Hi list,
As the author of the Postfix howto:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/postfix
I'm receiving some feedback that some things have changed in el6 (e.g,
dovecot confs).
As I don't have any plans to update my mail server to el6 (I intend to
run el5 until EOL), does anyone have any interest
Thank you for your help,I'll try this.
By the way, i make it work using the windows driver.
But it can't connect to the AP with weak signal.
Maybe it's still unstable.
Thank you!
2011/6/14 Phil Schaffner philip.r.schaff...@nasa.gov
liming wu wrote on 06/12/2011 09:05 PM:
Now i have done
OK,
Ahi te mando las configuraciones que me has pedido:
Tengo dos discos duros, que como bien te he dicho hay que conseguir
sincronizarlos.
Lo estoy haciendo por software.
Muchas gracias otra vez por la ayuda, si sabes como ayudarme, estoy delante del
servidor para ir mirando las cosas que
2011/6/15 Oriol Borràs obor...@jsf.es:
OK,
Ahi te mando las configuraciones que me has pedido:
Si quieres seguir adelante, cópianos el resultado de hacer
mdadm --detail /dev/md0
mdadm --detail /dev/md1
A qué te refieres con que has editado todo el apartado de Grub?
Cuéntame con todo el
no me ha llegado nada tuyo creo escrito eduardo
Oriol Borràs
JSF Software, S.L.
De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org en nombre de Eduardo Grosclaude
Enviado el: mié 15/06/2011 14:10
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es]Problemas con la sincronización
Si alguien tiene el manual de joel barrios director de alcance libre en
formato pdf u otro manual sobre centos. se los agradecería
Salu2
--
Carlos Ernesto Pruna
carlosepc@gmail.com
==
LinuxUser Registered: #413305 http://counter.li.org
UbuntuUser Registered: #17735
Hola a todos,
¿Alguno tiene montado Spacewalk 1.4 sobre CentOS 5?
Tengo unas dudillas sobre el tema de los Kickstart sobre Spacewalk.
Saludos.
---
Jose Antonio Vico Palomino
E-Mail: vicos...@gmail.com
*Algunos Blogs en los que participo:*
*Corazón de La Mancha. - www.vicosoft.org
http://www.alcancelibre.org/filemgmt/index.php?id=1
http://www.centos.org/docs/5/
**http://docs.redhat.com/docs/es-ES/index.html
Saludos
--
Ricardo David Carrillo Sánchez
Administrador de Sistemas
Analista de Seguridad Informática
PGP/GPG key fingerprint: 7AD4 6D7B A09B C010 8445 31F4 92C2 DDFA
No te enendi bien, puedes especificar màs que es lo que requieres sobre la
asignación de permisos..?
Saludos
--
Ricardo David Carrillo Sánchez
Administrador de Sistemas
Analista de Seguridad Informática
PGP/GPG key fingerprint: 7AD4 6D7B A09B C010 8445 31F4 92C2 DDFA 2DA0 E376
PGP/GPG public
2011/6/15 Oriol Borràs obor...@jsf.es:
no me ha llegado nada tuyo creo escrito eduardo
Porque necesito que envíes el resultado de los siguientes comandos
para poder diagnosticar
mdadm --detail /dev/md0
mdadm --detail /dev/md1
--
Eduardo Grosclaude
Universidad Nacional del Comahue
Neuquen,
El día 13 de junio de 2011 16:24, Carlos Ernesto Pruna
carlosepc@gmail.com escribió:
Si alguien tiene el manual de joel barrios director de alcance libre en
formato pdf u otro manual sobre centos. se los agradecería
Hola!
Amigo como estas? seguro que bien, pues si existe lo que pides y en
Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you have something other than an intel wifi chip?
No, not any more. I had a Broadcom card, but an older laptop we gave
away needed a WiFi card, so I invested $12 into an Intel card on eBay
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 13:37 +0930, Mark Bradbury wrote:
On 13 June 2011 23:53, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote:
I just want to say that I really, really, appreciate the
information
given on this site:
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 09:19 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Craig White wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 06:49 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 09:22 -0700, Craig White wrote:
easier just to give up - I moved my new servers to ubuntu - no more
new CentOS installs any
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 11:06 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Benjamin Franz wrote:
On 06/14/2011 06:19 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Timeliness, dunno. Ubuntu (or fedora) for production? NOT IF I HAVE ANY
CONTROL!!! Given how many developers write incredibly fragile code, that
is utterly
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 08:52 -0700, Jerry Franz wrote:
On 06/14/2011 08:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Yeah, but some people appear to think (or at least that was what I got
from the post of the guy I was replying to) that fedora is good enough for
production.
*blink*
Absolutely not.
Craig White wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 13:37 +0930, Mark Bradbury wrote:
On 13 June 2011 23:53, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote:
I just want to say that I really, really, appreciate the
information
given on this site:
On Jun 15, 2011, at 4:50 AM, Craig White wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 08:52 -0700, Jerry Franz wrote:
Like RHEL/CentOS, Ubuntu LTS is absolutely appropriate for server use.
In fact, it's sort of refreshing to set up a new server that isn't
overloaded with bloat from the very start.
Les Mikesell wrote on Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:13:08 -0500:
Are the updates supposed to be synced to the mirrors before the announce
message goes out?
Of course, and you know that. Announce goes out when most mirrors *should*
have it, not earlier. But some may still not have it.
Kai
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:
Since Pentium Pro, only old 400 MHz-bus versions of the Pentium M lack
PAE support.
This laptop is a Latitude D400, which I think were made in 2005. It
definitely doesn't have PAE support. I discovered that when I
Craig White wrote:
I actually use Fedora for my Desktop. It dual boots to Ubuntu but I
don't often use it. The only reason that I ever saw people using Fedora
for production was because the RHEL/CentOS software packages were so
completely out-of-date.
Time from CentOS 5.0 to 6.0 was marked
Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:
Since Pentium Pro, only old 400 MHz-bus versions of the Pentium M lack
PAE support.
This laptop is a Latitude D400, which I think were made in 2005. It
definitely doesn't have PAE support. I
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 08:52 -0700, Jerry Franz wrote:
On 06/14/2011 08:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Yeah, but some people appear to think (or at least that was what I got
from the post of the guy I was replying to) that fedora is good enough
for
production.
*blink*
Absolutely not.
Les Mikesell wrote:
Most of the stuff that you have to use 3rd party repos to get
on CentOS is in the stock ubuntu repositories in usably recent versions.
I've found 99% of the things I need on a CentOS
(which I only use on home servers)
is in the epel repository if it is not in the CentOS
Timothy Murphy wrote:
Am I alone in regarding epel as more or less a part of CentOS?
Does it have a rival in this role?
you may not be alone, but you're still wrong: epel is not part of centos
at all.
It's just another third party repo.
There are others including some reputable and widely
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
On 06/14/11 5:04 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
What is the worst thing can happen from excessive static?
ESD (Electro-static Discharge) is the Radioactive Crystal Meth of
computers. How much you can take before you exhibit measurable
capability loss is a detail of
On 14/06/2011 22:52, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
What 24th are you talking about?
Karanbir Singh's Twitter posts had an entry dated 10th June which mentioned the
postponement. However, I see it's been pulled now.
gvim
___
CentOS mailing list
On 06/15/2011 02:37 PM, gvim wrote:
Karanbir Singh's Twitter posts had an entry dated 10th June which mentioned
the postponement. However, I see it's been pulled now.
erm, I havent deleted anything. Are you confusing accounts somewhere ?
- KB
___
On 06/13/2011 05:56 PM, NOYK wrote:
No. Given the economy people are trying to make systems last as long as
possible and this is just 6.0 not 6.1. Smart folks will test 6.0 to see how
apps perform/behave and then wait till 6.1. Never go to a major revision.0
unless you are forced.
hopefully
On 06/14/2011 06:13 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Are the updates supposed to be synced to the mirrors before the announce
message goes out? Only a random few machines could get these updates
yesterday.
http://www.karan.org/blog/index.php/2010/01/04/ has the process. There
is a mirror check cycle,
On 15/06/2011 14:53, Karanbir Singh wrote:
erm, I havent deleted anything. Are you confusing accounts somewhere
Sorry, it was not your Twitter account but one belonging to cybernautape
http://twitter.com/#!/CentOS6/status/79206786703433728
gvim
On 06/15/2011 02:59 PM, gvim wrote:
On 15/06/2011 14:53, Karanbir Singh wrote:
erm, I havent deleted anything. Are you confusing accounts somewhere
Sorry, it was not your Twitter account but one belonging to cybernautape
http://twitter.com/#!/CentOS6/status/79206786703433728
I dont know
On 15/06/2011 14:53, Karanbir Singh wrote:
erm, I havent deleted anything. Are you confusing accounts somewhere ?
This was the original entry I saw:
http://twitter.com/#!/CentOS6/
gvim
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 09:12:44 AM Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
Damage to circuitry is not all instant-or-never; damaged junctions can
take their own time (sometimes zero) to degenerate from
damaged-but-perfectly-functional to occasional errors to persistent
failure.
The bullet-wound analogy
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 09:12:44 AM Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
Damage to circuitry is not all instant-or-never; damaged junctions can
take their own time (sometimes zero) to degenerate from
damaged-but-perfectly-functional to occasional errors to persistent
failure.
snip
Kevin wrote:
I'm just trying to get Dell openmanage to run on my Centos 5.6
box. The monitoring
[ Snipped ]
Can anyone point me at a suitable rpm, or do I have to resort to
compiling it? Surely I'm not
the only one trying to do this.
--
Kevin Thorpe
This is my fault. I enabled
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 09:12:44 AM Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
Damage to circuitry is not all instant-or-never; damaged junctions can
take their own time (sometimes zero) to degenerate from
gvim wrote:
On 15/06/2011 14:53, Karanbir Singh wrote:
erm, I havent deleted anything. Are you confusing accounts somewhere ?
This was the original entry I saw:
http://twitter.com/#!/CentOS6/
gvim
I assume that that person made an typo. There was announcement that it
will be released
Dear All,
I am using Centos 4.7, i have an issue when i run yum update, the URL
times-out even when i browse it on firefox
#yum update php
Setting up Update Process
Setting up repositories
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/updates/i386/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno
12] Timeout: urlopen
On 6/15/2011 6:54 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Timothy Murphy wrote:
Am I alone in regarding epel as more or less a part of CentOS?
Does it have a rival in this role?
you may not be alone, but you're still wrong: epel is not part of centos
at all.
It's just another third party repo.
On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 10:13:20 AM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Ever heard the old, old m'frame (I think) story, of the guy who needed to
do a backup, and the tape failed, and they had to go to an older one.
Yeah, I've read that one, and it is a nice lesson.
For more of the same (rather than
Kevin Thorpe wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 09:12:44 AM Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
Damage to circuitry is not all instant-or-never; damaged junctions
can take their own time (sometimes zero) to degenerate from
From: Torintino T torinti...@live.com
I am using Centos 4.7, i have an issue when i run yum update, the URL
times-out even when i browse it on firefox
...
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/updates/i386/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno
Works fine here...Maybe try the url with wget and, if they
On 6/15/2011 8:59 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 06/14/2011 06:13 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Are the updates supposed to be synced to the mirrors before the announce
message goes out? Only a random few machines could get these updates
yesterday.
http://www.karan.org/blog/index.php/2010/01/04/
Oh, that's ok: a friend of mine (who posts here occasionally) got to blow
up at someone(s) in his wife's office, where he comes in as a consultant:
someone had plugged a kettle? microwave? (I forget) into the orange box
that was labelled computer equipment only (Hope you don't mind me
telling
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:46 AM, Kevin Thorpe wrote:
Oh, that's ok: a friend of mine (who posts here occasionally) got to blow
up at someone(s) in his wife's office, where he comes in as a consultant:
someone had plugged a kettle? microwave? (I forget) into the orange box
that was labelled
Torintino T wrote:
Dear All,
I am using Centos 4.7, i have an issue when i run yum update, the URL
times-out even when i browse it on firefox
#yum update php
Setting up Update Process
Setting up repositories
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/updates/i386/repodata/repomd.xml:
On 6/14/2011 7:04 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Thanks all for the reply.
What is the worst thing can happen from excessive static?
We have two corrupted UEFI when we reboot servers which now I suspect
because of static.
Yesterday I actually saw a spark when I put a memory module on
motherboard
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Ron Blizzard rb4cen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
I wouldn't generalize based on your experience because Mint hasn't
become a very popular distribution by being broken. Same goes for
Ubuntu.
I don't
Dan Carl wrote:
If you spend a lot of time in your server room, you might also consider
a fish tank.
It will add moisture to your room and give you something to look at
other than flashing leds:-)
Actually, scientist say that 5 minutes of looking at the fish tank can
greatly reduce
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:09 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:
ElRepo has kernel modules already compiled:
http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-nvidia so I guess it should be OK. Playing
around with recompiling nVidia drivers was a real pain in a
Bookmarked. Thanks.
--
RonB --
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:50 AM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
Like RHEL/CentOS, Ubuntu LTS is absolutely appropriate for server use.
In fact, it's sort of refreshing to set up a new server that isn't
overloaded with bloat from the very start. Setting up a new VMWare image
w/
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Ron Blizzard rb4cen...@gmail.com wrote:
Mint/Ubuntu don't have an easy way to boot into the command line.
To boot into everything but X, you can append text to the kernel
(grub1) or linux (grub2) line in the grub configuration.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Ron Blizzard rb4cen...@gmail.com wrote:
Mint/Ubuntu don't have an easy way to boot into the command line.
To boot into everything but X, you can append text to the kernel
(grub1) or linux
On 06/13/2011 10:12 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
Never wait until revision.1 unless there's a good reason. :-)
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-6-errata.html
There are a number of Important reasons not to deploy 6.0 for
public-facing systems.
___
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:20:44PM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Actually, scientist say that 5 minutes of looking at the fish tank can
greatly reduce stress.
Sad that the same thing can't be said for off-topic threads like this in
a topical mailing list.
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 06/13/2011 10:12 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
Never wait until revision.1 unless there's a good reason. :-)
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-6-errata.html
There are a number of Important reasons not to deploy 6.0 for
public-facing systems.
Personally, I find that indenting config files by 3 spaces has a lot of
advantages to indenting them by 4 spaces although conventional wisdom
might suggest otherwise. Who's with me on this?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 04:41:44PM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
Personally, I find that indenting config files by 3 spaces has a lot of
advantages to indenting them by 4 spaces although conventional wisdom
might suggest otherwise. Who's with me on this?
I'm fully capable of driving to
Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Ron Blizzard rb4cen...@gmail.com
wrote:
Mint/Ubuntu don't have an easy way to boot into the command line.
To boot into everything but X, you can append text to the kernel
Mike A. Harris wrote:
Personally, I find that indenting config files by 3 spaces has a lot of
advantages to indenting them by 4 spaces although conventional wisdom
might suggest otherwise. Who's with me on this?
Indentation wars. I don't *think* there was a usenet newsgroup for that
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Mike A. Harris wrote:
Personally, I find that indenting config files by 3 spaces has a lot of
advantages to indenting them by 4 spaces although conventional wisdom
might suggest otherwise. Who's with me on this?
Indentation wars. I don't *think*
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 04:41:44PM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
Personally, I find that indenting config files by 3 spaces has a lot of
advantages to indenting them by 4 spaces although conventional wisdom
might suggest otherwise. Who's with me on this?
I prefer two or four, usually two.
Cody Jackson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 04:41:44PM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
Personally, I find that indenting config files by 3 spaces has a lot of
advantages to indenting them by 4 spaces although conventional wisdom
might suggest otherwise. Who's with me on this?
I prefer two or
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Five, it goes BOOM, and, being bad in Thy Sight, will buy it.
mark
Hey, look! It's the old admin from scene 24...
--
Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com http://www.madboa.com/
___
CentOS mailing
On 6/15/2011 3:41 PM, Mike A. Harris wrote:
Personally, I find that indenting config files by 3 spaces has a lot of
advantages to indenting them by 4 spaces although conventional wisdom
might suggest otherwise. Who's with me on this?
White space should be meaningless, but unnecessary changes
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:23:29PM -0700, Cody Jackson wrote:
I prefer two or four, usually two. Three is extremely disturbing to me
because it is not a multiple of two
I am constantly frustrated by being limited to a whole number of spaces.
What if I want pi spaces? Or e*i?
--keith
--
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Keith Keller wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:23:29PM -0700, Cody Jackson wrote:
I prefer two or four, usually two. Three is extremely disturbing to me
because it is not a multiple of two
I am constantly frustrated by being limited to a whole number of spaces.
What if
On Jun 15, 2011, at 12:33 PM, Tom H wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:50 AM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
Like RHEL/CentOS, Ubuntu LTS is absolutely appropriate for server use.
In fact, it's sort of refreshing to set up a new server that isn't
overloaded with bloat from the
On Jun 15, 2011, at 1:47 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Ron Blizzard rb4cen...@gmail.com
wrote:
Mint/Ubuntu don't have an easy way to boot into the command line.
To boot
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:47 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Ron Blizzard wrote:
Okay, thanks. Good to know. I forget what kludging process I had to
go through to get Mint to boot into text, I think I disabled the X
server somehow. But even when I got to text mode, the Nouveau driver
had
On 6/15/2011 5:26 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 03:04:59PM -0700, Craig White wrote:
I am generally interested in a basic install. On this Macintosh,
VMWare Fusion, installing 64 bit Ubuntu-server-amd64 it's about 10
minutes. Installing 64 bit CentOS 5.6 x86_64 took
On 06/15/2011 03:08 PM, Craig White wrote:
those days will be over soon as even fedora has now switched to upstart
Upstart would still honor the setting in /etc/inittab.
Fedora, however, is now using systemd. It's an even more different
beast than you are familiar with:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 05:46:20PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
I've seen vmware disk emulation - LVM - partitions run very, very
slowly. Didn't diagnose it beyond thinking if it hurts, don't do it,
though. And I don't remember if it was a sparse disk or not, but it
probably was. Could
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 06/15/2011 01:39 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
I'm not trying to serve as apologist for RHEL 6. I'm just saying that
there's little room in my world for an abolutist position like never
use a .0 release -- ever.
I wouldn't favor such a sentiment
On 06/13/2011 11:02 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
We just went to replace the bridge/firewall services one one server with
the same on another. It's pretty simple, and I literally cloned (w/ rsync)
a third server that does this onto the one that will be the new one. Then
copied the
On 06/15/2011 03:57 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
Maybe Red Hat will continue to obfuscate its infrastructure and
increase the burden on teams like CentOS who try to rebuild the
distribution from SRPMs
Nothing that Red Hat did has increased the burden on CentOS.
On 06/15/2011 03:46 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
I've seen vmware disk emulation - LVM - partitions run very, very
slowly. Didn't diagnose it beyond thinking if it hurts, don't do it,
though. And I don't remember if it was a sparse disk or not, but it
probably was. Could have been an issue in
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:26 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
I do not in any way believe your claims of an hour-long install process,
even if done manually by walking through anaconda screen by screen.
I've had a couple network installs take a long time (Desktop installs
not
On 6/15/2011 5:56 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 05:46:20PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
I've seen vmware disk emulation - LVM - partitions run very, very
slowly. Didn't diagnose it beyond thinking if it hurts, don't do it,
though. And I don't remember if it was a
On 06/13/2011 02:00 PM, Jeff Boyce wrote:
I am a novice system administrator and will soon be purchasing a new server
to replacing an aging file server for my company. I am considering setting
up the new server as a KVM host with two guests; one guest as the Samba file
server and a second
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 06:15:26PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Agreed, but testing something on vmware is a likely first step toward
production and bad performance on the first look can warp your opinions.
And blaming the OS being installed or the installer itself in such
circumstances is
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 06:10:15PM -0500, Ron Blizzard wrote:
I've had a couple network installs take a long time (Desktop installs
not Servers) but that was because the mirror I chose at random was
really slow.
That's possible, yes; but not germane here as the post stated that he
was using
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 04:08:11PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Any disk layout that doesn't align filesystem blocks with actual disk
blocks is going to perform very badly.
I will agree this is possible in real-world environments, yes. I also
will say that this is an issue of the admin not
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Nothing that Red Hat did has increased the burden on CentOS.
so says the person who has not done it
- the rpm tool changed, adding a non-backward compatible
compression scheme. as I blogged about months ago; this has
'flow through' effects as to
On 06/15/2011 10:41 PM, Mike A. Harris wrote:
Personally, I find that indenting config files by 3 spaces has a lot of
advantages to indenting them by 4 spaces although conventional wisdom
might suggest otherwise. Who's with me on this?
Three is evil, four even more. Two spaces and what do
John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:20:44PM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Actually, scientist say that 5 minutes of looking at the fish tank can
greatly reduce stress.
Sad that the same thing can't be said for off-topic threads like this in
a topical mailing list.
It's
Gordon Messmer wrote:
That's probably true. image file backed guests are a whole lot slower
than guests that run on partitions or logical volumes. Logical volumes
are the easiest option to manage, with good performance characteristics.
Hopefully that made sense. Ask questions if not.
Paul Heinlein wrote:
In *this* case, since Red Hat has already released 6.1, it may even be
prudent to wait for the CentOS 6.1 release before public deployment.
My guess is devs will first work on critical updates and release them
before the 6.1 official release. That way 6.0 will still be
On 6/15/11 7:08 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 06:15:26PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Agreed, but testing something on vmware is a likely first step toward
production and bad performance on the first look can warp your opinions.
And blaming the OS being installed or the
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 08:44:38PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
I'm not sure I'd go that far when using a different installer (or
avoiding LVM) in the same environment gives vastly better results.
Even if some quirk of the low level environment really turns
out to be responsible its not
On 6/16/11, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
I read somewhere recently that people were complaining abut LVM overhead
and poor performance, but I've never seen any evidence of it. Was there
something that made you think that LVM had significant overhead?
Looking at some very sparse
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Dan Carl d...@bluestarshows.com wrote:
If you spend a lot of time in your server room, you might also consider
a fish tank.
It will add moisture to your room and give you something to look at
other than flashing leds:-)
Is this a
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Fajar Priyanto fajar...@arinet.org wrote:
Btw, I've checked. My room humidity is 23%. That should be ok,
shouldn't it? But still I saw the spark.
Very early in this thread Benjamin Franz posted this:
Low humidity would be my first guess. The relative humidity
- Original Message -
| James A. Peltier wrote:
| Hi All,
|
| I've written a custom udev rule to change the permissions of
| /dev/ttyS* but it doesn't seem to be working at boot up. If I run
|
|/sbin/udevcontrol reload_rules; udevtrigger
|
| The rules are parsed, applied and the
On 6/14/11, James A. Peltier jpelt...@sfu.ca wrote:
The rules are parsed, applied and the permissions are then correct but why
is it not doing so at boot? The file in questions I've called
/etc/udev/rules.d/49-udev-override.rules and it contains
KERNEL==tty[A-Z]*,NAME=%k,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Mike Williams dmikewilli...@gmail.com wrote:
Low humidity would be my first guess. The relative humidity in your
server room should be between 50% +/- 10%. Too high and you can get
condensation. Too low and you get electrostatic discharges.
Oh! I thought it's
On 06/15/11 9:44 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Mike Williamsdmikewilli...@gmail.com
wrote:
Low humidity would be my first guess. The relative humidity in your
server room should be between 50% +/- 10%. Too high and you can get
condensation. Too low and you get
- Original Message -
| On 6/14/11, James A. Peltier jpelt...@sfu.ca wrote:
| The rules are parsed, applied and the permissions are then correct
| but why
| is it not doing so at boot? The file in questions I've called
| /etc/udev/rules.d/49-udev-override.rules and it contains
|
|
- Original Message -
| - Original Message -
| | On 6/14/11, James A. Peltier jpelt...@sfu.ca wrote:
| | The rules are parsed, applied and the permissions are then correct
| | but why
| | is it not doing so at boot? The file in questions I've called
| |
100 matches
Mail list logo
