On Apr 13, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/13/2011 12:39 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
We looked at a number of monitoring systems before closing on
(community version) Opsview. The main other contender we looked at
was
zenoss - I have to admit I was biased due to previous use
On 4/13/2011 12:47 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
OK, if you are going to use that as an example, please tell me how many
of those people made that choice knowing that updates were going to be
months behind upstream. There's certainly nothing on the project web
site to imply that.
How about I
Radu Gheorghiu wrote:
On 04/13/2011 07:55 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 04/13/2011 10:24 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/12/2011 5:40 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
snip
There is no time limit that we would go past where I would allow
people who I do not know and trust to commit items into the CentOS
On Apr 13, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/13/2011 12:47 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
OK, if you are going to use that as an example, please tell me how
many
of those people made that choice knowing that updates were going
to be
months behind upstream. There's certainly
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Radu Gheorghiu wrote:
On 04/13/2011 07:55 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 04/13/2011 10:24 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/12/2011 5:40 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
snip
There is no time limit that we would go past where I would allow
people who I do not know and trust
It looks like you are using OpenAFS packages built for a specific kernel
- in this case the 5.5 kernel-2.6.18-194.26.1.el5. My guess would be
that in updating to 5.6, yum has automatically removed that older kernel.
You need to get kmod-openafs packages that match the version of your
currently
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Nicolas Ross
rossnick-li...@cybercat.ca wrote:
I have Sangoma A101DE 1 Port E1/T1 With Hardware Echo Cancellation ( PCI
Express ) Card installed on the box. Its not detected. Details are as
below
:-
Sounds like a hardware problem. I'm running CentOS 5.5 with
It's probably something simple I'm missing.
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey
I started from there and used unetbootin which has always worked
for me before. The boot works but it can't find the RPMS which are
definitely on the stick. bah!
Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Radu Gheorghiu wrote:
On 04/13/2011 07:55 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 04/13/2011 10:24 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/12/2011 5:40 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
snip
There is no time limit that we would go past where I would allow
people who
On 4/13/2011 1:01 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
How many INSTALLS of CentOS do you still choose to have?
I think you know the answer for CentOS 6. I haven't deployed any new
services on CentOS since the 5.4 release, and am generally losing to
the
guy who favors SUSE here - and even the
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Ryan Wagoner rswago...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Nicolas Ross
rossnick-li...@cybercat.ca wrote:
I have Sangoma A101DE 1 Port E1/T1 With Hardware Echo Cancellation (
PCI
Express ) Card installed on the box. Its not detected. Details
On Apr 13, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/13/2011 1:01 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
How many INSTALLS of CentOS do you still choose to have?
I think you know the answer for CentOS 6. I haven't deployed any
new
services on CentOS since the 5.4 release, and am generally
On 4/12/2011 5:12 PM, ken wrote:
I'm shopping for a small/tiny audio recorder, the kind for recording in
a class, interviews, etc... not really music, just voice. Per usual, a
lot of these write their audio files in some Windows format, e.g., WMA.
As a confirmed Linux guy, I'd want to
On 4/13/2011 1:08 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
there are two other 238 kernels - do they show the same behavior?
I will install kernel-2.6.18-238.5.1.el5.centos.plus and let the list
know how it goes. I totally forgot that there was a Plus repo. I
actually had it disabled.
Brian.
Hi
I get anaconda.log:23:07:59 DEBUG : ignoring driverless device Sangoma
Technologies Corp. A200/Remora FXO/FXS Analog AFT card
Linux asterisk 2.6.18-194.11.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Aug 10 19:05:06 EDT 2010
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
lspci | grep sangoma does not return anything
Please
Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Ryan Wagoner rswago...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Nicolas Ross
rossnick-li...@cybercat.ca wrote:
I have Sangoma A101DE 1 Port E1/T1 With Hardware Echo Cancellation (
PCI Express ) Card installed on the box.
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 13:08 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote:
Mailing List wrote:
On 4/13/2011 7:35 AM, Mailing List wrote:
Hi,
I have upgraded my Dell C151 to the latest 5.6. I have always used
ntp to sync this machine and then the rest of the machines in the
network would sync from it.
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 14:42 -0400, Mailing List wrote:
On 4/13/2011 1:08 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
there are two other 238 kernels - do they show the same behavior?
I will install kernel-2.6.18-238.5.1.el5.centos.plus and let the list
know how it goes. I totally forgot that there was a
Hello group,
I have a CentOS 5.5 server freshly installed.
When I do a yum updated package_name, I have referenced to 5.6. Why?
Here is an example:
yum update vsftpd --changelog
Loaded plugins: changelog, fastestmirror, security
addons/other
| 192 B 00:00
base/other_db
| 11 MB 00:50
On 4/13/2011 2:50 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
You don't say what version of ntp you are using or whether the system in
question can access the Internet.
Should be: ntp-4.2.2p1-9.el5.centos.2.1.i386
[Refs]
http://www.ntp.org/
http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Support/WebHome
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Hello group,
I have a CentOS 5.5 server freshly installed.
When I do a yum updated package_name, I have referenced to 5.6. Why?
CentOS *finally* pushed 5.6 out the door, so you can expect any 5.5
system to upgrade to 5.6.
Mine did, painlessly.
//me
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Bernard Fay bernard@enodegroup.com wrote:
Hello group,
I have a CentOS 5.5 server freshly installed.
When I do a yum updated package_name, I have referenced to 5.6. Why?
CentOS point releases track the upstream Update x releases. So
CentOS 5.6 is
(...)
You need to contact the vendor and ask them for a driver for the card.
anaconda's *telling* you that it has no driver for the card, at least as
far as I can tell.
Even so, the card with no driver would be listed in lspci...
___
CentOS mailing
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:39:17AM -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 12, 2011, at 7:33 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:23:19AM +1000, Bob Hepple wrote:
We looked at a number of monitoring systems before closing on
(community version) Opsview. The main other
John Hodrien wrote on Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:37:16 +0100 (BST):
System Level | 126 Watts | ok
Ah, thanks. My systems don't show that :-)
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
- Original Message -
(...)
You need to contact the vendor and ask them for a driver for the
card.
anaconda's *telling* you that it has no driver for the card, at
least as
far as I can tell.
Even so, the card with no driver would be listed in lspci...
Sven Aluoor wrote:
Hi folks
I generate with SQL*Plus a CSV file. How to convert this to PDF? Or
more generally: how to get SQL*Plus output to PDF on Linux?
Perhaps you should ask Oracle, since sql*plus is Oracle?
mark
___
CentOS mailing
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 15:10 -0400, Mailing List wrote:
On 4/13/2011 2:50 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
[snip]
The ntp server does connect to the internet fine. the version of
ntp is as follows.
ntp-4.2.2p1-9.el5.centos.2.1
The time is not off by a matter of minutes or I would not
On Apr 13, 2011, at 12:28 PM, Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:39:17AM -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 12, 2011, at 7:33 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:23:19AM +1000, Bob Hepple wrote:
We looked at a number of monitoring systems before closing
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
John Hodrien wrote on Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:37:16 +0100 (BST):
System Level | 126 Watts | ok
Ah, thanks. My systems don't show that :-)
Yep, it's entirely system dependent. And on a current Dell, I believe you
don't get these stats unless
Even so, the card with no driver would be listed in lspci...
Sort of, it may be incorrectly identified as something else, all
those pretty names are simple mappings in a text file. See
/usr/share/hwdata/pci.ids
But then again, multiple people have suggested the same suggestions
and/or hints over
- Original Message -
On Apr 13, 2011, at 12:28 PM, Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:39:17AM -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 12, 2011, at 7:33 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:23:19AM +1000, Bob Hepple wrote:
We looked at a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/13/2011 03:35 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 15:10 -0400, Mailing List wrote:
On 4/13/2011 2:50 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
[snip]
The ntp server does connect to the internet fine. the version of
ntp is as follows.
I am sure if you do then you will have a mailing list on which your
fanbois can post that they want to give you money.
But this list is not for that purpose.
Once again an unnecessary personal attack. If anybody round here has fanbois,
the CentOS devs! Not language I would normally
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:37:28PM -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 13, 2011, at 12:28 PM, Jerry McAllister wrote:
So, if I already have a working nagios that I like, are there any
advantages to Opsview community? I only have about 100 services I
monitor, and I doubt it'd grow
Running v5 64bit on a Dell 1950.
A cluster of 3 DB machines, identical hardware. One of them suddenly
became slower 2 weeks ago.
tar -zxf with a large file on this machine takes 1.5 minutes, but takes
only 10 seconds on any of its siblings. CPU usage seems high while
untarring, with lots of
On 4/13/2011 12:52 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, Nagios is more for outage/alerts were I was looking more for
trending.
Thats why I was originally using Cacti w/Nagios plugin.
If you find anything that is really good at this, please post the
info.
Will do, sounds like I'm doing a
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 16:00 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
[snip]
The avc messages are in /var/log/audit/audit.log
ausearch -m avc -ts recent
Will also show you recent AVC messages.
audit2allow -la
will search for any avc message in /var/log/audit/audit.log or
/var/log/messages since
On 4/13/2011 3:01 PM, Jerry McAllister wrote:
Oh. OK. As I indicated, I haven't been following, just dived in
the middle.I have not used Cacti or Opsview, but am just starting
to learn rrdtool by itself.
Pretty much all of the packages that collect values and graph them use
rrdtool as
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Running v5 64bit on a Dell 1950.
A cluster of 3 DB machines, identical hardware. One of them suddenly
became slower 2 weeks ago.
snip proof the overall system is slow
snip proof that the CPU is not the problem
/var/log/messages was full of ntpd[7313]:
I am sure if you do then you will have a mailing list on which your
fanbois can post that they want to give you money.
But this list is not for that purpose.
Once again an unnecessary personal attack.
Nonsense.
___
CentOS mailing list
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
I am sure if you do then you will have a mailing list on which your
fanbois can post that they want to give you money.
But this list is not for that purpose.
Once again an unnecessary personal attack.
Nonsense.
Yes, fanboi is a denigration,
On 4/13/2011 3:35 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
I'm running the same kernel and ntp versions and I'm having no problems
at all on ntp servers or clients.
If my previous suggestions didn't help maybe you could share contents of
the following files and output of some commands so the list can see what
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 13:06 -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
Running v5 64bit on a Dell 1950.
A cluster of 3 DB machines, identical hardware. One of them suddenly
became slower 2 weeks ago.
tar -zxf with a large file on this machine takes 1.5 minutes, but takes
only 10 seconds on any of its
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Sven Aluoor wrote:
Hi folks
I generate with SQL*Plus a CSV file. How to convert this to PDF? Or
more generally: how to get SQL*Plus output to PDF on Linux?
I generally go from CSV files to PDF using a python scripts to
generate input for groff,
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/12/2011 5:12 PM, ken wrote:
I'm shopping for a small/tiny audio recorder, the kind for recording in
a class, interviews, etc... not really music, just voice. Per usual, a
lot of these write their audio files in some Windows format, e.g., WMA.
As a confirmed Linux
On 04/13/2011 01:34 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
tar -zxf with a large file on this machine takes 1.5 minutes, but takes
only 10 seconds on any of its siblings. CPU usage seems high while
untarring, with lots of user and sys cycles being used, but almost no
wait cycles. It doesn't matter whether I
Sven Aluoor wrote:
Hi folks
I generate with SQL*Plus a CSV file. How to convert this to PDF? Or
more generally: how to get SQL*Plus output to PDF on Linux?
cheers Sven
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 04/13/2011 01:55 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
1) Are you untarring from *and* to the SAN volume or is the source on
the local volume?
Source on SAN, destination on SAN. Still slow.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
There has been a steady stream of updates of security issues for 5.6.
I'm curious about the timeline for these updates from centos...:)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Mailing List
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 16:23
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOs 5.6 and Time Sync
/etc/ntp;
restrict default kod nomodify notrap nopeer
John Doe wrote:
Hi,
I was just wondering if there are specific steps to take to install CentOS on
SSDs...
By example, no swap partition?
Format with a flash fs?
Sysctl parameters?
Thx,
JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Les Mikesell wrote on 04/13/2011 02:22 PM:
I can't think of anything that has been a problem with 64-bit win
2003/2008 as production servers and I sort of like the way you can
decide after-the-fact that you want to convert a disk to software raid.
On 04/13/2011 01:16 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
Any RAID setups go into self-repair mode?
No RAID here, just LVM - not too different from the default redhat-style
setup of the system drives (except the additional SAN stuff and DB).
Anyway, if the drives are the cause, then riddle me this:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
There has been a steady stream of updates of security issues
for 5.6.
I'm curious about the timeline for these updates from centos...:)
You mean, besides when it's done?
I'm just glad I'm not doing anything business-critical that's exposed to
the Great Unwashed
William Warren wrote:
There has been a steady stream of updates of security issues for 5.6.
I'm curious about the timeline for these updates from centos...:)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 4/13/2011 5:20 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
William Warren wrote:
There has been a steady stream of updates of security issues for 5.6.
I'm curious about the timeline for these updates from centos...:)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 16:22 -0400, Mailing List wrote:
On 4/13/2011 3:35 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
I'm running the same kernel and ntp versions and I'm having no problems
at all on ntp servers or clients.
If my previous suggestions didn't help maybe you could share contents of
the
Hi Nicolas,
T1/Machine is not a real bottleneck if you throw enough hardware at
it. We're running several configurations of Centos/Asterisk with 24
AudioCodes based E1 channels and Software-SS7 here.
Configuration is 10 GB Ram and 8 procesor cores. The machines are sold
preconfigured like this
On 4/13/2011 5:24 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
ntpq -c pe -c as
root ~# ntpq -c pe -c as
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset
jitter
==
bindcat.fhsu.ed 132.163.4.1012 u 1015 1024
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote on 04/13/2011 05:20 PM:
You should try to search the mailing list first, then ask redundant
question. This was answered in last 24-48h.
And today on IRC we find:
15:36 @z00dax cap_: we will be all caught up with updates today
Do to the bandwidth constrictions,
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 17:42 -0400, Mailing List wrote:
On 4/13/2011 5:24 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
ntpq -c pe -c as
root ~# ntpq -c pe -c as
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset
jitter
On 4/13/2011 7:58 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
So when is DEntOS 6.0 going to be released?
What's that? The latest electronic flossing toothbrush?
The fresh maker!
With the great new hot silicon flavor!
Hot silicon? I thought that smell was smoldering Nomex underwear, from
all the
On 4/13/2011 6:01 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
Your ntpq output tells me that all the ntp.org servers have been
rejected in favor of your (undisciplined) local clock. You should
disable it as a time source in ntp.conf as suggested previously. You
gain nothing by keeping it configured under your
Maybe check /proc/interrupts ?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 14/04/11 7:42 AM, Mailing List wrote:
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset
jitter
==
bindcat.fhsu.ed 132.163.4.1012 u 1015 1024 377 49.987 -15082.
6919.88
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 05:57 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/13/2011 4:11 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote on 04/13/2011 02:22 PM:
I can't think of anything that has been a problem with 64-bit win
2003/2008 as production servers and I sort of like the way you can
decide
On 04/13/2011 03:21 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
I am sure if you do then you will have a mailing list on which your
fanbois can post that they want to give you money.
But this list is not for that purpose.
Once again an unnecessary personal attack.
On Apr 13, 2011, at 3:50 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 05:57 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/13/2011 4:11 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote on 04/13/2011 02:22 PM:
I can't think of anything that has been a problem with 64-bit
win
2003/2008 as
Brunner, Brian T. wrote on 04/13/2011 04:21 PM:
And this thread is all about something that doesn't exist, and nobody is
trying to make exist. It's about the web-footed boogeyman in the closet
that nobody living at the home ever alleged was there.
It may be that no such project exists today,
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 06:55 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
This is the CentOS General Discussion list. It is for talking about CentOS.
and Centos politics, Centos forums, whatever fun Centos subject. No
dracs here!
___
CentOS mailing list
On Wed, April 13, 2011 12:00 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Message: 30
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:10:52 -0400
From: m.r...@5-cent.us
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Got no login screen with the new 5.6 kernel
Phil Schaffner wrote:
Stanley A. Klein wrote on 04/12/2011 01:55 PM:
I did the 5.6 update
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Peter Brady
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 18:39
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOs 5.6 and Time Sync
On 14/04/11 7:42 AM, Mailing List wrote:
remote
On 04/12/2011 11:30 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/12/2011 9:36 AM, John Jasen wrote:
snipped: two recommendations for XFS
I would chime in with a dis-commendation for XFS. At my previous
employer, two cases involving XFS resulted in irrecoverable data
corruption. These were on RAID systems
On 4/13/2011 5:50 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
I can't think of anything that has been a problem with 64-bit win
2003/2008 as production servers and I sort of like the way you can
decide after-the-fact that you want to convert a disk to software raid.
On 04/12/2011 08:19 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 10:36 PM, John Jasen wrote:
On 04/12/2011 10:21 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:36 AM, Alain Péan
alain.p...@lpp.polytechnique.fr
mailto:alain.p...@lpp.polytechnique.fr wrote:
snipped: two
On 14/04/11 9:16 AM, Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote:
I think you may be comparing a couple of rotting apples to one that is
just now ripening.
when offset
1015 15082
998 15139
1 29233
i.e., the samples that are 17 seconds apart in the taking are .057S
apart in
Les Mikesell wrote on 04/13/2011 07:22 PM:
...
I can't think of anything that has been a problem with 64-bit win
2003/2008 as production servers and I sort of like the way you can
decide after-the-fact that you want to convert a disk to software raid.
On Apr 13, 2011, at 4:51 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote on 04/13/2011 07:22 PM:
...
I can't think of anything that has been a problem with 64-
bit win
2003/2008 as production servers and I sort of like the way you
can
decide after-the-fact that you want to convert a
On Apr 13, 2011, at 7:26 PM, John Jasen jja...@realityfailure.org wrote:
On 04/12/2011 08:19 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 10:36 PM, John Jasen wrote:
On 04/12/2011 10:21 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:36 AM, Alain Péan
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
One was a hardware raid over fibre channel, which silently corrupted
itself. System checked out fine, raid array checked out fine, xfs was
replaced with ext3, and the system ran without issue.
Second was multiple
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 19:14 -0400, Stanley A. Klein wrote:
On Wed, April 13, 2011 12:00 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Phil Schaffner wrote:
Stanley A. Klein wrote on 04/12/2011 01:55 PM:
I did the 5.6 update yesterday. When I started the machine today, I
did
not get a login screen --
from the gnome menu, system-shutdown, then press the hibernate button on the
popup window. during the process, the system stoped ,after shrink memory and
free many pages.
any suggest? tnks.___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Apr 13, 2011, at 9:40 PM, Brandon Ooi brand...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
One was a hardware raid over fibre channel, which silently corrupted
itself. System checked out fine, raid array checked out fine, xfs was
replaced
On 4/14/11, Phil Schaffner philip.r.schaff...@nasa.gov wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote on 04/13/2011 12:55 PM:
CentOS is ... right now ... deployed on 29% of web
servers on the Internet that use Linux.
That 28.9% is down from the high of 33.5% in Oct. 2010 or a 13.8% decrease.
On 4/14/11, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
You can't expand a mdraid raid0.
I believe you can expand a mdraid raid10,5,6, but not raid0.
That was what I thought previously when looking into this and weighing
the pros/cons of using RAID 10 vs RAID 5.
But earlier this week, from the
On 04/13/11 9:51 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
I'm was stuck trying to decide whether to go for the cheaper RAID 5
setup and possibly getting killed by the IOPS penalty and the risk
associated with rebuild time, or figure out a way to use the
recommended RAID 10 setup with a smaller usable
101 - 187 of 187 matches
Mail list logo
