Main question: is it safe, to open a port for an openssl server?
e.g.:
server side - generate a self-signed cert.
time openssl req -x509 -nodes -days 365 -newkey rsa:8192 -keyout mycert.pem
-out mycert.pem
openssl s_server -accept 52310 -cert mycert.pem
Is it secure? - it could be DOSed'
On 02/27/11 1:50 AM, erikmccaskey64 wrote:
Main question: is it safe, to open a port for an openssl server?
e.g.:
server side - generate a self-signed cert.
time openssl req -x509 -nodes -days 365 -newkey rsa:8192 -keyout
mycert.pem -out mycert.pem
openssl s_server -accept 52310 -cert
On 27/02/11 06:46, Always Learning wrote:
Octets
Thanks for pointing-out my misunderstanding.
I'll remember 2 octets are really 2 characters (IBM's bytes) = 2 digits,
4 octal numbers or 4 hexadecimal numbers.
This is a confusing summary.
3 bits = 1 octal number (values 0-7)
4 bits = 1
--On Saturday, February 26, 2011 9:04 PM + Always Learning
cen...@g7.u22.net wrote:
Are you sure 'octets' is correct?
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Octet_%28computing%29
Those of us who've used older mainframes (such as the PDP-10) remember
byte being a synonym for bit
I need to disable the spin-down on an external USB drive because it spins
down spontaneously while in use. The drive forgets the spindown-disable
state across power outage so I need to reissue the hdparm command with each
boot or hotplug. Where should I put the hdparm command to do this?
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 04:12 -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote:
Those of us who've used older mainframes (such as the PDP-10) remember
byte being a synonym for bit field and a byte could be any number of
bits, typically from 1 to 36 (on a 36-bit-wide machine). 7-bit and 9-bit
bytes were quite
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 00:38 -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Always Learning cen...@g7.u22.net wrote:
Today I received an allocation of IP6 addresses for some servers. I can
'play' with the last 2 of the 8 IP6 address segments.
I guess Will Rogers was correct
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Always Learning cen...@g7.u22.net wrote:
I was actually wrong. I can 'play' with not 2 but 4 groups of the IP6
allocation. Golly, what can I do with 64 x 64 x 64 x 64 address
combinations? Hire then out? Have a different IP6 address for every
hour of the
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 01:44:17PM +, Always Learning wrote:
I was actually wrong. I can 'play' with not 2 but 4 groups of the IP6
allocation. Golly, what can I do with 64 x 64 x 64 x 64 address
That's an odd combination. 64 is 6 bits, which has nothing to do
with an IPv6 group.
Many
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011, Kenneth Porter wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: Kenneth Porter sh...@sewingwitch.com
Subject: [CentOS] Standard location for hotplug-time hdparm invocation
I need to disable the spin-down on an external USB drive
because it spins down
On 27/02/11 14:44, Always Learning wrote:
I was actually wrong. I can 'play' with not 2 but 4 groups of the IP6
allocation. Golly, what can I do with 64 x 64 x 64 x 64 address
combinations? Hire then out? Have a different IP6 address for every
hour of the year?
If you got allocated a /48
On 2/27/11 8:00 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Always Learningcen...@g7.u22.net wrote:
I was actually wrong. I can 'play' with not 2 but 4 groups of the IP6
allocation. Golly, what can I do with 64 x 64 x 64 x 64 address
combinations? Hire then out? Have a
On 2/27/11 9:38 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
Yes, IPv6 gives every site a lot of more possibilities. And in IPv6 each NIC
can have multiple IPv6 addresses, without using aliasing which is needed for
IPv4. If you want to allocate 30 IPv6 addresses to one adapter, you may do so
very easily.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 22:48, cwlists cwli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 00:14, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
I have built a new PC on which I've installed CentOS 5.5 64-bit (with
updates) which after some hours of running suddenly either hard freeze
or instant power off.
On 02/27/11 5:32 AM, Always Learning wrote:
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 04:12 -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote:
Those of us who've used older mainframes (such as the PDP-10) remember
byte being a synonym for bit field and a byte could be any number of
bits, typically from 1 to 36 (on a 36-bit-wide
On 02/27/11 9:16 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Is there any difference in efficiency in how well the NIC hardware filters the
assigned addresses?
NIC's work in MAC addresses, not IP.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Hi.
The short story... Rush job, never done clustered file systems before,
vlan didn't support multicast. Thus I ended up with drbd working ok
between the two servers but cman / gfs2 not working, resulting in what
was meant to be a drbd primary/primary cluster being a primary/secondary
cluster
One of my servers is using ISO datetime formats
(2011-02-27T15:22:15.519857-05:00) in the logs
the rest use the default redhat/CentOS format (Feb 27 15:10:21).
After a couple of hours searching google I cannot find where this is
defined.
I know I changed it some months ago as an experiment but
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Rob Kampen
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 3:34 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] log time formats - where is this defined
One of my servers is using ISO datetime formats
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 15:33:57 -0500
Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.com wrote:
One of my servers is using ISO datetime formats
(2011-02-27T15:22:15.519857-05:00) in the logs
the rest use the default redhat/CentOS format (Feb 27 15:10:21).
After a couple of hours searching google I cannot
On 2/27/11 12:50 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 02/27/11 9:16 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Is there any difference in efficiency in how well the NIC hardware filters
the
assigned addresses?
NIC's work in MAC addresses, not IP.
Sort-of. Most NICs know enough about IPv4 multicast to at least help
--On Sunday, February 27, 2011 10:48 AM -0800 John R Pierce
pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
the PDP-10 was in fact considered a mainframe in the 1960s. They were
more commonly called DECsystem-10, or KA10, KL10. the CPU was multiple
cabinets, the KL10 supported up to 4 megawords of ram (where a
--On Sunday, February 27, 2011 3:37 PM + Keith Roberts
ke...@karsites.net wrote:
Not sure about hotpluging, but for the reboot
/etc/rc.d/rc.local might be a good place to try this:
Googling turned up that suggestion a lot. But I realized that since this is
a backup drive, it would be
BTW, this came up because the drive is a Seagate GoFlex Desk which spins
down and then won't come back up reliably. Googling around turned up this
patch that looks like it shows up in a much later kernel, no earlier than
2.6.24:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.usb.devel/58653
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 10:48 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
the PDP-10 was in fact considered a mainframe in the 1960s. They were
more commonly called DECsystem-10, or KA10, KL10. the CPU was multiple
cabinets, the KL10 supported up to 4 megawords of ram (where a word was
36 bits). They
Hi.
No worries it was a firewall issue. Not quite as bad as I though J .
Greg Machin
Systems Administrator - Linux
Infrastructure Group, Information Services
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Machin, Greg
Sent: Monday, 28 February 2011 9:33
Any word on approximate release date of Centos 6?
Cheers,
JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 07:13:32PM -0800, JD wrote:
Any word on approximate release date of Centos 6?
Cheers,
JD
Seriously? Seriously?!
Ray
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Feb 27, 2011, at 7:13 PM, JD wrote:
Any word on approximate release date of Centos 6?
Wow, I'm stunned.
- aurf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 07:13:32PM -0800, JD wrote:
Any word on approximate release date of Centos 6?
Sometime in 2011 would be a fair bet.
John
--
Anybody can win unless there happens to be a second entry.
-- George Ade (1866
Am 28.02.2011 um 04:15 schrieb Ray Van Dolson:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 07:13:32PM -0800, JD wrote:
Any word on approximate release date of Centos 6?
Cheers,
JD
Seriously? Seriously?!
It's like Sesame Street, you know...
There's a new audience coming every week ;-)
On Feb 27, 2011, at 7:13 PM, JD wrote:
Any word on approximate release date of Centos 6?
Seriously though.
Nothing wrong with asking.
Its been discussed several time to an order of magnitude.
No word, not even a peep, at least that I can gather.
We're all frustrated in anticipation so I
JD wrote:
Any word on approximate release date of Centos 6?
Yes [1].
[1] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2011-February/106135.html
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 07:29:16PM -0800, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
We're all frustrated in anticipation so I daily check the main page.
We are? Funny, I don't feel frustrated.
John
--
The machine has got to be accepted,
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 21:46 -0600, John R. Dennison wrote:
The machine has got to be accepted, but it is probably better
to accept it rather as one accepts a drug -- that is, grudgingly
and suspiciously. Like a drug, the machine is useful, dangerous,
and habit-forming. The oftener one
On Feb 27, 2011, at 8:00 PM, Always Learning wrote:
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 21:46 -0600, John R. Dennison wrote:
The machine has got to be accepted, but it is probably better
to accept it rather as one accepts a drug -- that is, grudgingly
and suspiciously. Like a drug, the machine is
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 20:04 -0800, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok that was weird.
The book or my posting or both ?
--
With best regards,
Paul.
England,
EU.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Feb 27, 2011, at 8:07 PM, Always Learning wrote:
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 20:04 -0800, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok that was weird.
The book or my posting or both ?
Really?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 02/27/2011 07:29 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 27, 2011, at 7:13 PM, JD wrote:
Any word on approximate release date of Centos 6?
Seriously though.
Nothing wrong with asking.
Its been discussed several time to an order of magnitude.
No word, not even a peep, at least that I
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 19:51 -0800, JD wrote:
OK, as a measuring yardstick: approximately how many
months after RHEL5's release date was Centos 5 released?
That might give people an approximate idea.
Currently, I have no RHEL installed. I just joined this list to
enquire about RHEL 6.
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 07:51:49PM -0800, JD wrote:
On 02/27/2011 07:29 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 27, 2011, at 7:13 PM, JD wrote:
Any word on approximate release date of Centos 6?
Seriously though.
Nothing wrong with asking.
Its been discussed several time to an
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 07:51:49PM -0800, JD wrote:
On 02/27/2011 07:29 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 27, 2011, at 7:13 PM, JD wrote:
Any word on approximate release date of Centos 6?
Nothing wrong with asking.
Its been discussed several time to an order of magnitude.
OK,
OK, as a measuring yardstick: approximately how many
months after RHEL5's release date was Centos 5 released?
That might give people an approximate idea.
It's difficult to make predictions, especially about the future.
While extrapolating from past data is legitimate, it does not apply to
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 22:38 -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Always Learning cen...@g7.u22.net wrote:
At my second computer job in 1967 on a Honeywell H-120 (a baby machine
with 3 tapes which took 1 hour to do a Cobol compilation ...
I have always hoped to find
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 21:46 -0600, John R. Dennison wrote:
The machine has got to be accepted, but it is probably better
to accept it rather as one accepts a drug -- that is, grudgingly
and suspiciously. Like a drug, the machine is useful, dangerous,
and habit-forming. The oftener one
45 matches
Mail list logo
