[CentOS-es] solicitud de manual instalacion gvsig-1

2012-01-13 Thread Carla Paulina Fernández Morocho
EStimados compañeros les solicio si me pueden ayudar con un manual para la instalcion de gvsig-1 gracias ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

Re: [CentOS-es] solicitud de manual instalacion gvsig-1

2012-01-13 Thread Mario Ganga
http://www.google.cl/#hl=esq=gvsig+manualoq=gvsig+manualaq=faqi=aql=gs_sm=sgs_upl=0l0l0l13503l0l0l0l0l0l0l0l0ll0l0bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw .,cf.osbfp=caaff759d828abeabiw=1787bih=801 en este enlace puedes encontrar mucha informacion Saludos. 2012/1/13 Carla Paulina Fernández Morocho

Re: [CentOS] Is Amanda vaulting what I need for archiving data?

2012-01-13 Thread Rafa Griman
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Devin Reade g...@gno.org wrote: --On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 03:40:20 PM -0500 Alan McKay alan.mc...@gmail.com wrote: Well, the scientists are talking longer than 7 years so HDs just are not going to cut it [...] For long term storage, you may need to

[CentOS] SELinux and rsh+xauth

2012-01-13 Thread Philippe Naudin
Hello, I have a strange (for me) problem with these two machines : - Client, a CentOS-5.7 workstation ; - Server, a CentOS-6.2 headless, up-to-date server. From Client, I want to use xauth on Server with the help of rsh (yes, I know, ssh and all this sort of things... another time.) When

Re: [CentOS] defense-in-depth possible for sshd?

2012-01-13 Thread Marc Deop
On Thursday 12 January 2012 18:56:04 Bennett Haselton wrote: Or is there a reason that an exploit against OpenVPN would be less powerful than an exploit against sshd? Not really. The thing is that the tools are there but you have to use them *CORRECTLY* The OpenVPN server and the SSH server

[CentOS] LSI/3ware 9750-4i and multipath I/O

2012-01-13 Thread Vahan Yerkanian
Hi, I was wondering if anyone has successfully configured two lsi/3ware 9750-4i series controllers for multipathing under CentOS 5.7 x86_64? I've tried some basic setups with both multibus and failover settings, and had repeatable filesystem corruption over a iscsi(tgtd) or nfs3 connection.

Re: [CentOS] defense-in-depth possible for sshd?

2012-01-13 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 01/12/2012 08:56 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote: On 1/12/2012 5:25 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 01/12/2012 10:31 AM, Tilman Schmidt wrote: Am 10.01.2012 19:05, schrieb Johnny Hughes: Limit access to the sshd port from only authorized places ... and the authorized places can be an openvpn type

Re: [CentOS] LSI/3ware 9750-4i and multipath I/O

2012-01-13 Thread Ross Walker
On Friday, January 13, 2012, Vahan Yerkanian va...@arminco.com wrote: Hi, I was wondering if anyone has successfully configured two lsi/3ware 9750-4i series controllers for multipathing under CentOS 5.7 x86_64? I've tried some basic setups with both multibus and failover settings, and had

[CentOS] Rozważania odnośnie storage?

2012-01-13 Thread Rafał Radecki
Cześć. Aktualnie mam do czynienia z klastrem pocztowym, w którym pliki wiadomości pocztowych użytkowników są przechowywane na raid software-owym udostępnianym po NFS. Serwerów NFS jest kilka, każdy udostępnia podzbiór wiadomości dla odpowiedniego serwera z postfix-em, który jest klientem NFS.

Re: [CentOS] LSI/3ware 9750-4i and multipath I/O

2012-01-13 Thread Vahan Yerkanian
On Jan 13, 2012, at 6:33 PM, Ross Walker wrote: On Friday, January 13, 2012, Vahan Yerkanian va...@arminco.com wrote: Hi, I was wondering if anyone has successfully configured two lsi/3ware 9750-4i series controllers for multipathing under CentOS 5.7 x86_64? I've tried some basic setups

[CentOS] sendmail deferred

2012-01-13 Thread Ismail Ozatay
Hi all, I having a problem with my sendmail server running on centos 5.7 x64. Sometimes when we send an email to microsoft exchange servers, sendmail says deferred or timeout. I do not know what is happening. Here is some details; [root@avgw ~]# sendmail -v -qr...@xxx.gov.qa Running

Re: [CentOS] Rozwa¿ania odno¶nie storage?

2012-01-13 Thread Leen de Braal
Cze¶æ. you probably won't get much of an answer if you do not use English. I for sure do not understand a word of it. Aktualnie mam do czynienia z klastrem pocztowym, w którym pliki wiadomo¶ci pocztowych u¿ytkowników s± przechowywane na raid software-owym udostêpnianym po NFS. Serwerów

Re: [CentOS] Rozwa¿ania odno¶nie storage?

2012-01-13 Thread Ismail Ozatay
Me either :)) On 13.01.2012 17:43, Leen de Braal wrote: Cze¶æ. you probably won't get much of an answer if you do not use English. I for sure do not understand a word of it. Aktualnie mam do czynienia z klastrem pocztowym, w którym pliki wiadomo¶ci pocztowych u¿ytkowników s± przechowywane

Re: [CentOS] Rozwa¿ania odno¶nie storage?

2012-01-13 Thread Benjamin Donnachie
On 13 Jan 2012, at 15:44, Leen de Braal l...@braha.nl wrote: I for sure do not understand a word of it. Let me Google translate it for you: Hi. Currently I am dealing with a cluster of mail, in which files mail messages are stored on users raid software-at that shared by NFS. Multiple NFS

Re: [CentOS] sendmail deferred

2012-01-13 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Ismail Ozatay ismailoza...@gmail.com wrote: I having a problem with my sendmail server running on centos 5.7 x64. Sometimes when  we send an email to microsoft exchange servers, sendmail says deferred or timeout. I do not know what is happening. Here is some

Re: [CentOS] Rozważania odnośnie storage?

2012-01-13 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, 2012/1/13 Rafał Radecki radecki.ra...@gmail.com: Cześć. Aktualnie mam do czynienia z klastrem pocztowym, w którym pliki wiadomości pocztowych użytkowników są przechowywane na raid software-owym udostępnianym po NFS. Serwerów NFS jest kilka, każdy udostępnia podzbiór wiadomości

Re: [CentOS] Is avahi essential?

2012-01-13 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 01/11/2012 03:42 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: As far as I can see, it is some sort of rival to dhcpd. No, DHCP is used to assign network addresses and routes (and other optional configuration items). mDNS is used to discover services using IP multicast. Is it only used within local LANs?

Re: [CentOS] Is avahi essential?

2012-01-13 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 01/11/2012 05:40 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: I must admit I'm rather confused by UPnP. UPnP is something completely different. That protocol allows devices behind a NAT router to request that it open a port forward to them. It is commonly used by game consoles to open the ports required for

Re: [CentOS] Is avahi essential?

2012-01-13 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 01/11/2012 05:10 PM, Florin Andrei wrote: Wait a sec, I have that setup (just mediatomb instead of ps3mediaserver) and there's no avahi on my network. Yet the PS3 is perfectly capable of discovering and using the DLNA server. Avahi allows the workstation running it to advertise and solicit

Re: [CentOS] Is avahi essential?

2012-01-13 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote: As far as I can see, it is some sort of rival to dhcpd. No, DHCP is used to assign network addresses and routes (and other optional configuration items). There is a larger 'zeroconf' context where if the request to a

Re: [CentOS] Is avahi essential?

2012-01-13 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote: On 01/11/2012 05:40 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: I must admit I'm rather confused by UPnP. UPnP is something completely different.  That protocol allows devices behind a NAT router to request that it open a port forward to

Re: [CentOS] LSI/3ware 9750-4i and multipath I/O

2012-01-13 Thread John R Pierce
On 01/13/12 6:41 AM, Vahan Yerkanian wrote: multipath -ll showed everything OK, with both sdb and sdc (the same 24 x 3tb raid6 array) as active and ready. are those controllers aware you're using them for multipathing?RAID cards like that tend to have large caches, and one controllers

Re: [CentOS] Rozważania odnośnie storage?

2012-01-13 Thread Diego Sanchez
Rafał Radecki : Please, write in english 2012/1/13 Rajagopal Swaminathan raju.rajs...@gmail.com What was that in simple English? Currently I am dealing with a cluster of mail, in which files mail messages are stored on users raid software-at that shared by NFS. Multiple NFS servers, each

[CentOS] skype on 5.7

2012-01-13 Thread ken
Earlier last year I had a 5.7 system running with skype. It worked fine. Later last year I had to reinstall my entire system. I didn't install skype then. Yesterday I tried to find a version of skype to use on 5.7, but couldn't find one on skype.com; there's no version for RH/CentOS 5.7.

Re: [CentOS] skype on 5.7

2012-01-13 Thread Frank Cox
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:14:29 -0500 ken wrote: Earlier last year I had a 5.7 system running with skype. It worked fine. Later last year I had to reinstall my entire system. I didn't install skype then. Yesterday I tried to find a version of skype to use on 5.7, but couldn't find one on

Re: [CentOS] Rozważania odnośnie storage?

2012-01-13 Thread fakessh
use the tool googletranslate is well for that cheers Le 2012-01-13 20:43, Diego Sanchez a écrit : Rafał Radecki : Please, write in english 2012/1/13 Rajagopal Swaminathan raju.rajs...@gmail.com What was that in simple English? Currently I am dealing with a cluster of mail, in which

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] blue screen instead of login screen

2012-01-13 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Frank Cox thea...@melvilletheatre.com wrote: On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:56:40 -0600 THE REMAINING MINOR ISSUE For some reason, the upper left two-thirds of the desktop background is darker than the rest of the desktop background.  It's easier to show than to

Re: [CentOS] skype on 5.7

2012-01-13 Thread ken
On 01/13/2012 03:18 PM Frank Cox wrote: On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:14:29 -0500 ken wrote: Earlier last year I had a 5.7 system running with skype. It worked fine. Later last year I had to reinstall my entire system. I didn't install skype then. Yesterday I tried to find a version of skype

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] blue screen instead of login screen

2012-01-13 Thread Louis Lagendijk
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 14:34 -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Frank Cox thea...@melvilletheatre.com wrote: On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:56:40 -0600 THE REMAINING MINOR ISSUE For some reason, the upper left two-thirds of the desktop background is darker than the

Re: [CentOS] skype on 5.7

2012-01-13 Thread Yves Bellefeuille
On Friday 13 January 2012, ken geb...@mousecar.com wrote: This was with skype_static-2.2.0.35, the one recommended for CentOS version 5.x in the HOW-TO. So the how-to is either wrong or it's missing some information. The How-To recommends skype_static-2.1.0.47 (not 2.2.x) for CentOS 5. It's

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] blue screen instead of login screen

2012-01-13 Thread Frank Cox
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:34:42 -0800 Bart Schaefer wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Frank Cox thea...@melvilletheatre.com wrote: On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:56:40 -0600 THE REMAINING MINOR ISSUE For some reason, the upper left two-thirds of the desktop background is darker than the

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] blue screen instead of login screen

2012-01-13 Thread Frank Cox
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:48:38 +0100 Louis Lagendijk wrote: I quite recently had something that looked quite similar on my iMac g5 when I had a cable plugged in to the VGA port. he system apparently overlaid the VGA screen over the screen on the built in LCD. Does the OP have a second monitor

[CentOS] what to do about [abrt] full crash report kernel taint?

2012-01-13 Thread Thomas Burns
I have a machine with a recent install of centos (2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64 kernel). It crashed 3 times this week, and sent emails like the one below complaining about kernel taint. I've gone back to a previous kernel to see if that helps, but otherwise I don't know how to investigate this. What

Re: [CentOS] skype on 5.7

2012-01-13 Thread Lars Hecking
Yves Bellefeuille writes: On Friday 13 January 2012, ken geb...@mousecar.com wrote: This was with skype_static-2.2.0.35, the one recommended for CentOS version 5.x in the HOW-TO. So the how-to is either wrong or it's missing some information. The How-To recommends

Re: [CentOS] LSI/3ware 9750-4i and multipath I/O

2012-01-13 Thread Ross Walker
On Jan 13, 2012, at 2:37 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 01/13/12 6:41 AM, Vahan Yerkanian wrote: multipath -ll showed everything OK, with both sdb and sdc (the same 24 x 3tb raid6 array) as active and ready. are those controllers aware you're using them for multipathing?

Re: [CentOS] LSI/3ware 9750-4i and multipath I/O

2012-01-13 Thread John R Pierce
On 01/13/12 3:46 PM, Ross Walker wrote: You will need to publish these disks as straight through individual disks with write-through cache and use software RAID if the controllers can't communicate with each other. write-through cache is not even good enough. if a given block is written

Re: [CentOS] what to do about [abrt] full crash report kernel taint?

2012-01-13 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am 14.01.2012 00:16, schrieb Thomas Burns: I have a machine with a recent install of centos (2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64 kernel). It crashed 3 times this week, and sent emails like the one below complaining about kernel taint. I've gone back to a previous kernel to see if that helps, but

Re: [CentOS] LSI/3ware 9750-4i and multipath I/O

2012-01-13 Thread Ross Walker
On Jan 13, 2012, at 6:51 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 01/13/12 3:46 PM, Ross Walker wrote: You will need to publish these disks as straight through individual disks with write-through cache and use software RAID if the controllers can't communicate with each other.

Re: [CentOS] what to do about [abrt] full crash report kernel taint?

2012-01-13 Thread Thomas Burns
Thanks for the reply, Alexander. On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org wrote: Am 14.01.2012 00:16, schrieb Thomas Burns: I have a machine with a recent install of centos (2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64 kernel). It crashed 3 times this week, and sent emails like the

Re: [CentOS] defense-in-depth possible for sshd?

2012-01-13 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 01/10/2012 01:12 AM, Bennett Haselton wrote: What about sshd -- assuming that the attacker can connect to sshd at all (i.e. not prevented by a firewall), if they find an exploit to let them take control of sshd, would that imply immediate total control of the machine? Yes, but the question

Re: [CentOS] Rozwa¿ania odno¶nie storage?

2012-01-13 Thread Devin Reade
Hi. Currently I am dealing with a cluster of mail, [...] For a highly scalable open source mail solution, have a look at the Cyrus IMAP (+POP) mail system, specifically the Cyrus Murder configuration. I don't know of any comparable open source system (and I would stack it against commercial

Re: [CentOS] what to do about [abrt] full crash report kernel taint?

2012-01-13 Thread Peter Brady
On 14/01/12 11:41 AM, Thomas Burns wrote: Thanks for the reply, Alexander. On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org wrote: Am 14.01.2012 00:16, schrieb Thomas Burns: I have a machine with a recent install of centos (2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64 kernel). It