Hello:
My user name is YvesBellefeuille.
I'd like to edit the information on using Skype under CentOS 6 at
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Skype .
The current information is based on
http://www.openfusion.net/2009/09/19#fn.html , which was written in
2009 and is no longer accurate. Here are
On Friday, July 29, 2011 08:02:20 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
If the machines are pretty much identical, clonezilla should work. Boot
the machine with a 'clonezilla-live' CD or USB drive. If you can attach
the target drive to the same machine you can go disk-disk. Otherwise,
connect to
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Jake Shipton crazylinuxn...@gmx.com wrote:
On 07/29/2011 12:48 PM, Thomas Harold wrote:
Heck, I'd settle for people coming back to a problem / issue thread
and updating on how or what the actual problem was or what they did to
get the thing to work properly.
So here goes...
First some back story
-Centos 5 with latest updates as of yesterday. kernel is
2.6.18-238.19.1.el5
-setup is raid 1 for /boot and lvm over raid6 for everything else
- The / partition (lvm RootVol) had run out of room... (100%
full, things where falling appart...)
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011, Cliff Pratt wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: Cliff Pratt enkiduonthe...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple
factors
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Jake Shipton crazylinuxn...@gmx.com wrote:
On
On 07/30/2011 06:37 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 08:07:38PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use oprofile to debug a problem with idle virtual machines
eating 10% cpu but apparently the debuginfo packages for Centos 6 do not
exist and so I cannot get
Am 30.07.2011 10:37, schrieb Sean Hart:
So here goes...
First some back story
-Centos 5 with latest updates as of yesterday. kernel is
2.6.18-238.19.1.el5
-setup is raid 1 for /boot and lvm over raid6 for everything else
- The / partition (lvm RootVol) had run out of
On 07/29/2011 02:21 PM Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:05:27AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
On 07/29/11 10:56 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Well, my new workstation has an internal speaker, as well as the jacks for
external. I want beeps, if necessary, but I can't figure out
At Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:45:42 -0700 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
I have a tested copy of EL6 that I would like to duplicate to a number of
similar servers, but can't seem to find a sane howto on the subject. TLDP's
Hard disk upgrade howto is embarrassingly antiquated:
I installed CentOS 6 to Acer 7750 laptop, which has Intel Sandybridge CPU
( i5-2410M) with integrated Intel HD Graphics 3000.
By default X won't use intel driver for graphics, but vesa instead, which
limits the resolution to 1024x768. I tried to force the use of intel driver
by writing a
On 7/30/11 2:03 AM, Benjamin Smith wrote:
On Friday, July 29, 2011 08:02:20 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
If the machines are pretty much identical, clonezilla should work. Boot
the machine with a 'clonezilla-live' CD or USB drive. If you can attach
the target drive to the same machine you
I see in my overnight email spool:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726872
I am amused because this kind of request comes up time and
time again with respect the package management system
It is technically _possible_ to attain this kind of rollbacks,
in some tightly controlled
At Sat, 30 Jul 2011 09:12:28 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On 7/30/11 2:03 AM, Benjamin Smith wrote:
On Friday, July 29, 2011 08:02:20 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
If the machines are pretty much identical, clonezilla should work. Boot
the machine with a
On Saturday, July 30, 2011 10:37:37 AM R P Herrold wrote:
I see in my overnight email spool:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726872
I am amused because this kind of request comes up time and
time again with respect the package management system
...
I had to check my
On Saturday, July 30, 2011 11:18:34 AM Robert Heller wrote:
dd can be problematic if the target and source disks are different
(sizes, geometry, etc.), since dd will do a literal sector-by-sector
copy, which is not generally advisable (and why o why to people *keep*
suggesting it? -- it is
Hey, at least the bug poster took the time to write it up nicely. Still
impossible...
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011, R P Herrold wrote:
I see in my overnight email spool:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726872
--
Jim
Hi list,
I am having a debate with one of my clients where I administer their
domain and storage server but the website is hosted by godaddy.
thus www.mydomain.org goes to one of godaddy's servers but the
mydomain.org and mail.mydomain.org and ns1.mydomain.org all go elsewhere.
My website
Am 30.07.2011 18:55, schrieb Rob Kampen:
Hi list,
I am having a debate with one of my clients where I administer their
domain and storage server but the website is hosted by godaddy.
thus www.mydomain.org goes to one of godaddy's servers but the
mydomain.org and mail.mydomain.org and
On 07/30/2011 12:55 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
Hi list,
I am having a debate with one of my clients where I administer their
domain and storage server but the website is hosted by godaddy.
thus www.mydomain.org goes to one of godaddy's servers but the
mydomain.org and mail.mydomain.org and
Hello Rob,
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 12:55 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote:
quote
Again, the standard practice in the industry is for name.org and
www.name.org to be tied together.
True, standard practice, but that doesn't mean that it *has* to be done
like this.
they say that out of close to 1
It's extremely common for an HTTP connection to the unqualified
first-level domain to direct one to the website home page, but whether
that is accomplished by having the IPs be the same or by way of an
HTTP redirect, I would not say there's any clear winner. However, it
is not a universal
On 7/30/11 11:55 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
Hi list,
I am having a debate with one of my clients where I administer their domain
and
storage server but the website is hosted by godaddy.
thus www.mydomain.org goes to one of godaddy's servers but the mydomain.org
and
mail.mydomain.org and
At Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:51:04 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On Saturday, July 30, 2011 11:18:34 AM Robert Heller wrote:
dd can be problematic if the target and source disks are different
(sizes, geometry, etc.), since dd will do a literal sector-by-sector
copy, which
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011, Bart Schaefer wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: Bart Schaefer barton.schae...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [CentOS] www.mydomain.org and mydomain.org should resolve to the
same IP
It's extremely common for an HTTP connection to the unqualified
At Sat, 30 Jul 2011 12:55:33 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Hi list,
I am having a debate with one of my clients where I administer their
domain and storage server but the website is hosted by godaddy.
thus www.mydomain.org goes to one of godaddy's servers but the
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 01:03:23PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 07/30/2011 06:37 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 08:07:38PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use oprofile to debug a problem with idle virtual machines
eating 10% cpu but
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 01:45:15PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
At Sat, 30 Jul 2011 12:55:33 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
I am having a debate with one of my clients where I administer their
domain and storage server but the website is hosted by godaddy.
Again, the
On 7/30/11 12:30 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
At Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:51:04 -0400 CentOS mailing listcentos@centos.org
wrote:
On Saturday, July 30, 2011 11:18:34 AM Robert Heller wrote:
dd can be problematic if the target and source disks are different
(sizes, geometry, etc.), since dd will do
At Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:19:40 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On 7/30/11 12:30 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
At Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:51:04 -0400 CentOS mailing listcentos@centos.org
wrote:
On Saturday, July 30, 2011 11:18:34 AM Robert Heller wrote:
dd can be
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org wrote:
Am 30.07.2011 10:37, schrieb Sean Hart:
So here goes...
First some back story
-Centos 5 with latest updates as of yesterday. kernel is
2.6.18-238.19.1.el5
-setup is raid 1 for /boot and lvm over raid6 for
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 10:17 -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
It's extremely common for an HTTP connection to the unqualified
first-level domain to direct one to the website home page, but whether
that is accomplished by having the IPs be the same or by way of an
HTTP redirect, I would not say
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Sean Hart teve...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org wrote:
Am 30.07.2011 10:37, schrieb Sean Hart:
So here goes...
First some back story
-Centos 5 with latest updates as of yesterday. kernel is
On 07/29/11 11:22 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
And I've had the external speakers jacked in both in the front
headphones jack, and the traditional one in the back, and sound comes
both out of the external speakers and a speaker inside the machine.
sound cards have a myriad of different ways
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 19:15 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
If you remove the ServerAlias from the apache config these
domains can be safely separated, even on IP if you wish.
I'm hosting a kind of fall back page at http://ottolander.nl which is
what shows up if someone tries to
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 19:12 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
www is typically just an A record and not a subdomain.
Why is it not a sub-domain ?
--
With best regards,
Paul.
England,
EU.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 18:19 -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
How do you disable gnome-panel on centos 6?
Before I could at least kill gnome-panel on centos 5, however
on centos 6 even kill -9 gnome-panel restarts it again.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Panel
GNOME Panel is a highly
Am 31.07.2011 01:05, schrieb Always Learning:
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 19:12 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
www is typically just an A record and not a subdomain.
Why is it not a sub-domain ?
A subdomain would have their own zone and could be delegated.
Alexander
On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 01:20 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Am 31.07.2011 01:05, schrieb Always Learning:
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 19:12 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
www is typically just an A record and not a subdomain.
Why is it not a sub-domain ?
A subdomain would have
On 07/30/11 9:55 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
Again, the standard practice in the industry is for name.org and
www.name.org to be tied together.
if the domain is primarily a website, for sure, in fact, many of my
websites prefer domain.com to www.domain.com and in fact, I redirect the
latter to the
On Friday 29 July 2011 22:45, Benjamin Smith wrote:
I have a tested copy of EL6 that I would like to duplicate to a
number of similar servers, but can't seem to find a sane howto on the
subject. TLDP's Hard disk upgrade howto is embarrassingly
antiquated: when's the last time you saw LILO?
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 16:49 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
VirtualHost 207.111.214.244
ServerName astronomy.santa-cruz.ca.us
DocumentRoot //html
ErrorLog /./logs/error_log
CustomLog //logs/access_log common
/VirtualHost
VirtualHost
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Always Learning cen...@u6.u22.net wrote:
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 16:49 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
VirtualHost 207.111.214.244
ServerName astronomy.santa-cruz.ca.us
DocumentRoot //html
ErrorLog /./logs/error_log
On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 13:47 +1200, Cliff Pratt wrote:
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Always Learning cen...@u6.u22.net wrote:
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 16:49 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
VirtualHost 207.111.214.244
ServerName astronomy.santa-cruz.ca.us
DocumentRoot
On 07/30/11 6:42 PM, Always Learning wrote:
You can amalgamate that into a single entry .
that doesn't do the redirect. I *want* it so that if you go to any of
these URLs...
http://astro.santa-cruz.ca.us
http://www.astro.santa-cruz.ca.us
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 2:39 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 07/30/11 6:42 PM, Always Learning wrote:
You can amalgamate that into a single entry .
that doesn't do the redirect. I *want* it so that if you go to any of
these URLs...
http://astro.santa-cruz.ca.us
hello list!!
I'm attempting to find out why this cron job isn't running. the host is centos
5.6 on i386 just so you know.
0 3 * * * /bin/alldb
/home/bluethundr/backupdb/alldb-$(date +%Y%m%d%H%S).sql
The job is meant to backup all the databases on a mysql
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 19:39 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
On 07/30/11 6:42 PM, Always Learning wrote:
You can amalgamate that into a single entry .
that doesn't do the redirect. I *want* it so that if you go to any of
these URLs...
http://astro.santa-cruz.ca.us
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Tim Dunphy bluethu...@jokefire.com wrote:
hello list!!
I'm attempting to find out why this cron job isn't running. the host is
centos 5.6 on i386 just so you know.
0 3 * * * /bin/alldb
/home/bluethundr/backupdb/alldb-$(date
On 07/30/2011 11:07 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
03***/bin/alldb /home/bluethundr/backupdb/alldb-$(date
+%Y%m%d%H%S).sql
I think the date paremters (percent etc) is causing you problems here.
Try it simple first:
* * * * */bin/alldb
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 03:19:01PM +1200, Cliff Pratt wrote:
Tim, the program is run by cron in a different environment to the
standard online environment. Is /bin/alldb a script? If so, *any*
program in the script should have a full path, or the PATH enviroment
variable should be specified
50 matches
Mail list logo
