Hi all,
I'm using CentOS from ages, I've never been translated, but if this
helps the CentOS community I'm available,
Regards
-Mauro
(Italy)
On 4/4/2011 6:00 PM, centos-docs-requ...@centos.org wrote:
Send CentOS-docs mailing list submissions to
centos-docs@centos.org
To subscribe or
Hola listeros, quisiera de ser posible si alguien tiene alguna ayuda o tutorial
para poder configurar un Proxy Squid + Active Directory, yo en realidad soy muy
nuevo en este mondo del Linux en general...
Gracias de antemano, y si por la lista es muy incomodo debido a mi poco
conocimientos, si
http://www.ecualug.org/2011/04/06/sali%C3%B3_centos56_al_fin
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Aun no estan los mirrors, solo esta por bitorrent, pero bueno, algo es algo
:D
Sls
El 6 de abril de 2011 11:58, Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez
cen...@nuestroserver.com escribió:
http://www.ecualug.org/2011/04/06/sali%C3%B3_centos56_al_fin
___
Y para cuando saldria CentOS 6
--
Fidel Dominguez-Valero
Linux User: 433411
Website: http://www.valerofix.ryanhost.net
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 12:02 -0500, Anthony Mogrovejo wrote:
Aun no estan los mirrors, solo esta por bitorrent, pero bueno, algo es algo
:D
Sls
El 6 de abril de
Por la lista lo dudo, para eso mismo está. y si por cierto a mi tambien me
interesa mucho esto de la autenticacion de squid y AD, mejor dicho de squid y
PDC, pq quieren poner aca eso y no puede un proveedor q ofrecio... (ldap-samba
como PDC)
Xavier Mauricio Tirado L.
Unidad de
Fidel Dominguez-Valero wrote:
Y para cuando saldria CentOS 6
Dijeron que después del 5.6 (pues el 5 ya está en producción)... supongo
que unas semanas después del anuncio oficial del 6 pues ya el 4.9
también salió.
___
CentOS-es mailing list
Muchachos,
Acaban de ver los torrents para CentOS 5.6 via Twiter:
http://twitter.com/centos
Aquí la copia:
help seed the 5.6 torrents:
http://bit.ly/fbW4oM
http://bit.ly/fwI4wJ
http://bit.ly/fjcrpn
http://bit.ly/h1snle
hace cerca de 6 horas vía web
Saludos y feliz descarga :)
Javier.
This was done on a trailling basis for a couple side arch's
builders by me and another. It turns out to be a lot of
chatter and 'noise', and not much 'signal'
Although it might not be of any real use in indicating when a version
would be ready, I think it helps a lot psychologically when
On 04/05/11 11:32 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
A lot of the anxiety seems to be about the silence about any kind of
progress.
there's a fair amount of traffic on centos-devel
archives here,
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2011-April/thread.html
Em 04-04-2011 23:45, Gilbert Sebenste escreveu:
Maybe its users need to realize that:
1. This entire thing is run by volunteers
How can a company dedicate a few man-hours per week to help CentOS?
I mean this in a more official way, rather than just a person dropping
by at the -devel list.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Fidel Dominguez-Valero
fdval...@gmail.com wrote:
- Are you using vsftpd? Proftpd?
I'm using vsftpd
Just edit vsftpd.conf and restart ftp
# Allow anonymous FTP? (Disabled by default)
anonymous_enable=NO
By default it will be /var/ftp/pub
On 4/6/11, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 04/05/11 11:32 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
A lot of the anxiety seems to be about the silence about any kind of
progress.
there's a fair amount of traffic on centos-devel
archives here,
If you need to display a folder, you can just set it up as a web page.
On Apr 5, 2011 6:45 PM, Fidel Dominguez-Valero fdval...@gmail.com wrote:
Friends I have a good ftp server working with authentication of users,
but I want to put a folder with general information for everyone can
read without
Sorry if this is somewhat naive, but I'm a little confused as to
what
the
criteria is for that which will get upgraded automatically by
yum
and
what
will not.
I see in our logwatch messages from time to time that yum upgraded
a bunch of stuff,
email builder wrote:
Do you know how to determine which repo a particular package is from? For
example, when I do yum info against clamav (which isn't receiving automatic
updates), it just says Repo: installed. I don't know what repo it comes
from.
yum list clamav --showduplicates
Le 06/04/2011 09:08, Emmanuel Noobadmin a écrit :
Apologies, I wasn't subscribed to the dev list since I didn't think I
would had been able to contribute anything. Fortunately, I'm also not
fixated about when exactly is Centos 6 coming out.
Maybe the standard reply to those chasing for
On 04/06/2011 02:54 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Em 04-04-2011 23:45, Gilbert Sebenste escreveu:
Maybe its users need to realize that:
1. This entire thing is run by volunteers
How can a company dedicate a few man-hours per week to help CentOS?
I mean this in a more official way,
On 5.4.2011 21.49, compdoc wrote:
For reasons of speed and ease of maintenance and backups, what I've settled
on is: a small separate drive for the host to boot from, a small separate
drive for the guest OSes (I like using qcow2 on WD Raptors), and then a
large array on a raid controller for
On 04/06/2011 07:32 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
Although it might not be of any real use in indicating when a version
would be ready, I think it helps a lot psychologically when people can
see that something is being done, even if it's discovering bugs that
will push back the release.
As
On 04/06/2011 07:54 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
How can a company dedicate a few man-hours per week to help CentOS?
I mean this in a more official way, rather than just a person dropping
by at the -devel list.
Thats a very good question, and something more people should be asking
:
On 04/04/2011 11:14 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
Nobody else really can give an update, the process is pretty much closed
to the general public. So if the only person why can provide information
is off by 2 months, I'd rather have no information at all.
That's not hard to do - stop reading them then.
Hi List,
I suppose this isn't strictly CentOS but I'm talking about some 5.5
servers so I thought someone else here may have had the same issues;
We power on servers at night via IPMI and shut them down the same way
for automation. The problem I'm facing is that the servers are
shutdown in about
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 09:53 -0700, David Brian Chait wrote:
All,
As much as I hate to ask, how is this project coming along? We
are approaching the 4 month post-release point…
-David
This reply is in no way directed at you personally David, I just picked
your message to reply to :)
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 21:38 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 05:41 -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
I haven't tried it, but in theory you could take a clonezilla image of
the physical machine and restore it to a KVM disk image: Just create the
initial virtual drives at
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 10:33 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 04/06/2011 07:54 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
How can a company dedicate a few man-hours per week to help CentOS?
I mean this in a more official way, rather than just a person dropping
by at the -devel list.
Thats a very
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 02:13:01PM -0700, John R Pierce spake thusly:
ZFS isn't GPL, therefore can't be integrated into the kernel where a
file system belongs, therefore is pretty much relegated to user space
It can be patched in by the end user. So if someone were to distribute a patch
which
Email builder wrote on Tue, 5 Apr 2011 16:46:55 -0700 (PDT):
then the outstanding question is how to figure out why certain
packages are not being updated.
Well, first action: did you actually check with the repo that there is a
newer package? Just because a package isn't updated doesn't
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 11:06 +0100, James Bensley wrote:
Hi List,
We power on servers at night via IPMI and shut them down the same way
for automation. The problem I'm facing is that the servers are
shutdown in about 2 seconds. IPMI provides remote access to the power
features as we know so I
On 04/06/2011 10:57 AM, Mister IT Guru wrote:
Ah! I like the sound of this. This can be a start. What I understand by
this, is adopt a package, test it out, and update the community via
wiki, hanging in the IRC channels and answering questions on the mailing
list.
... amongst other things.
- Original Message -
From:Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com
This thread or others like it will continue
wrong. It will continue as long people bite. Stop biting the bait!
Kai
Oh, the irony Likewise.
Somebody will still keep coming onto ask the questions, esp.
Thats a very good question, and something more people should be asking
: here is a terse reply : adopt a part of the distro, contribute tests
and take ownership of driving support for those components forward ( so,
wiki content, support in irc channels and support for users on those
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
On 5.4.2011 21.49, compdoc wrote:
For reasons of speed and ease of maintenance and backups, what I've settled
on is: a small separate drive for the host to boot from, a small separate
drive for the guest OSes (I like using qcow2 on WD Raptors), and then
firstly, get a better email client. Your existing one is broken.
On 04/06/2011 12:55 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
Its easy to fixate on the idea of CentOS being the distro and the distro
alone - however, a very large part of what the users see value in is the
user base around CentOS - and focused,
Hi to all,
I am trying to install CentOS 5.5 as VM on a KVM server running Ubuntu
10.04. The Problem: the installer does not find the iso image. (Direct
copy from website downlod.) I can start CentOS from the iso and can even
do some disk checks. But when I go further the installer says no CDROm
On 6.4.2011 14:44, Michael Zoet wrote:
Hi to all,
I am trying to install CentOS 5.5 as VM on a KVM server running Ubuntu
10.04. The Problem: the installer does not find the iso image. (Direct
copy from website downlod.) I can start CentOS from the iso and can even
do some disk checks. But
What the hell is so special about CentOS 6?
indeed
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
A bigger number? :-)
On 4/6/2011 7:52 AM, compdoc wrote:
What the hell is so special about CentOS 6?
indeed
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Am Mi, 6.04.2011, 14:51 schrieb Markus Falb:
On 6.4.2011 14:44, Michael Zoet wrote:
Hi to all,
I am trying to install CentOS 5.5 as VM on a KVM server running Ubuntu
10.04. The Problem: the installer does not find the iso image. (Direct
copy from website downlod.) I can start CentOS from
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Michael Zoet michael.z...@zoet.de wrote:
Am Mi, 6.04.2011, 14:51 schrieb Markus Falb:
On 6.4.2011 14:44, Michael Zoet wrote:
Hi to all,
I am trying to install CentOS 5.5 as VM on a KVM server running Ubuntu
10.04. The Problem: the installer does not find the
Hello all,
Well, my local mirror now has CentOS 5.6! Yay! But, I cannot
get it to install. A yum update and a yum --skip-broken
yields me this:
-- Processing Conflict: firefox conflicts xulrunner = 1.9.2.14
-- Finished Dependency Resolution
firefox-3.6.13-2.el5.centos.i386 from installed has
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Gilbert Sebenste
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 4:03 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6 will not install due to Firefox error
Any ideas? All the packages seem to be
KB, please don't top post.
/hides
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
top posting
you need to wait for 5.6 to actually be released
- KB
On 04/06/2011 03:02 PM, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
Hello all,
Well, my local mirror now has CentOS 5.6! Yay!
firstly, get a better email client. Your existing one is broken.
Irrelevant, unhelpful and quite rude. Aside from that, if you tell me what you
perceive to be the problem, perhaps stand a chance to fix the issue. If it is
genuinely a client issue, then please give me something to send back
On 04/06/2011 03:19 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
firstly, get a better email client. Your existing one is broken.
Irrelevant, unhelpful and quite rude.
mailing lists are setup to retain thread sanity, its expected people use
mailclients that can honour that. If yours cant and you prefer not to
On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 10:22:33 AM Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 04/06/2011 03:19 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
firstly, get a better email client. Your existing one is broken.
Irrelevant, unhelpful and quite rude.
mailing lists are setup to retain thread sanity, its expected people use
firstly, get a better email client. Your existing one is broken.
Irrelevant, unhelpful and quite rude.
mailing lists are setup to retain thread sanity, its expected people
use mailclients that can honour that. If yours cant and you prefer not
to change it- perhaps consider using the
On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 10:06:54 AM Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 04/06/2011 03:02 PM, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
Well, my local mirror now has CentOS 5.6! Yay! But, I cannot
get it to install. A yum update and a yum --skip-broken
yields me this:
you need to wait for 5.6 to actually be
On Tuesday, April 05, 2011 09:47:49 AM Mister IT Guru wrote:
I agree people
should stop asking about when 6 will be ready. Also, stop asking about
5.6 and 4.9? *please correct my post if I'm wrong*
Yeah, no reason at all to ask about 4.9, since it's already released.
And reports show that 5.6
Which version of the ixgbe driver is included in 5.6? I went through all the
RHEL5 release notes, but they only ever state that the driver was updated,
not which devices was added.
This device is not supported up to CentOS 5.5 (2.0.44-k2), but the latest
driver from the Intel web site works
On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 03:02:16 pm Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
Hi! I would need an advice from those that use IB (as admins :) )
i have a choice between :
1. Mellanox InfiniHost® III Lx HCA card, single-port CX4, DDR, PCIe
x8, mem-free, tall bracket, RoHS R5
2. QLogic Single Port 20 Gb
On 04/06/2011 05:04 PM, Lars Hecking wrote:
Which version of the ixgbe driver is included in 5.6? I went through all the
RHEL5 release notes, but they only ever state that the driver was updated,
not which devices was added.
In about 4 hrs time you should be able to check for yourself
Which version of the ixgbe driver is included in 5.6? I went through all
the
RHEL5 release notes, but they only ever state that the driver was
updated,
not which devices was added.
This device is not supported up to CentOS 5.5 (2.0.44-k2), but the latest
driver from the Intel web
Your mail is broken because it doesn't contain correct threading headers
(In-Reply-To). Because of that it just threads everywhere in this
thread. For instance, for me, your message was threaded to Russell Jones'
because it came in after his mail. Use a decent email program and the
problem is
Joshua Trutwin wrote on Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:52:23 +:
Some clients also thread by subject by default, I usually use claws
mail for ML stuff as it's threading is excellent.
Threading by subject works only in small threads with few people. The
client doesn't know to which message the reply
On 04/06/2011 03:52 PM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
Says the guy sending this email in Outhouse
yes your mail client is broken too.
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2011-April/thread.html to see
what that does.
- KB
___
CentOS mailing list
Lars Hecking wrote:
Which version of the ixgbe driver is included in 5.6? I went through all the
RHEL5 release notes, but they only ever state that the driver was updated,
not which devices was added.
This device is not supported up to CentOS 5.5 (2.0.44-k2), but the latest
driver from
Looking at the 5.6 kernel source (2.6.18-238), the file
drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h has the line:
#define IXGBE_DEV_ID_82599_T3_LOM0x151C
which part of the patch:
linux-2.6-net-ixgbe-update-to-upstream-version-2-0-84-k2.patch
I'll need to test it once available, but may
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Lars Hecking
lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Looking at the 5.6 kernel source (2.6.18-238), the file
drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h has the line:
#define IXGBE_DEV_ID_82599_T3_LOM 0x151C
which part of the patch:
On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 06:04:15 pm Lars Hecking wrote:
Which version of the ixgbe driver is included in 5.6? I went through all
the RHEL5 release notes, but they only ever state that the driver was
updated, not which devices was added.
This device is not supported up to CentOS 5.5
This does not mean it's not supported it's just not in the pci-id database.
You could try to update just the pci-db with:
# update-pciids
Cool!
05:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599EB 10 Gigabit TN Network
Connection (rev 01)
We've used 82599 on the normal 5.5 kernel no
On 4/5/2011 11:21 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
Dropping to 16.37 TB on the RAID configuration by switching to
RAID-6 let us put almost the entire array under a single 16 TB XFS
filesystem.
You really, really, really don't want to do this.
Actually, it seems that you can't do it any more. I tried,
On 4/5/2011 11:24 AM, Brandon Ooi wrote:
Afaik 32-bit binaries do run on the 64-bit build and compat libraries
exist for most everything. You should evaluate if you really *really*
need 32-bit.
Yes, thanks for assuming I don't know what I was talking about when I
wrote that we had a hard
On 6.4.2011 17:27, Warren Young wrote:
On 4/5/2011 11:24 AM, Brandon Ooi wrote:
Afaik 32-bit binaries do run on the 64-bit build and compat libraries
exist for most everything. You should evaluate if you really *really*
need 32-bit.
Yes, thanks for assuming I don't know what I was talking
On 4/6/2011 11:40 AM, Finnur Örn Guðmundsson wrote:
Just a shot in the darkbut can't you have a x86_64 NFS server export
a fs larger then 16TB and mount that on your x86 machine for use with
your application?
I already ran the two-server idea past the decision makers. It was
rejected,
then the outstanding question is how to figure out why certain
packages are not being updated.
Well, first action: did you actually check with the repo that there is a
newer package?
Yes. I'm not sure why would you think otherwise...?
Just because a package isn't updated doesn't
Do you know how to determine which repo a particular package is from? For
example, when I do yum info against clamav (which isn't receiving
automatic
updates), it just says Repo: installed. I don't know what repo it comes
from.
yum list clamav --showduplicates should show
It does look like updates are happening, but it's not clear to me by
whom.
do_update is set to no, but notification is by dbus, so I assumed
that
dbus is notifying another process to do the actual updates. Is
there
a way I
can track that down?
Are you sure the updates
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
On 6.4.2011 17:27, Warren Young wrote:
On 4/5/2011 11:24 AM, Brandon Ooi wrote:
Afaik 32-bit binaries do run on the 64-bit build and compat
libraries exist for most everything. You should evaluate if you
really *really* need 32-bit.
Yes, thanks for assuming
On 04/06/11 11:08 AM, Warren Young wrote:
I already ran the two-server idea past the decision makers. It was
rejected, even though this server I just built is going to replace an
existing one purely to add the extra storage, and so it could have just
acted as a storage side-car to the
On 04/06/11 7:56 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
I really really wish repositories would be ACID compliant.
I concur, but I'm not sure how you'd do this, since some users will be
in process with an update under 1 state while the repo switches to the
new state, even if that state switch is instantaneous.
Hello,
As I've learned recently, I do not have any auto updates configured on my
system. I see some posts on the web encouraging the use of yum-cron, but I'd
like to know what people feel about the use of automatic updates.
That is, for a server (non-desktop) system, automatic updates
If you don't want your system to break unexpectedly, do not enable
automatic updates; especially if you are running any packages with
non-standard configurations. In some cases, with bare packages and
stock configurations, automatic updates may prove to be a viable and
SEMI-safe solution. But,
At Wed, 6 Apr 2011 11:35:47 -0700 (PDT) CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Hello,
As I've learned recently, I do not have any auto updates configured on my
system. I see some posts on the web encouraging the use of yum-cron, but
I'd
like to know what people feel about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
email builder said the following on 06/04/11 20:35:
Is the only reasonable solution to schedule a human cron once a week to
look
at needed updates? Ouch.
I use human cron.
I have a CenOS server at home and I follow CentOS and other software
On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 01:16:19 PM Warren Young wrote:
I expect they added some checks for this since you last tried XFS on 32-bit.
Perhaps it wasn't clear from what I wrote, but the big partition on this
system is actually 15.9mumble TB, just to be sure we don't even get 1
byte over
On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 02:33:24 PM John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/06/11 7:56 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
I really really wish repositories would be ACID compliant.
I concur, but I'm not sure how you'd do this, since some users will be
in process with an update under 1 state while the repo
On 4/6/2011 1:35 PM, email builder wrote:
Hello,
As I've learned recently, I do not have any auto updates configured on my
system. I see some posts on the web encouraging the use of yum-cron, but
I'd
like to know what people feel about the use of automatic updates.
That is, for a
On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 03:22:48 PM Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 02:33:24 PM John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/06/11 7:56 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
I really really wish repositories would be ACID compliant.
I concur, but I'm not sure how you'd do this, since some users will
Peter A wrote:
On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 03:22:48 PM Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 02:33:24 PM John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/06/11 7:56 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
I really really wish repositories would be ACID compliant.
I concur, but I'm not sure how you'd do this, since
instead, what I think would make more sense would be a modified repo
architecture where the current repoinfo file is versioned, and there's a
master file which refers to the name of the 'current' version.
so, to update the repo, you first copy all the new packages, and the new
versioned
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:58 +0800, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Fidel Dominguez-Valero
fdval...@gmail.com wrote:
- Are you using vsftpd? Proftpd?
I'm using vsftpd
Just edit vsftpd.conf and restart ftp
# Allow anonymous FTP? (Disabled by default)
On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 01:27:10 PM Warren Young wrote:
Legacy is hard. Next time someone tells you they can't use the latest
and greatest for some reason, you might take them at their word.
Yes, it is.
To give another for instance, we do work with some interfaces for telescopes
On 4/6/2011 1:16 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
There are other issues with XFS and 32-bit; see:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3364
and
http://www.mail-archive.com/scientific-linux-users@listserv.fnal.gov/msg05347.html
and google for 'XFS 32-bit 4K stacks' for more of the gory details.
Thanks
[Ah! Peter! Back from the loonybin I see we're still using the sun QFE
boards and the Ex500 CPU cards, thanks again]
On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 03:48:14 PM Peter A wrote:
On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 03:22:48 PM Lamar Owen wrote:
Pipe dream: MultiVersion Concurrency Control, like
On 4/6/2011 2:52 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
This is very different than the delta rpms though... delta rpms and all
that still works with a simple http server. For a mvcc you'd need a
backend to
have an actual DB, scripting backend and such...
Ah, yes, sort of like, well, a real version
- Original Message
From: Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Wed, 6 April, 2011 17:15:27
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?
Your mail is broken because it doesn't contain correct threading headers
(In-Reply-To). Because of that it just threads
On 4/6/2011 12:25 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
Don't scream: I'm using RedHat 7.3 for related reasons.
Yep, we've still got a bunch of those running in the field, too, and
many older besides. We still build new boxes using CentOS 3, also for
legacy compatibility reasons.
can a 64-bit
On 6.4.2011 22:03, Fidel Dominguez-Valero wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:58 +0800, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Fidel Dominguez-Valero
fdval...@gmail.com wrote:
- Are you using vsftpd? Proftpd?
I'm using vsftpd
Just edit vsftpd.conf and restart ftp
# Allow
On 04/06/2011 03:19 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
firstly, get a better email client. Your existing one is broken.
Irrelevant, unhelpful and quite rude.
mailing lists are setup to retain thread sanity, its expected people use
mailclients that can honour that. If yours cant and you prefer
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/6/2011 2:52 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
This is very different than the delta rpms though... delta rpms and all
that still works with a simple http server. For a mvcc you'd need a
backend to
have an actual DB, scripting backend and such...
Ah, yes, sort of like,
yOn Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 04/04/2011 11:14 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
Nobody else really can give an update, the process is pretty much closed
to the general public. So if the only person why can provide information
is off by 2 months, I'd rather have no information at all.
On 4/6/2011 3:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/6/2011 2:52 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
This is very different than the delta rpms though... delta rpms and all
that still works with a simple http server. For a mvcc you'd need a
backend to
have an actual DB, scripting
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 04/06/2011 07:54 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
How can a company dedicate a few man-hours per week to help CentOS?
I mean this in a more official way, rather than just a person dropping
by at the -devel list.
Thats a very good question, and
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 22:17 +0200, Markus Falb wrote:
On 6.4.2011 22:03, Fidel Dominguez-Valero wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:58 +0800, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Fidel Dominguez-Valero
fdval...@gmail.com wrote:
- Are you using vsftpd? Proftpd?
I'm
On 04/06/2011 09:57 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
But there's no problem with all of these things where people can help
already. The wiki is working fine, the mailinglist is helping people, I
never heard anyone complain about this.
There is no problem that people can help there, sure - but how many
On 04/06/2011 09:53 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
That's not hard to do - stop reading them then.
And once again we are avoiding a proper solution.
No, once again you dont understand the issues, the problem or the
efforts going into the solution.
Really, try stopping reading for a few weeks. You
On 04/05/2011 08:47 AM, Mister IT Guru wrote:
What the hell is so special about CentOS 6?
For me, that would be kernel version 2.6.32. I have hardware and
software that needs a kernel a lot newer than the 2.6.18 kernel in
CentOS 5.6. I would dearly love to get off the Fedora roller coaster.
On 04/06/11 2:07 PM, Fidel Dominguez-Valero wrote:
Ridiculous is you answer
suggesting you read the documentation is ridiculous?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
2011/4/6 Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org:
On 04/06/2011 09:53 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
That's not hard to do - stop reading them then.
And once again we are avoiding a proper solution.
No, once again you dont understand the issues, the problem or the
efforts going into the solution.
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
