G'day
Not sure how my previous email ended up with an In-Reply-To header for an
existing thread...most odd.
Wiki username: SteveBarnes
As per the guidelines on:
http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute#head-42b3d8e26400a106851a61aebe5c2cca54dd79e5
I'd like to tidy up this page a bit:
Am 29.04.11 18:32, schrieb Alex Goffe:
Ok, changes made! If you could move it that would be great.
Okay, done. Could you please explain in the document
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Fog why you are truning off iptables?
Thanks,
Ralph
___
CentOS-docs
Am 02.05.11 10:21, schrieb Steve Barnes:
I'd like to tidy up this page a bit:
http://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/AutomatedTests
I used it as the basis for developing my test scripts; the formatting for the
code examples is a little wonky so I thought I'd tidy it up so others can
read
On Mon, 2 May 2011, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Am 29.04.11 18:32, schrieb Alex Goffe:
Ok, changes made! If you could move it that would be great.
Okay, done. Could you please explain in the document
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Fog why you are truning off iptables?
My thought, reading the
si la verdad, lo busque y poweroff me funciona bien.
gracias,
El 1 de mayo de 2011 14:27, Xavier Mauricio Tirado L.
xtir...@ambiente.gob.ec escribió:
poweroff es muy efectivo para mi jeje
simple y directo ;)
Xavier Mauricio Tirado L.
Unidad de Infraestructura
Dirección de Tecnología
On 2 May 2011 12:22, R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2011, Amos Shapira wrote:
Does anyone have instructions on how to go through the
entire process from downloading source RPM's from RedHat's
servers through to building the entire distribution?
I've searched
On Saturday, April 30, 2011 04:10 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
Some interesting developments coming:
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/96/html/6.1_Release_Notes/index.html
biosdevname for nics...bye bye eth0!
FUSE!
control groups!
a linux 2.2 feature!
ipchains
On Monday, May 02, 2011 06:48 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Saturday, April 30, 2011 04:10 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
Some interesting developments coming:
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/96/html/6.1_Release_Notes/index.html
biosdevname for nics...bye bye eth0!
Hi All,
I'm lately suffering from Quota abuse at home. believe it or not my
teenagers are eating through my allowed quota.
Hence, i'm thinking of setting up a centos machine to work as such:
HDSL modem(natted to an onboard dhcp service for lan users) - Centos -
Switch - LAN users
Hw
Roland Roland wrote:
Hi All,
I'm lately suffering from Quota abuse at home. believe it or not my
teenagers are eating through my allowed quota.
Hence, i'm thinking of setting up a centos machine to work as such:
HDSL modem(natted to an onboard dhcp service for lan users) - Centos -
Also worth considering is to upgrade the subscription to unlimited
internet access.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Also worth considering is to upgrade the subscription to unlimited
internet access.
In Australia for example, and other remote locations have mandatory caps
because they get their internet via limited throughput links (satellite
or old under the see cables?), so he might
Roland Roland wrote on Mon, 2 May 2011 15:09:00 +0300:
As you noticed above, my whole connection management is relying on
squid, i'm worried that it will process only traffic that's forwarded
to port 80 instead of everything going through the server. any idea if
thats the case?
Correct.
On Monday, May 02, 2011 06:48:37 AM Christopher Chan wrote:
biosdevname for nics...bye bye eth0!
Not by default, and according to the release notes only for certain Dell
servers ATM.
But, yes, a different way of looking at NICs is coming down the pipe. It's
about time.
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Also worth considering is to upgrade the subscription to unlimited
internet access.
Or consider checking into just what your teenagers are downloading that's
gigabytes and gigabytes
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
On 05/02/2011 09:38 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Monday, May 02, 2011 06:48:37 AM Christopher Chan wrote:
biosdevname for nics...bye bye eth0!
Not by default, and according to the release notes only for certain Dell
servers ATM.
But, yes, a different way of looking at NICs is coming down the
On Monday, May 02, 2011 09:57:19 AM Steve Clark wrote:
On 05/02/2011 09:38 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Monday, May 02, 2011 06:48:37 AM Christopher Chan wrote:
biosdevname for nics...bye bye eth0!
Not by default, and according to the release notes only for certain Dell
servers ATM.
On 5/2/2011 8:57 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 05/02/2011 09:38 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Monday, May 02, 2011 06:48:37 AM Christopher Chan wrote:
biosdevname for nics...bye bye eth0!
Not by default, and according to the release notes only for certain Dell
servers ATM.
But, yes, a different way
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 5/2/2011 8:57 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 05/02/2011 09:38 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Monday, May 02, 2011 06:48:37 AM Christopher Chan wrote:
biosdevname for nics...bye bye eth0!
Not by default, and according to the release notes only for certain Dell
servers ATM.
But,
On 5/2/2011 9:58 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
But, yes, a different way of looking at NICs is coming down the pipe.
It's about
time.
EGADS Why? After working with FreeBSD for ten years it so nice not to
have to worry
is this rl0, vr0, em0, fxp0, bge0, ed0, etc in networking scripts. Why
On Monday, May 02, 2011 09:57:19 AM Steve Clark wrote:
On 05/02/2011 09:38 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
But, yes, a different way of looking at NICs is coming down the pipe. It's
about time.
EGADS Why? After working with FreeBSD for ten years it so nice not to have
to worry is this rl0, vr0,
On 5/2/2011 10:14 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
Major networking gear does this; cisco, for instance, gives you things like
FastEthernet4/47, or GigabitEthernet2/2, or TenGigabitEthernet1/0, or POS3/0,
etc for networking interfaces. Having seen the PCI eth device flips before
between update
On 05/02/2011 11:07 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 5/2/2011 9:58 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
But, yes, a different way of looking at NICs is coming down the pipe.
It's about
time.
EGADS Why? After working with FreeBSD for ten years it so nice not to
have to worry
is this rl0, vr0, em0, fxp0,
On 5/2/2011 11:19 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Anybody know *why*? Is it based on the order of response of the NIC
firmware? Certainly, were I writing the code, I'd have based it on the bus
address.
I think the 2.4 kernel did it that way, and was single-threaded during
detection. At least I
Roland Roland R_O_L_A_N_D@... writes:
Hence, i'm thinking of setting up a centos machine to work as such:
HDSL modem(natted to an onboard dhcp service for lan users) - Centos -
Switch - LAN users
Hw specs:
3 GB ram
3.0 core 2 duo
2 X 1 TB HDD
2 X 1 Gb NIC
Your proposed
Hi all,
Somehow I mistakenly install a bunch of 32bit packages in my 64bit Centos 5.6
How do I remove those 32bit packages?
Thank you.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On May 2, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Hi all,
Somehow I mistakenly install a bunch of 32bit packages in my 64bit Centos 5.6
How do I remove those 32bit packages?
yum remove *.i*86
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Fajar Priyanto wrote on 05/02/2011 12:39 PM:
Hi all,
Somehow I mistakenly install a bunch of 32bit packages in my 64bit Centos 5.6
How do I remove those 32bit packages?
FAQ #22:
http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General#head-357346ff0bf7c14b0849c3bcce39677aaca528e9
Phil
Hi all,
I am trying to run kvm (which works) on my desktop.
then when I vnc into my desktop I can use everything as normal
except the kvm window. It messes up. Its like the mouse isnt really
when its supposed to be or something.
Anyone ran into this? I am using 5.6 x86_64.
Thanks,
Jerry
On 05/02/11 6:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Correct. The easy solution is to ban bittorrent and other P2P services.
not as easy as it sounds. those services are remarkably agile at
dodging firewall rules
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
John R Pierce wrote:
On 05/02/11 6:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Correct. The easy solution is to ban bittorrent and other P2P services.
not as easy as it sounds. those services are remarkably agile at
dodging firewall rules
P2P always happens on much higher ports and if you create rules
Correct. The easy solution is to ban bittorrent and other P2P services.
not as easy as it sounds. those services are remarkably agile at
dodging firewall rules
At home it's a bit easier. You can do stuff at the firewall but any
parent should have their kid's computer's root password so they
At Tue, 3 May 2011 00:39:24 +0800 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote:
Hi all,
Somehow I mistakenly install a bunch of 32bit packages in my 64bit Centos 5.6
How do I remove those 32bit packages?
You do know that the default install includes a basic set of 32-bit
libraries to support
On Mon, 2 May 2011 20:21:19 +0800
Fajar Priyanto fajar...@arinet.org wrote:
Also worth considering is to upgrade the subscription to unlimited
internet access.
1. There's no such thing as unlimited. There are always limits. You're
thinking of flat rate.
2. Flat rate isn't available in every
3. Irrespective of cost, sometimes heavy downloading can eat into a
connection's bandwidth and kill the connection for everyone else. In
fact, upgrading to a flat rate plan encourages this kind of behaviour
more.
If the ISP offer's flat rate or capped flat rate services and
can't handle the
On 5/2/2011 4:06 PM, Spiro Harvey wrote:
Also worth considering is to upgrade the subscription to unlimited
internet access.
1. There's no such thing as unlimited. There are always limits. You're
thinking of flat rate.
2. Flat rate isn't available in every country.
3. Irrespective of
On 5/2/2011 10:25 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Trying to save a few seconds when rebooting a server seems pointlessto me
The Linux kernel is also used in laptops/desktops
Fast boots also matter for embedded systems.
We integrate a series of Linux-based boxes made by another company into
our
On Mon, 2 May 2011 14:19:13 -0700
Drew drew@gmail.com wrote:
3. Irrespective of cost, sometimes heavy downloading can eat into a
connection's bandwidth and kill the connection for everyone else. In
fact, upgrading to a flat rate plan encourages this kind of
behaviour more.
If the ISP
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:33 AM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 05/02/11 6:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Correct. The easy solution is to ban bittorrent and other P2P services.
not as easy as it sounds. those services are remarkably agile at
dodging firewall rules
Layer 7 net
39 matches
Mail list logo
