Re: [CentOS-virt] (no subject)

2011-07-28 Thread Karanbir Singh
Hi, On 07/27/2011 01:48 PM, Grant McWilliams wrote: Or ban Indonesia since that's where it's coming from. I can post a comment with anyone's email as the reply to address. Thats a bit silly. If we did something like that, USA would have no email worth talking about given that most spam

[CentOS-virt] Send magic-sysrq from virtual serial console?

2011-07-28 Thread David Knierim
I am using CentOS 5.6 as a KVM host. My guests are running CentOS 5.6 with the only console being a virtual serial console. The guests are configured so magic-sysreq can be used to debug kernel issues. However, in order to send magic-sysrq from a serial port, I need to send a break. How

[CentOS-virt] Snapshot error command savevm not found

2011-07-28 Thread Trey Dockendorf
Attempting to take snapshots of VM using virsh with the following command, # virsh -c qemu:///system snapshot-create CentOS6-x86-001 Results in the following error, error: internal error unable to execute QEMU command 'savevm': The command savevm has not been found The VM's virtual disks are

Re: [CentOS-es] Herramienta test network

2011-07-28 Thread Federico Don
tengo perdidas de paquetes en aleatorios, y dudo de que sea problema de la red, por lo cual le quiero tirar culpas a la placa de red del server, para esto quiero una herramienta/aplicacion que me deje saber en donde radica el problema.Gracias! El 27 de julio de 2011 15:57, Javier Basisty

Re: [CentOS-es] Herramienta test network

2011-07-28 Thread Ramón Macías Zamora
No hace mucho me pasó con un amigo, un problema similar, se tiraba la culpa a la tarjeta de red por la desconexión temporal de la tarjeta, hasta que se detectó un proceso cuyo dueño era apache que consumía muchos recursos de CPU (con top), se monitoreó y resultó que era un proceso suponemos de un

Re: [CentOS-es] Herramienta test network

2011-07-28 Thread Ricardo David Carrillo Sanchez
Con respecto a lo que andas estas buscándo, antes de hacer eso podrías revisar lo siguente: 1. Parámetros de red definidos dentro de sysctl.conf 2. Hacer uso de herramientas como ping, arp, netstat, ifconfig para revisar conectividad y parametros de red, y ethtool para revisar la

Re: [CentOS-es] Herramienta test network

2011-07-28 Thread Pere Casas Puig
No tengo conocimientos de herramientas para comprovar el estado de una tarjeta de red. Pero alguna vez que me encontrado con este problema he tirado de las herramientas basicas, como mtr, htop... Para comprovar si tu tarjeta pierde paquetes creo que te puede servir el comando ifconfig. Si no

Re: [CentOS-es] Herramienta test network

2011-07-28 Thread Alexis
Hola ! Con el comando 'netstat -i' puedes ver las estadísticas de los interfaces de red y comprobar los errores. Tienes seis columnas que te interesan : - rx-ok : recibidos sin problemas - rx-err : con errores en la recepción - rx-drp : paquetes descartados

[CentOS] centos6 xen

2011-07-28 Thread Juergen Gotteswinter
hi, is there any chance to see a xen kernel + xen in centosplus probably? or is any recommend 3rd party repo available yet which provides this? cheers, juergen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

2011-07-28 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 07/28/2011 08:01 AM, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote: hi, is there any chance to see a xen kernel + xen in centosplus probably? or is any recommend 3rd party repo available yet which provides this? if someone was to step up and offer to manintain it, and a few people to help test it -

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

2011-07-28 Thread Juergen Gotteswinter
Hello Kb, theres myoungs repo available, he maintains a 2.6.32 kernel for fedora which has been ported to rhel/centos 6 as well. http://xenbits.xen.org/people/mayoung/ perhaps this could be a base for cplus xen. for me it worked fine so far, but i whouldnt take it onto production until

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

2011-07-28 Thread John R. Dennison
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:53:23AM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote: i think i am not the only one who wants to stay with with xen :) Far from it. Xen still has a place as a dom0. John -- Since when do we have to agree with people

Re: [CentOS] Subnet expansion

2011-07-28 Thread John Doe
From: Fajar Priyanto fajar...@arinet.org Currently I have this network: 10.1.16.0/22. 10.1.16.0-10.16.17.254 are DHCP managed 10.1.18.0-10.1.19.254 are statically assigned If I need to expand it to: 10.1.16.0/20 1. What is the best way to do it with minimal network disruption? I am no

[CentOS] /usr/sbin/logcheck: line 100: kill: (24333) - No such process

2011-07-28 Thread Andreas Reschke
Hello I've installed a new mailserver with CentOS 6.0 x86_64. For the reporting I need logcheck. I've the same problem as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678436 Description of problem: I installed logcheck and now I get mails from cron with the following error message: Subject:

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

2011-07-28 Thread Peter Peltonen
Hi, A few more questions :) On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:53:23AM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote: i think i am not the only one who wants to stay with with xen :) Far from it.  Xen still has a place as a dom0. What

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

2011-07-28 Thread Juergen Gotteswinter
Am 28.07.11 11:23, schrieb Peter Peltonen: Hi, A few more questions :) On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, John R. Dennisonj...@gerdesas.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:53:23AM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote: i think i am not the only one who wants to stay with with xen :) Far

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

2011-07-28 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 07/28/2011 10:23 AM, Peter Peltonen wrote: What are the reasons for people staying with Xen as dom0, just the learning curve? Or are there some technical considerations as well? while they are all relevant and good questions, please start a new thread when going off on a tangent from the

Re: [CentOS] Kickstart and CentOS 6...

2011-07-28 Thread John Doe
From: John Doe jd...@yahoo.com I am trying to upgrade my kickstart usb key to 6.0 and I ran into a few issues. I boot with:   append initrd=initrd.img ks=hd:sdb2:/ks.cfg repo=hd:sdb2:/centos and in the ks.cfg I have:   harddrive --partition=sdb2 --dir=/centos and on sdb2 I have:  

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

2011-07-28 Thread Rudi Ahlers
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Peter Peltonen peter.pelto...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, A few more questions :) On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:53:23AM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote: i think i am not the only one who

Re: [CentOS] non PAE support

2011-07-28 Thread Michael Simpson
On 28 July 2011 03:09, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote: At Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:39:55 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: On Jul 27, 2011, at 12:33 PM, Always Learning wrote: On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 10:15 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: you can build the kernel RPM

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] How to remove Microsoft soft raid?

2011-07-28 Thread David McGuffey
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 11:17 -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote: Drew wrote on 07/21/2011 11:09 AM: From the sounds of it it's fake raid. M$ doesn't leave any signatures on their raid system that linux will detect. dm/md raid can see fakeraid signatures in newer versions so the installer may be

Re: [CentOS] Subnet expansion

2011-07-28 Thread Fajar Priyanto
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:53 PM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk wrote: Currently I have this network: 10.1.16.0/22. 10.1.16.0-10.16.17.254 are DHCP managed 10.1.18.0-10.1.19.254 are statically assigned If I need to expand it to: 10.1.16.0/20 I think the answer to this part is not

Re: [CentOS] non PAE support

2011-07-28 Thread Always Learning
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 11:33 +0100, Michael Simpson wrote: ok mum, lets get you setup with centos6..oh dear.. it looks like you bought your laptop at exactly the wrong period in intel's mobile cpu history...unlucky. Ah well, lets go down to $PC_VENDOR and get you something with m$'s latest

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

2011-07-28 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 07/28/2011 11:49 AM, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote: Am 28.07.11 11:23, schrieb Peter Peltonen: Hi, A few more questions :) On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, John R. Dennisonj...@gerdesas.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:53:23AM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote: i think i am not

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

2011-07-28 Thread Tom H
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Peter Peltonen peter.pelto...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:53:23AM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

2011-07-28 Thread John R. Dennison
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 07:27:38AM -0400, Tom H wrote: 2. A so-called Enterprise Operating System like RHEL. And your gratuitous edit of this point serves what purpose exactly? John -- People learn something every day, and a lot of

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

2011-07-28 Thread Scot P. Floess
I can definitely say why I need Xen... My reasons are partially selfish - I have some older hardware at home that does not support native hardware virtualization (two Dell Precision 470s and a Dell Poweredge SC 430)... By using Xen, the performance is great for me using VMs... Using qemu

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

2011-07-28 Thread Alain Péan
Le 28/07/2011 13:27, Tom H a écrit : On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Rudi Ahlersr...@softdux.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Peter Peltonen peter.pelto...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, John R. Dennisonj...@gerdesas.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] How to remove Microsoft soft raid?

2011-07-28 Thread Drew
Whatever raid metadata was written by WinXP-64 was destroyed and I was able to do a proper install of CentOS 6. I'd still strongly recommend, if you haven't done so, check your BIOS to make sure your SATA controller doesn't have RAID mode enabled. I've seen the odd weird interaction between

[CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads

2011-07-28 Thread Karanbir Singh
hi guys, Just a quick note about adding [SOLVED] tags to the Subject lines on email lists : Dont do it, it does not help and makes no difference to the content - yet, it breaks threading of responses. Unline web forums, email clients will try and thread using the Subject and in-reply-to

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

2011-07-28 Thread Karanbir Singh
hi, On 07/28/2011 08:01 AM, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote: is there any chance to see a xen kernel + xen in centosplus probably? or is any recommend 3rd party repo available yet which provides this? having spoken to a couple of people who have shown interest in this issue over the last few

Re: [CentOS] Subnet expansion

2011-07-28 Thread Les Mikesell
On 7/28/11 4:18 AM, John Doe wrote: 2. If I keep some machine with 22 subnet mask, will it still be able to talk to the other machines in it's range? Linux boxes seem to mostly work with the wrong netmask, but I've seen things that don't. Your subnet broadcast will be wrong. They would

Re: [CentOS] non PAE support

2011-07-28 Thread Keith Roberts
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Always Learning wrote: *snip* ... and do not forget to pay the GBP 90 (Euro 100, USD 150) compulsory Windoze tax on the new computer ! In England it is impossible, in my experience, to purchase a new computer from a major retailer without paying the Windoze tax. Yes.

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads

2011-07-28 Thread Keith Roberts
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Karanbir Singh wrote: To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org From: Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org Subject: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads hi guys, Just a quick note about adding [SOLVED] tags to the Subject lines on email lists : Dont do

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads

2011-07-28 Thread Rudi Ahlers
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Keith Roberts ke...@karsites.net wrote: Is that why it's frowned upon to use a current thread to start a new one? Like doing a 'reply to' and then changing the subject line? Kind Regards, Keith Roberts

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads

2011-07-28 Thread Tony Mountifield
In article sig.51907ae09c.caaj3djkxvacpejzzyywuhqspfew2pken93xrfbmbd8jnvsc...@mail.gmail.com, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Keith Roberts ke...@karsites.net wrote: Is that why it's frowned upon to use a current thread to start a new one? Like doing a

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

2011-07-28 Thread Tom H
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:41 AM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 07:27:38AM -0400, Tom H wrote: 2. A so-called Enterprise Operating System like RHEL. And your gratuitous edit of this point serves what purpose exactly? That blaming CentOS for the switch to

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

2011-07-28 Thread ken
On 07/28/2011 09:59 AM Tony Mountifield wrote: In article sig.51907ae09c.caaj3djkxvacpejzzyywuhqspfew2pken93xrfbmbd8jnvsc...@mail.gmail.com, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Keith Roberts ke...@karsites.net wrote: Is that why it's frowned upon to use a

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

2011-07-28 Thread Marc Deop
Regards, Marc Deop On Thursday 28 July 2011 11:14:38 ken wrote: On 07/28/2011 09:59 AM Tony Mountifield wrote: In article sig.51907ae09c.caaj3djkxvacpejzzyywuhqspfew2pken93xrfbmbd8jnvsc...@mail.gmail.com, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Keith Roberts

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiplefactors

2011-07-28 Thread Owen Beckley
As a test, I appended a couple words to the previous subject line. If this causes this email to show up as the beginning of a new thread to you, please report that back to us along with the email reader and version you're using. (Of course this is far from a rigorous test, but it's

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

2011-07-28 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 07/28/2011 04:19 PM, Marc Deop wrote: This discussion makes no sense to me. If the email client is using the subject for threading it is doing something wrong (or you specifically set it that way). As Ken said, there are headers used to organize the emails. the thing is that not all

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiplefactors

2011-07-28 Thread Always Learning
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 10:49 -0500, Owen Beckley wrote: Because of corporate requirements, I use Microsoft Outlook 2007 to read email. I use View-Arrange By-Conversation to read this forum. Each time someone changes the subject line, it appears to me as a new conversation. For example,

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 77, Issue 8

2011-07-28 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

Re: [CentOS] centos6 not using /etc/gdm/custom.conf

2011-07-28 Thread Jamieson, Stephen CTR Navair, 5.4.4.4
If anyone really needs to do this, there is a patch in the gdm srpm called plymoth.patch that changes the parameters. It's located on line 225. If you change that to what you need and recompile it, it should work. Not that I recommend this... Regards, Stephen Jamieson -Original

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

2011-07-28 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thursday 28 July 2011 16:52:07 Karanbir Singh wrote: On 07/28/2011 04:19 PM, Marc Deop wrote: This discussion makes no sense to me. If the email client is using the subject for threading it is doing something wrong (or you specifically set it that way). As Ken said, there are

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

2011-07-28 Thread John R Pierce
On 07/28/11 8:52 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: the thing is that not all mail clients will set the in-reply-to headers, whuch is why clients like thunderbird, evolution and mutt will use the subject line as well to thread messages. Its the References: header that controls threading in mail clients

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

2011-07-28 Thread John R Pierce
On 07/28/11 10:21 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: So the mail clients that don't set these headers should be fixed, right? I mean, fix the broken software rather than try to fix human habits in order to keep using broken software. a frequent cause of missing References seems to be users who get a

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

2011-07-28 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 07/28/2011 06:21 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: So the mail clients that don't set these headers should be fixed, right? I mean, fix the broken software rather than try to fix human habits in order to keep using broken software. Habit is an interestion term, same with convention - the fact

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

2011-07-28 Thread Les Mikesell
On 7/28/2011 12:32 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 07/28/11 10:21 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: So the mail clients that don't set these headers should be fixed, right? I mean, fix the broken software rather than try to fix human habits in order to keep using broken software. a frequent cause of

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

2011-07-28 Thread Always Learning
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 18:49 +0100, Thunderbird Fan (KB) wrote: ideally people would stop using yahoo mail / squirrelmail etc. ... and use a *real* email programme ? -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

2011-07-28 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 07/28/2011 06:23 PM, John R Pierce wrote: Its the References: header that controls threading in mail clients that support it. I'm using thunderbird, and afaik, it won't revert to Subject based pseudo threading in the absence of References. Subject line changes don't break the thread,

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

2011-07-28 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 07/28/2011 06:53 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: But the thing I'd like mailers to do is to call attention to messages that belong to a thread where I've replied earlier. Is there a way to get thunderbird to do that? yes, I mark email threads I am interested in with a flag, and its easy to

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

2011-07-28 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 07/28/2011 06:54 PM, Always Learning wrote: On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 18:49 +0100, Thunderbird Fan (KB) wrote: ideally people would stop using yahoo mail / squirrelmail etc. ... and use a *real* email programme ? 'real' is hard to quantify, but an email client that does the right thing

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

2011-07-28 Thread Les Mikesell
On 7/28/2011 12:57 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: On 07/28/2011 06:53 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: But the thing I'd like mailers to do is to call attention to messages that belong to a thread where I've replied earlier. Is there a way to get thunderbird to do that? yes, I mark email threads I am

[CentOS] How to test for '.' in a script

2011-07-28 Thread James B. Byrne
I am trying to check for a single period '.' in a shell variable. $ I=. $ echo $I . $ if [[ $I -eq '.' ]]; then echo true; fi -bash: [[: .: syntax error: operand expected (error token is .) All other variants of this construct, with and without escape characters, single and double quote

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

2011-07-28 Thread Jake Shipton
On 07/28/2011 06:54 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: My argument here is that not all mail clients do, therefore sticking with subject line sanity would help increase the number of threads that can stay together. I agree with KB on this one. Way I see it is, you could go everyone to install a new

Re: [CentOS] How to test for '.' in a script

2011-07-28 Thread Owen Beckley
$ if [[ $I -eq '.' ]]; then echo true; fi -bash: [[: .: syntax error: operand expected (error token is .) -eq is for numbers == is for strings See man bash. -Owen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

2011-07-28 Thread John R. Dennison
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 07:14:39PM +0100, Keith Roberts wrote: +1 that's what my hosting provider gives on my webmail service, and I think it's a nice application to use. Please excuse the untimely response - been busy. I'd give users Exchange and OWA before I would even consider Horde and

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

2011-07-28 Thread John R. Dennison
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:44:18AM -0400, Tom H wrote: That blaming CentOS for the switch to KVM and the deprecation of Xen doesn't make sense since it's simply re-rpm'ing RHEL. Ok, that makes sense and I fully agree :) I blame the lack of bacon for not understanding that earlier. Thanks

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

2011-07-28 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 03:28:59PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: John R. Dennison wrote: On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 07:14:39PM +0100, Keith Roberts wrote: +1 that's what my hosting provider gives on my webmail service, and I think it's a nice application to use. Please excuse the

Re: [CentOS] How to test for '.' in a script

2011-07-28 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, James B. Byrne wrote: I am trying to check for a single period '.' in a shell variable. $ I=. $ echo $I . $ if [[ $I -eq '.' ]]; then echo true; fi if [ $I = '.' ]; then ... Use a single = rather than -eq (which tests numeric equality) and use single brackets --

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

2011-07-28 Thread John Hinton
On this list, we are not supposed to talk about politics, religion, guns and helmet laws... Oops That's my motorcycling lists! ;) I guess the first three pertain to 'all' list except for those devoted to one or more of those three topics. Although, it can be really hard to refrain

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

2011-07-28 Thread Tony Mountifield
In article 4e319b13.8000...@hogranch.com, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 07/28/11 8:52 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: the thing is that not all mail clients will set the in-reply-to headers, whuch is why clients like thunderbird, evolution and mutt will use the subject line as well

[CentOS] kvm module and boot order

2011-07-28 Thread Jerry Geis
I use kvm-amd a lot to do test installs. I am using it with qemu-kvm-0.14 the lastest. I think your supposed to be able to give your command line and add the parameter -boot dc so it initially boots with the cdrom (d) and then after reboot will boot do the HD or c. This never works for me. It

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

2011-07-28 Thread Always Learning
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:28 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: As Americans we must always remember that we all have a common enemy, an enemy that is dangerous, powerful and relentless. I refer, of course, to the federal government. -- Dave Barry (3 July 1947-), Pulitzer Prize-winning

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

2011-07-28 Thread John R. Dennison
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 09:50:00PM +0100, Always Learning wrote: Excess noise removed. It was a .signature quote. It's not fodder for this list. If you've a point to make or a comment to make about what I include in my .signature database then take it up with me _off-list_; otherwise please

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

2011-07-28 Thread Spiro Harvey
the thing is that not all mail clients will set the in-reply-to headers, whuch is why clients like thunderbird, evolution and mutt will use the subject line as well to thread messages. Apple Mail does that too and it makes the threading unusable IMO. If the clients are too dumb to adhere to a

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

2011-07-28 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 09:50:00PM +0100, Always Learning wrote: On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:28 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: As Americans we must always remember that we all have a common enemy, an enemy that is dangerous, powerful and relentless. I refer, of course, to the federal

[CentOS] i am not qble to install centos 6

2011-07-28 Thread sridhar sri
Hi CentOS Team, i am not able to install CentOS 6.0 , while installing 1) Insert your CentOS 6.0 installation DVD into DVD drive 2) In the pre-boot phase of system startup http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Booting press F11 to enter UEFI Boot Manager 3) Enter 'UEFI Boot

Re: [CentOS] i am not qble to install centos 6

2011-07-28 Thread RedShift
On 07/28/11 23:14, sridhar sri wrote: Hi CentOS Team, i am not able to install CentOS 6.0 , while installing 1) Insert your CentOS 6.0 installation DVD into DVD drive 2) In the pre-boot phase ofsystem startup http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Booting pressF11

Re: [CentOS] i am not qble to install centos 6

2011-07-28 Thread Always Learning
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 02:44 +0530, sridhar sri wrote: when i press the F11 i am not able go to boot options , for that i used the del and esc, OK. Are you using SATA or PATA hard disks (HDD) ? What processor (CPU) does your machine have ? How much RAM does your machine have. Please note

[CentOS] [Fwd: [SOLVED] Re: How to test for '.' in a script]

2011-07-28 Thread James B. Byrne
On Thu, July 28, 2011 14:30, James B. Byrne wrote: I am trying to check for a single period '.' in a shell variable. $ I=. $ echo $I . $ if [[ $I -eq '.' ]]; then echo true; fi -bash: [[: .: syntax error: operand expected (error token is .) . . . How does one check to see for this

Re: [CentOS] Yum Issues ; Segmentation fault

2011-07-28 Thread Ross Walker
On Jul 26, 2011, at 2:06 PM, Frank M. Ramaekers framaek...@ailife.com wrote: Mine just segfault on the next one (I was having problems with dag): # yum --disablerepo=dag check-update Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * addons:

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

2011-07-28 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 07/28/2011 10:01 PM, Spiro Harvey wrote: Personally, I like the idea of the [SOLVED] tags because they can indicate when help is no longer needed. There is a fundamental problem with that - this list isnt a support list, its a list of and for people who use CentOS to talk about CentOS. By

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

2011-07-28 Thread Julio Martinez
I'd give users Exchange and OWA before I would even consider Horde and its ilk Well, we want free software, if I wanted to pay for a good webmail server I'd go for Axigen, as my experience, excellent option running on CentOS. J. ___ CentOS mailing

[CentOS] how to use centos 6 live cd with virtualbox on win xp

2011-07-28 Thread Michel Donais
If I try to start live cd with Virtual box; it say: no boot medium found system halted --- Michel Donais___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

2011-07-28 Thread Spiro Harvey
There is a fundamental problem with that - this list isnt a support list, its a list of and for people who use CentOS to talk about CentOS. By thinking of it as a one way support system you have reduced the list to essentially a bugtracker / issuetracker / support thread and that in itself