[CentOS-es] Sobre YUM.

2011-02-21 Thread Yoinier Hernandez Nieves
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tengo una PC con Fedora 14 a la que le instale mrepo. Ahora, genere el repositorio de centos en esa maquina, pero cuando consulto a cualquiera de de los repositorios desde uno de mis servidores, me dice:

[CentOS-es] Virtualizacion y HA

2011-02-21 Thread Claudio Ceballos Paz
Hola. Estoy armando dos servidores fisicos con 3 maquinas virtuales cada uno kvm, y quiero ponerlos en HA y failover. En una MV voy a tener samba, en otro apache, y en otro Windows con Active Directory. Que recomiendan? piranha? u otra solucion? Saludos, Claudio.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 Java Process Death

2011-02-21 Thread Martin Hewitt
After 3 days of continual operation ( I barely managed 9hrs before ) it seems I have narrowed this down to the saddeningly basic cause of the process being sent the SIGHUP signal when its owner process dies. Using the nohup prefix solves the problem. Thanks for all the help on this everyone!

[CentOS] Basic Bash Script Question

2011-02-21 Thread James Bensley
I'm stuck trying to work this one out and my Google skills are apparently lacking today. This is a test bash script; #!/bin/bash do something | tee a.log if [ $? -ne 0]; then echo broken fi The problem with this script is $? contains the exit value of the tee command, but I want to check the

Re: [CentOS] Basic Bash Script Question

2011-02-21 Thread Philippe Naudin
Le lun 21 fév 2011 10:31:38 CET, James Bensley a écrit: I'm stuck trying to work this one out and my Google skills are apparently lacking today. This is a test bash script; #!/bin/bash do something | tee a.log if [ $? -ne 0]; then echo broken fi What about : { do something ;

Re: [CentOS] Basic Bash Script Question

2011-02-21 Thread Pascal
2011/2/21 James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com: I'm stuck trying to work this one out and my Google skills are apparently lacking today. This is a test bash script; #!/bin/bash do something | tee a.log if [ $? -ne 0]; then  echo broken fi The problem with this script is $? contains the

Re: [CentOS] Basic Bash Script Question

2011-02-21 Thread James Bensley
On 21 February 2011 11:05, Pascal pax...@gmail.com wrote: man bash search for Pipelines, pipefail and PIPESTATUS. Great, thanks for that, pipefail is exactly what I need :) -- James. http://www.jamesbensley.co.cc/ There are 10 kinds of people in the world; Those who understand Vigesimal,

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-21 Thread Dag Wieers
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 02/20/2011 07:30 PM, Dag Wieers wrote: On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 02/16/2011 04:31 AM, David Sommerseth wrote: On 15/02/11 17:25, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: Let's see. 7 weeks after a RHEL release, we have: For RHEL6, lets make

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-21 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Dag Wieers d...@wieers.com wrote: On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote: On the initial pass through builder for c6, there are hundreds of packages that need to be analyzed. So you are now saying that you cannot scale out this work to more people to

[CentOS] java-1.6.0-openjdk.x86_64 keeps clobbering logging.properties

2011-02-21 Thread Jason Pyeron
It appears that the rpm does not list the logging.properties as a config file, as such every time yum updates the file get overwritten. /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/jre/lib/logging.properties For now I have a cron job to replace it. Any suggestions? --

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-21 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 02/21/2011 03:28 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On the initial pass through builder for c6, there are hundreds of packages that need to be analyzed. Johnny said something... So you are now saying that you cannot scale out this work to more people to release faster ? This is something that

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-21 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/21/2011 08:33 AM, Dag Wieers wrote: On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 02/20/2011 07:30 PM, Dag Wieers wrote: On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 02/16/2011 04:31 AM, David Sommerseth wrote: On 15/02/11 17:25, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: Let's see. 7 weeks after a

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-21 Thread Les Mikesell
On 2/21/11 10:35 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: So you are now saying that you cannot scale out this work to more people to release faster ? This is something that has to be done by Karanbir only ? Dag, The packages have to be built in a specific order, preferably the order that they are

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-21 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/21/2011 11:08 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 2/21/11 10:35 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: So you are now saying that you cannot scale out this work to more people to release faster ? This is something that has to be done by Karanbir only ? Dag, The packages have to be built in a specific

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-21 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: The packages have to be built in a specific order, preferably the order that they are originally produced in, so that they can be linked properly.  Package A builds, then Package B, then Package C.  If package B is

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-21 Thread Ian Murray
Seeing as how we are currently dealing with 2 trees in the QA directory for testing right now (4.9 and 5.6) ... 6.0 will be waiting until we get those out of QA. I recall discussing this off-list with Johnny, like a year and a half ago (Wed, 12 August, 2009 14:25:18) I said

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-21 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/21/2011 11:23 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: The packages have to be built in a specific order, preferably the order that they are originally produced in, so that they can be linked properly. Package A builds, then

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-21 Thread William Warren
On 2/21/2011 12:18 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 02/21/2011 11:08 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 2/21/11 10:35 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: So you are now saying that you cannot scale out this work to more people to release faster ? This is something that has to be done by Karanbir only ? Dag, The

[CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!

2011-02-21 Thread John Hinton
All, (and please do not turn this into the next long thread) We have a small team which volunteers their time to create the CentOS releases. They are pounded right now with getting that done... it is as simple as that. Each of us 'chose' to use CentOS and with that choice comes nothing more.

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-21 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: This is the last post I am making to this thread ... and maybe to this list in general.  During the build processes, here are the files that we have had to add (at various times) to get packages to build.  I have no idea

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-21 Thread William Warren
On 2/21/2011 1:28 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Johnny Hughesjoh...@centos.org wrote: This is the last post I am making to this thread ... and maybe to this list in general. During the build processes, here are the files that we have had to add (at various

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-21 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:33 PM, William Warren hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com wrote: On 2/21/2011 1:28 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: Thanks for the information. Could you drop it in the Wiki? And drop your notes on this process for CentOS 6 pre-building there, too? *EL4* dump:

Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!

2011-02-21 Thread Corey A Johnson
John Hinton wrote: All, (and please do not turn this into the next long thread) snip I am not a man of many words.. and i am usually very quiet on this list. But would just like to say that i appreciate all the CentOS team members immensely. I sincerely thank you all for the time

Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!

2011-02-21 Thread Nicolas Ross
John Hinton wrote: All, (and please do not turn this into the next long thread) snip I am not a man of many words.. and i am usually very quiet on this list. But would just like to say that i appreciate all the CentOS team members immensely. I sincerely thank you all for the

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-21 Thread Always Learning
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 13:28 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: Thanks for the information. Could you drop it in the Wiki? And drop your notes on this process for CentOS 6 pre-building there, too? Nico, Why can't you? And save the developers one more extra job? -- With best regards, Paul.

Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!

2011-02-21 Thread Always Learning
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 13:34 -0500, Corey A Johnson wrote: I am not a man of many words.. and i am usually very quiet on this list. But would just like to say that i appreciate all the CentOS team members immensely. I sincerely thank you all for the time you put in to what i consider

Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!

2011-02-21 Thread Barry Brimer
I am not a man of many words.. and i am usually very quiet on this list. But would just like to say that i appreciate all the CentOS team members immensely. I sincerely thank you all for the time you put in to what i consider the best free Linux distro available. +1000

Re: [CentOS] java-1.6.0-openjdk.x86_64 keeps clobberinglogging.properties

2011-02-21 Thread Jason Pyeron
-Original Message- From: Jason Pyeron Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 10:27 To: 'CentOS mailing list' Subject: [CentOS] java-1.6.0-openjdk.x86_64 keeps clobberinglogging.properties It appears that the rpm does not list the logging.properties as a config file, as such every time

Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!

2011-02-21 Thread Digimer
On 02/21/2011 01:21 PM, John Hinton wrote: All, (and please do not turn this into the next long thread) We have a small team which volunteers their time to create the CentOS releases. They are pounded right now with getting that done... it is as simple as that. Each of us 'chose' to use

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-21 Thread James Hogarth
Far be it from me to take credit for someone else's work. I also don't have the CentOS 6 information, which is what I've really been wanting all along. There is no C6 info yet. Maybe he will release it once it's all worked out. After all this I wouldn't blame him if he didn't. How hard is

Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!

2011-02-21 Thread Ian Murray
2. Add more staff. As a small business owner, the very last thing you want to do is add more staff when you are in a slammed state. It takes all of the 'productive' workers time to train the new staff and output slows to a crawl. .

Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!

2011-02-21 Thread Digimer
On 02/21/2011 04:02 PM, Ian Murray wrote: another six months and 5.6 another 2 months. Perhaps we have been spoilt by the snappiness of the releases in the past. Plus, rename to something that doesn't suggest enterprise grade. You always have the option of paying for a RHEL license if

Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!

2011-02-21 Thread Barry Brimer
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Ian Murray wrote: Plus, rename to something that doesn't suggest enterprise grade. How does the time between upstream release and downstream release have any effect on whether or not something is considered enterprise grade? Barry

Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!

2011-02-21 Thread aly . khimji
I too am with the fella's on this. Thanks for all your time and hard work. It is greatly appreciated, more then words can say. Aly --Original Message-- From: Corey A Johnson Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org To: CentOS mailing list ReplyTo: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Air

Re: [CentOS] java-1.6.0-openjdk.x86_64 keeps clobbering logging.properties

2011-02-21 Thread Benjamin Franz
On 02/21/2011 07:27 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote: It appears that the rpm does not list the logging.properties as a config file, as such every time yum updates the file get overwritten. /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/jre/lib/logging.properties For now I have a cron job to replace

Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!

2011-02-21 Thread Fajar Priyanto
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:21 AM, John Hinton webmas...@ew3d.com wrote: We have a small team which volunteers their time to create the CentOS releases. They are pounded right now with getting that done... it is as simple as that. Each of us 'chose' to use CentOS and with that choice comes

[CentOS] iptables question.

2011-02-21 Thread Bill Campbell
We use a home-brew system similar to fail2ban to block traffic from IP addresses which appear to be doing Nasty Things(tm). The main thing our system does that fail2ban doesn't is to use a central DNSRBL we maintain allowing it to immedatiately ban listed IP addresses the first time they make an

Re: [CentOS] iptables question.

2011-02-21 Thread Bill Campbell
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011, Stephen Harris wrote: On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 03:32:40PM -0800, Bill Campbell wrote: My problem is that occassionally an IP addresses doesn't appear to be blocked as we continue to see the e-mail messages after the blocks are in place. Most frequently these occur from

Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!

2011-02-21 Thread Ian Murray
- Original Message From: Barry Brimer li...@brimer.org To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Mon, 21 February, 2011 21:12:57 Subject: Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON! On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Ian Murray wrote: Plus, rename to something that doesn't suggest

[CentOS] funding

2011-02-21 Thread compdoc
Maybe what Centos needs is a bridal registry. Here in the US, an engaged couple can tell their friends what they'd like to be given as wedding presents. They do this by listing items in a registry, in various stores around town. Anyway, the idea is, post stuff you need in a list on your site.

Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!

2011-02-21 Thread John R. Dennison
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:33:39AM +, Ian Murray wrote: You get me wrong here. I am not having a go about how long the updates are taking...(if you think I am, you are not reading my comments properly)... take as long as you want... just please don't dress the distribution as

Re: [CentOS] funding

2011-02-21 Thread aly . khimji
I thinks is a great idea, Its our way of trying to contribute towards a common goal. Who knows it could be a great way to assist in any way we can. I think its a good thought, and I think we should point out, if you do help with hardware or whatever, then you still have no right to be bossy or

[CentOS] System Log Error

2011-02-21 Thread sync
When I issue sudo tail -f/var/log/syslog in order to try and track down an external drive problem I get the following: Jan 11 07:56:00 kernel: [17179663.076000] atkbd.c: Unknown key released (translated set 2, code 0x81 on isa0060/serio0). Jan 11 07:56:00 kernel: [17179663.076000] atkbd.c: Use

Re: [CentOS] System Log Error

2011-02-21 Thread aly . khimji
Are you using a wireless keyboard?? AK Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry -Original Message- From: sync jian...@gmail.com Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:25:31 To: CentOS mailing listcentos@centos.org Reply-To: CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] System Log Error

2011-02-21 Thread sync
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:27 PM, aly.khi...@gmail.com wrote: Are you using a wireless keyboard?? AK Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry No , I use the USB keyboard ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] System Log Error

2011-02-21 Thread aly . khimji
Hmm, I usually get tons of that on my desktop linux machine that has a wireless keyboard, but if I use a ps2 keyboard I none of it. I also notice it with keyboards with ton's of extra functions (volume, audio functions, etc..). I believe its something with special key mappings. Do u have