Buen día:
He estado buscando información de como pasar de un servidor con sistema
operativo Centos 5.7 a una maquina virtual, ya tengo como servidor host
para las virtualizaciones y en otro servidor con sistema operativo Centos
6.2 e instalado KVM.
Lo que he encontrado y que está mas o menos
La forma mas facil de hacer eso es usar rzync. La virtual la inicias en
modo rescate, particionas el disco a piaccere y montas las particiones
dentro de un arbol de directorios estandar. Despues en el sistema a
migrar creas un directorio X por ejemplo /X y montas todo el raiz ahi
dentro con
Hola tengo un servidor Centos 5.7 con OpenLDAP, para autenticacion de
usuarios, el problema radica en que veo que las cuentas se pueden
loggear tantas veces ellos quieran, es decir un misma cuenta se usa para
ingresos en computadoras cliente distintas, y lo que requiero es que no
hagan eso, si
Gracias, no tengo conocimientos de configuración en KVM, he usado VMware
player y VirtualBox OSE. Si es posible los pasos uno a uno agradecería
mucho.
El 26 de enero de 2012 12:59, Javier Basisty javier.basi...@gmail.comescribió:
La forma mas facil de hacer eso es usar rzync. La virtual la
qemu-img create imagen_del_disco.img -f raw 20G
Crea una imagen estatica de 20 GB, para ver los distintos posibles
formatos tenes el man del comando qemu-img
qemu-kvm -hda imagen_del_disco.img -cdrom /path/al/iso.iso -m 1024 -boot
dc -net nic -net tap -daemonize
Inicia la maquina virtual con
Gracias por la información, con estos comandos lo que entiendo es que son
para crear una maquina virtual nueva con centos, lo que quiero hacer y si
es posible pasar todo un servidor físico a uno virtual y no se si es fácil
realizarlo con KVM.
El 26 de enero de 2012 14:08, Javier Basisty
Lee mejor, lo que haces es iniciar con el centos en modo rescue para
preparar a la virtual para recibir toda la info del otro server.
Si te complica mucho esa parte lo que podes hacer es usar el disco del
server real y usarlo directamente con KVM y te ahorras toda la parte de
migrar.
On
On 01/26/2012 03:11 PM, Carlos Andres Torres Paredes wrote:
Gracias por la información, con estos comandos lo que entiendo es que son
para crear una maquina virtual nueva con centos, lo que quiero hacer y si
es posible pasar todo un servidor físico a uno virtual y no se si es fácil
realizarlo
Saludos
Lo que te dijo Javier Basisty es correcto y es la solucion que buscas
para pasar una maquina fisica a una maquina virtual (P2V), necesitas
buscar mejor hay mucha info en la red.
http://www.josemariagonzalez.es/tag/rhev
El 26/01/12 15:24, Ernesto Pérez Estévez escribió:
On 01/26/2012
On 26/01/12 18:35, Daniel wrote:
Saludos
Lo que te dijo Javier Basisty es correcto y es la solucion que buscas
para pasar una maquina fisica a una maquina virtual (P2V), necesitas
buscar mejor hay mucha info en la red.
http://www.josemariagonzalez.es/tag/rhev
Holas...
Lo que te puede
centos-boun...@centos.org schrieb am 25.01.2012 22:26:54:
John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com
Gesendet von: centos-boun...@centos.org
25.01.2012 22:27
Bitte antworten an
CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
An
centos@centos.org
Kopie
Thema
Re: [CentOS] HP ProLiant N40L
A while ago when doing my RHCE someone mentioned to me a rather nifty
site that can randomly break a system in a variety of ways - useful
for practical testing of a candidate.
It was something like monkey test or something...
Anyway as you can see my memory is failing me does this ring
Okay found it... don't know where I had monkey from...
For the record if useful for anyone else:
http://trouble-maker.sourceforge.net/
James
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
From: Andreas Reschke andreas.resc...@behrgroup.com
I don't know the exactly difference between the Models N36L and N40L. In a
german forum has somebody 12 GB (8+4) in his N36L and it works.
From the quickspecs:
http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/13716_na/13716_na.HTML
AMD Athlon
From: Jason T. Slack-Moehrle slackmoeh...@gmail.com
Here is where I draw some confusion. Where do items such as Varnish Cache,
HAProxy go in relationship to firewall, DMZ, etc?
Here, we use 2 keepalived/lvs servers in direct routing for HA, then
n cache servers with nginx (for consistent
centos-boun...@centos.org schrieb am 26.01.2012 11:33:27:
John Doe jd...@yahoo.com
Gesendet von: centos-boun...@centos.org
26.01.2012 11:33
Bitte antworten an
CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
An
CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Kopie
Thema
Re: [CentOS] Antwort:
Hi Frank,
Do we know if this bug affects Centos?
http://www.techworld.com.au/article/413300/linux_vendors_rush_patch_privilege_escalation_flaw_after_root_exploits_emerge
The article states that it affects kernel 2.6.39 and above, but since RH
backports so much stuff I'm not sure if this
I am at my wits end, googling, trying various things, and nothing seems
to really solve my problem, so I thought I would break down and write to
the community to see if anyone else has run into the issue and actually
solved it. My environment of interest contains a mix of various Fedora
and CentOS
On 26 January 2012 15:46, Weiner, Michael wein...@ccf.org wrote:
I am at my wits end, googling, trying various things, and nothing seems
to really solve my problem
Hello,
Check /var/log/audit/audit.log, maybe it's a Selinux related problem.
Were you using Selinux on those Centos/Fedora
On Behalf Of Lucian
Check /var/log/audit/audit.log, maybe it's a Selinux related problem.
Were you using Selinux on those Centos/Fedora installations
previously? Maybe the contexts haven't been migrated over (properly).
Thank you for your reply. I normally disable selinux, but its worth
On Jan 25, 2012, at 5:34 PM, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012, Craig White wrote:
On Jan 25, 2012, at 3:45 PM, Bill Campbell wrote:
...
What I haven't been able to find are the sql script files to do the initial
database creation that were present in older versions of horde,
Hi John,
Are you using Comcast in Santa Cruz?
absolutely not.the local cable system blows. my home is on a sonic.net
(http://sonic.net)
ADSL circuit resold by another ISP. television is on satellite.
I am looking at Sonic.net and I am awaiting a call from a sales rep (had been 2
days)
On 01/26/2012 05:09 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
Can you explain a bit so I can develop a better understanding of how they
advertise speeds, etc?
have you considered taking your questions to the lopsa lists ? That
would be far more topical ( or even to a local LUG list ) than the
CentOS
Hi Karanbir,
Can you explain a bit so I can develop a better understanding of how they
advertise speeds, etc?
have you considered taking your questions to the lopsa lists ? That
would be far more topical ( or even to a local LUG list ) than the
CentOS lists.
I have no idea what
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Weiner, Michael wein...@ccf.org wrote:
Has anyone run into a similar problem?
Different versions of NFS and automount over time and over platforms
requiring slightly different config tweaks - this problem is always
kicking my butt.
Any relevant messages in
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:39:35AM -0500, Weiner, Michael wrote:
On Behalf Of Lucian
Check /var/log/audit/audit.log, maybe it's a Selinux related problem.
Were you using Selinux on those Centos/Fedora installations
previously? Maybe the contexts haven't been migrated over (properly).
OK ... then it ought to move (probably) :)
See my post on repoforge users list.
http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/2012-January/022634.html
There's no one to move the package but Dag.
Per your suggestion, I filed a bug report on this, although
that tracker seems like a
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Thomas Burns tbu...@hawaii.edu wrote:
Any relevant messages in /var/log/messages of the server? Is automount
able to mount and it is just a permissions problem?
I had a vaguely similar problem recently, trying to get OSX to access
NIS/NFS, it needs different
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Tru Huynh t...@centos.org wrote:
no issue here on CentOS-6.2 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64
selinux enforced (but I have setsebool -P use_nfs_home_dirs=1)
ibrix:/ibfs1/tru mounted as /home/ibrix (newly created ibrix user)
Tru -
Thank you for your response. When
I'm reading a lot on how to setup my smtp auth on a new Centos 6.2
server. I want to use sendmail and have this running on a Centos 3
machine now, so it's not new stuff to me.
Unfortunately, the more I read, the more confusion I seem to have.
Firstly, how to generate my certificates. A good
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Michael Weiner hun...@userfriendly.net wrote:
5) i tried mounting manually, creating a $home directory for a new
user, giving that user a password and i can ssh in but not Gnome or
KDE
If it was me, I'd try creating a new home directory for that user on a
disk
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Thomas Burns tbu...@hawaii.edu wrote:
If it was me, I'd try creating a new home directory for that user on a
disk local to the machine where you're trying to log in. Presumably
the user could then log in. Then I'd check that the user could access
the NFS share
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Thomas Burns tbu...@hawaii.edu wrote:
Gnome just does not like NFS
home dirs. (My experience has been, if the same user is logged in to
two machines, kablooey!)
Gnome doesn't like multiple concurrent logins, period. For example,
via the console and freenx as
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Gnome doesn't like multiple concurrent logins, period. For example,
via the console and freenx as the same user. I've sometimes wondered
if the authors ever saw a multi-headed unix system or used X remotely.
But that
On 01/26/2012 09:09 AM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
They advertise the starting Business T at 1.5Mbps per second
They advertise the ADSL2+ 2 lines at up to 40Mbps per second.
Am I mis-understanding that the cost for a T seems high, but a better
option for me than getting their ADSL2+
Hi Gordon.
They advertise the starting Business T at 1.5Mbps per second
They advertise the ADSL2+ 2 lines at up to 40Mbps per second.
Am I mis-understanding that the cost for a T seems high, but a better
option for me than getting their ADSL2+ service? I mean, is the T
faster over all
option for me than getting their ADSL2+ service? I mean, is the T
faster over all given it is all my traffic and I am not sharing?
Can you explain a bit so I can develop a better understanding of how
they advertise speeds, etc?
Yes, the cost for a T1 will seem very high. It is antiquated
On 01/26/12 3:43 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Yes, the cost for a T1 will seem very high. It is antiquated telco
tech. T1s are generally very reliable, but very very slow.
1.5Mbps is not faster than 40Mbps. There's nothing hidden in the way
they advertise speeds.
DSL and DOCSIS technologies
On 01/26/2012 03:43 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 01/26/2012 09:09 AM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
They advertise the starting Business T at 1.5Mbps per second
They advertise the ADSL2+ 2 lines at up to 40Mbps per second.
Am I mis-understanding that the cost for a T seems high, but a better
On 01/26/2012 03:57 PM, Ken godee wrote:
Not so much haven't matured but are capable of some other technologies
besides internet access that the local CO could setup, like channelizing
and different types of signaling, not to mention a
dedicated circuit to the CO.
...which they always have
On Jan 26, 2012, at 4:59 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/26/12 3:43 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Yes, the cost for a T1 will seem very high. It is antiquated telco
tech. T1s are generally very reliable, but very very slow.
1.5Mbps is not faster than 40Mbps. There's nothing hidden in the way
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012, Raymond Lillard wrote:
On 01/26/2012 03:43 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 01/26/2012 09:09 AM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
They advertise the starting Business T at 1.5Mbps per second
They advertise the ADSL2+ 2 lines at up to 40Mbps per second.
Am I mis-understanding
On 01/26/12 4:32 PM, Nate Duehr wrote:
T1 is a channelized synchronous telecommunications circuit type first
designed in the late 60s, updated in the 70s. After removing framing bits,
1.544 Mb/s.
DS0 is a sub-channel of a T1 when broken up into frames. Extended
SuperFrame being the
On 01/27/2012 12:14 AM, Raymond Lillard wrote:
There are two reasons T1 is more expensive. T1 requires
2 copper pairs in the cable. Those 2 pairs not available
for voice traffic. The other reason is the uptime
requirements.
the DSX or the old TX standard does not still deliver better
Have you seen this problem? I downloaded
CentOS-6.2-i386-bin-DVD1.iso
verified the md5sum, wrote on a DVD, verified that against the iso.
When I boot a computer with that disk, It does not present the usual
Linux install menu, it jumps to a thing called Gnome Partition
Manager, and that offers
On 01/25/2012 05:09 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
it's saying that sudo: sorry, you must have a tty to
run sudo.
I'm trying to enable the user apache to have the ability to run an
executable from a web page. One of the common solutions is to do the
following:
Defaults:apache !requiretty
46 matches
Mail list logo
