyance

2010-08-25 Thread Robert Heller
At Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:41:11 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: Robert, On 25 August 2010 14:24, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote: The main problem is that yum is NOT well written to deal with a slow and *unreliable* dial-up interface -- it in fact behaves

Re: [CentOS] Updates offered annoyance

2010-08-25 Thread Giles Coochey
On Wed, August 25, 2010 16:19, Robert Heller wrote: At Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:41:11 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: Robert, On 25 August 2010 14:24, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote: The main problem is that yum is NOT well written to deal with a slow and

Re: [CentOS] Updates offered annoyance

2010-08-25 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote: My 'work' is at home (dialup).  The local library is only good for about 1.5mbits/sec (about 150kbytes/sec).  I don't have enough free disk space for a full repo on either my laptop or my desktop. Perhaps

Re: [CentOS] Dovecot attack

2010-08-25 Thread Dag Wieers
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Karanbir Singh wrote: On 08/23/2010 03:58 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: pam_shield is available from RPMforge and requires a minimum of configuration. Never heard of this one before - just installed and simple to configure. I note that version 0.9.3 was released April 2010 and

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

2010-08-25 Thread Meenoo Shivdasani
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Gabriel Tabares gabriel.taba...@roboreus.com One more thing, if this is the case, why does the nslookup respond straight away? Is the destination server trying to somehow validate the host where the connection came from? It's entirely possible (and probable)

Re: [CentOS] Updates offered annoyance

2010-08-25 Thread Robert Heller
At Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:28:04 +0200 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: On Wed, August 25, 2010 16:19, Robert Heller wrote: At Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:41:11 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: Robert, On 25 August 2010 14:24, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com

Re: [CentOS] Dovecot attack

2010-08-25 Thread Dag Wieers
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rob Kampen wrote: Dag Wieers wrote: pam_shield is available from RPMforge and requires a minimum of configuration. Never heard of this one before - just installed and simple to configure. I note that version 0.9.3 was released April 2010 and includes a supposed

Re: [CentOS] PAM_shield locking me out?

2010-08-25 Thread Dag Wieers
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Rob Kampen wrote: Yesterday I installed pam_shield and followed the testing suggested and thought all was well. today I find that I cannot get to my email account, I can login via ssh okay (uses keys) but su and sudo give segmentation faults. I am guessing due to the

Re: [CentOS] Updates offered annoyance

2010-08-25 Thread Lamar Owen
My 'work' is at home (dialup). The local library is only good for about 1.5mbits/sec (about 150kbytes/sec). I don't have enough free disk space for a full repo on either my laptop or my desktop. While not currently supported by the main CentOS project (AFAIK), there are presto repos out

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

2010-08-25 Thread Les Mikesell
On 8/23/2010 10:08 AM, Gabriel Tabares wrote: One more thing, if this is the case, why does the nslookup respond straight away? Is the destination server trying to somehow validate the host where the connection came from? Some servers do, some don't. The ones that do are often just trying to

Re: [CentOS] i can't install centos on my poweredge 2950

2010-08-25 Thread Eric Doutreleau
well i transfer the initrd on another computer and i can see the megaraid_sas module. another strange when i install with DVd it works like a charm :( but i would like to install my server with cobbler with all the task in my kickstart done. that s really very very strange during the boot

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 66, Issue 7

2010-08-25 Thread centos-announce-request
-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20100825/fee735d9/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 2 Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

2010-08-25 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: On 8/23/2010 10:08 AM, Gabriel Tabares wrote: Some servers do, some don't. Have you tried google's DNS servers 8.8.8.8 IP and one more IP I can't recollect exactly Regards, Rajagopal

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

2010-08-25 Thread Keith Roberts
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Les Mikesell wrote: To: centos@centos.org From: Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem On 8/23/2010 10:08 AM, Gabriel Tabares wrote: One more thing, if this is the case, why does the nslookup respond straight away? Is

[CentOS] System beeps in kernel 2.6.18-194

2010-08-25 Thread Glenn Eychaner
So, just today I noticed a problem with kernel 2.6.18-194 (CentOS 5.5) on several Intel DP965LT systems; the system beeps (such as terminal beeps) are no longer passed through to the external speakers. This is a problem because in our situation the boxes are distant from their

Re: [CentOS] System beeps in kernel 2.6.18-194

2010-08-25 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Glenn Eychaner geycha...@mac.com wrote:        So, just today I noticed a problem with kernel 2.6.18-194 (CentOS 5.5) on several Intel DP965LT systems; the system beeps (such as terminal beeps) are no longer passed through to the external speakers.  This is a

Re: [CentOS] Strange Apache log entry

2010-08-25 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 08/24/2010 04:25 AM, Keith Roberts wrote: So bolting down PHP really tight should address these hacks? No. This vulnerability would be in a PHP application. I don't believe you could configure PHP in such a way that this would no longer be a problem.

Re: [CentOS] System beeps in kernel 2.6.18-194

2010-08-25 Thread Todd Denniston
Akemi Yagi wrote, On 08/25/2010 05:56 PM: On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Glenn Eychaner geycha...@mac.com wrote: Is there someplace can I find *detailed* release notes on the differences between -164 and -194 kernels to help in looking for the problem, You can find kernel changelog

[CentOS] System beeps in kernel 2.6.18-194

2010-08-25 Thread Glenn Eychaner
Akemi Yagi amyagi at gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Glenn Eychaner geychaner at mac.com wrote: So, just today I noticed a problem with kernel 2.6.18-194 (CentOS 5.5) on several Intel DP965LT systems; the system beeps (such as terminal beeps) are no longer passed through to

Re: [CentOS] process eggcups

2010-08-25 Thread Tsuyoshi Nagata
Hi Jerry, (2010年08月25日 21:05), Jerry Geis wrote: I have done a service cups stop but eggcups is still running. Run App. [System]-[Preferences]-[More Preferences]-[Sessions] In Sessions, Select [Current Session] Scroll running programs, find eggcups, then select it. Pull down

Re: [CentOS] process eggcups

2010-08-25 Thread Jerry Geis
Tsuyoshi Nagata wrote: Hi Jerry, (2010年08月25日 21:05), Jerry Geis wrote: I have done a service cups stop but eggcups is still running. Run App. [System]-[Preferences]-[More Preferences]-[Sessions] In Sessions, Select [Current Session] Scroll running programs, find eggcups,

Re: [CentOS] Updates offered annoyance

2010-08-25 Thread Kahlil Hodgson
On 26/08/10 00:03, Todd Denniston wrote: And if you are maintaining more than one machine at home, you need to realize that you don't need to waste the time twice to update the same thing on two machines. Assuming your home machines are networked together. Good Point. I run a 'fat' squid