Hi all,
How can I see what vnet is attached to a certain kvm guest?? For
example: I have a kvmguest1. When I launch this guest with virsh
command, virsh creates a new vnetX interface for this guest. How can I
extract this virtual net interface (vnet0, vnet1, vnet2 or so on) using
a script??
On 05/13/2011 04:13 AM, carlopmart wrote:
Hi all,
How can I see what vnet is attached to a certain kvm guest?? For
example: I have a kvmguest1. When I launch this guest with virsh
command, virsh creates a new vnetX interface for this guest. How can I
extract this virtual net interface
El día 12 de mayo de 2011 14:42, Anthony Mogrovejo
tony001...@gmail.com escribió:
Prueba con esta linea
ACCEPT+ loc:ip_proxy net
Hola intente con esta opcion pero no jala , lo raro es que veo que
hace mencion a la interfaz loc , y yo no tengo definida ya q estoy
usando shorewall
entonces coloca la interfaz de la red local de tu pc como lo hayas
definido...
Sls
El 13 de mayo de 2011 09:40, troxlinux xserverli...@gmail.com escribió:
El día 12 de mayo de 2011 14:42, Anthony Mogrovejo
tony001...@gmail.com escribió:
Prueba con esta linea
ACCEPT+
2011/5/13 Anthony Mogrovejo tony001...@gmail.com:
entonces coloca la interfaz de la red local de tu pc como lo hayas
definido...
Sls
ya lo intente, pero no me resulta ..
sldss
--
rickygm
http://gnuforever.homelinux.com
___
CentOS-es mailing
Dne 13.5.2011 6:58, David Mehler napsal(a):
Hello,
Thank you everyone for your replies. I would definitely like to stick
with postfix as it's what i'm most comfortable with. The problem is
dovecot. I believe it's extras there's the 1.0.7 dovecot, I'd like to
be running the 2.0.x dovecot
On Friday 13 May 2011 07:04:33 Frederick Abrams wrote:
Hi all.
i'm trying to modify some parameters but when system reboots it doesn't
load. For the sysctl if I run sysctl -p then it changes
/etc/sysctl.conf
net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_max = 1048576
/etc/modprobe.conf
Frederick Abrams fred@... writes:
...
***
Look at /etc/rc.sysinit, by which time proc is already mounted:
...
# Configure kernel parameters
update_boot_stage RCkernelparam
= insert debugging statements BEFORE sysctl
sysctl -e -p /etc/sysctl.conf /dev/null 21
for file in
On 5/13/2011 12:58 AM, David Mehler wrote:
The two packages I can think of as alternatives to
dovecot are courier-imap and cyrus-imap. I'd appreciate experiences
pro conn with each.
I've been using courier-imap for a few years along with the rest of the
Courier-MTA package. I have had no
I would think highly reliable is all (network connectivity, bandwidth and
personnel) but I recognize that many data centers don't offer rack installation
service but in those cases, provide names of local people who know their way
around the data center.
Thanks
Craig
On May 12, 2011, at 5:57
Does anybody know why this list is private and password protected? It
would be nice to see progress, but it appears that part of the
development is completely locked down and not open source.
--
Steven Crothers
steven.croth...@gmail.com
___
CentOS
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Does anybody know why this list is private and password protected? It
would be nice to see progress, but it appears that part of the
development is completely locked down and not open source.
For (x = 0; x REALLY_LARGE_NUMBER; x++)
{
system(echo \IS IT DONE
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On 05/13/2011 10:52 AM, Steven Crothers wrote:
Does anybody know why this list is private and password protected? It
would be nice to see progress, but it appears that part of the
development is completely locked down and not open source.
We have made the QA tracker open for viewing here:
On May 12, 2011, at 6:08 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Friday, May 13, 2011 04:07 AM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Wondering if any of you have thoughts/experiences with ApacheDS?
We've all had trials and tribulations regarding OpenLDAP and while
its
basically working pretty
On May 12, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Craig White craig.wh...@ttiltd.com wrote:
On May 12, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Mark Bradbury mark.bradb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do you expect the C6.0 - C6.1
On 5/13/2011 12:28 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
No, but after reading your post I checked it.
Looks cool, Java based which seems the in thing, I like it.
But, and not to sound lamerz; the Sun sponsor turned me off.
Sun or the fact that they are gone now? And where are you seeing this?
On May 13, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 5/13/2011 12:28 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
No, but after reading your post I checked it.
Looks cool, Java based which seems the in thing, I like it.
But, and not to sound lamerz; the Sun sponsor turned me off.
Sun or the fact that
On May 13, 2011, at 11:32 AM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Forget all of this Sun/Oracle debate. It's not meaningful any more.
Free IPA will be included in RHEL 6.1 and fully supported by Red Hat with the
RHEL 6.2 release and it seems obvious that if you aren't already entrenched in
a DS
Craig White wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 11:32 AM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Forget all of this Sun/Oracle debate. It's not meaningful any more.
Free IPA will be included in RHEL 6.1 and fully supported by Red Hat with
the RHEL 6.2 release and it seems obvious that if you aren't already
On 05/13/2011 07:41 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Free IPA? India Pale Ale?
mark I'll drink to/with that!
See: http://freeipa.org/page/Main_Page
--
Athmane Madjoudj
RHCE
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On May 13, 2011, at 11:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Craig White wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 11:32 AM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Forget all of this Sun/Oracle debate. It's not meaningful any more.
Free IPA will be included in RHEL 6.1 and fully supported by Red
Hat with
the RHEL 6.2
Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
On 05/13/2011 07:41 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Free IPA? India Pale Ale?
mark I'll drink to/with that!
See: http://freeipa.org/page/Main_Page
*bleah*!
I've got enough to deal with... like PIV-II card logins, here at work.
mark yeah, for the US gov't
On 5/13/2011 2:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
mark I'll drink to/with that!
See: http://freeipa.org/page/Main_Page
*bleah*!
I've got enough to deal with... like PIV-II card logins, here at work.
mark yeah, for the US gov't
Is it going to be used by default with matching
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 5/13/2011 2:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
snip IPA
mark I'll drink to/with that!
See: http://freeipa.org/page/Main_Page
*bleah*!
I've got enough to deal with... like PIV-II card logins, here at work.
mark yeah, for the US gov't
Is it going to be
On 5/13/2011 2:36 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
mark I'll drink to/with that!
See: http://freeipa.org/page/Main_Page
*bleah*!
I've got enough to deal with... like PIV-II card logins, here at work.
mark yeah, for the US gov't
Is it going to be used by default with
On 05/13/11 11:39 AM, Craig White wrote:
Free IPA will be included in RHEL 6.1 and fully supported by Red Hat with the
RHEL 6.2 release and it seems obvious that if you aren't already entrenched
in a DS server, this would be the way to go now.
and FreeIPA is the 389 fka FedoraDS bundled with
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Craig White craig.wh...@ttiltd.com wrote:
Lastly, Johnny has made clear that this is not supposed to be an SL
discussion list but curiously enough, SL is invoked by those who want to use
SL to justify the alacrity of the CentOS 6.0 release. As was pointed
On May 13, 2011, at 1:29 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 05/13/11 11:39 AM, Craig White wrote:
Free IPA will be included in RHEL 6.1 and fully supported by Red Hat with
the RHEL 6.2 release and it seems obvious that if you aren't already
entrenched in a DS server, this would be the way to go
On Saturday, May 14, 2011 01:28 AM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 12, 2011, at 6:08 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Friday, May 13, 2011 04:07 AM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Wondering if any of you have thoughts/experiences with ApacheDS?
We've all had trials and tribulations
On Saturday, May 14, 2011 01:30 AM, Craig White wrote:
CentOS has always been a take it or leave it proposition and thus nothing has
really changed except that many businesses have become reliant upon it and I
see my company and many other companies turning to Ubuntu not just because of
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
On Saturday, May 14, 2011 01:30 AM, Craig White wrote:
CentOS has always been a take it or leave it proposition and thus nothing
has really changed
except that many businesses have become reliant upon
32 matches
Mail list logo
