El 17/02/2011 7:24, Normando Hall escribió:
Hola Normando!
¿Por qué cuando actualizo mi Centos 5.5 64b también instala versiones
i386 de 32b en algunas librerías y programas? De hecho, en el raíz hay
dos directorios lib: Un es /lib y el otro /lib64
Se hace por compatibilidad. En la FAQ
Hola, soy nuevo en esta lista y mi consulta es la siguiente:
tengo un servidor con CentOS 5.5, cuando me conecto a este servidor
independiente de donde sea, después de cierta cantidad de minutos de idle
(sin escribir ningún comando por consola) esta se congela (no me deja
escribir nada), al los
sebastian garcia wrote:
Hola, soy nuevo en esta lista y mi consulta es la siguiente:
tengo un servidor con CentOS 5.5, cuando me conecto a este servidor
independiente de donde sea, después de cierta cantidad de minutos de idle
(sin escribir ningún comando por consola) esta se congela (no me
Gracias Santi. Increible, llevo años en esto y omití la FAQ!!!
Saludos
El 19/02/2011 05:14 a.m., Santi Saez escribió:
El 17/02/2011 7:24, Normando Hall escribió:
Hola Normando!
¿Por qué cuando actualizo mi Centos 5.5 64b también instala versiones
i386 de 32b en algunas librerías y
Más bien suena como que hay algúna restriccion en /etc/mail/access
--
Ramón Macías Zamora
Tecnología, Investigación y Desarrollo
Guayaquil - Ecuador
msn:ramon_mac...@hotmail.com
skype: ramon_macias
UserLinux# 180926 (http://counter.li.org)
Cel:593-9-6298060
Tel:593 4 6044566
On 02/19/2011 01:13 AM, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
Just for the record ... we (the CentOS Project) do not recommend this
site. They are using our name without permission.
Attribution goes to EliteMoly:
CentALT repository not
Johnny has remarked on the importance of trust.
My trust in RedHat went down when I learned they are not shipping all
the SRPMs. Some say it is due to human error. If that is the case,
why should I think they are better at backporting security fixes than
at making sure a manifest of SRPMs
My trust in RedHat went down when I learned they are not shipping all
the SRPMs. Some say it is due to human error. If that is the case,
why should I think they are better at backporting security fixes than
at making sure a manifest of SRPMs is complete and correct?
Centos, SL and oracle
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 6:58 AM, James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.com wrote:
For the record an archive of all mails sent to the mailing list
appears here... in this case in date order.
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2011-January/date.html
To give you the benefit of the doubt I
On Saturday, February 19, 2011 12:57:40 am Larry Vaden wrote:
Through this experience,
starting with a hacked or poisoned name server, or, quite frankly, the
perception of one, I have learned what people really see.
Having a server hacked is one of the worst things that can happen in IT; not
On Saturday, February 19, 2011 01:51:55 am Larry Vaden wrote:
My trust in RedHat went down when I learned they are not shipping all
the SRPMs. Some say it is due to human error. If that is the case,
why should I think they are better at backporting security fixes than
at making sure a
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On 18/02/2011, at 2:29 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Everyone,
I am trying to print some *.doc files from the command line with
openoffice on centos 5.5 with using cups as the print server.
I can open the file from the command line with open
Great article to enlighten us all on why this round seems to be taking
longer then the previous versions. And why in general this is a tremendous
undertaking.
http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7952/
You'll need to log in to read the entire article but its worth it.
- aurf
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 13:41:04 -0600
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Is there a way to request that CentOS maintainers or rpmforge to upgrade
the rpm to 3.3.0?
Is there any reason not to simply install the openoffice or libreoffice rpms
from their respective websites? I've been doing that for some
On 02/17/2011 06:08 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
yum install qt-devel
root@sevcenco: ~ # rpm -qa | grep qt | grep devel
qt-devel-3.3.6-23.el5
qt-devel-docs-3.3.6-23.el5
qt4-devel-4.2.1-1
Thanks,
Adrian
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Hello,
I am trying to get some more information about the following issue:
# strace -p 2256
attach: ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, ...): Operation not permitted
I am trying to trace an mdadm re-sync pid and I keep getting the above
error.
I have done some digging on google and forums, but have not had
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
If your server was really hacked, I'd start from scratch, and set the new one
up more defensively.
THANKS for your input; there exists a consensus, so that's what will
be done (replace 4.8 with 5.x). Troy says Fermi (a great
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 04:37:57PM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
THANKS for your input; there exists a consensus, so that's what will
be done (replace 4.8 with 5.x). Troy says Fermi (a great target for
the miscreants/actors) runs stock BIND as it appears in
RHEL/CentOS/SL, so, to be redundant,
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 5:07 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
Just out of curiosity, have you ever thought about hiring a
competent admin?
Yes.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
on 13:29 Sat 19 Feb, Eric Gerzon (ericger...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to get some more information about the following issue:
# strace -p 2256
attach: ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, ...): Operation not permitted
As root? (Prompt suggests yes).
Is another strace attached to the
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 13:41:04 -0600
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Is there a way to request that CentOS maintainers or rpmforge to upgrade
the rpm to 3.3.0?
Is there any reason not to simply install the openoffice or libreoffice rpms
from their respective websites? I've been doing that for some
I'm happy to report that, as of (at least) the last Flash update, full
screen Flash (on Hulu and Youtube) is again working on my machine. I
know some folks weren't updating Flash because of this so it might be
time to update.
--
RonB -- Using CentOS 5.5
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 17:44:42 -0600
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion, I have had difficulty stepping out of the
CentOS rpm barrier in the past so I did not try. Knowing you have
succeeded gives me some confidence to proceed. Does OpenOffice have yum
repository or do you
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 17:44:42 -0600
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion, I have had difficulty stepping out of the
CentOS rpm barrier in the past so I did not try. Knowing you have
succeeded gives me some confidence to proceed. Does OpenOffice have yum
repository or do you
James B. Byrne wrote:
But, our future financial support
for CentOS is contingent upon dealing with an independent legal
entity that conforms with national and international tax laws and
corporate reporting requirements.
A new model (appropriate to OSS) is being worked on here:
25 matches
Mail list logo
