[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0749 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 poppler Update

2010-10-11 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0749 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0749.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 66ee1357503afe32ee034b91227b70a2

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0749 Important CentOS 5 i386 poppler Update

2010-10-11 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0749 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0749.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 72e449e8db5b17a87cdba060c072b823

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0646 CentOS 5 i386 ghostscript Update

2010-10-11 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0646 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0646.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 9c3052568673423d60d3a49eb020338d

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0646 CentOS 5 x86_64 ghostscript Update

2010-10-11 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0646 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0646.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: a3dd062c82646f0ef41667217ac66eff

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0742 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 postgresql84 Update

2010-10-11 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0742 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0742.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: cb420292f2b778da1364c78ef841cd50

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0753 Important CentOS 5 i386 kdegraphics Update

2010-10-11 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0753 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0753.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 1cf0c1d049128c5391141fbad6fe1bbb

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0720 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 mikmod Update

2010-10-11 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0720 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0720.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: fb576dead59bd03479e4da16b10a4fe4

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0708 CentOS 5 i386 openais Update

2010-10-11 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0708 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0708.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: a627871ba4ec41f8c41cf870706c64ca

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0708 CentOS 5 x86_64 openais Update

2010-10-11 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0708 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0708.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 2d2d94c9d29772dda82e85cc52eb3241

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0744 CentOS 5 x86_64 tomcat5 Update

2010-10-11 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0744 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0744.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 7a7ed5e8aae2f92cd1112622dca1e453

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0744 CentOS 5 i386 tomcat5 Update

2010-10-11 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0744 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0744.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 785f021ca998cdf3d662d761e36e

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0742 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 postgresql Update

2010-10-11 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0742 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0742.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: a2f087dd2963808a1b0001d6917ab5ee

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0742 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 postgresql Update

2010-10-11 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0742 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0742.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 0e1254a1eade7a996020c491a9952d35

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0716 CentOS 5 i386 conga Update

2010-10-11 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0716 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0716.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 093a78cb38f91231691bc8fdac6d8ed2

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0716 CentOS 5 x86_64 conga Update

2010-10-11 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0716 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0716.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 024f57483c6345cba1c26bcf5d4dfe4c

Re: [CentOS-es] Problema resolución de DNS?

2010-10-11 Thread Normando Hall
Gracias Eduardo Para comenzar, he ejecutado wget con -4 y funcionó de forma instantánea. Cuando lo ejecuto sin la opción -4, veo a través de iptraf muchas solicitudes UDP al DNS que tengo configurado hasta que finalmente resuelve y descarga. En cambio si lo ejecuto con -4 envía solo una

Re: [CentOS-es] Problema resolución de DNS?

2010-10-11 Thread Lic. Domingo Varela Yahuitl.
Ya verificaste en el /etc/resolv.conf que tengas ahi la ip de tu dns, deberas de tener al menos 3 nameservers, y has probado con dig y nslookup tu dns y resolucion inversa, tambien checa si tu dns esta en chroot Saludos Enviado desde mi Nokia E71 3G de Telcel -- mens. original -- Asunto: Re:

Re: [CentOS] installing 32 bit vlc on Centos 5.5??

2010-10-11 Thread Scott Robbins
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:58:51PM -0700, Dave Stevens wrote: Quoting Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com: Is movieplayer mplayer? I don't think so I think it's Totem Totem often seems to have problems, even in more up to date distributions such as Fedora and Ubuntu. If that's the case,

[CentOS] yum update error

2010-10-11 Thread Timothy Murphy
For some reason all the perl man pages cause yum errors like - Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/man/man1/c2ph.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.2.x86_64 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.1.i386

Re: [CentOS] yum update error

2010-10-11 Thread Timo Schoeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 thus Timothy Murphy spake: For some reason all the perl man pages cause yum errors like - Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/man/man1/c2ph.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.2.x86_64 conflicts

[CentOS] security updates

2010-10-11 Thread Ritika Garg
I can't understand exactly what these security updates do? Why is there a need to have a security update? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] security updates

2010-10-11 Thread Timo Schoeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 thus Ritika Garg spake: I can't understand exactly what these security updates do? Why is there a need to have a security update? YMMD. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

Re: [CentOS] security updates

2010-10-11 Thread Giles Coochey
On Mon, October 11, 2010 13:36, Ritika Garg wrote: I can't understand exactly what these security updates do? Why is there a need to have a security update? ___ What is your IP? :-D ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] security updates

2010-10-11 Thread sync
I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] security updates

2010-10-11 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Am 11.10.10 14:30, schrieb sync: I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe? Okay, I'll bite. From time to time there are bugs found in the software which CentOS ships. These bugs can lead your code to crash, your machine to be denied of service as the process which has the bug

Re: [CentOS] security updates

2010-10-11 Thread Ben McGinnes
On 11/10/10 11:30 PM, sync wrote: I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe? *Sigh* If you don't update it then it won't remain so. It's like buying a brand new deadlock for the door to your house and then leaving the door wide open when you go out. Chances are that sooner or

Re: [CentOS] security updates

2010-10-11 Thread Robert Heller
At Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:30:04 +0800 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe? If you apply ALL of the security updates as they become available. ALL O/Ss have security updates from time-to-time (what do you think those

Re: [CentOS] yum update error

2010-10-11 Thread John Doe
From: Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net For some reason all the perl man pages cause yum errors like - Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/man/man1/c2ph.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.2.x86_64 conflicts with file from package

Re: [CentOS] security updates

2010-10-11 Thread John Doe
From: Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net On Mon, October 11, 2010 13:36, Ritika Garg wrote: I can't understand exactly what these security updates do? Why is there a need to have a security update? What is your IP? :-D Keep this information secret, but I think his IP is 127.0.0.1 ... And

Re: [CentOS] security updates

2010-10-11 Thread Morten P.D. Stevens
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:30 PM, sync jian...@gmail.com wrote: I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe? CentOS (RHEL 5) is one of the most secure operating systems worldwide. Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] recommended way to install source rpms?

2010-10-11 Thread Patrick Lists
On 10/11/2010 07:10 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote: [snip] - install 'mock' (IMPORTANT: install the one from CentOS, exclude the one from EPEL in your repo file) Would you mind giving a hint why one should not use mock from EPEL? Afaict the mock version in the CentOS repo is 0.6.13 which was

Re: [CentOS] recommended way to install source rpms?

2010-10-11 Thread Mathieu Baudier
Would you mind giving a hint why one should not use mock from EPEL? Because the one in CentOS will, out of the box, pull out and properly configure the CentOS buildsys package, which itself is a meta-package whose dependencies are the minimal set required to create a chroot build environment:

[CentOS] recommended way to install source rpms?

2010-10-11 Thread R P Herrold
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Patrick Lists wrote: Would you mind giving a hint why one should not use mock from EPEL? Afaict the mock version in the CentOS repo is 0.6.13 which was released years ago and the one in EPEL is 1.0.7 which is current. ehh?? mock-1.1.5-1orc.src.rpm from upstream Raw Hide

Re: [CentOS] recommended way to install source rpms?

2010-10-11 Thread Phil Schaffner
Robert P. J. Day wrote on 10/10/2010 05:56 PM: ... http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/SourceInstalls seems just a touch on the hysterical side. i don't disagree that installing packages from the source rpm is probably a questionable idea. but that doesn't justify simply not

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 68, Issue 5

2010-10-11 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

Re: [CentOS] recommended way to install source rpms?

2010-10-11 Thread Lamar Owen
On Sunday, October 10, 2010 05:56:47 pm Robert P. J. Day wrote: frankly, the wiki page on downloading from source: http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/SourceInstalls seems just a touch on the hysterical side. For certain uses and certain software stacks from source is the only sane

Re: [CentOS] recommended way to install source rpms?

2010-10-11 Thread Patrick Lists
On 10/11/2010 05:12 PM, R P Herrold wrote: On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Patrick Lists wrote: Would you mind giving a hint why one should not use mock from EPEL? Afaict the mock version in the CentOS repo is 0.6.13 which was released years ago and the one in EPEL is 1.0.7 which is current. ehh??

Re: [CentOS] Went with OpenDNS for now

2010-10-11 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Ron Blizzard rb4cen...@gmail.com wrote: A few weeks ago I asked about firewalls and family filters. Lanny Marcus, I believe, suggested OpenDNS. Just wanted to thank him (and everyone here) for their suggestions. snip Ron: My pleasure. Usually, I am the one

[CentOS] recommended way to install source rpms?

2010-10-11 Thread R P Herrold
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Patrick Lists wrote: On 10/11/2010 05:12 PM, R P Herrold wrote: The mock inplementaion is a moving target --- I do not know the particulars of why the other party recommmended using THE ONE CENTOS BUILT ON for CentOS, but ... Sorry but I don't get it. Are you saying

[CentOS] Automated Reply from Dieter Thiel cent os-annou...@centos.org=

2010-10-11 Thread Dieter Thiel
Abwesenheitsnotiz: Vielen Dank für Ihre Nachricht. Ich bin ab dem 22.10. wieder im Büro erreichbar. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an Herrn Ostermann, Email osterm...@dimast.de. Vielen Dank! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

[CentOS] One server not showing SSH port, the other is.

2010-10-11 Thread Dotan Cohen
I have two CentOS servers running SSH on two different non-standard ports. So far as I can tell, they have identical /etc/ssh/sshd_config files with the exception of the different port (both are 22xx). However, when running nmap on them, one betrays the port that SSH is running on, and the other

Re: [CentOS] One server not showing SSH port, the other is.

2010-10-11 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 10/11/2010 04:21 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote: However, when running nmap on them, one betrays the port that SSH is running on, and the other does not. I have shut down iptables on both machines and the behaviour remains this way. What could be the cause? You're probably not running a full port

Re: [CentOS] One server not showing SSH port, the other is.

2010-10-11 Thread Joseph L. Casale
However, when running nmap on them, one betrays the port that SSH is running on, and the other does not. What does betray mean? I have shut down iptables on both machines and the behaviour remains this way. What could be the cause? Public facing machines w/ iptables off? Specifically, how

[CentOS] Why WOL? ( WAS: Re: Getting Wake on lan to work )

2010-10-11 Thread Drew
On a semi-related subtopic, Why do I want WoL? What concrete examples are there where it's useful? I understand what it is and how it works but the why has eluded me. -- Drew Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood. --Marie Curie

Re: [CentOS] One server not showing SSH port, the other is.

2010-10-11 Thread Ryan Manikowski
On 10/11/2010 7:44 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: Specifically, how can I hide the port that SSH is running on? I'm sorry that I cannot provide the IP addresses, the owner of the servers doesn't want that! I also know how silly it is to do stealth ports but I'm not the one making the decision!

Re: [CentOS] Why WOL? ( WAS: Re: Getting Wake on lan to work )

2010-10-11 Thread Chad Woolley
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Drew drew@gmail.com wrote: On a semi-related subtopic, Why do I want WoL? What concrete examples are there where it's useful? I understand what it is and how it works but the why has eluded me. You want to VNC or SSH into a remote workstation that happens

Re: [CentOS] Why WOL? ( WAS: Re: Getting Wake on lan to work )

2010-10-11 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I understand what it is and how it works but the why has eluded me. You need to do maintenance on hardware and you don't want it running wasting power or it happen to be off such as the case with many client boxes? You need to start a node and you don't want it running wasting power while you

[CentOS] LDAP Mail Notice

2010-10-11 Thread sync
Hi, all : I have a thought of writing the script to implement the LDAP mail noticerecently. That's to say , after creating the new account and his passwd , then how to send an E-mail to notice him? By the way , I used the LDAP tool called 389 LDAP or openldap recently . Could

[CentOS] Scanner missing again

2010-10-11 Thread Mark
A while back I posted about my new HP J3600 scan/fax/copy/print-er and how it was visible to the root but not me as an ordinary user. I had no trouble configuring it as a printer, but the scanner was invisible to xsane until I added my user id to the lp group. Now it's gone again, except that it

Re: [CentOS] LDAP Mail Notice

2010-10-11 Thread Sean Hart
I have a thought of writing the script to implement the LDAP mail noticerecently. That's to say , after creating the new account and his passwd , then how to send an E-mail to notice him? By the way , I used the LDAP tool called 389 LDAP or openldap recently . Could

Re: [CentOS] One server not showing SSH port, the other is.

2010-10-11 Thread Eero Volotinen
2010/10/12 Ryan Manikowski jee...@gmail.com:  On 10/11/2010 7:44 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: Specifically, how can I hide the port that SSH is running on? I'm sorry that I cannot provide the IP addresses, the owner of the servers doesn't want that! I also know how silly it is to do stealth

Re: [CentOS] LDAP Mail Notice

2010-10-11 Thread John R Pierce
On 10/11/10 10:34 PM, sync wrote: What you said is right . I'm trying to write a script to create the new account and his password and then can email them . By the way , My Mail server is not the Linux Server(CentOS) , it is the Windows 2003 Server . So how can I do that ? hire a

Re: [CentOS] LDAP Mail Notice

2010-10-11 Thread sync
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:56 PM, sync jian...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:36 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.comwrote: On 10/11/10 10:34 PM, sync wrote: What you said is right . I'm trying to write a script to create the new account and his password and then can email