CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0737 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0737.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
f74574c523f4fd9dbb493a64813aca87
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0728
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0728.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
9d75907753ba5c8a9993bf970d26057a
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0728
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0728.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
506dcc5cfd7d883281f4d7baca1df602
2010/10/2 Tom Bishop bisho...@gmail.com:
what I would like to know what is the latest KVM that I can run with 5.5 and
Run the qemu-kvm version included with CentOS and use the KVM modules
included in the default CentOS kernel - these versions are tweaked to
work the best in CentOS/RHEL.
what
Y por que mejor no te bajas los DVDs, son solo 2 y en escencia solo
necesitas el primero, el segundo solo si quieres usar OpenOffice.org.
Slds,
Javier.
-Mensaje original-
De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En
nombre de Normando Hall
Enviado el:
yo pienso lo mismo esta disponible un solo dvd que incluye todo
El 04/10/2010 11:20 a.m., Javier Aquino H. escribió:
Y por que mejor no te bajas los DVDs, son solo 2 y en escencia solo
necesitas el primero, el segundo solo si quieres usar OpenOffice.org.
Slds,
Javier.
-Mensaje
Muchas gracias amigos.
Lo que no entiendo es por qué antes no vi los DVD, no estaban en los
directorios de los mirrors del 5.5 y ahora sí los veo.
Muchas gracias a todos!
El 04/10/2010 04:58 p.m., Alejandro Marin Maturano escribió:
yo pienso lo mismo esta disponible un solo dvd que
Hello!
You can look at xfs: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/
I think this benchmarks help you:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=ext4_benchmarksnum=2
I use this file system for MySQL with a big DB on Software RAID. This file
system shows good perfomance for small files.
2010/10/3
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 02:28:23PM +0100, James Pearson wrote:
easily set up. Some of the nice things about NIS on Linux are:
It is fairly simple to set up
Comes with built in server redundancy and failover
Has simple server load balancing built in
Very lightweight on the client
It's
At Sun, 3 Oct 2010 20:53:17 -0600 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote:
I saw something somewhere about AHCI support requiring kernel 2.6.19 or later.
But the current CentOS/RHEL stable kernels are 2.6.18
Drivers, etc. are back ported.
I'm trying to run CentOS/RHEL in a
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Aleksey Tsalolikhin
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 1:17 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] system stuck with 2.6.18-128 kernel. how
to move to2.6.18-194.17?
Hi. I
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 08:53:17PM -0600, drew einhorn wrote:
I saw something somewhere about AHCI support requiring kernel 2.6.19 or later.
But the current CentOS/RHEL stable kernels are 2.6.18
RHEL/CentOS 2.6.18 kernel is very far from kernel.org/upstream 2.6.18.
RHEL/CentOS 2.6.18 kernel
Iain Morris wrote:
And NIS servers belong in a museum! :-)
Although NIS has a number of issues against it - it still has some
pretty good things going for it. If you are on a private network and
security is not a high priority, then NIS is something that can be
easily set up. Some of the
From: Tom Bishop bisho...@gmail.com
So I have been playing with a RAID 10 f2 ( 2 disks far layout) setup...thanks
for all of the advice..Now I am playing with the format and want to make sure
I
have it setup the best that I can, my raid was built using the raid 10 option
with 2 disks with the
Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Aleksey Tsalolikhin
Hi. I just noticed I had a CentOS 5.3 system that I updated to CentOS
5.5 a few days ago, and I just ran yum -y update again to get the latest
kernel, and I just noticed it still has the old
I can't tell if someone's email has run the lines together. The
first entry has to be
title CentOS (2.6.18-194.17.1.el5)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.18-194.17.1.el5 ro root=/dev/md1
initrd /initrd-2.6.18-194.17.1.el5.img
with the next title on the next
From: Brunner, Brian T. bbrun...@gai-tronics.com
I can't tell if someone's email has run the lines together. The
first entry has to be
title CentOS (2.6.18-194.17.1.el5)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.18-194.17.1.el5 ro root=/dev/md1
initrd
Given that the Document Foundation has now split away from Oracle to
continue the development of an independent office suite, do we have
any idea which was CentOS and Red Hat are planning to go in this area
- OpenOffice or LibreOffice?
I know that LibreOffice is not production ready yet - they
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:20, Mark mhullr...@gmail.com wrote:
Given that the Document Foundation has now split away from Oracle to
continue the development of an independent office suite, do we have
any idea which was CentOS and Red Hat are planning to go in this area
- OpenOffice or
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Brunner, Brian T.
bbrun...@gai-tronics.com wrote:
BINGO! Only one time did the word 'title' appear in his grub.conf.
So I looked at the LAST not FIRST 'kernel' line after 'title' and noted
that the 'kernel' info there matched what actually booted.
I surmise
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:26 AM, John Kennedy skeb...@gmail.com wrote:
:
Once it hits beta, I will install it to see how it goes.
It's in beta right now, but I think the beta is the same as OO 3.3
beta - they haven't progressed past the next release, which is common
to both Oracle and the DF.
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 09:35:46AM -0700, Mark wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:26 AM, John Kennedy skeb...@gmail.com wrote:
:
Once it hits beta, I will install it to see how it goes.
Quote from Distrowatch:
The Document Foundation is a newly founded organisation with a mission
- to make
Mark wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Brunner, Brian T.
bbrun...@gai-tronics.com wrote:
BINGO! Only one time did the word 'title' appear in his grub.conf.
So I looked at the LAST not FIRST 'kernel' line after 'title' and noted
that the 'kernel' info there matched what actually
Hello List,
I found these wonderful instruction by Alan Bartlett (thanks Alan) for
building a kernel.org kernel
that would install on CentOS 5.5. Doing this and moving the resulting .rpm
to the target system and doing a rpm -ivh ... works great.
Now I am trying to use the same rpm as part of
BINGO! Only one time did the word 'title' appear in his grub.conf.
Well ... Only once did it appear on the left margin as the start-of-line.
Thanks, M$ Outlook, for deciding how to format the message.
So the rest of the surmising was based on a false reading. Sorry folks.
grub look
Hi All,
When a couple of EXT4 filesystems are mounted in a server I get the
message
Oct 1 18:49:42 sraid3 kernel: EXT4-fs (sdb): mounted filesystem without journal
Oct 1 18:49:42 sraid3 kernel: EXT4-fs (sdc): mounted filesystem without journal
in the system logs.
My confusion is why are
I'm using a call to the resource module's getrusage method. On openSUSE
this works, on CentOS [python26-2.6.5-3.el5] it 'works' but just returns
zeros for the memory utilization values.
resource.getrusage(resource.RUSAGE_SELF).ru_maxrss
openSUSE: returns 5512
CentOS: returns 0
Anyone know
Can you give us the output of tune4fs -l /dev/sdb ?
Does it show has_journal under Filesystem features?
If it doesn't, you can input the following:
tune4fs -o journal_data
The option journal_data fits the case in which you don't care about
the fastest speed but you put your focus on data
Given that the Document Foundation has now split away from Oracle to
continue the development of an independent office suite, do we have
any idea which was CentOS and Red Hat are planning to go in this area
- OpenOffice or LibreOffice?
I know that LibreOffice is not production ready yet -
On 4 October 2010 20:07, Steve Brooks ste...@mcs.st-and.ac.uk wrote:
both are 11T and so I would prefer as much stability as possible, io
performance is not an issue on either device just integrity so I thought
the journal would be default and necessary.
Any thoughts would be much
Hi,
Below is the output from tune4fs. From what people are saying it looks
like et4 may not be the way to go.
[r...@sraid3 ~]# tune4fs -l /dev/sdb
tune4fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
Filesystem volume name: none
Last mounted on: /sraid3/sraid3
Filesystem UUID:
Below is the output from tune4fs. From what people are saying it
looks like et4 may not be the way to go.
What people are saying? So instead of understanding and solving some
issue you just jump wagon, maybe only to find some other issue there?
ext4 is stable and works perfectly. You just
Filesystem state: not clean
You should really look at that line and at why it is there.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi Miguel,
Thanks for the reply.
What people are saying? So instead of understanding and solving some issue
I was just a little worried at the response from Brent earlier quote
Don't play Russian Roulette and use ext4. . The really odd thing here
is that on another raid disk created the
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, Miguel Medalha wrote:
Filesystem state: not clean
You should really look at that line and at why it is there.
Thanks again Miguel,
Yep I have mounted the filesystems as read only for the time being. I am
inclined to move the data and rebuild the filesystem
As a test, I just created an ext4 file system using the defaults, i.e.
'mkfs.ext4 -L test1 /dev/sdb1' and it has the following features, how did
your's get so lean:
Filesystem features: has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index filetype
needs_recovery extent flex_bg sparse_super
I was just a little worried at the response from Brent earlier quote
Don't play Russian Roulette and use ext4. .
Maybe he was referring to some old information dating back to the
development period.
ext4 has been declared stable by the kernel people. As a matter of fact
it is now the
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Miguel Medalha miguelmeda...@sapo.pt wrote:
I was just a little worried at the response from Brent earlier quote
Don't play Russian Roulette and use ext4. .
Maybe he was referring to some old information dating back to the
development period.
ext4 has been
On 10/04/2010 02:52 PM, Steve Brooks wrote:
The really odd thing here
is that on another raid disk created the exact same way with the exact
same parameters to mkfs and identically mounted I have an EXT4
filesystem with different attributes, see below. Surely that should not
happen. Also as
The defaults are determined by /etc/mke2fs.conf. If you've modified or
removed that file, mkfs.ext4 will behave differently
On my CentOS 5.5 systems, defaults for ext4 reside on /etc/mke4fs.conf.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Monday 04 October 2010 12:35, Mark wrote:
I'll probably put LO beta on my laptop and play with it a little
before I decide. There is a caveat that LO might install over OO in
this beta, but future releases won't.
The warning that LibreOffice overwrites OpenOffice only applies to
Windows.
41 matches
Mail list logo
