[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0697 Critical CentOS 3 i386 samba - security and bug fix update

2010-09-16 Thread Tru Huynh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0697 samba security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0697.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/samba-3.0.9-1.3E.18.i386.rpm

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0697 Critical CentOS 3 x86_64 samba - security and bug fix update

2010-09-16 Thread Tru Huynh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0697 samba security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0697.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/samba-client-3.0.9-1.3E.18.i386.rpm

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0697 Critical CentOS 4 i386 samba - security and bug fix update

2010-09-16 Thread Tru Huynh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0697 samba security update for CentOS 4 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0697.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/samba-3.0.33-0.19.el4_8.3.i386.rpm

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0697 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 samba - security and bug fix update

2010-09-16 Thread Tru Huynh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0697 samba security update for CentOS 4 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0697.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/samba-3.0.33-0.19.el4_8.3.x86_64.rpm

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0695 CentOS 5 x86_64 python-dmidecode Update

2010-09-16 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0695 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0695.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 856a846d2b27de0a5a74a055e100efcb

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0696 CentOS 5 i386 device-mapper-multipath Update

2010-09-16 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0696 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0696.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 4aa482821c012d554a32ef5c8dbea36b

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0696 CentOS 5 x86_64 device-mapper-multipath Update

2010-09-16 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0696 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0696.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 183024be4611c71b5cef0c667f1404b3

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0698 Critical CentOS 5 i386 samba3x Update

2010-09-16 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0698 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0698.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 6503b6b291bd78f5f7b46e4c9cf990c5

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0698 Critical CentOS 5 x86_64 samba3x Update

2010-09-16 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0698 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0698.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: faa58b13a65533c118e9ac87e8fa4d31

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0697 Critical CentOS 5 i386 samba Update

2010-09-16 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0697 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0697.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 95ea039e89055e74c840c0ce0ab8fcc7

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0697 Critical CentOS 5 x86_64 samba Update

2010-09-16 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0697 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0697.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 9bdbcbc0c4751e076eff5f4ace1da9df

[CentOS-es] Apache + PHP + Oracle OCI

2010-09-16 Thread Emiliano Roatta
Gente: Buenos días. Estoy teniendo un problema con Apache + PHP + Oracle en CentOS. Logré instalar y configurar un servidor web apache, desde el cuál se ejecutan unos scripts php que consultan datos a un servidor de bases de datos Oracle. El problema reside en la visualización de los resultados,

[CentOS-es] CAPTURAR VIDEOS EN CENTOS

2010-09-16 Thread Carlos Jara Alva
Saludos, desde hace muchisimo tiempo que quiero hacer videos tutoriales pero desde centos, asi como en Windows existe el sreen, el cual captura los eventos que uno realiza, en centos habra uno tambien lo necesito urgente... Gracias. ___ CentOS-es

Re: [CentOS-es] CAPTURAR VIDEOS EN CENTOS

2010-09-16 Thread e...@r Rodolfo
Hola, si existe uno muy bueno y se llama recordmydesktop (para screencast), puedes tenerlo añadiendo repos de rpmfusion, q necesita habilitar epel primero, o tambien añadiendo rpmforge, yo hice un video grabandome, la calidad no es muy buena, pero creo q va bien, saludos y espero q esto te

Re: [CentOS-es] Apache + PHP + Oracle OCI

2010-09-16 Thread Paúl Vizuete
espero que este articulo te sirva http://www.vivaphp.com.ar/articulos/acentos-en-php-postgresql-y-apache2 lo unico que tendrias que configurar es el juego de caracteres en tu bd oracle Saludos ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org

[CentOS-es] VIDEOS EN LINUX

2010-09-16 Thread Carlos Jara Alva
Bueno *recordmydesktop parece bueno.. pero como se instala en un Centos 5.4... que debo de hacer primero.. para que funciones.. que rpm necesita previo a la instalacion??? * ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org

Re: [CentOS-es] CAPTURAR VIDEOS EN CENTOS

2010-09-16 Thread Ruben Moyota
Hola prodrias probar Xvidcap screen capture, lo he probado en fedora, centos y ubuntu, esta bien Saludos El 16 de septiembre de 2010 10:30, Carlos Jara Alva fbja...@gmail.comescribió: Saludos, desde hace muchisimo tiempo que quiero hacer videos tutoriales pero desde centos, asi como en

[CentOS-es] Chrome

2010-09-16 Thread Elias Salomon Valderrama De La Cruz
Hola listeros, como les va. Soy nuevo en esto de GNU/Linux pero ahi le estoy dando. El siguiente tema no es de gran relevancia como los problemas de firewall o compartir archivos que si me han ayudado bastante para tener cuidado. Quiero instalar el Chrome de Google en mi CentOS 5.5 segui los

Re: [CentOS-es] problemas con DNS e IPTABLES

2010-09-16 Thread Lic. Domingo Varela Y.
Y ya probaste abriendo el puerto 53 tcp y udp en iptables -- mens. original -- Asunto: [CentOS-es] problemas con DNS e IPTABLES De: Roberto Panta Arcos roberto_pa...@hotmail.com Fecha: 16/09/2010 11:54 Buenos dias tengo centos 5.4 , instalando iptables y named. todo va bien con el servicio

[CentOS-es] Sendmail, no envia correos a hotmail.

2010-09-16 Thread Carlos Sura
Hola a todos, Mi problema es el siguiente: Tengo un servidor con CentOS 5.5, y he instalado Sendmail para la salida de los correos de el servidor, probe enviando a Gmail, Yahoo -y funciona muy bien- pero a la hora de enviar a Hotmail, simplemente no caen, ni si quiera a la carpeta de correo

[CentOS-es] Sendmail, no envia correos a hotmail.

2010-09-16 Thread Carlos Sura
Hola a todos, Mi problema es el siguiente: Tengo un servidor con CentOS 5.5, y he instalado Sendmail para la salida de los correos de el servidor, probe enviando a Gmail, Yahoo -y funciona muy bien- pero a la hora de enviar a Hotmail, simplemente no caen, ni si quiera a la carpeta de

Re: [CentOS-es] VIDEOS EN LINUX

2010-09-16 Thread e...@r Rodolfo
Primero q nada amigo necesitas instalar repositorios adicionales, como rpmforge, karan o rpmfusion, trata de instalar uno de ellos no todos juntos para evitar conflictos, yo recomendaria el rpmforge para multimedia, creo q ahi esta recordmydesktop, no me acuerdo bien o en rpmfusion, pero si se

Re: [CentOS] is Intel VT-d really necessary?

2010-09-16 Thread John R Pierce
On 09/15/10 2:19 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: Hi all, I'm just curios and would like some input from the community on this one. We're busy budgeting for a couple of new servers and I thought it would be good to try out the Core i7 CPU's, but see the majority of them don't offer VT-d, but just

Re: [CentOS] is Intel VT-d really necessary?

2010-09-16 Thread Rudi Ahlers
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 8:24 AM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: Core I7 is the branding for the desktop CPU family.  The Server processors are branded Xeon 5500 and 5600 (for dual socket servers) and Xeon 7000 for 4+ socket servers.   Typically, desktop processors go with desktop

Re: [CentOS] is Intel VT-d really necessary?

2010-09-16 Thread John R Pierce
On 09/16/10 12:16 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: Yet the server vendors ship servers, with server chassis, hardware RAID, redundant power supplies, etc offer Core i7 options. How does that work? low end servers, i guess. I'd have to see a specific model to comment specifically. most of the stuff

[CentOS] Can anyone suggest a decent backup system?

2010-09-16 Thread Kevin Thorpe
Hi all, We have a bit of a problem with backups. We've been using bacula to tape and now trying to disk but it's a complete nightmare as regards tape management. The backup to file storage went ok for ages and now is stuck 'waiting for max storage jobs' which is odd as that's set to 20 and

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone suggest a decent backup system?

2010-09-16 Thread Theo Band
On 09/16/10 10:34, Kevin Thorpe wrote: Hi all, We have a bit of a problem with backups. We've been using bacula to tape and now trying to disk but it's a complete nightmare as regards tape management. The backup to file storage went ok for ages and now is stuck 'waiting for max storage

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone suggest a decent backup system?

2010-09-16 Thread Keith Roberts
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Kevin Thorpe wrote: To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org From: Kevin Thorpe ke...@pibenchmark.com Subject: [CentOS] Can anyone suggest a decent backup system? Hi all, We have a bit of a problem with backups. We've been using bacula to tape and now trying to disk

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone suggest a decent backup system?

2010-09-16 Thread Sorin Srbu
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Theo Band Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 10:53 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Can anyone suggest a decent backup system? Can anyone suggest a simple backup package for

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone suggest a decent backup system?

2010-09-16 Thread John Doe
From: Kevin Thorpe ke...@pibenchmark.com We have a bit of a problem with backups. We've been using bacula to tape and now trying to disk but it's a complete nightmare as regards tape management. The backup to file storage went ok for ages and now is stuck 'waiting for max storage jobs'

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone suggest a decent backup system?

2010-09-16 Thread Tom Yates
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Kevin Thorpe wrote: We have a bit of a problem with backups. We've been using bacula to tape and now trying to disk but it's a complete nightmare as regards tape management. i suspect it's quite annoying when people try to re-engineer your request, but i use bacula for

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone suggest a decent backup system?

2010-09-16 Thread Kevin Thorpe
On 16/09/2010 10:35, Tom Yates wrote: On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Kevin Thorpe wrote: We have a bit of a problem with backups. We've been using bacula to tape and now trying to disk but it's a complete nightmare as regards tape management. i suspect it's quite annoying when people try to

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone suggest a decent backup system?

2010-09-16 Thread Sorin Srbu
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Thorpe Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:59 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Can anyone suggest a decent backup system? I'll definitely look into BackupPC for HDD

[CentOS] how to show that a filesystem is ACL-enabled?

2010-09-16 Thread Robert P. J. Day
currently reading the RHEL deployment guide and i have a short question about ACLs that i can test on my centos 5.5 box. here: http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/Deployment_Guide/ch-acls.html the manual clearly claims that, in order to use ACLs on a

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone suggest a decent backup system?

2010-09-16 Thread David Milholen
Freenas is the way do it. Very simple and fast to get up and running on most hardware platforms. Supports E-sata,USB, IDE, RAID configurations. Can use an old pc laying around but recommend more up2date hardware to meet the demands of a large system. Dual GigE ports with mtu modified will

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone suggest a decent backup system?

2010-09-16 Thread Les Mikesell
On 9/16/10 6:20 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Thorpe Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:59 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Can anyone suggest a decent backup system?

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone suggest a decent backup system?

2010-09-16 Thread m . roth
On 9/16/2010 3:34 AM, Kevin Thorpe wrote: Hi all, We have a bit of a problem with backups. We've been using bacula to tape and now trying to disk but it's a complete nightmare as regards tape management. The backup to file storage went ok for ages and now is stuck 'waiting for max

Re: [CentOS] how to show that a filesystem is ACL-enabled?

2010-09-16 Thread Miguel Medalha
can someone clarify this? is there a command that shows whether a filesystem is currently acl-enabled? and is the mount man page simply incomplete in that respect? thanks. tune2fs -l /dev/[hda1,sda1] The values between [ ] are an example only. Replace, of course, with your own

Re: [CentOS] how to show that a filesystem is ACL-enabled?

2010-09-16 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Miguel Medalha wrote: can someone clarify this? is there a command that shows whether a filesystem is currently acl-enabled? and is the mount man page simply incomplete in that respect? thanks. tune2fs -l /dev/[hda1,sda1] The values between [ ] are an

Re: [CentOS] how to show that a filesystem is ACL-enabled?

2010-09-16 Thread Toby Bluhm
On 9/16/2010 10:09 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Miguel Medalha wrote: can someone clarify this? is there a command that shows whether a filesystem is currently acl-enabled? and is the mount man page simply incomplete in that respect? thanks. tune2fs -l

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone suggest a decent backup system?

2010-09-16 Thread Tom Yates
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Kevin Thorpe wrote: You've hit the nail on the head. You've got the proper tape library hardware. Our ISP uses Bacula absolutely fine for our hosted servers. ah, right. Our problem is mostly tape management. It will work fine for ages then we do something stupid like

Re: [CentOS] is Intel VT-d really necessary?

2010-09-16 Thread Lamar Owen
On Thursday, September 16, 2010 03:37:23 am John R Pierce wrote: On 09/16/10 12:16 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: Yet the server vendors ship servers, with server chassis, hardware RAID, redundant power supplies, etc offer Core i7 options. How does that work? low end servers, i guess. I'd

Re: [CentOS] Transferring system to new drive

2010-09-16 Thread Lamar Owen
On Tuesday, September 14, 2010 01:42:05 pm Robert Heller wrote: At Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:19:16 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: What about doing all with dd ... If you have the second disk installed in the same machine you can do dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb ort you can use

[CentOS] https

2010-09-16 Thread Jerry Geis
hi all, I wish to just have secure browsing for my application. no credit cards or anything like that just secure browser usage is the goal. I can self sign a certificate (I already have) on my servers but for anyone accessing the server you see this nasty message about untrusted sight and all

Re: [CentOS] https

2010-09-16 Thread Kevin Thorpe
On 16/09/2010 16:45, Jerry Geis wrote: hi all, I wish to just have secure browsing for my application. no credit cards or anything like that just secure browser usage is the goal. I can self sign a certificate (I already have) on my servers but for anyone accessing the server you see

Re: [CentOS] is Intel VT-d really necessary?

2010-09-16 Thread Rudi Ahlers
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote: On Thursday, September 16, 2010 03:37:23 am John R Pierce wrote:   On 09/16/10 12:16 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: Yet the server vendors ship servers, with server chassis, hardware RAID, redundant power supplies, etc  offer Core i7

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 67, Issue 4

2010-09-16 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

Re: [CentOS] https

2010-09-16 Thread Patrick Lists
On 09/16/2010 05:53 PM, Kevin Thorpe wrote: On 16/09/2010 16:45, Jerry Geis wrote: hi all, I wish to just have secure browsing for my application. no credit cards or anything like that just secure browser usage is the goal. I can self sign a certificate (I already have) on my servers but

Re: [CentOS] https

2010-09-16 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 04:53:17PM +0100, Kevin Thorpe wrote: Sorry, but you need to buy a certificate. It needs to be signed by an authority which already has a master certificate in the end user's browser. We use Thawte but there are cheaper options such as cough GoDaddy who offer them

Re: [CentOS] https

2010-09-16 Thread Brian Mathis
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Patrick Lists centos-l...@puzzled.xs4all.nl wrote: On 09/16/2010 05:53 PM, Kevin Thorpe wrote:    On 16/09/2010 16:45, Jerry Geis wrote: hi all, I wish to just have secure browsing for my application. no credit cards or anything like that just secure browser

Re: [CentOS] https

2010-09-16 Thread Rudi Ahlers
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org wrote: On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 04:53:17PM +0100, Kevin Thorpe wrote: Sorry, but you need to buy a certificate. It needs to be signed by an authority which already has a master certificate in the end user's browser. We use Thawte

Re: [CentOS] is Intel VT-d really necessary?

2010-09-16 Thread John R Pierce
On 09/16/10 8:56 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: Dell's PowerEdge R210 and R310 are available with Core i3. But those aren't servers since the Core iX CPU's are desktop class CPU's ;) those are low end servers in Dell's line. I'd be looking at the R410 or R710 for virtualization hosts, along with

[CentOS] https

2010-09-16 Thread R P Herrold
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Matthew Miller wrote: Or get one from: http://cert.startcom.org/ I had seen this cross as well from another poster: Sorry, but you need to buy a certificate. Bzzzrttt I am firmly with Matthew on this one. When I saw the initial post hit my email inbound queue (not

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone suggest a decent backup system?

2010-09-16 Thread John R Pierce
On 09/16/10 6:27 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Not sure of a package - we use rsync and scripts - but you should consider what we do: an external eSATA dock, and a number of inexpensive SATA drives. It *will* speed up the backups, and recoveries, should you need them. actually? tapes like

Re: [CentOS] is Intel VT-d really necessary?

2010-09-16 Thread Rudi Ahlers
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 7:09 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:  On 09/16/10 8:56 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:  Dell's PowerEdge R210 and R310 are available with Core i3. But those aren't servers since the Core iX CPU's are desktop class CPU's ;) those are low end servers in Dell's

Re: [CentOS] is Intel VT-d really necessary?

2010-09-16 Thread Alan Hodgson
On September 16, 2010 10:23:15 am Rudi Ahlers wrote: But I'm convinced now that XEON's would be better even though they're far more expensive. And at the same time our older Pentium IV, Core2Duo Core2Quad machines work as well as our XEON machines, but at much cheaper prices - which

Re: [CentOS] is Intel VT-d really necessary?

2010-09-16 Thread Rudi Ahlers
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Alan Hodgson ahodg...@simkin.ca wrote: On September 16, 2010 10:23:15 am Rudi Ahlers wrote: But I'm convinced now that XEON's would be better even though they're far more expensive. And at the same time our older Pentium IV, Core2Duo Core2Quad machines work as

Re: [CentOS] https

2010-09-16 Thread Keith Roberts
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Matthew Miller wrote: To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org From: Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] https On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 04:53:17PM +0100, Kevin Thorpe wrote: Sorry, but you need to buy a certificate. It needs to be signed by an

Re: [CentOS] Transferring system to new drive

2010-09-16 Thread Timothy Murphy
Lamar Owen wrote: But having done a few now I vastly prefer doing it online using LVM. No downtime, and it just works, including resizing, as long as you are going to a larger lv. When a server simply has to have minimal downtime, LVM is worth its LoC in gold for this use. What do you

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone suggest a decent backup system?

2010-09-16 Thread Les Mikesell
On 9/16/2010 12:20 PM, John R Pierce wrote: actually? tapes like LTO/DLT write *faster* than file systems on hard disks. in fact the biggest issue in many LTO/DLT backup systems is not being able to READ the source fast enough to keep the tape busy. re: BackupPC... while this is a neat

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone suggest a decent backup system?

2010-09-16 Thread Alan Hodgson
On September 16, 2010 10:49:04 am Les Mikesell wrote: Agreed there. Backuppc doesn't know much about tapes and nothing about changers. But for straight long-term archiving you could wrap a script around BackupPC_tarCreate to save whatever you wanted off to tape. And you are on your own for

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone suggest a decent backup system?

2010-09-16 Thread Les Mikesell
On 9/16/2010 12:52 PM, Alan Hodgson wrote: On September 16, 2010 10:49:04 am Les Mikesell wrote: Agreed there. Backuppc doesn't know much about tapes and nothing about changers. But for straight long-term archiving you could wrap a script around BackupPC_tarCreate to save whatever you wanted

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone suggest a decent backup system?

2010-09-16 Thread Alan Hodgson
On September 16, 2010 11:02:25 am Les Mikesell wrote: Amanda's dumps are standard tar archives and can be restored without Amanda. Well, sort-of. You have to know how to skip over the amanda label and header. And how to find the right set of tapes. Sure, but at least it's documented.

Re: [CentOS] is Intel VT-d really necessary?

2010-09-16 Thread John R Pierce
On 09/16/10 10:37 AM, Alan Hodgson wrote: The 6 core Xeons are still kinda pricey though. the new AMD 6-8 core Opteron stuff, OTOH, is relatively cheap, Dell sells these as the Rx15 models, like the R715 they also support a LOT of ram. ___

[CentOS] Howto enter a password to mount windows share in Places

2010-09-16 Thread Denis
Hi - using gnome I am trying to use Places - Connect to Server to mount a windows share. I can do: smbclient //disk.site.edu/uname$ -U uname%passwd but have not been able to transfer that infomation into the GUI that can mount the Windows Share, specifically can't figure out how to enter the

Re: [CentOS] is Intel VT-d really necessary?

2010-09-16 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:19:38AM +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: Hi all, I'm just curios and would like some input from the community on this one. We're busy budgeting for a couple of new servers and I thought it would be good to try out the Core i7 CPU's, but see the majority of them don't

Re: [CentOS] Howto enter a password to mount windows share in Places

2010-09-16 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Denis denis.bec...@mnsu.edu wrote: Hi - using gnome I am trying to use Places - Connect to Server to mount a windows share. I can do: smbclient //disk.site.edu/uname$ -U uname%passwd but have not been able to transfer that infomation into the GUI that can

[CentOS] Firefox spelling checker

2010-09-16 Thread Frank Cox
I just noticed that since the last updates, Firefox no longer does the automatic spelling checking thing in text boxes. I'm sure that it used to work and I'm not sure exactly when it stopped. I just tried it on two different up-to-date Centos 5 machines with the same results. Check my spelling

[CentOS] iptables

2010-09-16 Thread alexus
I'm trying to do some simple tcp port forwarding [r...@wcmisdlin02 ~]# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward 0 [r...@wcmisdlin02 ~]# /bin/echo 1 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward [r...@wcmisdlin02 ~]# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward 1 [r...@wcmisdlin02 ~]# iptables --list Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone suggest a decent backup system?

2010-09-16 Thread John R Pierce
On 09/16/10 1:34 AM, Kevin Thorpe wrote: Can anyone suggest a simple backup package for us? Essentially a single server, full backup to tape every day. We don't need tape management as we're fully capable of reading the written label on the tape ourselves. u, reading your requirements

Re: [CentOS] iptables

2010-09-16 Thread m . roth
alexus wrote: I'm trying to do some simple tcp port forwarding snip [r...@wcmisdlin02 ~]# iptables --table nat --append PREROUTING --proto tcp --dport 80 --jump DNAT --to 10.52.208.223:80 snip ^^^ [r...@wcmisdlin02 ~]# curl --verbose

Re: [CentOS] iptables

2010-09-16 Thread alexus
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:18 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: alexus wrote: I'm trying to do some simple tcp port forwarding snip [r...@wcmisdlin02 ~]# iptables --table nat --append PREROUTING --proto tcp --dport 80 --jump DNAT --to 10.52.208.223:80 snip                                      ^^^

Re: [CentOS] Firefox spelling checker

2010-09-16 Thread Yves Bellefeuille
On Thursday 16 September 2010 15:59, Frank Cox wrote: I just noticed that since the last updates, Firefox no longer does the automatic spelling checking thing in text boxes. I'm sure that it used to work and I'm not sure exactly when it stopped. I just tried it on two different up-to-date

Re: [CentOS] Firefox spelling checker

2010-09-16 Thread Frank Cox
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 21:54 -0400, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: Check under Tools Add-ons Extensions. If the dictionary you need there? (If not, download it at https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/language-tools/) Is it deactivated? That did it. Oddly enough, I'm pretty sure I never