Saludos.
A nivel de red la mejor alternativa es que uses una solución como port
mirroring (con un switch administrable) o uses un hub para conectar ambos
servidores (nada de iptables).
Lo que pretendes hacer dudo que se pueda hacer con iptables, a menos que
reenvíes los paquetes a una dirección
Hola Carlos, como es eso de crear un cluster a nivel de aplicación ??
Saludos
-Mensaje original-
De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En
nombre de Carlos Martinez
Enviado el: domingo, 26 de junio de 2011 13:19
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Asunto: Re:
Hola
Creo que el problema no es el firewall, sino que el trafico que estas
controlando es unicast, por lo tanto se entrega de un punto a otro, el
firewall simplemente te permite filtrar o cambiar de puerto pero hasta donde
se, no podrias enviar el mismo paquete a dos ips diferentes. Por lo tanto
Hola Yvan, disculpa mi ignorancia y como se puede implementar ésto ???,
Saludos
-Mensaje original-
De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En
nombre de Yvan Galarza
Enviado el: domingo, 26 de junio de 2011 22:16
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Asunto: Re:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Always Learning cen...@u6.u22.net wrote:
Does anyone know how to determine which file system a disk was
formatted with, if fdisk -l doesn't show it?
I would use gparted from the command line or from Gnome's /
Applications / System Tools menu
yum install
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
If 'fdisk -l /dev/sda' does not show anything, either the disks were
never partitioned or formatted, at least not as a bare drive. What kind
of disk is this (I know it says USB above, but I am assuming these are
bare
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Robert Nichols
rnicholsnos...@comcast.netwrote:
On 06/25/2011 06:46 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone know how to determine which file system a disk was formatted
with,
if fdisk -l doesn't show it?
[snip]
I need to see what data is on a bunch
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Saturday, June 25, 2011 07:46:01 AM Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Does anyone know how to determine which file system a disk was formatted
with, if fdisk -l doesn't show it?
blkid -s TYPE
On a C5 box here:
[root@backup670 ~]#
On 06/26/11 12:58 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
All the drives are old 160GB SATA. There's 1x 160GB IDE as well.
They were used in the office on various machines, so no hardware RAID,
but they definitely had some data on them.
I did get some drives with software RAID on and could recover the
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:04 AM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 06/26/11 12:58 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
All the drives are old 160GB SATA. There's 1x 160GB IDE as well.
They were used in the office on various machines, so no hardware RAID,
but they definitely had some data
On 06/26/11 1:11 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
It's hard to say. They've been in the cupboard for along time and I
don't know which tech did what on them, which is why I'm trying to see
which file systems were on them last, so that I can see what data is
on them.
well, if as you say...
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com
Subject: Re: [CentOS] how do determine last file system on disk?
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:04 AM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 06/26/11 12:58 AM, Rudi
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Keith Roberts ke...@karsites.net wrote:
It's hard to say. They've been in the cupboard for along time and I don't
know which tech did what on them, which is why I'm trying to see which
file
systems were on them last, so that I can see what data is on
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com
Subject: Re: [CentOS] how do determine last file system on disk?
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Keith Roberts ke...@karsites.net wrote:
It's hard to say. They've been
On 06/26/11 1:18 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
[root@HP-DL360 ~]# file -s /dev/sda
/dev/sda: empty
I'm guessing the tech wiped them clean.
or they were spares for a raid system, never used.
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca
Dear all,
I would like to forward a port to an internet server, but failed. can you
help me?
Server: eth0: 192.168.1.250, Port: 8080 TCP, CentOS 5.6
Remote server: IP: a.b.c.d Port: 8181
Forward path: client1(192.168.1.10) - 192.168.1.250:8080 (forward) - a.b.c.d
Port: 8181
At Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:58:16 +0200 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
If 'fdisk -l /dev/sda' does not show anything, either the disks were
never partitioned or formatted, at least not as a bare
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
Wondering: could these extra 2 drives have been 'spare' disks that were
never actually installed? And got mixed in with the 'used' drives?
I doubt it since there are quite a few drives that were part of a RAID set
I'm wondering, that since Jumbo Frames was supposed to be better for
bulk transfers, why am I seeing these results? Is it the ElRepo
drivers I used to enable higher MTUs or possibly some kind of oddity
with the realtek NICs I am using? Or am I mistaken about the benefits
of jumbo frames and
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
Now the question is whether the overheads reduction, even at sub-10GBs
speeds, may be significant if the host/guest are VMs instead of actual
physical machines.
If you are going to use it on virtual interfaces, I would think it would
help, especially if you have
On Sunday 26 June 2011 12:53:07 muiz wrote:
Dear all,
I would like to forward a port to an internet server, but failed. can you
help me? Server: eth0: 192.168.1.250, Port: 8080 TCP, CentOS 5.6
Remote server: IP: a.b.c.d Port: 8181
Forward path: client1(192.168.1.10) -
Max Pyziur p...@brama.com wrote:
Are there any views in this CentOs user community on [using port 587]?
Yes. Not only is enabling 'submission' a good idea, but you should also
enable 'smtps' (which is different from smtp+tls):
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Name=MTA')dnl
I have the samba problems solved thanks to the help of folks on
this forum, but I do not have the php umask problems solved.
The www directory is /var/www/html and the html directory is
owned by apache and is in the apache groups with the following
permissions:
drwxrwsr--
A sub-driectory,
On 06/26/11 3:53 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
It is also possible that the drives got 'wiped' somehow, eg they were
on the bottom shelf when the cleaning crew came by with the floor waxing
machine...
in that scenario, you would get nothing but servo errors from the drive,
they wouldn't even
Thanks Marian,
The server only has one IP. I think I should add more iptables records, only
one NAT record is not enough,isit correct? If yes , then how?
2011-06-26 23:38:58，Marian Marinov m...@yuhu.biz wrote：
On Sunday 26 June 2011 12:53:07 muiz wrote:
Dear all,
I would like to forward
On Monday 27 June 2011 00:08:08 muiz wrote:
Thanks Marian,
The server only has one IP. I think I should add more iptables records,
only one NAT record is not enough,isit correct? If yes , then how?
Huh, I'm sorry yes you need a second rule. So the rules are:
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -j
Rudi Ahlers wrote on Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:42:16 +0200:
it's 2 different list, with different people
and different input
Ask on one list first, wait, if you ask on another provide what you got so
far from the other list. That is plain courtesy.
Kai
I accidentally noticed this error written to the warn log on my Dell
R200's when the machines booted up after latest kernel update. Google
doesn't have this exact error, only a few with differently named devices,
but all seem to have to do with USB.
Could this be a bug?
Didn't see this error
I have the samba problems solved thanks to the help of folks on
this forum, but I do not have the php umask problems solved.
The www directory is /var/www/html and the html directory is
owned by apache and is in the apache groups with the following
permissions:
drwxrwsr--
A sub-driectory,
yes cool isn't it, that webpage is updated! actually that's what makes
it useful.
besides, read the title text on that page again:
QA dates are tentative dates for internal planning only. These are not
official release dates, but only a guide for the QA team. All target
dates are subject
So,
to go back to the topic what is the current status for 6.0? Will it happen
in June or July?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
My goal is to have any created directories and files to have 774
permissions.
Hi Todd,
Am I correct in assuming the php script that creates the directory
uses the mkdir() function? If so something along the lines of:
mkdir('mydir', 0774); should suffice. The 0 can be changed to 2, 4 or
6
On Monday, June 27, 2011 10:46 AM, robert mena wrote:
So,
to go back to the topic what is the current status for 6.0? Will it
happen in June or July?
I vote who cares?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:25:21AM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
I vote who cares?
I vote http://qaweb.dev.centos.org;.
John
--
I begin by taking. I shall find scholars later to demonstrate my perfect right.
-- Euripides (c 480
Dear Marian and all,
It seems don't works:
/sbin/iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -j DNAT -p tcp --dport 8080 --to
a.b.c.d:8181
/sbin/iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j SNAT -s 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 --to
a.b.c.d
echo 1 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_foward
I check the Fedora iptables setting:
On Monday 27 June 2011 06:50:27 muiz wrote:
Dear Marian and all,
It seems don't works:
/sbin/iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -j DNAT -p tcp --dport 8080 --to
a.b.c.d:8181 /sbin/iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j SNAT -s
192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 --to a.b.c.d echo 1
On Monday, June 27, 2011 11:48 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:25:21AM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
I vote who cares?
I vote http://qaweb.dev.centos.org;.
Too bad that does not seem to be good enough for some.
___
CentOS
Marian, I'm very happy you're online :)I think I have try the record you
mention just now. And I would like to clear what I have done (the scripts I
test):/sbin/iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -j DNAT -p tcp --dport 8080 --to
a.b.c.d:8181
/sbin/iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j SNAT -s
On Monday 27 June 2011 07:15:33 muiz wrote:
Marian, I'm very happy you're online :)I think I have try the record you
mention just now. And I would like to clear what I have done (the scripts
I test):/sbin/iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -j DNAT -p tcp --dport 8080
--to a.b.c.d:8181
39 matches
Mail list logo
