centos-virt-boun...@centos.org schrieb am 30.12.2011 11:54:18:
Radek Bursztynowski ra...@bursztynowski.waw.pl
Gesendet von: centos-virt-boun...@centos.org
30.12.2011 11:54
Bitte antworten an
radek ra...@bursztynowski.waw.pl; Bitte antworten an
Discussion about the virtualization on
centos-virt-boun...@centos.org schrieb am 30.12.2011 12:30:31:
Radek Bursztynowski ra...@bursztynowski.waw.pl
Gesendet von: centos-virt-boun...@centos.org
30.12.2011 12:30
Bitte antworten an
radek ra...@bursztynowski.waw.pl; Bitte antworten an
Discussion about the
On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 08:19 -0500, David McGuffey wrote:
Started this over on the main list, but remembered there is a
CentOS-virt list also where this would be more appropriate.
At home, I'm all Linux and only run Windows in VMs when I absolutely
have to (e.g., TurboTax on Win7 during the
Lo he mirado, pero los paquetes rpm son para la versión 5.
Al instalar me aparecen estas dependecias:
rpm -ivh *
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 335624 dic 29 19:48
ocfs2-2.6.18-274.7.1.el5-1.4.7-1.el5.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1549393 dic 29 19:48 ocfs2-tools-1.4.4-1.el5.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1
On 12/30/2011 03:13 AM, Sergio Villalba wrote:
Lo he mirado, pero los paquetes rpm son para la versión 5.
es raro de explicar.. pero redhat hizo todo lo posible por hacer un
kernel en un sólo parche, difícil de modificar, expresamente para darle
en la boca a oracle.
ahora oracle no tiene
solo me queda compilar los tar.gz no??
Gracias por todo y FELIZ AÑO NUEVO!!
El día 30 de diciembre de 2011 13:49, Ernesto Pérez Estévez
cen...@ecualinux.com escribió:
On 12/30/2011 03:13 AM, Sergio Villalba wrote:
Lo he mirado, pero los paquetes rpm son para la versión 5.
es raro de
Hola a tod@s,
estoy intentando montar Apache con ChrootDir pero me lanza este
mensaje de error:
[Fri Dec 30 15:10:08 2011] [notice] core dump file size limit raised
to 18446744073709551615 bytes
[Fri Dec 30 15:10:09 2011] [notice] mod_chroot: changed root to /latam_chroot.
[Fri Dec 30 15:10:09
There is a concept called dynamic firewall i am working on that should
eliminate any brute force attempts. If you think about it, if you know someone
is trying to break in there is no need to give them access to the server any
more. So after a hundred wrong passwords you cut them off.
Reindl
On 12/30/2011 03:55 AM, Alex Milojkovic wrote:
There is a concept called dynamic firewall i am working on that should
eliminate any brute force attempts. If you think about it, if you know
someone is trying to break in there is no need to give them access to the
server any more. So after a
On 12/30/2011 02:33 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I like to use serial numbers from MB, HDD, etc., as passwords. I never
use normal words for my passwords, and few other users (with ssh/cli
access) are carefully checked for their passwords.
If this formula is true (1/2 . 2 ^ 54 . 1s / 10)
Hi Friends,
I am trying to write a shell script which can merge the 2 columns into
3rd one on Centos 5. The file is very long around 31200 rows having
around 1370 unique groups and around 12000 unique user-names.
The 1st column is the groupname and then 2nd column is the user-name.
1st Column
I knocked up the enclosed under Cygwin:
#!/bin/sh
(
cat EOTx
admin ankush
admin amit
powerusers dinesh
powerusers jitendra
EOTx
) | awk '
{
Hi,
On Friday, December 30, 2011 at 9:00 PM, ankush grover wrote:
Hi Friends,
I am trying to write a shell script which can merge the 2 columns into
3rd one on Centos 5. The file is very long around 31200 rows having
around 1370 unique groups and around 12000 unique user-names.
The 1st
Rushton Martin wrote:
I knocked up the enclosed under Cygwin:
#!/bin/sh
(
cat EOTx
admin ankush
admin amit
powerusers dinesh
powerusers jitendra
Demonstration purposes only. I wanted to show the data going is was the
user's data as described. The awk script is the key, the cat and sort
are merely decoration.
Martin Rushton
HPC System Manager, Weapons Technologies
Tel: 01959 514777, Mobile: 07939 219057
email: jmrush...@qinetiq.com
On Wednesday, December 28, 2011 10:38:30 PM Craig White wrote:
the top priority was to get the machine back online?
Seems to me that you threw away the only opportunity to find out what
you did wrong and to correct that so it doesn't happen again. You are
left to endlessly suffer the endless
On 12/30/2011 09:15 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, December 28, 2011 10:38:30 PM Craig White wrote:
the top priority was to get the machine back online?
Seems to me that you threw away the only opportunity to find out what
you did wrong and to correct that so it doesn't happen again. You
On Tuesday, December 27, 2011 10:13:12 PM Bennett Haselton wrote:
Roughly what percent of the time is there such an unpatched exploit in the
wild, so that the machine can be hacked by someone keeping up with the
exploits?
While I did reply elsewhere in the thread, I want to address this
I cannot seem to find a checkinstall rpm package for
CentOS-6 or one for x86_64 more recent than CentOS4. When
I try to build it locally from the most recent source I
can find, c.2006, I get build errors having to do with
size constants either missing or improperly defined.
Does anyone have a
On Thursday, December 29, 2011 12:33:41 PM Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
If you use denyhosts or fail2ban, attacker needs 10,000 attack PC's that
never attacked any denyhosts or fail2ban server in recent time.
That would be a very small botnet.
And with gamers out there with CUDA-capable GPU's
On Friday, December 30, 2011 10:24:15 AM Johnny Hughes wrote:
Agree with this. At the very least, some kind of image (dd) of the
original disk for further study even if you have to get the machine back
on line and you don't have a failover machine.
Speaking of dd, ddrescue in my experience is
On 12/30/2011 09:00 PM, ankush grover wrote:
Hi Friends,
I am trying to write a shell script which can merge the 2 columns into
3rd one on Centos 5. The file is very long around 31200 rows having
around 1370 unique groups and around 12000 unique user-names.
The 1st column is the groupname
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2011 12:33:41 PM Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
If you use denyhosts or fail2ban, attacker needs 10,000 attack PC's that
never attacked any denyhosts or fail2ban server in recent time.
That would be a very small botnet.
And with gamers out there with
On Friday 30 December 2011 19:40:55 夜神 岩男 wrote:
[snip]
We can start a 10,000 computer botnet (or, more realistically, a 10m
computer botnet these days, and this is a technique used right now)
working on the problem of assembling a new index table that orders and
assigns every possible valid
Hey, supergiantpotato (and btw, this list is plain text, not unicode, and
most of us don't read Japanese...),
å¤ç¥ãå²©ç· wrote:
On 12/30/2011 09:00 PM, ankush grover wrote:
I am trying to write a shell script which can merge the 2 columns into
3rd one on Centos 5. The file is very long
On Dec 30, 2011, at 8:24 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Tuesday, December 27, 2011 10:13:12 PM Bennett Haselton wrote:
Roughly what percent of the time is there such an unpatched exploit in the
wild, so that the machine can be hacked by someone keeping up with the
exploits?
While I did reply
looked like English to me...
On Dec 30, 2011, at 9:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hey, supergiantpotato (and btw, this list is plain text, not unicode, and
most of us don't read Japanese...),
夜神　岩男 wrote:
On 12/30/2011 09:00 PM, ankush grover wrote:
I am trying to write a
On Friday, December 30, 2011 11:19:46 AM Marko Vojinovic wrote:
You are basically saying that, given enough resources, you can precalculate
all hashes for all possible passwords in advance.
Can the same be said for keys? Given enough resources, you could precalculate
all possible
Craig White wrote:
looked like English to me...
On Dec 30, 2011, at 9:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hey, supergiantpotato (and btw, this list is plain text, not unicode,
and most of us don't read Japanese...),
å¤ç¥ãå²©ç· wrote:
^^ doesn't look like English, or ASCII,
On Dec 30, 2011, at 9:52 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Craig White wrote:
looked like English to me...
On Dec 30, 2011, at 9:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hey, supergiantpotato (and btw, this list is plain text, not unicode,
and most of us don't read Japanese...),
夜神　岩男
On 12/31/2011 01:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hey, supergiantpotato (and btw, this list is plain text, not unicode, and
most of us don't read Japanese...),
Thanks for the info
This is really complicated and fiddly. Look at the one awk script that was
posted, which is *far* simpler, and
On 12/31/2011 01:19 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Friday 30 December 2011 19:40:55 夜神 岩男 wrote:
[snip]
We can start a 10,000 computer botnet (or, more realistically, a 10m
computer botnet these days, and this is a technique used right now)
working on the problem of assembling a new index
On 12/31/2011 01:56 AM, Craig White wrote:
On Dec 30, 2011, at 9:52 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Craig White wrote:
looked like English to me...
On Dec 30, 2011, at 9:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hey, supergiantpotato (and btw, this list is plain text, not unicode,
and most of us don't
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 11:52:21AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Craig White wrote:
looked like English to me...
On Dec 30, 2011, at 9:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hey, supergiantpotato (and btw, this list is plain text, not unicode,
and most of us don't read Japanese...),
On Dec 30, 2011, at 10:19 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 11:52:21AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Craig White wrote:
looked like English to me...
On Dec 30, 2011, at 9:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hey, supergiantpotato (and btw, this list is plain text, not
On Friday 30 December 2011 11:41:47 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hey, supergiantpotato (and btw, this list is plain text, not unicode, and
most of us don't read Japanese...),
You are not using plain text and unicode correctly here.
I've read pleasantly his emails in *plain text* encoded in *ASCI*.
å¤ç¥ãå²©ç· wrote:
On 12/31/2011 01:56 AM, Craig White wrote:
On Dec 30, 2011, at 9:52 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Craig White wrote:
looked like English to me...
On Dec 30, 2011, at 9:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hey, supergiantpotato (and btw, this list is plain text, not unicode,
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 6:00 AM, ankush grover ankushcen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Friends,
I am trying to write a shell script which can merge the 2 columns into
3rd one on Centos 5. The file is very long around 31200 rows having
around 1370 unique groups and around 12000 unique user-names.
On 12/30/11 9:58 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Here's a perl approach:
which, unlike all the other versions, doesn't require the data be
pre-sorted, by virtue of adding all the tuples to a hash. I don't even
think that sort in the output loop is required, unless you want the
groups output in
John R Pierce wrote:
On 12/30/11 9:58 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Here's a perl approach:
which, unlike all the other versions, doesn't require the data be
pre-sorted, by virtue of adding all the tuples to a hash. I don't even
think that sort in the output loop is required, unless you want the
On 12/30/2011 03:34 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
Does anyone have a source for an rpm of this package that
runs on CentOS-6_x86_64 or can recommend a replacement for
it?
consider using fpm instead ? it kind of address's the same problem in a
different way.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389
Reinl,
On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 15:28 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
why do you not tell this the idiot who is argumentating against kyes
and thinks using password-login is smart?
I don't like your tone. I'm not sure if it's me or Bennett you are
calling an idiot or both, but in any case you should
Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Reinl,
On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 15:28 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
why do you not tell this the idiot who is argumentating against kyes
and thinks using password-login is smart?
I don't like your tone. I'm not sure if it's me or Bennett you are
calling an idiot or
On 12/30/2011 05:47 PM, Craig White wrote:
to reiterate my thoughts... I still don't understand the logic of the list
indulging the OP's rampant speculation of various causes when his first
action was to eliminate all possibility to find out what actually happened.
An apt analogy is to
On 12/30/2011 12:46 AM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Either get a real RAID controller which does hardware RAID or use
CentOS's software raid function.
+1. For Linux/CentOS/mdadm RAID 10 use far setting to get better (2x
??) read speed on mirroring.
--
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL
Dear All,
I just got a new server with the following specifications:
motherboard : Intel S5500BC
CPU : Xeon Quad Core 2.6Ghz
RAM : 8GB
HDD : 4 x 2TB SATA with configured raid 10 using raid embedded
server.
The problem is the centos installer can't detect raid virtual
On 12/31/2011 04:31 PM, David wrote:
Dear All,
I just got a new server with the following specifications:
motherboard : Intel S5500BC
CPU : Xeon Quad Core 2.6Ghz
RAM : 8GB
HDD : 4 x 2TB SATA with configured raid 10 using raid embedded
server.
The problem is the
Dear All,
I just got a new server with the following specifications:
motherboard : Intel S5500BC
CPU : Xeon Quad Core 2.6Ghz
RAM : 8GB
HDD : 4 x 2TB SATA with configured raid 10 using raid embedded
server.
The problem is the centos installer can't detect raid
I think the best password policy is the one you've never told anyone and never
posted on a public mailing list.
How many of you out there know of cases where administrators' passwords were
compromised by brute force?
Can we take a count of that?
I believe in passwords. I don't believe in PKI.
On 12/30/11 9:02 PM, Alex Milojkovic wrote:
I believe in passwords. I don't believe in PKI.
It's a lot more likely that I will forget my laptop somewhere, or that
someone will steal my usb key than that someone will guess my password and
have opportunities to try it.
you're supposed to
50 matches
Mail list logo
