Re: [CentOS] httpd log weirdness

2010-12-20 Thread Kai Schaetzl
The logs do not contain hostnames like this. This was a request for http://your.example.com/http://www.cablecarmuseum.org/Car42.jpg or something similar. In addition to Eero's explanation it could be a wrong link in one of your pages. Scan your logs manually. Kai -- Get your web at Conactive

Re: [CentOS] httpd log weirdness

2010-12-20 Thread Jason T. Slack-Moehrle
Kai, There is nothing deployed on this server as of yet. It simply serves the default apache page when you hit it at this point. So it does seem weird to me to have that show up. I will examine the log manually and see what that yields. -Jason On Dec 20, 2010, at 2:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:

[CentOS] CentOS 6

2010-12-20 Thread m . roth
*sigh* I'm sitting here with my manager and the other admin, as they argue as to when CentOS 6 will be out. Anyone have a clue as to when? Are we getting close? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6

2010-12-20 Thread William Warren
On 12/20/2010 3:35 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: *sigh* I'm sitting here with my manager and the other admin, as they argue as to when CentOS 6 will be out. Anyone have a clue as to when? Are we getting close? mark ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6

2010-12-20 Thread Jason T. Slack-Moehrle
I'm sitting here with my manager and the other admin, as they argue as to when CentOS 6 will be out. Anyone have a clue as to when? Are we getting close? this happens every release. there's no set date. it'll be done when it is completed. Is there a roadmap or expected feature set that

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6

2010-12-20 Thread John R Pierce
On 12/20/10 12:50 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote: Is there a roadmap or expected feature set that we can look at? http://www.redhat.com/rhel/server/details/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6

2010-12-20 Thread John R. Dennison
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:50:50PM -0800, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote: I'm sitting here with my manager and the other admin, as they argue as to when CentOS 6 will be out. Anyone have a clue as to when? Are we getting close? this happens every release. there's no set date. it'll be

Re: [CentOS] Routing issue between 2 LANs

2010-12-20 Thread José María Terry Jiménez
Andrej Moravcik escribió: Hello Jose, from the picture you provided the situation looks pretty simple. - you have enabled IP forwarding on router, I recommend you to put it into /etc/sysctl.conf for persistence. - you have configured firewall rules on router to allow forwarding traffic

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6

2010-12-20 Thread Les Mikesell
On 12/20/10 2:55 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:50:50PM -0800, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote: I'm sitting here with my manager and the other admin, as they argue as to when CentOS 6 will be out. Anyone have a clue as to when? Are we getting close? this happens every

Re: [CentOS] Routing issue between 2 LANs

2010-12-20 Thread José María Terry Jiménez
Les Mikesell escribió: On 12/19/10 1:45 PM, Jose Maria Terry Jimenez wrote: I wanted the reverse path. Traceroute from the 192.168.236.80 box back to the fedora address. It doesn't make sense that it can return packets without a route going through the Centos box. Hello This

[CentOS] SATA NCQ and Linux Software RAID

2010-12-20 Thread Matt
Does SATA Native Command Queueing and Linux software RAID1 play well together or is it better to turn off NCQ when doing software RAID? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] SATA NCQ and Linux Software RAID

2010-12-20 Thread William Warren
On 12/20/2010 5:40 PM, Matt wrote: Does SATA Native Command Queueing and Linux software RAID1 play well together or is it better to turn off NCQ when doing software RAID? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] two cents or not two cents

2010-12-20 Thread Sean
And there are IDEs like eclipse that do a lot of the grunge work boilerplate for you, and maven to manage components as you scale up. eclipse froze my first FC4 tryout ... is for me what BerkeleyDB is for you. I do agree personally - I can't think in java and do much better when you can

Re: [CentOS] two cents or not two cents

2010-12-20 Thread Scott Robbins
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:56:26AM +1300, Sean wrote: CentOS is beginning to look more more like my cup of tea, and since I gather that a new major is immanent maybe it will support the new Google Chrome (along with Seamonkey, Opera-11+)? Just for the record, someone just made a very

Re: [CentOS] two cents or not two cents

2010-12-20 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:56:26AM +1300, Sean wrote: CentOS is beginning to look more more like my cup of tea, and since I gather that a new major is immanent maybe it will support the new Google Chrome (along with

Re: [CentOS] two cents or not two cents

2010-12-20 Thread Les Mikesell
On 12/20/10 4:56 PM, Sean wrote: By 'size' I was actually referring to 'source size' : (1) you say it above ..[all micro] logic..[on] one page ...(2) the same idea but in a project-macro-logic sense viz a viz sheer quantity of code lines to manage overall. Agreed, but long term the main

Re: [CentOS] two cents or not two cents

2010-12-20 Thread Scott Robbins
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 03:12:46PM -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: What do you mean you cannot find it :-P https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=23746forum=38post_id=121629#forumpost121629 I didn't look at that time, I was multi-tasking. :) However, thank you as always.