Re: [CentOS-virt] Can I mix kvm and virtual box?

2010-11-14 Thread MargoAndTodd
On 11/13/2010 10:52 PM, Mathieu Baudier wrote: Concretely, before running VirtualBox, run: sudo /sbin/modprobe -r kvm_intel (or maybe kvm_amd if you're not running on Intel processors...) If you want to disable kvm for between reboots, you can blacklist the module. Thank you!

Re: [CentOS-virt] Can I mix kvm and virtual box?

2010-11-14 Thread MargoAndTodd
On 11/13/2010 06:36 PM, Todd Deshane wrote: On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 8:32 PM, MargoAndToddmargoandt...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/13/2010 04:29 PM, MargoAndTodd wrote: Hi All, On my customer's CentOS 5.5 x64 server, I have Virtual Box installed. To make a side by side comparison, I would like

Re: [CentOS-virt] KVM: where are the directions?

2010-11-14 Thread Kenni Lund
2010/11/14 MargoAndTodd margoandt...@gmail.com: On 11/13/2010 07:44 AM, compdoc wrote: $ uname -r -m 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 i686 $ rpm -qa \*kvm\* kvm-36-1 kmod-kvm-36-3 Not even close to 83.  :-( My centos 5.5 has kvm 83. I'm not sure how you got that old stuff I am 32 bit. yum

Re: [CentOS-virt] KVM: where are the directions?

2010-11-14 Thread MargoAndTodd
On 11/14/2010 03:11 PM, Kenni Lund wrote: ...and the current 64-bit updates: http://mirror.stanford.edu/yum/pub/centos/5.5/updates/x86_64/RPMS/ which contains several kvm-packages, with the latest being kvm-83-164.el5_5.23.x86_64.rpm. Guess I will just have to upgrade my office computer to 64

Re: [CentOS-virt] KVM: where are the directions?

2010-11-14 Thread compdoc
Unless you have old cards you have to retain, PCI-x isn't useful anymore. Too slow. ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

Re: [CentOS-virt] KVM: where are the directions?

2010-11-14 Thread MargoAndTodd
On 11/14/2010 05:25 PM, compdoc wrote: Unless you have old cards you have to retain, PCI-x isn't useful anymore. Too slow. Supermicro X8SAX: 2 (x16) PCI-Express 2.0, 1 (x4) PCI-Express (using X8 slot), 2x 64-bit 133/100MHz PCI-X, 1x 32-bit PCI Slots I put the video and the RAID

Re: [CentOS] Confused about Java browser plugin for Firefox

2010-11-14 Thread Przemysław Pawełczyk
Hi, I missed the most posts of the thread so let me say those few words. First of all I use Java or OpenOffice.org from producers' websites. They are always fresh and installable in RHEL. I assume too, that the i386 and amd64 versions work the same way, only the lib names can be different.

Re: [CentOS] Confused about Java browser plugin for Firefox

2010-11-14 Thread Przemysław Pawełczyk
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 09:18:24 +0100 Przemysław Pawełczyk pp...@o2.pl wrote: Hi, I missed the most posts of the thread so let me say those few words. First of all I use Java or OpenOffice.org from producers' websites. They are always fresh and installable in RHEL. I assume too, that the

Re: [CentOS] Confused about Java browser plugin for Firefox

2010-11-14 Thread topeak
I use fedora i386. After i link the jre plugin file to user's ~/.mozilla/plugins directory, they both work very well. 2010/11/14 Przemysław Pawełczyk pp...@o2.pl On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 09:18:24 +0100 Przemysław Pawełczyk pp...@o2.pl wrote: Hi, I missed the most posts of the thread so let

Re: [CentOS] Confused about Java browser plugin for Firefox

2010-11-14 Thread Przemysław Pawełczyk
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:03:16 +0800 topeak topea...@gmail.com wrote: I use fedora i386. After i link the jre plugin file to user's ~/.mozilla/plugins directory, they both work very well. Hi, Of course, I only wanted to point to another directories where one would be able to place JRE and other

Re: [CentOS] Confused about Java browser plugin for Firefox

2010-11-14 Thread Lars Hecking
topeak writes: yesterday, i resolved the issue. type about:plugins in url box, then there is a link to firefox plugin document. These links haven't been updated in long time, it seems. Come on, flash player version 9? How to pick the correct java plugin on firefox:

Re: [CentOS] Addressing outgoing connections to a specific interface

2010-11-14 Thread Dotan Cohen
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 00:08, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote: Well, this runs afoul of one of the annoyances with IP.  That is, IP addresses don't belong to the host; they belong to the interface.  Even on a cisco router, to assign the router itself an interface requires a loopback

Re: [CentOS] Addressing outgoing connections to a specific interface

2010-11-14 Thread Lamar Owen
On Sunday, November 14, 2010 08:28:40 am Dotan Cohen wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 00:08, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote: I'll have to admit to some curiosity in how to do this myself; I might lab it up one day and see, when I have more time to spend on it. Thank you Lamar, I have spent

Re: [CentOS] Best practices for the maximal length of user names

2010-11-14 Thread Benjamin Franz
On 11/13/2010 05:25 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote: But people are sometimes frustrated with having their last name truncated and I wonder if limiting the user name to 8 characters is not a kind of superstition coming from some old times... CentOS5 supports 31 characters for user names (I tested

Re: [CentOS] Best practices for the maximal length of user names

2010-11-14 Thread Stephen Harris
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 07:54:10AM -0800, Benjamin Franz wrote: CentOS5 supports 31 characters for user names (I tested it). 8 character limits for user names was a holdover from some truly ancient Unix systems and has been pretty much irrelevant to Linux for more than ten years. There are

[CentOS] Auto-Re: CentOS Digest, Vol 70, Issue 14

2010-11-14 Thread 韦加宁
信已收到,谢谢! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] RAID Resynch...??

2010-11-14 Thread Tom Bishop
So still coming up to speed with mdadm and I notice this morning one of my servers acting sluggish...so when I looked at the mdadm raid device I see this: mdadm --detail /dev/md0 /dev/md0: Version : 0.90 Creation Time : Mon Sep 27 22:47:44 2010 Raid Level : raid10 Array Size

Re: [CentOS] RAID Resynch...??

2010-11-14 Thread Tom Bishop
NEVERMINDsomehow my fstab mount is not right. On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Tom Bishop bisho...@gmail.com wrote: So still coming up to speed with mdadm and I notice this morning one of my servers acting sluggish...so when I looked at the mdadm raid device I see this: mdadm

Re: [CentOS] RAID Resynch...??

2010-11-14 Thread Ryan Wagoner
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Tom Bishop bisho...@gmail.com wrote: NEVERMINDsomehow my fstab mount is not right. On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Tom Bishop bisho...@gmail.com wrote: So still coming up to speed with mdadm and I notice this morning one of my servers acting

Re: [CentOS] RAID Resynch...??

2010-11-14 Thread Ryan Wagoner
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Tom Bishop bisho...@gmail.com wrote: NEVERMINDsomehow my fstab mount is not right. On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Tom Bishop bisho...@gmail.com wrote: So still coming up to speed with mdadm and I notice this morning one of my servers acting

[CentOS] updating to gtk+ = 2.0

2010-11-14 Thread aurfalien
Hi all, Any know the best way to up gtk+ on Centos 5.5 to something being at least 2.0 or greater? - aurf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] updating to gtk+ = 2.0

2010-11-14 Thread Ned Slider
On 14/11/10 22:33, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Any know the best way to up gtk+ on Centos 5.5 to something being at least 2.0 or greater? yum install gtk2 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] External HD on CentOS 5.5

2010-11-14 Thread Dick Roth
Rob Kampen wrote: Dick Roth wrote: I'm looking into backing up my CentOS 5.5 system using an external USB 2.0 hard drive. Anyone with experience with Toshiba Canvio USB 750 GB unit? I'm backing up to DVDs now and would like to streamline the process. Any advice is welcome with thanks.

Re: [CentOS] updating to gtk+ = 2.0

2010-11-14 Thread aurfalien
On Nov 14, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Ned Slider wrote: On 14/11/10 22:33, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Any know the best way to up gtk+ on Centos 5.5 to something being at least 2.0 or greater? yum install gtk2 Not so fast. gtk+-1.2.10-56.el5 is whats installed. I've an app that

Re: [CentOS] updating to gtk+ = 2.0

2010-11-14 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 11/14/2010 11:52 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: yum install gtk2 Not so fast. gtk+-1.2.10-56.el5 is whats installed. I've an app that requires 2 or greater to compile and therefore fails. try that command Ned recommended, really. If you want to look before doing : yum list gtk\*; - KB

Re: [CentOS] updating to gtk+ = 2.0

2010-11-14 Thread aurfalien
On Nov 14, 2010, at 4:05 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: On 11/14/2010 11:52 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: yum install gtk2 Not so fast. gtk+-1.2.10-56.el5 is whats installed. I've an app that requires 2 or greater to compile and therefore fails. try that command Ned recommended, really.

Re: [CentOS] Confused about Java browser plugin for Firefox

2010-11-14 Thread Michael Klinosky
topeak wrote: yesterday, i resolved the issue. type about:plugins in url box, then there is a link to firefox plugin document. at first, i used firefix-3.6. the java plugin always did not work. later, i changed the jdk version. it still not work. last, i changed to used firefox-3.5,

Re: [CentOS] updating to gtk+ = 2.0

2010-11-14 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 11/14/2010 03:52 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 14, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Ned Slider wrote: yum install gtk2 Not so fast. gtk+-1.2.10-56.el5 is whats installed. I've an app that requires 2 or greater to compile and therefore fails. In that case: yum install gtk2 gtk2-devel

Re: [CentOS] updating to gtk+ = 2.0

2010-11-14 Thread aurfalien
On Nov 14, 2010, at 5:10 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 11/14/2010 03:52 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 14, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Ned Slider wrote: yum install gtk2 Not so fast. gtk+-1.2.10-56.el5 is whats installed. I've an app that requires 2 or greater to compile and therefore

Re: [CentOS] hwclock problem

2010-11-14 Thread Jobst Schmalenbach
Ok I try that, but the thing is: * motherboards not that old * its exactly 11 hours (+/- a couple of seconds) each time Jobst On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:31:55AM -0500, Brunner, Brian T. (bbrun...@gai-tronics.com) wrote: and off course dovecot falls over too Time just moved

Re: [CentOS] hwclock problem

2010-11-14 Thread Jorge Fábregas
On Thursday 11 November 2010 20:41:45 Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: Now I had to reboot a couple of them two days ago and to my surprise all had problems with the time upon booting. Hi, Are you 100% sure that your timezone file (/etc/localtime) corresponds to the one Australia/Melbourne? Try

Re: [CentOS] hwclock problem

2010-11-14 Thread Jorge Fábregas
On Thursday 11 November 2010 20:41:45 Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: Nov 10 08:08:52 XX ntpdate[2464]: step time server 192.168.1.1 offset -39599.950905 sec Also, try to disable ntpdate with chkconfig ntpdate off and reboot the machine and see if that solves the problem. If it does, then you

Re: [CentOS] hwclock problem

2010-11-14 Thread John R Pierce
On 11/14/10 5:38 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: Ok I try that, but the thing is: * motherboards not that old * its exactly 11 hours (+/- a couple of seconds) each time sounds like a conflict between time zones.a PC hardware clock could be set to UTC or local time. I always set my PC

[CentOS] Does yum update tzdata update /etc/localtime?

2010-11-14 Thread Jobst Schmalenbach
Hi list. Does yum update tzdata update /etc/localtime or does this need to be done manually? [this is part of the hwclock problem, a guy from sage-au has given me a hint] Jobst -- Keyboard not found - please clean up desktop! | |0| | Jobst Schmalenbach, jo...@barrett.com.au, General

Re: [CentOS] kernel bug ?

2010-11-14 Thread Tsuyoshi Nagata
Hi, (2010/11/13 6:25), My LinuxHAList wrote: I saw in the logs: kernel: INFO: task sadc:23936 blocked for more than 120 seconds. kernel: echo 0 /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs disables this message. This message is useless to solve problem without Linux developer. Every high load and

Re: [CentOS] updating to gtk+ = 2.0

2010-11-14 Thread Niki Kovacs
aurfal...@gmail.com a écrit : Funny thing is those are already installed. However I require a later version of gtk+. [kikino...@babasse:~] $ rpm -qa | grep ^gtk ... gtk2-2.10.4-20.el5 gtk2-engines-2.8.0-3.el5 gtk+-1.2.10-56.el5 ... GTK (Gimp Tool Kit) is a graphic library originally