Hola lista tengo una duda que quiero compartir , termine de instalar
el modulo de ipp2p con centos 5.6 para el bloqueo de los p2p, quiero
cargar las reglas adicionales iptables para el bloqueo a nivel de mi
interfaces de red , el detalle es que estoy usando shorewall como
firewall/ipables y no
On Monday, May 09, 2011 10:28 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Laurent CREPET wrote:
On Mon, 9 May 2011 05:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
John Doejd...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Laurent CREPETl...@megrapet.fr
Today, squid crashed again.
Maybe ask on the squid mailing list, they might have more insight...
Le 09/05/2011 18:36, Benjamin Smith a écrit :
On Saturday, May 07, 2011 11:52:21 AM Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
in-place upgrade of C5 to C6 will be most likely impossible. To many
changes of how thing work.
Thankfully, the only in-place upgrades I'll really consider is to
cross-grade SL6
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
On Monday, May 09, 2011 10:28 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Laurent CREPET wrote:
On Mon, 9 May 2011 05:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
John Doejd...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Laurent CREPETl...@megrapet.fr
On Tuesday, May 10, 2011 04:51 PM, Brandon Ooi wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk
mailto:christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
On Monday, May 09, 2011 10:28 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Laurent CREPET wrote:
On Mon,
On Tue, 10 May 2011 01:51:18 -0700
Brandon Ooi brand...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
On Monday, May 09, 2011 10:28 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Laurent CREPET wrote:
On Mon, 9 May 2011 05:20:48 -0700
Alain Péan wrote:
The problem is that when C6.0 will be released, it is likely that RHEL
6.1 will be already released. So there will be no security updates for
C6.0, and it will be better to stay under SL6, until the release of
C6.1. I already installed three machines under SL6, and it
On 04/26/2011 08:24 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
VIA Eden Processor?
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : CentaurHauls
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : VIA Eden Processor 500MHz
I am
If I had to guess, it would be that the OS is considered an enterprise OS,
and that the CPU is too low end, now, to be considered that. It is kind of low
end now for even personal use.
Not that people only use the OS for high end server hardware :)
At work, we still have to support 500MHz
Hello,
I have a Kyocera FS1920 network printer, and I run an up-to-date
CentOS 5.6 x86_64 workstation.
When I try to print with evince or Firefox the default paper size is
always set to US Letter whereas the printer use A4.
I have searched and other people seem to have the problem, but the
only
Hi all,
Centos 5.6 doesn't detect any disks connected to an Adaptec 6405 RAID
Controller. The hardware isn't brand new to the market, so what might be the
issue here? It seems, that the driver is missing for that particular card.
All best,
mjb
___
On 5/10/2011 9:53 AM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
Hi all,
Centos 5.6 doesn't detect any disks connected to an Adaptec 6405 RAID
Controller. The hardware isn't brand new to the market, so what might be the
issue here? It seems, that the driver is missing for that particular card.
I don't
Mathieu Baudier wrote:
Hello,
I have a Kyocera FS1920 network printer, and I run an up-to-date
CentOS 5.6 x86_64 workstation.
When I try to print with evince or Firefox the default paper size is
always set to US Letter whereas the printer use A4.
I have searched and other people seem to
Hello,
Is anyone using an ipv6 to ipv4 tunnel? I've got one through Hurricane
Electric http://www.tunnelbroker.net and am having an extremely
difficult time getting it to work. If anyone has this going i'd
appreciate hearing from you offlist and please have Ubuntu experience
if possible.
Thanks.
Wiadomość napisana przez Les Mikesell w dniu 2011-05-10, o godz. 17:07:
On 5/10/2011 9:53 AM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
Hi all,
Centos 5.6 doesn't detect any disks connected to an Adaptec 6405 RAID
Controller. The hardware isn't brand new to the market, so what might be the
issue here?
From: Maciej Jan Broniarz gau...@gausus.net
Centos 5.6 seems not to have any drivers for Adaptec 6405.
Maybe try Adaptec drivers?
http://www.adaptec.com/en-us/downloads/rh/rhel_5/productid=sas-6405dn=adaptec+raid+6405.html
JD
___
CentOS mailing
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Mathieu Baudier wrote:
Hello,
I have a Kyocera FS1920 network printer, and I run an up-to-date CentOS
5.6 x86_64 workstation.
When I try to print with evince or Firefox the default paper size is
always set to US Letter whereas the printer use A4.
snip
What are the
On 5/10/2011 10:17 AM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
Wiadomość napisana przez Les Mikesell w dniu 2011-05-10, o godz. 17:07:
On 5/10/2011 9:53 AM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
Hi all,
Centos 5.6 doesn't detect any disks connected to an Adaptec 6405 RAID
Controller. The hardware isn't brand new
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 5/10/2011 10:17 AM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
Wiadomo¶æ napisana przez Les Mikesell w dniu 2011-05-10, o godz. 17:07:
On 5/10/2011 9:53 AM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
Hi all,
Centos 5.6 doesn't detect any disks connected to an Adaptec 6405 RAID
Controller. The
# en_GB should print in A4 by default
export LC_PAPER=en_GB.UTF_8
That did the trick!
(evince + Firefox)
Merci beaucoup,
Mathieu
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Yes,
We are using one to HE and one to SIXXS. We don't rely on any of the standard
redhat config stuff - we do it all thru our own configs.
Been working great.
On 05/10/2011 11:17 AM, David Mehler wrote:
Hello,
Is anyone using an ipv6 to ipv4 tunnel? I've got one through Hurricane
I have a CentOS 5.6 system (recently installed) that, for some
reason, has decided to mangle one of its drives, specifically /dev/hde1
... No errors anywhere, just rebooted the machine over the weekend and
it's gone. Up till the reboot, the drive was fine, I was writing to it
without a
On 05/10/2011 02:24 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
I have a CentOS 5.6 system (recently installed) that, for some
reason, has decided to mangle one of its drives, specifically /dev/hde1
... No errors anywhere, just rebooted the machine over the weekend and
it's gone. Up till the reboot,
Or ddrecovery to another disk?
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 05/10/2011 02:24 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
I have a CentOS 5.6 system (recently installed) that, for some
reason, has decided to mangle one of its drives, specifically /dev/hde1
I have a CentOS 5.6 system (recently installed) that, for some
reason, has decided to mangle one of its drives, specifically
/dev/hde1
... No errors anywhere, just rebooted the machine over the
weekend and
it's gone. Up till the reboot, the drive was fine, I was
writing to it
On 05/10/2011 02:28 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 05/10/2011 02:24 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
I have a CentOS 5.6 system (recently installed) that, for some
reason, has decided to mangle one of its drives, specifically /dev/hde1
... No errors anywhere, just rebooted the machine over the
On 5/10/2011 12:30 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
mke2fs -n /dev/hde1 should list you the block addresses where copies of
the superblock would be found.
Set ASB=any one of the alternate blocks listed.
Then, try mount -t ext3 -o sb=$ASB /dev/hda2 /mnt
Thanks! I will try that as soon as
Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
On 5/10/2011 12:30 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
mke2fs -n /dev/hde1 should list you the block addresses where copies of
the superblock would be found.
Set ASB=any one of the alternate blocks listed.
Then, try mount -t ext3 -o sb=$ASB /dev/hda2 /mnt
Thanks!
Wiadomość napisana przez m.r...@5-cent.us w dniu 2011-05-10, o godz. 17:54:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 5/10/2011 10:17 AM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
Wiadomo¶æ napisana przez Les Mikesell w dniu 2011-05-10, o godz. 17:07:
On 5/10/2011 9:53 AM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
Hi all,
Centos
On 5/10/2011 2:00 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I will byte and actually say it: Use Backups for important data you can
not afford to lose. rsync or similar tool can be used via cron to make
sure important files are saved.
And this is normally done, except I was in the middle of working
Wiadomość napisana przez John Doe w dniu 2011-05-10, o godz. 17:28:
From: Maciej Jan Broniarz gau...@gausus.net
Centos 5.6 seems not to have any drivers for Adaptec 6405.
Maybe try Adaptec drivers?
On 5/10/2011 5:17 PM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
Wiadomość napisana przez John Doe w dniu 2011-05-10, o godz. 17:28:
From: Maciej Jan Broniarzgau...@gausus.net
Centos 5.6 seems not to have any drivers for Adaptec 6405.
Maybe try Adaptec drivers?
Wiadomość napisana przez Les Mikesell w dniu 2011-05-11, o godz. 00:22:
On 5/10/2011 5:17 PM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
Wiadomość napisana przez John Doe w dniu 2011-05-10, o godz. 17:28:
From: Maciej Jan Broniarzgau...@gausus.net
Centos 5.6 seems not to have any drivers for Adaptec
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:17 PM, David Mehler dave.meh...@gmail.com wrote:
appreciate hearing from you offlist and please have Ubuntu experience
No wonder you can't manage to get it working, you couldn't even post
to the right list.
___
CentOS mailing
On 05/10/11 3:46 PM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
I am sure it doesn't. I have booted 5.5 and 5.6 in linux dd mode. Then I have
loaded the drivers from: aacraid-driverdisk-CentOS.iso . Still, the installer
sees no hard disk. I have read somewhere, that the adaptec driver to that
controller
Hello,
I am afraid a comment in my last message was misinterpreted. I
previously had this configuration, linux and ipv6 tunnel through a
tunnel broker. It was on a Ubuntu 9.10 box that a friend of mine set
up. That box has been retired and replaced with CentOS 5.6. I am now
trying to get the
On Tue, 10 May 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Alain Péan wrote:
The problem is that when C6.0 will be released, it is likely that RHEL
6.1 will be already released. So there will be no security updates for
C6.0, and it will be better to stay under SL6, until the release of
C6.1. I already
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 12:13 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Alain Péan wrote:
The problem is that when C6.0 will be released, it is likely that RHEL
6.1 will be already released. So there will be no security updates for
C6.0, and it will be better to stay under SL6, until the release
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 03:12 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Tue, 10 May 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Alain Péan wrote:
The problem is that when C6.0 will be released, it is likely that RHEL
6.1 will be already released. So there will be no security updates for
C6.0, and it will be
On Tue, 10 May 2011, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
On 5/10/2011 2:00 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I will byte and actually say it: Use Backups for important data you can
not afford to lose. rsync or similar tool can be used via cron to make
sure important files are saved.
And this is
40 matches
Mail list logo
