CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0377
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0377.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
Hi,
On Monday, March 12, 2012 you wrote:
What do you guys recommend for backing up a small CentOS server in a
business environment. It will have (3) 300gb drives in a raid 5 array but I
don't anticipate more than about 25gb of data that needs to be backed up
each night.
I stumbled on
On 08/03/12 17:34, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/08/2012 07:49 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
On 08/03/12 14:35, John Doe wrote:
I use both 3.6.26 (from centOS 5) and 10.0.2 (binary from mozilla).
And, after setting the same font settings in both, I cannot see any real
differences...
Only tiny
On 08/03/12 15:36, John Doe wrote:
From: John Doejd...@yahoo.com
Hum... playing with the gnome font settings does not change anything
in either firefoxes...
Really? I'm trying this again now... What I'm doing is:
1. Start firefox
2. Select System-Preferences-Fonts from the desktop panel
On 12/03/12 09:11, Toralf Lund wrote:
On 08/03/12 15:36, John Doe wrote:
From: John Doejd...@yahoo.com
Hum... playing with the gnome font settings does not change anything
in either firefoxes...
Really? I'm trying this again now... What I'm doing is:
1. Start firefox
2. Select
i figured that if you use filesystems and protocols most native to the
mac os you´ll get the best results in stability on the client side,
that´s why i thought of HFS. but ext4 seems to do the job well.
i´ll definitely checkout samba too. do you also serve homedirs to them?
had any issues?
Thank you all for answering
Finally I exclude php-pear for updating.
Leonard you are right, for some reason rpm forge has install some packs
for pear.
I'll leave it as is, I cant afford causing problems. We have a lot of
web pages and databases running so we cant take any risk.
Thank you again
Hi
Can anyone here point me in the direction of a .spec or SRPM for Perl 5.12.4 for
CentOS6? Or even any newer version would do.
Whilst I'm asking, ditto a Perl-enabled version of OpenLDAP (latest stable
release)? IIRC, the version in the base repo has the Perl extensions disabled.
Thanks,
Hi Ljubomir, thanx for reply.
I need for CentOS 5 exactly. It will be *great* if you'd share them.
Are they compatable with the latest kernel? I have found some rpms in
CentOSplus repo, but they are for 2.6.18-92.1.13 only.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Once you make the network interface no longer NM managed you can then perform
a service network restart in your post and all network functionality should
then become available.
This may be desired or true in theory, but is not working.
I have NM_CONTROLLED=no in ifcfg-eth0, and it works
From: Nick oinksoc...@letterboxes.org
Can anyone here point me in the direction of a .spec or SRPM for Perl 5.12.4
for
CentOS6? Or even any newer version would do.
Maybe try to tweak:
On 03/12/2012 10:27 AM, Nick wrote:
Hi
Can anyone here point me in the direction of a .spec or SRPM for Perl 5.12.4
for
CentOS6? Or even any newer version would do.
Whilst I'm asking, ditto a Perl-enabled version of OpenLDAP (latest stable
release)? IIRC, the version in the base repo
Thanks for the links.
On 12/03/12 16:06, John Doe wrote:
Maybe try to tweak:
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/source/SRPMS/p/perl-5.14.2-212.fc18.src.rpm
On 12/03/12 16:49, Johnny Hughes wrote:
This is where all the CentOS-6.2 SRPMS live:
Lars Hecking wrote:
Once you make the network interface no longer NM managed you can then
perform a service network restart in your post and all network
functionality should then become available.
This may be desired or true in theory, but is not working.
I have NM_CONTROLLED=no in
I'm trying to configure an old 64-bit desktop machine as a client for a
CentOS server. The client must have no modifiable storage at all so my
options seem to be:
1) Stateless network boot
2) Live DVD
I've been looking at the latter route, does anyone know if there is a
convenient hook
Rushton Martin wrote:
I'm trying to configure an old 64-bit desktop machine as a client for a
CentOS server. The client must have no modifiable storage at all so my
options seem to be:
1)Stateless network boot
2)Live DVD
I've been looking at the latter route, does anyone know if
From: Brian Mathis brian.mathis+cen...@betteradmin.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS Server Backup Options
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Scott Walker
CentOS-6.2
We moved a cron job from a CentOS-5.7 host to a CentOS-6.2
host. The MAILTO variable is set to supp...@harte-lyne.ca
in both instances. On the CentOS-6 host instead of
receiving the mail with the output we see this in
/var/log/cron instead:
Mar 12 14:49:01 inet09 CROND[6639]: (cron
On 3/11/2012 6:12 PM, Scott Walker wrote:
What do you guys recommend for backing up a small CentOS server in a
business environment. It will have (3) 300gb drives in a raid 5 array but I
don't anticipate more than about 25gb of data that needs to be backed up
each night.
I want a lot of
On Mar 12, 2012, at 12:03 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
CentOS-6.2
We moved a cron job from a CentOS-5.7 host to a CentOS-6.2
host. The MAILTO variable is set to supp...@harte-lyne.ca
in both instances. On the CentOS-6 host instead of
receiving the mail with the output we see this in
Steve Lindemann wrote:
On 3/11/2012 6:12 PM, Scott Walker wrote:
What do you guys recommend for backing up a small CentOS server in a
business environment. It will have (3) 300gb drives in a raid 5 array
but I don't anticipate more than about 25gb of data that needs to be
snip
The vendor is
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Steve Lindemann st...@marmot.org wrote:
I believe in tape... it's just not a viable option with the large disk
sizes we have today unless you have a lot of money for a fast,
multi-drive solution. I can backup a bit over 500GB daily in 3 hours to
external
Am 12.03.2012 20:03, schrieb James B. Byrne:
CentOS-6.2
We moved a cron job from a CentOS-5.7 host to a CentOS-6.2
host. The MAILTO variable is set to supp...@harte-lyne.ca
in both instances. On the CentOS-6 host instead of
receiving the mail with the output we see this in
/var/log/cron
I have had the same email address since 1997 (when microsoft stole
bob.com from me thanks to network solutions...)
In the early days I of course was free with my email and used it everwhere.
Fast forward to 2012, some 15 years later.
woof..the amount of spam sent to me has always just kept
On Mar 12, 2012, at 12:03 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
/ CentOS-6.2
//
// We moved a cron job from a CentOS-5.7 host to a CentOS-6.2
// host. The MAILTO variable is set tosupport at harte-lyne.ca
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
// in both instances. On the CentOS-6 host
On 03/12/2012 05:11 AM, Wessel van der Aart wrote:
i figured that if you use filesystems and protocols most native to the
mac os you´ll get the best results in stability on the client side,
that´s why i thought of HFS. but ext4 seems to do the job well.
i´ll definitely checkout samba too. do
On 12-03-12 22:12, Bob Hoffman wrote:
[snip]
Not sure if this setup is perfect, but it is working quite well. Yes,
the mail takes a few seconds longer and there is probably more I could
do, but this ROCKS!!!
Totally agree. I'm definitely not a postfix expert but below I have
listed some rules
Bob Hoffman wrote:
I have had the same email address since 1997 (when microsoft stole
bob.com from me thanks to network solutions...)
I remember reading about you, vaguely.
snip
Now I have set up a centos 6 box using postfix. Today I decided to try
to add smtpd restrictions. After a lot of
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:12:13 -0400
Bob Hoffman b...@bobhoffman.com wrote:
On my centos 5 server I just used sendmail with spamassassin and it
killed a lot. Still, 100s, sometimes more made it through. Then
thunderbird would weed out more, learned as it went...
Still, had an inbox with a lot
on/Mon Mar 12 18:39:23 EDT 2012
Jure Pecar wrote
/==
/On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:12:13 -0400
/Bob Hoffmanbob at bobhoffman.com
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos wrote:
// On my centos 5 server I just used sendmail with
On 03/12/2012 12:37 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
So today I use TB size drives dropped into an external docking station.
The docking station plugs into the server using eSATA. Then it's a
relatively simple script run by cron to handle the daily backup. I'm
Yup. Our home directories (NFS
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Nataraj incoming-cen...@rjl.com wrote:
I would ideally like to get several drives on a single ESATA controller
(At least 4 would be nice, though I know it won't have amazing
performance if I access multiple drives at once).
If you have internal space there
On 03/12/2012 04:39 PM, Anton Zaytsev wrote:
Hi Ljubomir, thanx for reply.
I need for CentOS 5 exactly. It will be *great* if you'd share them.
Are they compatable with the latest kernel? I have found some rpms in
CentOSplus repo, but they are for 2.6.18-92.1.13 only.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at
Over the years I have run into several situations where for one reason
or another a backup utility such as dump or tar couldn't read a
particular backup. For that reason, I like to periodically do a backup
using another backup format. So I might use backuppc for my main backup
system, but once a
On 03/12/2012 04:28 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Nataraj incoming-cen...@rjl.com wrote:
I would ideally like to get several drives on a single ESATA controller
(At least 4 would be nice, though I know it won't have amazing
performance if I access multiple drives at
On 03/12/2012 02:25 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Bob Hoffman wrote:
I have had the same email address since 1997 (when microsoft stole
bob.com from me thanks to network solutions...)
I remember reading about you, vaguely.
snip
Now I have set up a centos 6 box using postfix. Today I decided to
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Nataraj incoming-cen...@rjl.com wrote:
On 03/12/2012 02:25 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Bob Hoffman wrote:
I have had the same email address since 1997 (when microsoft stole
bob.com from me thanks to network solutions...)
I remember reading about you, vaguely.
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 23:15 +0100, Patrick Lists wrote:
On 12-03-12 22:12, Bob Hoffman wrote:
[snip]
Not sure if this setup is perfect, but it is working quite well. Yes,
the mail takes a few seconds longer and there is probably more I could
do, but this ROCKS!!!
Totally agree. I'm
On 03/12/2012 09:08 PM, Ron Loftin wrote:
I'm going to chuck in my 2 cents worth here, as I've been using Postfix
as a first-line filter for some years now.
All of the above suggestions are very useful. The only point that I
haven't seen in this thread is that mail server/filter configs are
39 matches
Mail list logo
