CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1841
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1841.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1841
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1841.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1842
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1842.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1845 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1845.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
On Mon, December 19, 2011 18:04, Jeff Boyce wrote:
Greetings -
I am hoping someone can confirm for me the steps that
I am using to add an LV to an existing Guest in KVM,
and what I am seeing as I do some of these steps.
I think that you will find it easier to create guest
storage volumes
Buenas tardes,
Estoy utilizando en produccion la convinacion de Qemu-Kvm como entorno de
virtualizacion.
Bueno, el caso és que quiero realizar un snapshot de una maquina
virtualizada que esta corriendo en el server, però no encuentro la forma.
Alguna idea ?
Buenas ,
Usando LVM se puede hacer perfectamente en vez de usar imágenes de disco
raw usas una partición LVM haces un snapshot , otra opción pero con peor
rendimiento para la maquina (segun la version) es usar qcow2 que permite
snapshot en caliente .
Un saludo.
El 20 de diciembre de 2011
Parece interesante,
la question es que via grafica creo que no se puede ( virt-manager )
y por consola tampoco me queda nada claro el procedimiento.
Podria veer algun link de referencia ?
Disculpad las molestias.
El 20 de desembre de 2011 21:16, Raul Moreno Sola r...@ametsa.biz ha
escrit:
Hi,
After yum update on a Cent OS 6.0 IBM x3850 server to Cent OS 6.1, the
kernel crashes on boot.
I have googlet a little, and find that others have the same problem and
there seems not to be a solution yet.
The kernel that crashes is 2.6.32-131.21.1.el6.x86_64.
If i boot the prior kernel
On 12/20/2011 03:24 AM, Thomas Rønshof wrote:
Hi,
After yum update on a Cent OS 6.0 IBM x3850 server to Cent OS 6.1, the
kernel crashes on boot.
I have googlet a little, and find that others have the same problem and
there seems not to be a solution yet.
The kernel that crashes is
On 12/20/2011 12:59 AM, Barry Brimer wrote:
1. The switch being used has autoneg off and has port set to 100 full duplex.
2. Many times NIC fails to come up properly during PXE boot:
Any other ideas?
udev rules?
mii-tool?
___
CentOS mailing list
In article 4ef0939c.9030...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com,
William Warren hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com wrote:
On 12/20/2011 12:59 AM, Barry Brimer wrote:
1. The switch being used has autoneg off and has port set to 100 full
duplex.
2. Many times NIC fails to come up
Message: 37
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:41:26 -0500
From: m.r...@5-cent.us
Subject: Re: [CentOS] java installation failure
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
I would suggest that if openjdk doesn't work, you go with Sun/Oracle's
java, which is the Source of All Java
Sun java was
CentOS-6.1 KVM guest on CentOS-6.1 host.
I am seeing this SEAlert in the /var/log/audit/audit.log
file a new guest immediately after startup. Can someone
tell me what it means and what I should do about it? A
Google search reveals a number of Fedora issues with
similar errors dating back a few
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/20/2011 02:44 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
CentOS-6.1 KVM guest on CentOS-6.1 host.
I am seeing this SEAlert in the /var/log/audit/audit.log file a new
guest immediately after startup. Can someone tell me what it means
and what I should do
I finally started yum upgrade for CentOS 6.0+CR x86_64.
yum reports that I have already installed
perl-5.10.1-119.el6_1.1,
but perl-CGI requests for
perl-5.10.1-119.el6 from ISO/base repo.
Can someone advise on the best course of action? Logical would be to
downgrade perl to the one from ISO
On 12/20/2011 03:55 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I finally started yum upgrade for CentOS 6.0+CR x86_64.
yum reports that I have already installed
perl-5.10.1-119.el6_1.1,
but perl-CGI requests for
perl-5.10.1-119.el6 from ISO/base repo.
Can someone advise on the best course of
Vreme: 12/20/2011 03:58 PM, Fabien Archambault piše:
On 12/20/2011 03:55 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I finally started yum upgrade for CentOS 6.0+CR x86_64.
yum reports that I have already installed
perl-5.10.1-119.el6_1.1,
but perl-CGI requests for
perl-5.10.1-119.el6 from ISO/base
e-letter wrote:
From: m.r...@5-cent.us
I would suggest that if openjdk doesn't work, you go with Sun/Oracle's
java, which is the Source of All Java
Sun java was obtained. After attempt to run jedit, the following error
occurred:
jedit
Warning: $JAVA_HOME environment variable not set!
On 12/20/2011 09:55 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I finally started yum upgrade for CentOS 6.0+CR x86_64.
yum reports that I have already installed
perl-5.10.1-119.el6_1.1,
but perl-CGI requests for
perl-5.10.1-119.el6 from ISO/base repo.
Can someone advise on the best course of
On 12/20/2011 09:03 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Vreme: 12/20/2011 03:58 PM, Fabien Archambault piše:
On 12/20/2011 03:55 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I finally started yum upgrade for CentOS 6.0+CR x86_64.
yum reports that I have already installed
perl-5.10.1-119.el6_1.1,
but
Vreme: 12/20/2011 04:15 PM, Johnny Hughes piše:
On 12/20/2011 09:03 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Vreme: 12/20/2011 03:58 PM, Fabien Archambault piše:
On 12/20/2011 03:55 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I finally started yum upgrade for CentOS 6.0+CR x86_64.
yum reports that I have already
Vreme: 12/20/2011 04:11 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us piše:
e-letter wrote:
From: m.r...@5-cent.us
I would suggest that if openjdk doesn't work, you go with Sun/Oracle's
java, which is the Source of All Java
Sun java was obtained. After attempt to run jedit, the following error
occurred:
jedit
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Vreme: 12/20/2011 04:11 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us pie:
e-letter wrote:
From: m.r...@5-cent.us
I would suggest that if openjdk doesn't work, you go with Sun/Oracle's
java, which is the Source of All Java
Sun java was obtained. After attempt to run jedit, the following
Vreme: 12/20/2011 04:20 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic piše:
Vreme: 12/20/2011 04:15 PM, Johnny Hughes piše:
On 12/20/2011 09:03 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Vreme: 12/20/2011 03:58 PM, Fabien Archambault piše:
On 12/20/2011 03:55 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I finally started yum upgrade for
Vreme: 12/20/2011 04:34 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us piše:
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Vreme: 12/20/2011 04:11 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us piše:
e-letter wrote:
From: m.r...@5-cent.us
I would suggest that if openjdk doesn't work, you go with Sun/Oracle's
java, which is the Source of All Java
Sun java was
On 20 December 2011 14:34, Tony Mountifield t...@softins.co.uk wrote:
In article 4ef0939c.9030...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com,
William Warren hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com wrote:
On 12/20/2011 12:59 AM, Barry Brimer wrote:
1. The switch being used has autoneg off and has port
On Tue, December 20, 2011 09:49, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
This means somebody is executing a chcon with a context
that the kernel does not understand. I would look for a
chcon in an init script.
I tried this and did not find any in the init scripts:
find /etc/rc.d -print | xargs grep chcon
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/20/2011 04:55 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Tue, December 20, 2011 09:49, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
This means somebody is executing a chcon with a context that the
kernel does not understand. I would look for a chcon in an init
script.
On Tue, December 20, 2011 13:40, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
grep -R chcon /etc/rc.d
Would be an easier way to do this...
ps -eZ | grep initrc
# grep -R chcon /etc/rc.d
# ps -eZ | grep initrc
system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s01211 ?00:00:01
miniserv.pl
No chcon found in /etc/rc.d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/20/2011 07:33 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Tue, December 20, 2011 13:40, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
grep -R chcon /etc/rc.d
Would be an easier way to do this...
ps -eZ | grep initrc
# grep -R chcon /etc/rc.d # ps -eZ | grep initrc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don't know if it is a mirror synch issue or what else.
Given a CentOS 6.1, if I give the commands:
# yum clean all
# yum update
I get this output
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can confirm that issue but currently only on my i386 boxes. The x86_64
updates fine to 6.2.
Am 20.12.11 20:57, schrieb Luigi Rosa:
Don't know if it is a mirror synch issue or what else.
Given a CentOS 6.1, if I give the commands:
# yum clean
This is annoying. I ssh to a server, then, it doesn't matter if I su - or
sudo -s, I start a service (motion, if it matters), and when the service
sends an email, it's from me, not from root, or the user the service runs
as.
I've dumped my environment, I've just dumped service's environment. I've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Shade.GE said the following on 20/12/11 21:04:
Can confirm that issue but currently only on my i386 boxes. The x86_64
updates fine to 6.2.
Confirmed.
Tried a yum clean all/yum update on an x86_64 and works as expected.
The problem is limited to
On Tue, December 20, 2011 14:42, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 12/20/2011 07:33 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
# grep -R chcon /etc/rc.d # ps -eZ | grep initrc
system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s01211 ?00:00:01
miniserv.pl
No chcon found in /etc/rc.d
miniserv.pl is the Webmin httpd server.
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
This is annoying. I ssh to a server, then, it doesn't matter if I su - or
sudo -s, I start a service (motion, if it matters), and when the service
sends an email, it's from me, not from root, or the user the service runs
as.
I've dumped my environment, I've just
On 12/20/2011 02:10 PM, Luigi Rosa wrote:
Shade.GE said the following on 20/12/11 21:04:
Can confirm that issue but currently only on my i386 boxes. The x86_64
updates fine to 6.2.
Confirmed.
Tried a yum clean all/yum update on an x86_64 and works as expected.
The problem is limited to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Johnny Hughes said the following on 20/12/11 21:31:
Shade.GE said the following on 20/12/11 21:04:
Can confirm that issue but currently only on my i386 boxes. The x86_64
updates fine to 6.2.
Confirmed.
Tried a yum clean all/yum update on
On 12/20/2011 12:57 PM, Luigi Rosa wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don't know if it is a mirror synch issue or what else.
Given a CentOS 6.1, if I give the commands:
# yum clean all
# yum update
I get this output
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit
On 12/20/2011 1:46 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
I can also verify this error/problem/issue. I had *just* installed a
fresh system yesterday with 6.1 (which I downloaded the day before as
the latest) and as of this morning I can not install any packages, and
after running a 'yum clean all',
Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
On 12/20/2011 1:46 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
I can also verify this error/problem/issue. I had *just* installed a
fresh system yesterday with 6.1 (which I downloaded the day before as
the latest) and as of this morning I can not install any packages, and
after
On 12/20/2011 1:51 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
If I can suggest a thought, I'm wondering if the mirrors list for i386 has
either an error, or a permission problem.
I'd say error:
yum update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Determining fastest mirrors
* base: mirrors.tummy.com
* extras:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
m.r...@5-cent.us said the following on 20/12/11 21:51:
If I can suggest a thought, I'm wondering if the mirrors list for i386 has
either an error, or a permission problem.
Dunno; from the client point of view, the directory exists (I verified by
On 12/20/2011 02:49 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
On 12/20/2011 1:46 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
I can also verify this error/problem/issue. I had *just* installed a
fresh system yesterday with 6.1 (which I downloaded the day before as
the latest) and as of this morning I can not install
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 12/20/2011 02:49 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
On 12/20/2011 1:46 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
I can also verify this error/problem/issue. I had *just* installed a
fresh system yesterday with 6.1 (which I downloaded the day before as
the latest) and as of this morning
On 12/20/2011 1:58 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
For the short term, you should be able to remark out the mirrorlist=
line in [base] and un-remark the baseurl=mirror.centos.org line until
all the external mirrors are caught up.
Mirror.centos.org should be ok ... I have verified the file exists
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Johnny Hughes said the following on 20/12/11 21:58:
For the short term, you should be able to remark out the mirrorlist= line
in [base] and un-remark the baseurl=mirror.centos.org line until all the
external mirrors are caught up.
Vreme: 12/20/2011 10:04 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner piše:
On 12/20/2011 1:58 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
For the short term, you should be able to remark out the mirrorlist=
line in [base] and un-remark the baseurl=mirror.centos.org line until
all the external mirrors are caught up.
On 12/20/2011 2:07 PM, Luigi Rosa wrote:
The line I uncommented is:
baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/
But did you comment out the one right above it?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Vreme: 12/20/2011 10:07 PM, Luigi Rosa piše:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Johnny Hughes said the following on 20/12/11 21:58:
For the short term, you should be able to remark out the mirrorlist= line
in [base] and un-remark the baseurl=mirror.centos.org line until all the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ashley M. Kirchner said the following on 20/12/11 22:10:
baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/
But did you comment out the one right above it?
Yes, of course.
Ciao,
luigi
- --
/
+--[Luigi Rosa]--
\
In every
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Johnny Hughes said the following on 20/12/11 21:58:
For the short term, you should be able to remark out the mirrorlist= line
in [base] and un-remark the baseurl=mirror.centos.org line until all the
external mirrors are caught up.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 02:58:57PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 12/20/2011 02:49 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
On 12/20/2011 1:46 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
I can also verify this error/problem/issue. I had *just* installed a
fresh system yesterday with 6.1 (which I downloaded the day
On 12/20/2011 2:09 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Official announcement on www.centos.org is dated today, Dec 20th.
Of course it is. :) How much a difference 24 hours make.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Vreme: 12/20/2011 09:46 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner piše:
On 12/20/2011 12:57 PM, Luigi Rosa wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don't know if it is a mirror synch issue or what else.
Given a CentOS 6.1, if I give the commands:
# yum clean all
# yum update
I get this
Le 20/12/2011 22:09, Ljubomir Ljubojevic a écrit :
Official announcement onwww.centos.org is dated today, Dec 20th.
Congratulations to the developpers for this very quick release of CentOS
6.2. It is a very pleasant surprise. I read some posts saying that the
framework for this release was in
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 03:10:31PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
echo To: user
help
| sendmail -t
If you're gonna send automated email, you should specify the from
address as well
echo To: user
From: my_service_al...@example.com
Subject: testy mctesty
bleh | /usr/sbin/sendmail
I just tried to update to CentOS 6.2, but I am faced with Errors: Protected
multilib versions error, the offending packages are:
jasper-libs.i686
krb5-libs.i686
nss.i686
After some investigation, it turns out that there are newer packages in x86_64
updates repository, but only for x86_64
I just tried to update to CentOS 6.2, but I am faced with Errors: Protected
multilib versions error, the offending packages are:
jasper-libs.i686
krb5-libs.i686
nss.i686
After some investigation, it turns out that there are newer packages in
x86_64 updates repository, but only for
On 12/21/2011 08:38 AM, lee_yiu_ch...@yahoo.com wrote:
...
To solve this problem, I have to manually pick up these packages from
CentOS/6.2/updates/i386/Packages (i386 update) and install them:
jasper-libs-1.900.1-15.el6_1.1.i686.rpm
krb5-libs-1.9-22.el6_2.1.i686.rpm
62 matches
Mail list logo
