Per Alan's suggestion:
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/EmulateFixedAddressByDHCP
Comments please.
Phil
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Nice Tips!
A comment about dhcp server info.
To get the dhcp lease info from a dhclient, that info is stored in
dhclient.leases.
The router/dhcp server info described in section Home router with
DHCP and DNS could be made more generic by changing the heading and
the context.
Heading example
debug I get using virt-install instead virt-manager
[root@kvmsrv001 ~]# virt-install -d --prompt
Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:59:59 DEBUGRequesting libvirt URI default
Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:59:59 DEBUGReceived libvirt URI 'qemu:///system'
Would you like to use KVM acceleration? (yes or no) yes
Wed,
I once tried moving my qcow2 VM guest files to a zfs-fuse volume, and the
VMs refused to boot after. They only ran while on ext3 or ext4.
Although I wasn't trying at that time, I understand that in order migrate
VMs between servers, you need a shared file system.
Maybe NFS is the answer?
On 01/19/2011 05:48 PM, compdoc wrote:
I once tried moving my qcow2 VM guest files to a zfs-fuse volume, and the
VMs refused to boot after. They only ran while on ext3 or ext4.
I saw something similar when I put some images on an NTFS volume. This
worked under Fedora 11 but when I switched to
Well, we'll need a little more details in order to help you.
Are you trying to install a Windows-shared printer on a Linux box, or a
Linux-shared printer on a Windows box ? If the printer is shared using
Linux, are you using CUPS ?
2011/1/19 Im Corp - Xcelris im.c...@xcelrislabs.com
As i am
thus John R Pierce spake:
On 01/18/11 10:51 PM, Geoff Galitz wrote:
Wrong on the demise of the Sparc. Oracle just posted a massively
record breaking TPC-C benchmark using their new Sparc T3 servers,
something like 30 MILLION TPM.
Oracle has very publically committed to keeping SPARC
From: Agnello George agnello.dso...@gmail.com
i have currently started to deploy code into our production environment from
the the dev environment, we deploy code on to the production from the svn , (
i
do a svn export ) , some times not code is checked into the svn and it does
not throw
Not aimed at John in particular ...
Please, folks, you really don't need to add extra noise. That thread is
already unnecessarily noisy. Thanks.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
You should better ask this on an SVN list. Thanks.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 19 January 2011 06:09, Agnello George agnello.dso...@gmail.com wrote:
is there a way i can verify or write a script to check each file that is in
the SVN is same as that in the dev environment .
find . -type f | grep -v .svn | xargs md5sum
then diff the output from each server.
--
Hakan
On 19 January 2011 06:09, Agnello George agnello.dso...@gmail.com wrote:
is there a way i can verify or write a script to check each file that is in
the SVN is same as that in the dev environment .
find . -type f | grep -v .svn | xargs md5sum
Obviously the above will compare the export vs.
Parshwa,
On 16 January 2011 20:45, Parshwa Murdia b330...@gmail.com wrote:
Another option, if you are concerned about the short life cycle of
Fedora, would be to look at Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. The 'LTS' means Long Term
Support and will be supported for a fairly long time. 10.04 was
released last
Ok. It's a Firefox Add-on:
https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
Questions:
1) But: Why can't i find it on the offical Firefox Add-ons site?:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
2) Did anyone audited the HTTPS Everywhere code?
3) Can someone trust this Add-on? Is it safe to install/use?
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:29 PM, S Mathias smathias1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Ok. It's a Firefox Add-on:
https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
Questions:
1) But: Why can't i find it on the offical Firefox Add-ons site?:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
2) Did anyone audited the HTTPS
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Hakan Koseoglu ha...@koseoglu.org wrote:
Ubuntu LTS has a 3 year life cycle overall for desktops, 5 year for servers.
Ubuntu and Fedora have a new release approx every 6 months but their
end of life is 18 months. (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS and
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 03:29 -0800, S Mathias wrote:
Ok. It's a Firefox Add-on:
https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
Questions:
1) But: Why can't i find it on the offical Firefox Add-ons site?:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
No clue.
2) Did anyone audited the HTTPS Everywhere
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:29:12AM -0800, S Mathias wrote:
1) But: Why can't i find it on the offical Firefox Add-ons site?:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere/faq/ answers this.
2) Did anyone audited the HTTPS Everywhere code?
On 01/19/2011 03:29 AM, S Mathias wrote:
Ok. It's a Firefox Add-on:
https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
Questions:
1) But: Why can't i find it on the offical Firefox Add-ons site?:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere/faq/
2) Did anyone
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 01:33:56PM +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Maybe cause it's not part of CentOS, or even Linux? Just a guess?
What has that to do with the OP's questions? No firefox add-on
fits that criteria but yet I suspect everyone is using one or
more.
From: S Mathias smathias1...@yahoo.com
Ok. It's a Firefox Add-on:
https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
Questions:
1) But: Why can't i find it on the offical Firefox Add-ons site?:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
maybe because they did not choose to put it there...?
maybe they
Btw, this is the complete error.
Jan 16 07:03:23 server kernel: irq 177: nobody cared (try booting with the
irqpoll option)
Jan 16 07:03:23 server kernel: [c044d886] __report_bad_irq+0x2b/0x69
Jan 16 07:03:23 server kernel: [c044da73] note_interrupt+0x1af/0x1e8
Jan 16 07:03:23 server kernel:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Parshwa Murdia b330...@gmail.com wrote:
I personally would recommend Ubuntu LTS for family members. CentOS is
geared for technical people.
Oh I see. But at least work could be done in Fedora too like without
going into the technical details at least multimedia
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Agnello George
agnello.dso...@gmail.com wrote:
i have currently started to deploy code into our production environment
from the the dev environment, we deploy code on to the production from the
svn , ( i do a svn export ) , some times not code is checked
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Parshwa Murdia b330...@gmail.com wrote:
I personally would recommend Ubuntu LTS for family members. CentOS is
geared for technical people.
snip
Ubuntu's focus is usability - that is, making the distribution easy to
install and use. Fedora
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Agnello George
agnello.dso...@gmail.com wrote:
i have currently started to deploy code into our production environment
from the the dev environment, we deploy code on to the production from
the svn , ( i do a svn export ) , some times
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
CentOS would likely only be used as a desktop OS by people who also run
servers and like everything to be the same. They all assemble approximately
the same set of upstream packages, though, so it is possible to make them
all do the same things with
I find that in places where I don¹t have latest and greatest hardware,
CEntOS makes a much better Desktop OS than Ubuntu. If all I am doing is
running a web browser for the most part, I use CEntOS.
-- cwebber
On 1/19/11 7:13 AM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Christopher R Webber
christopher.web...@ucr.edu wrote:
I find that in places where I don¹t have latest and greatest hardware,
CEntOS makes a much better Desktop OS than Ubuntu. If all I am doing is
running a web browser for the most part, I use CEntOS.
Means
At Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:13:41 + (GMT) CentOS mailing list
centos@centos.org wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
CentOS would likely only be used as a desktop OS by people who also run
servers and like everything to be the same. They all assemble approximately
the same
Dear Parshwa,
I tend to agree with you in some of your points. I migrated my systems
from ubuntu to centos and I could not be more happy. off course I have
been force to learn the new places where things are the redhat way but
not problem since the usual tools continue to exist in both platforms.
On 1/19/2011 9:13 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
CentOS would likely only be used as a desktop OS by people who also run
servers and like everything to be the same. They all assemble approximately
the same set of upstream packages, though, so it is possible
As Rober puts it, sometimes is better to keep Things...stable and reliable
rather than in the bleeding edge... makes perfect sense.
Robert Heller 01/19/11 10:43 AM
At Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:13:41 + (GMT) CentOS mailing list wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
CentOS
Hi jason,
Thank you for pointing this out. I am running 5.5 in 5 new boxes suddenly the
boxes would start randomly rebooting. Checking the logs point out to smartd in
all the boxes. I should all of them out except one. In that one I disable and
shutdown smartd and the machine has been running
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
That's not true for desktop applications and environments. If you don't
have something current you are missing the improvements that many
thousands of man-hours of work have made.
But I guess that's the bit I don't /always/ buy into. In the
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:27 PM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk wrote:
And for every bit of juiciness you think you're getting with an upgrade,
you're getting the disruption of a reinstall or an upgrade, and seemingly for
everything that's improved there's a bug or a quirk to match. I
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 1/19/2011 9:13 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
CentOS would likely only be used as a desktop OS by people who also run
servers and like everything to be the same. They all assemble
approximately the same set of upstream packages,
Jan 16 07:03:23 server kernel: irq 177: nobody cared (try booting with the
irqpoll option)
Jan 16 07:03:23 server kernel: [c044d886] __report_bad_irq+0x2b/0x69
Jan 16 07:03:23 server kernel: [c044da73] note_interrupt+0x1af/0x1e8
Jan 16 07:03:23 server kernel: [c044d081]
Jan 16 07:03:23 server kernel: irq 177: nobody cared (try
booting with the irqpoll option)
I spoke too soon, the problem wasn't fixed but I found the cause
of the issue.
The above error occurs when you unplug the video cable from the
onboard video.
As our machines
Jan 16 07:03:23 server kernel: irq 177: nobody cared (try
booting with the irqpoll option)
I spoke too soon, the problem wasn't fixed but I found the cause
of the issue.
The above error occurs when you unplug the video cable from the
onboard video.
As our machines
On 1/19/2011 10:43 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
The difference is that open source server software has been 'feature
complete' for ages and the standards processes that change client/server
interactions are very, very slow - so outdated versions of server
software is not a problem as long as
2011/1/19 Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com
On 1/19/2011 10:43 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
The difference is that open source server software has been 'feature
complete' for ages and the standards processes that change client/server
interactions are very, very slow - so outdated
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 1/19/2011 10:43 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
The difference is that open source server software has been 'feature
complete' for ages and the standards processes that change
client/server interactions are very, very slow - so outdated versions
of server
software is not a
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 12:35:18 pm Drew Weaver wrote:
The kernel boots fine, and everything works ok until you unplug the monitor
from the DVI port on the motherboard.
When you unplug the monitor, that IRQ/ACPI message is displayed, and it
screws up the USB and the e1000 card in
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 12:55:19 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
And remember that firefox/openoffice are rare exceptions in RHEL/Centos
in that they have had major-version updates since the distro release,
even though they still are far behind 'current' now.
How is Firefox 3.6.13 not current
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 12:35:18 pm Drew Weaver wrote:
The kernel boots fine, and everything works ok until you unplug the monitor
from the DVI port on the motherboard.
When you unplug the monitor, that IRQ/ACPI message is displayed, and it
screws up the USB and the e1000 card in
Let's talk about CentOS on this list, shall we?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
I have downloaded the following version:
CentOS-5.5-i386-LiveCD-Release2.iso
from the mirror:
http://ftp.iitm.ac.in/centos/5.5/isos/i386/
What I want to ask is that 'Release2' is the complete OS and after
installation we can use 'yum update'. So at first, is it enough (as I
am not going
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Lisandro Grullon
lgrul...@citytech.cuny.edu wrote:
Dear Parshwa,
I tend to agree with you in some of your points. I migrated my systems from
ubuntu to centos and I could not be more happy. off course I have been force
to learn the new places where things are
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:33:59AM -0800, Mark wrote:
Let's talk about CentOS on this list, shall we?
Presumably the OP is running firefox on CentOS. So... how it this
not about CentOS?
John
--
A man or woman is
Nataraj wrote:
There's always ncftp which has the ability to resume an interrupted file
transfer, though I regularly transfer DVD images with both http and ftp
without any errors.
wget
Mike
--
p=p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);};main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World
On 1/19/2011 12:03 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
You are biased by having learned to live with the restrictions of old
So, what I like how something works is all old cruft, and I should get
with the program, and not have opinions on what I want and how I want it
to work?
That's not the point.
Parshwa Murdia writes:
Hi,
I have downloaded the following version:
CentOS-5.5-i386-LiveCD-Release2.iso
from the mirror:
http://ftp.iitm.ac.in/centos/5.5/isos/i386/
What I want to ask is that 'Release2' is the complete OS and after
installation we can use 'yum update'. So at
Maybe ask what sort of cellphones your family use. If they use and are
happy with old bw text ones (like me), then by all means pursue the
Linux quest. But if they are up-to-the-minute snappy ones, or if they
hang out for the latest, you are probably buying into headaches.
Remember, Linux is
I have seen over the past few months subjects on RHEL 6 and RHEL 5.6
Are these two different builds for Centos to chase or one in the same?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
I have seen over the past few months subjects on RHEL 6 and RHEL 5.6
Are these two different builds for Centos to chase or one in the same?
Yes, they are very different. RHEL6 has a lot of new functionality.
RHEL
By default, CentOS v5 requires a user's password when the system wakes
up from the screensaver. This can be disabled by each user, but how
can I disable this system-wide? Many of my users forget to do this,
which results in workstations being locked up.
Bob
--On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 2:41 PM -0500 Kwan Lowe
kwan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, they are very different. RHEL6 has a lot of new functionality.
RHEL 5.6 is the current version of RHEL5.
Which has a little bit of new functionality, notably bind and php stuff.
I need the newer Ruby, so
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 at 11:44am, Bob Eastbrook wrote
By default, CentOS v5 requires a user's password when the system wakes
up from the screensaver. This can be disabled by each user, but how
can I disable this system-wide? Many of my users forget to do this,
which results in workstations
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Joshua Baker-LePain jl...@duke.edu wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 at 11:44am, Bob Eastbrook wrote
By default, CentOS v5 requires a user's password when the system wakes
up from the screensaver. This can be disabled by each user, but how
can I disable this
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 1/19/2011 12:03 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
You are biased by having learned to live with the restrictions of old
So, what I like how something works is all old cruft, and I should get
with the program, and not have opinions on what I want and how I want it
to work?
Why don't you download the DVD, it give you much more than disc 1.
Parshwa Murdia 01/19/11 1:41 PM
Hi,
I have downloaded the following version:
CentOS-5.5-i386-LiveCD-Release2.iso
from the mirror:
http://ftp.iitm.ac.in/centos/5.5/isos/i386/
What I want to ask is that 'Release2' is the
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 at 9:49pm, Rudi Ahlers wrote
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Joshua Baker-LePain jl...@duke.edu wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 at 11:44am, Bob Eastbrook wrote
By default, CentOS v5 requires a user's password when the system wakes
up from the screensaver. This can be
On 1/19/11 11:49 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Joshua Baker-LePain jl...@duke.edu wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 at 11:44am, Bob Eastbrook wrote
By default, CentOS v5 requires a user's password when the system wakes
up from the screensaver. This can be disabled by
On 01/19/2011 02:31 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have seen over the past few months subjects on RHEL 6 and RHEL 5.6
Are these two different builds for Centos to chase or one in the same?
There are substantial differences.
5.6 is the latest update to the 5-series where 6.0 is a fully updated
On 01/19/11 11:53 AM, Lisandro Grullon wrote:
Why don't you download the DVD, it give you much more than disc 1.
Parshwa Murdia b330...@gmail.com 01/19/11 1:41 PM
Hi,
I have downloaded the following version:
CentOS-5.5-i386-LiveCD-Release2.iso
from the mirror:
Sean Hart wrote:
On 1/19/11 11:49 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Joshua Baker-LePain jl...@duke.edu
wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 at 11:44am, Bob Eastbrook wrote
By default, CentOS v5 requires a user's password when the system wakes
up from the screensaver. This can
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:18:37PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Sean Hart wrote:
On 1/19/11 11:49 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
I believe that CTRL-ALT-Bksp will restart X, not the computer. On
restart of X you should be welcomed with the login screen.
Note that in later versions of X,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:18:37PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
But the locked screensaver wants the *same* password that you log in with.
I'm having trouble understanding the problem... or is it that many of the
users *never* log out?
The locked screensaver will be killed along with the
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
Sorry, but Outlook 2003 and 2007 are huge improvements over earlier
versions - and lacking tight integration between messaging and
calendar/scheduling has been one of the places where free software
really missed the boat.
But then that's partly
On 19/01/11 18:42, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:33:59AM -0800, Mark wrote:
Let's talk about CentOS on this list, shall we?
Presumably the OP is running firefox on CentOS. So... how it this
not about CentOS?
You are kidding, right?
I do my accounts on
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 17:21 -0500, Kwan Lowe wrote:
Yesterday I was troubleshooting an issue with a KVM host. I was
unable to access the DNS service on a KVM virtual machine. After
verifying that the vm allowed through the DNS ports (53 on UDP/TCP)
and still being unable to access, I was
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 15:29 -0500, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:18:37PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Sean Hart wrote:
On 1/19/11 11:49 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
I believe that CTRL-ALT-Bksp will restart X, not the computer. On
restart of X you should be
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:09 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
the LiveCD will not install the operating system. It is purely for
demo or diagnostic purposes.
But there comes an option Install to Hard-disk after we see the Live
CD desktop!
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
Making the
I'm trying to update a workstation, and it wants to update mpeg2-utils.
But that has a dependency of libmpeg2-0.5.1-3, for i386. epel doesn't have
it, and I tried looking on rpmfusion.org, and I can only find a very few
packages there. Anyone have an idea which of the regular repositories
carries
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 04:04:21PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I'm trying to update a workstation, and it wants to update mpeg2-utils.
But that has a dependency of libmpeg2-0.5.1-3, for i386. epel doesn't have
it, and I tried looking on rpmfusion.org, and I can only find a very few
packages
On 1/19/2011 4:00 PM, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:09 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
the LiveCD will not install the operating system. It is purely for
demo or diagnostic purposes.
But there comes an option Install to Hard-disk after we see the Live
CD
Hi All
I am investigating an Apache change I was told about that involved adding
apache22_http_accept_enable=YES to /etc/rc.conf, but I don't think this
exists on CentOS 5.
Can anyone help me decide where to make this change?
-Jason
___
CentOS
2011/1/19 Jason S-M slackmoehrle.li...@gmail.com:
Hi All
I am investigating an Apache change I was told about that involved adding
apache22_http_accept_enable=YES to /etc/rc.conf, but I don't think this
exists on CentOS 5.
Can anyone help me decide where to make this change?
man
At Wed, 19 Jan 2011 22:00:21 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:09 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
the LiveCD will not install the operating system. Â It is purely for
demo or diagnostic purposes.
But there comes an option
I am investigating an Apache change I was told about that involved adding
apache22_http_accept_enable=YES to /etc/rc.conf, but I don't think this
exists on CentOS 5.
Can anyone help me decide where to make this change?
man chkconfig
chkconfig service_name on
I don't follow why what
On 01/19/2011 11:46 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 2:41 PM -0500 Kwan Lowe
kwan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, they are very different. RHEL6 has a lot of new functionality.
RHEL 5.6 is the current version of RHEL5.
Which has a little bit of new functionality,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:40:40PM +, Ned Slider wrote:
You are kidding, right?
No.
I do my accounts on CentOS - does that make this a suitable venue to
discuss my tax returns?
Please conflate more.
The SNR of this list is shocking and encouraging the above doesn't
2011/1/19 Jason S-M slackmoehrle.li...@gmail.com:
I am investigating an Apache change I was told about that involved adding
apache22_http_accept_enable=YES to /etc/rc.conf, but I don't think this
exists on CentOS 5.
Can anyone help me decide where to make this change?
man chkconfig
Am 19.01.2011 22:30, schrieb Jason S-M:
I am investigating an Apache change I was told about that involved adding
apache22_http_accept_enable=YES to /etc/rc.conf, but I don't think this
exists on CentOS 5.
Can anyone help me decide where to make this change?
man chkconfig
chkconfig
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 04:26:57 pm Robert Heller wrote:
At Wed, 19 Jan 2011 22:00:21 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:09 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
the LiveCD will not install the operating system. It is purely for
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 04:26:57 pm Robert Heller wrote:
At Wed, 19 Jan 2011 22:00:21 +0100 CentOS mailing list
centos@centos.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:09 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com
wrote:
the LiveCD will not install the operating system.
On 01/19/2011 01:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 01/19/2011 11:46 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 2:41 PM -0500 Kwan Lowe
kwan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, they are very different. RHEL6 has a lot of new functionality.
RHEL 5.6 is the current version of RHEL5.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:07 PM, n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
You could also get the DVD:
http://ftp.iitm.ac.in/centos/5.5/isos/i386/CentOS-5.5-i386-bin-DVD.torrent
This DVD is having KDE or GNOME desktop? As I want KDE one?
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
Making the simple complicated is commonplace,
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 05:09:25 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Yeah - I hate the Fedora way. Why not *ask* where you want to install the
liveCD? Why force it into /boot, when until now, *everyone* has kept boot
at about 100M or so?
The last one I did from LiveCD was prior to the need for a
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On 01/19/2011 01:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 01/19/2011 11:46 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 2:41 PM -0500 Kwan Lowe
kwan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, they are very different.
On 01/19/2011 02:58 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Robert Moskowitzr...@htt-consult.com
wrote:
On 01/19/2011 01:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 01/19/2011 11:46 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 2:41 PM -0500 Kwan Lowe
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:42 AM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:33:59AM -0800, Mark wrote:
Let's talk about CentOS on this list, shall we?
Presumably the OP is running firefox on CentOS. So... how it this
not about CentOS?
If that's
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 05:44:45PM -0500, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 05:09:25 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Yeah - I hate the Fedora way. Why not *ask* where you want to install the
liveCD? Why force it into /boot, when until now, *everyone* has kept boot
at about 100M or
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:35 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
The OP asked a pretty straight-forward set of questions. Was it
100% germane to this list? No, perhaps not.
The problem is that none of his questions is ever 100% germane to the
various lists to which he
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Mark mhullr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:35 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
The OP asked a pretty straight-forward set of questions. Was it
100% germane to this list? No, perhaps not.
The problem is that none of
On Jan 19, 2011, at 3:36 PM, Mark wrote:
This is a fellow who routinely asks extremely general questions that
so strongly resemble first-year student homework questions that I, and
others, have taken the path of not helping him. I'm not here to do
anyone's homework for them.
You can
On 1/19/2011 1:51 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
That's not the point. You've had years to learn how to make a computer
work like a slightly smarter typewriter, and for a long time that was
about all they could do and everyone was happy with it. But that's not
what someone starting today
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:38:36PM -0800, Mark wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:35 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
The OP asked a pretty straight-forward set of questions. Was it
100% germane to this list? No, perhaps not.
The problem is that none of his
On 1/19/2011 4:42 PM, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
You could also get the DVD:
http://ftp.iitm.ac.in/centos/5.5/isos/i386/CentOS-5.5-i386-bin-DVD.torrent
This DVD is having KDE or GNOME desktop? As I want KDE one?
It should have both and you can custom-select packages during the
install or add
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
